throbber
Case 1:22-cv-09511-JPC-KHP Document 92 Filed 08/07/23 Page 1 of 2
`
`August 7, 2023
`
`VIA ECF
`
`Hon. Katharine H. Parker
`United States District Judge
`500 Pearl Street, Room 750
`New York, New York 10007
`
`Sarah M. Matz
`
`Partner
`
`sarah@adelmanmatz.com
`
`Dir: (646) 650-2213
`
`8/7/2023
`
`Re:
`
`Phase One Network, Inc. v. Ye f/k/a Kanye West d/b/a “Yeezy Tech”, et al
`Case No. 1:2022-cv-09511
`
`Hon. Judge Parker:
`
`We are litigation counsel for the plaintiff, Phase One Network, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) in the
`above-referenced action. We write pursuant to Rules I(b) and (c) of Your Honor’s Individual
`Practices to request an extension of time of the Case Management Conference currently scheduled
`for August 8, 2023 at 10:45 a.m. [Dkt. No. 83].
`
`Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, filed on or about June 23, 2023 (the “Motion to
`Dismiss”).
`
`On June 20, 2023, the Court scheduled a Case Management Conference for August 8, 2023
`at 10:45 a.m. (the “August 8th Case Management Conference”). Plaintiff now requests an
`adjournment of the August 8th Case Management Conference to September 19, 2023, i.e. six (6)
`weeks. This will be the first adjournment of a case management conference in this case. One
`previous request for an adjournment was made, as Defendants Ye f/k/a Kanye West d/b/a “Yeezy
`Tech”, Getting Out Our Dreams II, LLC, and Getting Out Our Dreams, Inc. a/k/a G.O.O.D.
`Music (collectively “Ye Defendants”), previously requested an adjournment of the Initial Case
`Management Conference, which Plaintiff opposed, and which was denied by the Court. [Dkt No.
`54].
`
`The reason for this request is, given that the briefing schedule as to Ye Defendants’ motion
`to dismiss was extended [Dkt. No. 90], and Plaintiff recently served its first set of discovery
`demands on Ye Defendants on July 25, 2023, it would be more fruitful to hold a case management
`conference in mid-September, at which point there will be more for the parties to report to the
`Court. Further, Plaintiff and Ye Defendants are continuing to engage in informal settlement
`discussions and believe that an adjournment of the August 8th Case Management Conference will
`
`Adelman Matz P.C.
`
` Phone: (646) 650-2207 • Fax: (646) 650-2108
`
`Mailing:
`
`1159 Second Avenue, Suite 153
`
`New York, New York 10065
`
`Office:
`
`800 3rd avenue, 25th floor
`
`New York, New York 10022
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-09511-JPC-KHP Document 92 Filed 08/07/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`August 7, 2023
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`be beneficial in that regard. This extension request does not affect any other scheduled dates in
`this matter.
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff and Ye Defendants have conferred and Ye Defendants are in
`agreement with the extension request.
`
`Further, good cause exists for this request to be granted although the request was not made
`48 hours prior to the conference, because upon preparation for the conference, the parties agreed
`that there was not a substantial amount of information to report to the Court and that in the interest
`of judicial economy the request for an adjournment should be made.
`
`We greatly appreciate the Court’s time and consideration, and should the Court need any
`additional information we are available at the Court’s convenience.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`ADELMAN MATZ P.C.
`
`Sarah M. Matz, Esq.
`
`8/7/2023
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket