`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 7:22-cv-09184
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`--------------------------------------------------------------------X
`AROMATHERAPY ASSOCIATES, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BIRCHBOX, INC. and FEMTEC HEALTH,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`--------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Aromatherapy Associates, Inc. (“Aromatherapy”), by and through its attorneys,
`
`LYONS MCGOVERN LLP, and as and for its Complaint against Birchbox, Inc. (“Birchbox”) and
`
`FemTec Health (“FemTec”) alleges as follows:
`
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Aromatherapy is a corporation which is organized and existing under the laws of
`
`the State of Texas, whose principal place of business is in the State of Texas. Aromatherapy is a
`
`manufacturer and distributor of certain cosmetics, skin care, hair care, and grooming products.
`
`2.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendant Birchbox is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of the State of Delaware whose principal place of business is located at 16
`
`Madison Square West, 4th Floor, New York, New York, 10010. Birchbox is in the business of the
`
`promotion and retail sale of consumer products through websites and retail stores.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendant FemTec is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. At all times relevant to this Complaint, FemTec
`
`was transacting business in New York through its acquisition of Birchbox, located at 16 Madison
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 7:22-cv-09184 Document 1 Filed 10/26/22 Page 2 of 13
`
`
`
`Square West, New York, New York 10010. Upon information and belief, defendant FemTec is in
`
`the women’s health and wellness business and acquired Birchbox in or about October 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` JURISDICTION and VENUE
`
`
`This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2). Jurisdiction is
`
`4.
`
`proper because (1) the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00, exclusive of costs, interest, and
`
`attorneys’ fees, and (2) Plaintiff and Defendants are citizens of different states.
`
`5.
`
`Venue is proper in the Southern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
`
`1391(b)(2) because defendant Birchbox maintains a place of business in New York City which is
`
`where the events giving rise to the claims occurred. Venue is also proper as Aromatherapy and
`
`Birchbox consented to having any disputes arising under their Distribution Agreement adjudicated
`
`in this Court and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.
`
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`This is an action by Aromatherapy to recover the sum of $424,195.08 due and
`
`6.
`
`owing from defendants, together with costs, plus interest and attorneys’ fees in connection with
`
`Aromatherapy’s provision to Birchbox of certain products pursuant to a Distribution Agreement.
`
`Said products were provided to Birchbox for the express purpose of being offered by Birchbox to
`
`its customers through its subscription service.
`
`7.
`
`The Distribution Agreement further provides that the prevailing party shall be
`
`entitled to attorneys’ fees and related expenses in any suit or proceeding with respect to the subject
`
`matter of the Agreement or arising from or related to it.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 7:22-cv-09184 Document 1 Filed 10/26/22 Page 3 of 13
`
`
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`In or about January 26, 2021, Aromatherapy and Birchbox entered into a
`
`8.
`
`Distribution Agreement (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which Birchbox was designated an
`
`authorized retailer of Aromatherapy’s products. Under the Agreement, Aromatherapy was to
`
`provide Birchbox with certain products as ordered by Birchbox, which were to be offered to
`
`Birchbox’s customers through its monthly subscription service. In exchange for these products,
`
`Birchbox agreed to make payment to Aromatherapy as more specifically set forth therein.
`
`9.
`
`The Agreement was in effect from January 26, 2021 for an initial term of one year,
`
`and the Agreement was to automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless notice of non-
`
`renewal was served by either party. Neither party served a notice of non-renewal of the Agreement
`
`which remained in full force and effect up through and including the time of Birchbox’s breach
`
`beginning on or about March 2022.
`
`10.
`
`In or about October 2021, while the Agreement was still in full force and effect,
`
`FemTec acquired Birchbox. Upon information and belief, this acquisition included the purchase
`
`of all of the assets of Birchbox.
`
`11.
`
`Pursuant to the Agreement, Birchbox submitted to Aromatherapy periodic Purchase
`
`Orders (collectively “Purchase Orders”) to request specific products in specific sizes and/or
`
`quantities. In accordance with these Purchase Orders, Aromatherapy provided the specified
`
`products to Birchbox. Invoices for the products were issued at the time of shipment, and payment
`
`terms were net 30, subject to receipt and inspection of the products by Birchbox. This process was
`
`repeated without incident from the effective date of the Agreement through January 2022.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 7:22-cv-09184 Document 1 Filed 10/26/22 Page 4 of 13
`
`
`
`12.
`
`On January 24, 2022, Birchbox issued Purchase Order No. 340677 to
`
`Aromatherapy for products totaling $214,500.00 (“Purchase Order No. 1”). The products were
`
`ordered for delivery between April 15-29, 2022.
`
`13.
`
`In satisfaction of Purchase Order No. 1, Aromatherapy manufactured and shipped
`
`the requested products to Birchbox’s receiving facility. On March 29, 2022, Aromatherapy issued
`
`to Birchbox Invoice No. 69540 for the products totaling $214,437.08 (“Invoice No. 1”).
`
`14.
`
`The products included in Purchase Order No. 1 and Invoice No. 1 have been
`
`delivered to and accepted by Birchbox. With the exception of a trivial quantity of damaged items
`
`that were immediately credited, Birchbox has never otherwise expressed any displeasure with, or
`
`raised any claims regarding their lack of satisfaction with, or questioned the sufficiency of, the
`
`balance of the products in this order. Birchbox has received and accepted this order, but has made
`
`no payment despite multiple requests by Aromatherapy.
`
`15.
`
`Also on January 24, 2022, Birchbox issued Purchase Order 340678 to
`
`Aromatherapy for products totaling $187,500.00 (Purchase Order No. 2). The products were
`
`ordered for delivery to be made between July 18 – August 1, 2022.
`
`16.
`
`In May 2022, Birchbox made payments to Aromatherapy in the sum of $1,251.50
`
`and $983.00 for balances due on other invoices numbered 69736, 68584, 68604 and 69110
`
`(collectively “Other Invoices”). However, no payment was made on the outstanding full balance
`
`of $214,437.08 on Invoice No. 1 despite due demand therefor.
`
`17.
`
`In the intervening time since Purchase Orders Nos. 1 and 2 were issued in January
`
`2022, Birchbox issued Purchase Orders 341158 for $1,248.00 (“Purchase Order No. 3”) and
`
`341247 for $360.00 (“Purchase Order No.4”) in May 2022. The products ordered were shipped
`
`and corresponding Invoices 70495 (“Invoice No. 3”) and 70382 (“Invoice No. 4”) were issued.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 7:22-cv-09184 Document 1 Filed 10/26/22 Page 5 of 13
`
`
`
`Upon information and belief, these shipments were received and accepted by Birchbox. Birchbox
`
`has never expressed any displeasure with, or raised any claims regarding their lack of satisfaction
`
`with, or questioned the sufficiency of, the products in these orders. Despite demand therefor,
`
`Birchbox has not made payment for the amounts owed on Invoices Nos. 3 and 4.
`
`18.
`
`Thereafter, on June 7, 2022 Birchbox issued Purchase Order No. 341311, in the
`
`amount of $10,650.00 (“Purchase Order No. 5”). Aromatherapy shipped these products and issued
`
`Invoice No.70421 on June 8, 2022 in the amount of $10,650.00 (“Invoice No. 5”). Upon
`
`information and belief, this shipment was received and accepted by Birchbox. At no time during
`
`the prescribed shipment review period did Birchbox raise any issues as to the quality or sufficiency
`
`or condition of the products it received. Additionally, no payment was ever made in relation to that
`
`shipment. Nevertheless, in or around September 2022, Birchbox requested replacement of a trivial
`
`quantity of the product which it alleged had been damaged during shipment. Birchbox did not
`
`provide any evidence of the alleged damage to any of the products, and has never otherwise
`
`expressed displeasure with, or raised claims regarding their lack of satisfaction with, or questioned
`
`the sufficiency of, the balance of the products in this order. Despite demand therefor, Birchbox has
`
`still not made payment for any portion of the amount owed on Invoice No.5.
`
`19.
`
`Despite having requested but not receiving payment for Invoices Nos.1, 3, 4, and
`
`5, on June 22, 2022 Aromatherapy in good faith prepared for shipping the products contained in
`
`Purchase Order No. 2. For this order, Aromatherapy issued Invoice No. 70566, dated June 22,
`
`2022, in the amount of $187,500.00 (“Invoice No. 2”).
`
`20.
`
`In good faith, Aromatherapy corresponded with Birchbox repeatedly by email from
`
`April 4, 2022 through July, 2022 to request payment of Invoice No. 1 which remained unpaid for
`
`many months.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 7:22-cv-09184 Document 1 Filed 10/26/22 Page 6 of 13
`
`
`
`21.
`
`As of July 18, 2022, Aromatherapy was ready and able to ship the items ordered in
`
`Purchase Order No.2 and charged by Invoice No.2. However, as Aromatherapy had no assurances
`
`or any payment for the multiple outstanding invoices, the shipment of this order was withheld. The
`
`products were held and stored at the arrival port in New York for five days and were subsequently
`
`shipped to Aromatherapy’s warehouse in Texas.
`
`22.
`
`The correspondences between Aromatherapy and Birchbox continued from July 20
`
`through July 29, 2022 during which time Aromatherapy repeatedly requested payment from
`
`Birchbox of the outstanding balance owed.
`
`23.
`
`By email dated July 20, 2022 defendant FemTec on behalf of Birchbox
`
`acknowledged the outstanding amount when it communicated to Aromatherapy that it was seeking
`
`internal approval of a proposed payment plan. The details of the proposed payment plan were then
`
`shared by FemTec in an email to Aromatherapy on July 26, 2022 which also advised that internal
`
`approval was necessary before a commitment could be made. Thereafter, despite follow-up emails
`
`from Aromatherapy on July 28 and July 29, neither FemTech nor Birchbox responded to any
`
`further communications regarding the proposed payment plan. At no time since has Birchbox or
`
`FemTec paid or committed to paying any portion of the outstanding invoices.
`
`24.
`
`Despite multiple requests to Birchbox, Aromatherapy received no payment for the
`
`outstanding Invoices Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5. Birchbox’s non-payment of these four prior invoices
`
`constituted clear and willful repudiation of the Agreement in breach thereof.
`
`25.
`
`As a result of this repudiation of the Agreement which constituted a material breach
`
`by Birchbox, Aromatherapy was not obligated to continue performing under the Agreement by
`
`shipping the products which were the subject of Purchase Order No. 2.
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 7:22-cv-09184 Document 1 Filed 10/26/22 Page 7 of 13
`
`
`
`26.
`
`Aromatherapy was ready and able to fulfill the order of the specially manufactured
`
`goods as of the intended shipping date of July 18, 2022.
`
`27.
`
`Based on Birchbox’s continued failure to pay for the items it had already received
`
`and accepted under prior Purchase Orders, which constituted repudiation and breach of the
`
`Agreement, Aromatherapy withheld shipment of this order. The products were instead stored at
`
`the arrival port in New York for several days and ultimately transferred to warehouse storage in
`
`Texas where they have remained to the present time. Aromatherapy has incurred costs of $10,000
`
`due to storage at the New York port and shipment to Texas thereafter.
`
`28.
`
`Other than as stated above, at no time during the communications about the
`
`outstanding Invoices did Birchbox or FemTec dispute the obligation to pay Aromatherapy or
`
`otherwise express any displeasure with, or raise any claims regarding their lack of satisfaction
`
`with, or question the sufficiency of, the majority balance of the products that had been provided
`
`by Aromatherapy pursuant to Purchase Orders 1, 3, 4, and 5.
`
`29.
`
`Accordingly, and by letter dated August 10, 2022, Aromatherapy made a formal
`
`demand upon Birchbox to make payment of the sum of $414,195.08 (the “First Demand Letter”)
`
`representing the total sum of Invoices Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
`
`30.
`
`Notwithstanding the First Demand Letter, Birchbox failed and refused to make
`
`payment to Aromatherapy of the amounts due.
`
`31.
`
`By letter dated August 25, 2022, Aromatherapy made another formal demand,
`
`through its counsel, for Birchbox to make payment, or make arrangements for payment, of the
`
`outstanding balance by the close of business on September 6, 2022 (the “Second Demand Letter”).
`
`32.
`
`Notwithstanding the Second Demand Letter, Birchbox failed and refused to make
`
`payment to Aromatherapy of the outstanding balance of $414,195.08 within the time contained in
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 7:22-cv-09184 Document 1 Filed 10/26/22 Page 8 of 13
`
`
`
`the Second Demand Letter or thereafter.
`
`
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`AGAINST BIRCHBOX
`FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT AS TO ORDER NOS. 1, 3, 4, AND 5
`
`Aromatherapy repeats and realleges Paragraphs “1” through “32” of this Complaint
`
`33.
`
`as if fully set forth herein.
`
`34.
`
`Aromatherapy agreed to provide the Products as requested by Birchbox in Purchase
`
`Orders Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5, and Birchbox agreed to compensate Aromatherapy for same, for a
`
`cumulative price of $226,695.08.
`
`35.
`
`Aromatherapy performed all of its obligations in connection with the provision of
`
`the Products to Birchbox pursuant to Purchase Orders Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5.
`
`36.
`
`Birchbox made no payment to Aromatherapy for the Products requested by
`
`Purchase Orders No. 1, 3, 4, and 5 in the aggregate amount of $226,695.08
`
`37.
`
`There is now due and owing to Aromatherapy the outstanding balance of
`
`$226,695.08 for Invoices 1, 3, 4, and 5.
`
`38.
`
`As a result of Birchbox’s failure to make full payment for the Products,
`
`Aromatherapy has been damaged in the amount of $226,695.08, together with interest, costs, and
`
`attorneys’ fees, and all other amounts due and to become due to Aromatherapy.
`
`39.
`
`Accordingly, Aromatherapy is entitled to a money judgment against Birchbox in
`
`the amount of $226,695.08, plus interest, costs, and attorneys’ fees.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 7:22-cv-09184 Document 1 Filed 10/26/22 Page 9 of 13
`
`
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`AGAINST BIRCHBOX
`FOR PARTIAL ACCOUNT STATED AS TO ORDER NOS. 1,3,4 AND 5
`
`Aromatherapy repeats and realleges Paragraphs “1” through “32” of this Complaint
`
`40.
`
`as if fully set forth herein.
`
`41.
`
`From January 2021 through June 2022, Aromatherapy rendered the Invoices to
`
`Birchbox in the regular course of business.
`
`42.
`
`Each of the Invoices related to a Purchase Order and specifically set forth the
`
`Purchase Order for which the respective Invoice was issued, and specifically set forth the amount
`
`due therefor.
`
`43.
`
`Birchbox did not object to the Invoices orally or in writing, in whole or in part, or
`
`in any way, shape, or manner, within any reasonable time after receipt thereof.
`
`44.
`
`Nevertheless, Birchbox has failed and refused to pay the balance remaining due to
`
`Aromatherapy under Invoices Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5 for which all products were shipped and received
`
`by Birchbox, for an aggregate total of $226,695.08.
`
`45.
`
`By reason of the foregoing, a partial account stated has been established for the sum
`
`of $226,695.08.
`
`46.
`
`Accordingly, Aromatherapy is entitled to a money judgment against Birchbox for
`
`an account stated in the amount of $226,695.08, together with interest, costs, attorneys’ fees and
`
`all other amounts due and to become due to Aromatherapy.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`AGAINST BIRCHBOX AND FEMTEC
`FOR UNJUST ENRICHMENT AS TO ORDER NOS. 1,3,4 AND 5
`
`Aromatherapy repeats and realleges Paragraphs “1” through “32” of this Complaint
`
`47.
`
`as if fully set forth herein.
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 7:22-cv-09184 Document 1 Filed 10/26/22 Page 10 of 13
`
`
`
`48.
`
`In the alternative, and if the Court should find that Aromatherapy is not entitled to
`
`recover against Birchbox under its breach of contract claim, it is entitled to recover the amounts
`
`due from FemTec and Birchbox on the basis of unjust enrichment.
`
`49.
`
`Aromatherapy provided the Products which were the subject of Purchase Orders
`
`Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5 to Birchbox in good faith pursuant to the Agreement. As of the dates of these
`
`shipments, FemTec had already acquired Birchbox and all of its assets and inventory, including
`
`the products provided to Birchbox by Aromatherapy. The aggregate amount owed for these
`
`products pursuant to the corresponding Invoices Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5 is $226,695.08.
`
`50.
`
`Birchbox accepted and received the value and benefit of the Products and further
`
`benefitted from the Products through increased revenues and profitability in an unknown amount.
`
`As the owner of Birchbox, FemTec also received the value and benefit of the products and the
`
`revenues and profit derived therefrom.
`
`51.
`
`It would be inequitable, unjust, and against good conscience to permit Birchbox
`
`and FemTec to retain the benefit of the Products, and the profits realized therefrom, without
`
`making payment to Aromatherapy.
`
`
`
`52.
`
`Birchbox and FemTec have been unjustly enriched by the benefit conferred upon
`
`them, and Aromatherapy has been damaged, in an amount to be determined at trial, but not less
`
`than $226,695.08.
`
`
`
`53.
`
`Accordingly, Aromatherapy is entitled to recover a money judgment against
`
`Birchbox and FemTec in the amount of $226,695.08, together with interest, costs and attorneys’
`
`fees.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 7:22-cv-09184 Document 1 Filed 10/26/22 Page 11 of 13
`
`
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`AGAINST BIRCHBOX
`FOR ANTICIPATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT AS TO ORDER NO. 2
`
`
`54. Aromatherapy repeats and realleges Paragraphs “1” through “28” of this Complaint
`
`
`
`as if fully set forth herein.
`
`
`
`55.
`
`Purchase Order No. 2 requested delivery to Birchbox of a large quantity of certain
`
`products in specific sizes for Birchbox to offer to its customers.
`
`
`
`56.
`
`The quantity and specific size of the products was manufactured and prepared for
`
`shipment to Birchbox for the requested delivery between July 18, 2022 and August 1, 2022.
`
`
`
`57. As of July 18, 2022, Birchbox had failed to make payment of any portion of the
`
`aggregate amount of $226,695.08 owed to Aromatherapy under previously issued Invoices Nos.
`
`1, 3, 4, and 5. This continued failure to make payment of the invoices for products shipped to
`
`and received and accepted by Birchbox was a repudiation of the Agreement in breach thereof.
`
`
`
`58.
`
`Aromatherapy relied on Birchbox to perform under the contract, which reliance
`
`was to its detriment.
`
`
`
`59.
`
`In anticipated further repudiation and breach of the Agreement by Birchbox,
`
`Aromatherapy withheld shipment of the products which were the subject of Purchase Order No.2
`
`which were valued in the amount of $187,500.00.
`
`
`
`60.
`
`Said products were manufactured in a large quantity and sized specifically as
`
`requested by Birchbox for its exclusive use. As these products were manufactured specifically
`
`for Birchbox, they are unable to be resold. The products remain warehoused and ready to be
`
`shipped to Birchbox upon payment therefor.
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 7:22-cv-09184 Document 1 Filed 10/26/22 Page 12 of 13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`61. As a result of Birchbox’s repudiation and breach of the Agreement, Aromatherapy
`
`has sustained additional damages in the amount of $187,500.00 for the products which were
`
`specially manufactured for Birchbox in accordance with Purchase Order No. 2.
`
`
`
`62. As a further result of Birchbox’s repudiation and breach of the Agreement,
`
`Aromatherapy has also incurred costs of $10,000.00 in fees for alternate storage and shipping of
`
`the products which were specially manufactured for Birchbox in accordance with Purchase Order
`
`No. 2.
`
`
`
`63.
`
`Accordingly, Aromatherapy is entitled to recover a money judgment against
`
`Birchbox in the additional amount of $197,500.00, together with interest, costs and attorneys’ fees.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`64.
`
`Aromatherapy demands a trial by jury of this action.
`
`WHEREFORE, Aromatherapy respectfully demands judgment against Birchbox and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FemTec in the aggregate amount of $424,195.08 as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`
`(b)
`
`
`
`(c)
`
`
`
`(d)
`
`
`
`as to the First Cause of Action for Breach of Contract, an Order issuing judgment
`against Birchbox in the amount of $226,695.08 plus interest; or in the alternative,
`
`as to the Second Cause of Action for Partial Account Stated, an Order issuing
`judgment against Birchbox in the amount of $226,695.08 plus interest, costs, and
`fees; or in the alternative,
`
`as to the Third Cause of Action for Unjust Enrichment, an Order issuing judgment
`against Birchbox and FemTec in the amount of $226,695.08 plus interest, costs,
`and fees; and,
`
` as to the Fourth Cause of Action for Breach of Contract, and Order issuing
`judgment against Birchbox in the amount of $197,500.00 plus interest, costs and
`fees; and
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 7:22-cv-09184 Document 1 Filed 10/26/22 Page 13 of 13
`
`
`
`for such other and further relief which as to this Court may seem just, equitable,
`and proper.
`
`(e)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: White Plains, New York
`October 26, 2022
`
`
`
`_______________________
`Desmond C.B.Lyons
`
`LYONS MCGOVERN LLP
`
`
`By:
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`AROMATHERAPY ASSOCIATES, INC.
`399 Knollwood Road, Suite 216
`White Plains, New York 10603
`Telephone: (914) 631-1336
`Facsimile: (914) 631-1161
`Email: dlyons@lyons-mcgovern.com
`
`13
`
`