throbber
At I.A.S. Part 19_A of the Supreme Court
`of the State of New York, held in and
`for the County of Bronx, at 851 Grand
`Concourse , NY on
`
`day of
`
`, 2013
`
`P R E S E N T:
`
`Hon. Douglas E. McKeon
`Justice.
`
`STEVEN VIDAL, an infant, by his mother
`and natural guardian LETICIA HERNANDEZ,
`and LETICIA HERNANDEZ, individually,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`NEW YORK CITY HEALTH &
`HOSPITALS CORPORATION, LINCOLN
`HOSPITAL and BELLEVUE HOSPITAL
`
`CENTER
`
`Defendants.
`
`:
`
`I
`
`Index.: 20062/2013
`
`INFANT’S
`COMPROMISE ORDER
`
`Upon reading and filing the Petition of LETICIA HERNANDEZ dated August 21, 2013,
`
`and the Affirmation of MARTHA GOLD, ESQ., dated August 21, 2013, and the exhibits
`
`attached thereto; and,
`
`It further appearing that the infant-plaintiff STEVEN VIDAL, was born on October 23,
`
`2007 and is presently approximately six years old, and it further appearing that the best interest of
`
`the infant-plaintiff will be served by settlement of the within action, and after due deliberation
`
`having been had thereon, and upon all the papers and proceedings heretofore had herein, the
`
`papers and proceedings heretofore had herein,
`
`

`

`NOW, on motion of MARTHA GOLD, attorney for the plaintiffs, it is
`
`ORDERED, that LETICIA HERNANDEZ, as the mother and natural guardian of the
`
`infant, STEVEN VIDAL, is hereby empowered and authorized to settle the within action for
`
`personal injuries sustained by the infant-plaintiff, STEVEN VIDAL, against the defendants NEW
`
`YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION, LINCOLN HOSPITAL AND
`
`BELLEVUE HOSPITAL CENTER, for the sum of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND
`
`($100,000.00) DOLLARS to be paid as follows:
`
`SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY TWO AND SIXTY EIGHT
`
`CENTS ($68,752.68) for conscious pain and suffering to be made payable and deposited to
`
`LETICIA HERNANDEZ as parent and natural guardian of the infant STEVEN VIDAL together
`
`‘with an officer of the following savings bank, in trust for the exclusive use and benefit of
`
`STEVEN VIDAL until he reaches his majority, to be deposited in such designated depositories in
`
`an insured, interest bearing account, certificate of deposit, bank money market fund or other bank
`
`instrument insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, at the highest legal rate of
`
`interest available.
`
`Such funds shall be deposited aforesaid with the following depositories:
`
`l.
`
`The sum of Thirty One Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Nine Dollars and
`
`Twenty-Five Cents ($31,239.25) jointly with an Officer of the Bank of America located 329 E.
`
`149th Street, Bronx, NY 10459.
`
`2.
`
`The sum of Thirty One Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Nine Dollars and
`
`Twenty-Six Cents ($31,239.26) jointly with an Officer of Chase Bank located at 360 E. 149th
`
`Street, Bronx, NY 10455.
`
`

`

`ORDERED, that the su.m in the amount of SIX THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED
`
`SEVENTY FOUR AND SEVENTEEN CENTS shall be paid to the Human Resource
`
`Administration in full satisfaction of the Medicaid lien herein; and it is further
`
`ORDERED, that all disbursements advanced by THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA
`
`GOLD, in the sum of One Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty One Dollars and Eighty-Eight Cents
`
`($1,781.88), shall be deducted from the sum of the One Hundred Thousand ($100,000.00) dollars
`
`as reimbursement to said attorney and the remaining sum thereof in the amount of Ninety Eight
`
`Thousand Two Hundred Eighteen Dollars and Twelve cents shall be subject to attorney fees
`
`payable to THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD, in the amount of Twenty Nine Thousand
`
`Four Hundred Sixty Five and Forty Four cents ($29,465.44) pursuant to Judiciary Law § 474-a;
`
`and it is further
`
`ORDERED, the loss of services cause of action for LETICIA HERNANDEZ is
`
`withdrawn; and it is further
`
`ORDERED, that the filing of a bond be dispensed with; and it is further
`
`ORDERED, that LETICIA HERNANDEZ hereby be granted leave to sign all necessary
`
`papers to effectuate this settlement; and it is further
`
`ORDERED, that upon his eighteenth birthday the infant- plaintiff STEVEN VIDAL be
`
`given access to the money to which he is entitled to and the funds be released to his control.
`
`ENTER,
`
`.I.S.C
`
`

`

`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF BRONX
`
`STEVEN VIDAL, an infant, by his mother and
`natural guardian, LETICIA HERNANDEZ, and LETICIA
`HERNANDEZ individually,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`—against-
`
`:
`
`‘
`
`'.
`
`Index No. 20062/2013
`
`ATTORNEY’S
`AFFIRNIATION
`
`NEW YORK CITY HEALTH & HOSPITALS
`CORPORATION, LINCOLN HOSPITAL, and BELLEVUE
`HOSPITAL CENTER
`
`Defendants.
`
`ss.:
`
`) )
`
`STATE OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
`
`MARTHA GOLD, ESQ., an attorney duly admitted to practice law before the Courts of the
`
`State of New York, hereby affirms the following pursuant to the penalties of perjury:
`
`1.
`
`I am the attorney ofrecord in the above-entitled action and as such I am fiilly familiar
`
`with all the facts and circumstances contained herein.
`
`2.
`
`This Affirmation is submitted in support of the plaintiffs application seeking
`
`permission to settle and compromise the case of the infant—plaintiff, STEVEN VIDAL (hereinafter
`
`“STEVEN”) against the above-named defendants NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS
`
`CORPORATION, (hereinafter “NYCHHC”) BELLEVUE HOSPITAL (hereinafter “BELLEVUE”)
`
`and LINCOLN HOSPITAL (hereinafter “LINCOLN”).
`
`3.
`
`On September 24, 2012 LETICIA HERNANDEZ, the mother and natural guardian
`
`of the infant-plaintiff, retained THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD, to represent her infant-
`
`son, STEVEN, and to represent her individually in a medical malpractice action regarding the care
`
`and treatment of STEVEN at LINCON HOSPITAL (hereinafter “LINCOLN”) and BELLEVUE
`
`HOSPITAL CENTER (hereinafier “BELLEVUE”).
`
`

`

`pursuant to which THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD would be paid the following fee based
`
`upon the sliding scale provisions of Judiciary Law §474-a(2);
`
`(I)
`
`30 per cent of the first $250,000 of the net sum recovered;
`
`(ii)
`
`25 per cent of the first $250,000 of the net sum recovered;
`
`(iii)
`
`20 per cent of the next $500,000 of the net sum recovered;
`
`(iv)
`
`15 per cent of the next $250,000 of the net sum recovered;
`
`(V)
`
`10 per cent of any amount over $1,250,000 of the net sum recovered.
`
`5.
`
`THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD, filed a retainer statement with the
`
`Offices of Court Administration and obtained retainer statement number 3688572 JAN 13.
`
`6.
`
`On September 25, 2012 THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD filed a Notice of
`
`Claim against the defendants NYCHHC, LINCOLN, and BELLEVUE alleging medical malpractice
`
`in the care and treatment of infant-plaintiff STEVEN in that they failed to properly and promply
`
`diagnose and treat the infant-plaintiffs ear infection causing it to spread. (Exhibit “B”)
`
`7.
`
`On January 30, 2013 THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD represented
`
`LETICIA HERNANDEZ at a 50-H Hearing where she appeared and gave sworn testimony
`
`regarding her sons’s case.
`
`8.
`
`When the 50-H Hearing transcript was received it was reviewed by this office and
`
`then sent to the plaintiff for correction.
`
`9.
`
`On January 7, 2013 THE LAW FIRM OF MARTHA GOLD, instituted a medical
`
`malpractice lawsuit against NYCHHC, LINCOLN and BELLEVUE, claiming that because of
`
`medical and hospital negligence and malpractice, they failed to diagnose and treat the infant’s ear
`
`infection leading to a sixth nerve palsy which has since resolved. The defendants NYCHHC,
`
`LINCOLN and BELLEVUE in the aforesaid actions answered the complaint by Schiavetti, Corgan,
`
`DiEdwards, Weinberg & Nicholson dated February 13, 2013. (Exhibit “C”)
`
`10.
`
`Additionally, an action Was brought on behalf of LETICIA HERNANDEZ for loss
`
`of services.
`
`

`

`11.
`
`During the litigation of this action, this office reviewed and familiarized itself with
`
`voluminous medical records and consulted with several medical experts at various times during the
`
`course of the litigation regarding different issues in the medical records.
`
`12.
`
`On April 9, 2013 THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD appeared at a
`
`Preliminary Conference where discovery was scheduled. Numerous discovery demands were
`
`prepared and served, responses to discovery demands of the defendant were prepared and served
`
`including a separate verified bill of particulars for each defendant.
`
`13.
`
`From the time issue was joined, considerable expense and effort was expended in
`
`making certain that all discovery was completed so that all possible theories of recovery were
`
`considered and used, if possible.
`
`14.
`
`The record of all hospitals, physicians, nurses, related health care providers who
`
`treated the infant for any reason since his birth had to be obtained and reviewed. Medical experts
`
`had to be obtained in the fields of pediatrics, emergency medicine and pediatric surgery. To
`
`properly evaluate the action with the expert, this office had to be thoroughly familiar with all of the
`
`infant’s records as well as the testimony ofthe parties who were deposed. The experts, in turn, were
`
`provided with copies of voluminous records for review and discussions.
`
`15.
`
`During the course of the litigation, this office met numerous times with the Infant-
`
`Plaintiff’ s mother, LETICIA HERNANDEZ in order to obtain medical history regarding her infant
`
`son STEVEN and with non-party CALISTO VIDAL , STEVEN’S father.
`
`16.
`
`During the course of discovery, ongoing settlement negotiations were engaged in by
`
`this office and representatives for the defendants NYCHHC, LINCOLN and BELLEVUE.
`
`17.
`
`On August 1, 2013 an offer of $50,000.00 was made by defendant NYCHHC and
`
`after speaking and discussing with the plaintiff on August 1, 2013 that offer was rejected.
`
`18.
`
`Throughout the month of August, 2013 negotiations were ongoing with defense
`
`counsel.
`
`19.
`
`In addition this office submitted the paperwork required to obtain the amount of the
`
`

`

`social services lien in this case.
`
`20.
`
`On August 19, 2013 defendant NYCHHC made an offer to settle the above
`
`matter for $100,000.00 dollars at which time the offer was discussed with STEVEN’S mother and
`
`accepted.
`
`21.
`
`The infant-plaintiffs current treating physician affidavit regarding STEVEN’S
`
`condition is armexed hereto as Exhibit “D” and states that Steven’s condition is stable and he has
`
`made a good recovery. (Exhibit “D”)
`
`22.
`
`LETICIA HERNANDEZ has discontinued her cause of action for loss of services
`
`so that the entire settlement amount can be allocated to her son, STEVEN.
`
`23.
`
`Out ofthe total settlement all disbursements advanced by this office in the course of
`
`prosecuting this action, from the date of the settlement with NYCHHC, LINCOLN and BELLEVUE
`
`totalled the sum of One Thousand Seven HundredEighty One and Eighty-Eight Cents ($1,781.88).
`
`Annexed hereto as Exhibit “E”, is a breakdown of said disbursements. (Exhibit “E”)
`
`24.
`
`The City of New York Human Resources Administration has indicated they will be
`
`asserting a lien against the proceeds oftl:1is action in the amount of six thousand two hundred seventy
`
`four dollars and seventeen cents ($6,274.17). (Exhibit “F")
`
`25.
`
`Based on the above, I recommend that the aforesaid proposed settlement be accepted
`
`for the following reasons: (a) the settlement is fair and just; (b) the settlement is compatible with
`
`jury verdicts sustained by the Appellate Division, First Department, for similar injuries and
`
`conditions, and; (c) the entire settlement will be paid in a lump sum; (d) STEVEN has made a good
`
`recovery with no functional impairment and is not presently under the care of the doctors for this
`
`condition.
`
`26.
`
`After deducting $1,781.88 for disbursements, attorneys fees are in the amount of
`
`Twenty Nine Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Five and Forty-Four Cents ($29,465.44) pursuant to
`
`the retainer herein.
`
`

`

`27.
`
`After deducting attorney’s fee and the social services lien, the balance of the
`
`settlement is Sixty Two Thousand Four Hundred Seventy Eight and Fifiy-One Cent ($62,478.51).
`
`28.
`
`It is requested that the settlement filnds be allocated solely to pain and suffering and
`
`deposited in an interest-bearing account of certificate of deposit and held in trust for the infant-
`
`plaintiff STEVEN VIDAL until he reaches his majority.
`
`29.
`
`I have neither directly nor indirectly become concerned in the settlement of this
`
`action at the instance of a party or person opposing, or with interest adverse to, the infant, nor
`
`received nor will receive any compensation from such party.
`
`30.
`
`Based on the above, I respectfully request that the aforesaid settlement be approved
`
`by the Court.
`
`31.
`
`No previous application has been made for the relief requested herein.
`
`WI-IEREFORE, your affirmant respectfiilly requests an Order approving the
`
`proposed settlement, authorizing LETICIA HERNDANDEZ to settle the action and execute
`
`documents necessary to release the defendants from any fiirther liability and for such other and
`
`further relief as may be just, proper and equitable.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`August 21, 2013
`
`
`
`

`

`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF BRONX
`
`STEVEN VIDAL, an infant, by his mother and
`guardian, LETICIA HERNANDEZ, and LETICIA '
`natural
`HERNANDEZ individually,
`
`Index No. 20062/2013
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`-against-
`
`PLAINTIFF’S
`AFFIRMATION
`
`NEW YORK CITY HEALTH & HOSPITALS
`CORPORATION, LINCOLN HOSPITAL, and BELLEVUE
`HOSPITAL CENTER
`
`Defendants.
`
`STATE OF NEW YORK
`
`)
`
`COUNTY OF BRONX
`
`i 55':
`
`LETICIA HERNANDEZ, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
`
`1.
`
`I am the mother of the infant-plaintiff in the above-entitled action and as such I am
`
`fully familiar with all the facts and circumstances contained herein.
`
`2.
`
`This Affirmation is submitted in support of the plaintiffs application seeking
`
`permission to settle and compromise the case of my son, STEVEN VIDAL (hereinafter “STEVEN”)
`
`against
`
`the above-named defendants NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS
`
`CORPORATION, (hereinafier “NYCHHC”) BELLEVUE HOSPITAL (hereinafter “BELLEVUE”)
`
`and LINCOLN HOSPITAL (hereinafter “LINCOLN”).
`
`3.
`
`On September 24, 2012 I retained THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD, to
`
`represent my infant-son, STEVEN, and to represent me individually in a medical malpractice action
`
`regarding the care and treatment of STEVEN at LINCOLN HOSPITAL (hereinafter “LINCOLN”)
`
`and BELLEVUE HOSPITAL CENTER (hereinafter “BELLEVUE”).
`
`4.
`
`At that time I signed a retainer agreement (Exhibit “A”) pursuant to which THE LAW
`
`OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD would be paid the following fee based upon the sliding scale
`
`

`

`(I)
`
`(ii)
`
`30 per cent of the first $250,000 of the net sum recovered;
`
`25 per cent of the first $250,000 of the net sum recovered;
`
`(iii)
`
`20 per cent of the next $500,000 of the net sum recovered;
`
`(iv)
`
`15 per cent of the next $250,000 of the net sum recovered;
`
`(v)
`
`10 per cent of any amount over $1,250,000 of the net sum recovered.
`
`5.
`
`I was informed that THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD, filed a retainer
`
`statement with the Oflices of Court Administration and obtained retainer statement number 3688572
`
`JAN 13.
`
`6.
`
`My attorney informed that on September 25, 2012 THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA
`
`GOLD filed a Notice of Claim against the defendants NYCHHC, LINCOLN, and BELLEVUE
`
`alleging medical malpractice in the care and treatment of my son STEVEN in that they failed to
`
`properly and promptly diagnose and treat my son’s ear infection causing it to spread. (Exhibit_‘_‘§:)
`
`7.
`
`On January 30, 2013 THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD represented me at
`
`a 50-H Hearing where I appeared and gave sworn testimony regarding my sons’s case.
`
`8.
`
`When the 50-H Hearing transcript was received it was reviewed by my attorney and
`
`then Sent to me for correction and signature.
`
`9.
`
`My attorney informed me that on January 7, 2013 THE LAW FIRM OF MARTHA
`
`GOLD, instituted a medical malpractice lawsuit against NYCHHC, LINCOLN and BELLEVUE,
`
`claiming that because of medical and hospital negligence and malpractice, the defendants failed to
`
`diagnose and treat my son’s ear infection leading to a sixth nerve palsy which has since resolved.
`
`The defendants NYCHHC, LINCOLN and BELLEVUE in the aforesaid actions answered the
`
`complaint by Schiavetti, Corgan, DiEdwards, Weinberg & Nicholson dated February 13, 2013.
`
`(Exhibit “C”)
`
`10.
`
`1 1.
`
`Additionally, an action was brought on my behalf for loss of services.
`
`During the litigation of this action, THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD
`
`reviewed and familiarized itself with voluminous medical records and consulted with several
`
`

`

`medical experts at various times during the course of the litigation regarding different issues in the
`
`medical records.
`
`12.
`
`My attorney informed me that on April 9, 2013 THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA
`
`GOLD appeared at a Preliminary Conference where discovery was scheduled. Numerous discovery
`
`demands were prepared and served, responses to discovery demands ofthe defendant were prepared
`
`and served including a separate verified bill of particulars for each defendant.
`
`13.
`
`My attorney infonned me that from the time issue was joined, considerable expense
`
`and effort was expended in making certain that all discovery was completed so that all possible
`
`theories of recovery were considered and used, if possible.
`
`14.
`
`My attorney informed me that all the records of all hospitals, physicians, nurses,
`
`related health care providers who treated my son for any reason since his birth were obtained and
`
`reviewed. Medical experts had to be obtained in the fields of pediatrics, emergency medicine and
`
`pediatric surgery. To properly evaluate the my son’s action THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA
`
`GOLD spoke with the experts, and had to become thoroughly familiar with all of the son’s records
`
`as well as the testimony ofthe parties who were deposed. The experts, in turn, were provided with
`
`copies of voluminous records for review and discussions.
`
`15.
`
`During the course ofthe litigation, my attorney met numerous times with me in order
`
`to obtain medical history regarding my son STEVEN. She also met with non-party CALISTO
`
`VIDAL , STEVEN’S father.
`
`1 6.
`
`During the course of discovery, ongoing settlement negotiations were engaged in by
`
`this office and representatives for the defendants NYCHHC, LINCOLN and BELLEVUE.
`
`17.
`
`My attorney informed me that on August 1, 2013 a settlement offer of $50,000.00 was
`
`made by defendant NYCHHC and afier speaking and discussing with me on August 1, 2013 that
`
`offer was rejected.
`
`18.
`
`My attorney informed me that throughout the month of August, 2013 negotiations
`
`were ongoing with defense counsel.
`
`

`

`19.
`
`My attorney informed me that in addition THE LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD
`
`submitted the paperwork to obtain the amount of the social services lien in my son’s case and
`
`explained this would have to be repaid from any funds received in my son’s case.
`
`20.
`
`My attorney informed me that on August 19, 2013 defendant NYCHHC made an
`
`offer to settle the above matter for $100,000.00 dollars at which time the offer was discussed with
`
`me and accepted.
`
`21.
`
`STEVEN’S current treating physician has provided me with an affidavit regarding
`
`STEVEN’S condition which states that Steven’s condition is stable and has made a good recovery.
`
`(Exhibit “D”)
`
`22.
`
`I have discontinued my cause of action for loss of services so that the entire
`
`settlement amount can be allocated to my son, STEVEN.
`
`23.
`
`My attorney informed me that out of the total settlement all disbursements advanced
`
`by this office in the course of prosecuting this action, from the date ofthe settlement with NYCHHC,
`
`LINCOLN and BELLEVUE totaled the sum of One Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty-One and
`
`Eighty-Eight Cents ($1,781.88) dollars. I was provided with a copy the breakdown ofdisbursements.
`
`(Exhibit “E”)
`
`24.
`
`My attorney informed me that The City of New York Human Resources
`
`Administration has indicated they will be asserting a lien against the proceeds of this action in the
`
`amount of six thousand two hundred seventy four dollars and seventeen cents ($6,274.17). (Exhibit
`
`(‘F5’)
`
`25.
`
`Based on the above, I recommend that the aforesaid proposed settlement be accepted
`
`for the following reasons: (a) the settlement is fair and just; (b) the entire settlement will be paid in
`
`a lump sum; (c) STEVEN has made a good recovery with no functional impairment and is not
`
`presently under the care of the doctors for this condition.
`
`26.
`
`My attorney informed that after deducting $1,781.88 for disbursements, attorneys fees
`
`are in the amount of Twenty Nine Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Five and Forty-Four Cents
`
`

`

`($29, 465.44) pursuant to the retainer I signed herein.
`
`27.
`
`My attorney informed me that after deducting attorney's fee and the social services
`
`lien, the balance ofthe settlement is Sixty Two Thousand Four Hundred Seventy Eight and Fifiy-One
`
`cents ($62,478.51).
`
`28.
`
`I
`
`request that the settlement funds be allocated solely to pain and suffering and
`
`deposited in an interest-bearing account of certificate of deposit and held in trust for my son
`
`STEVEN until he reaches his majority.
`
`29.
`
`Based on the above, I respectfully request that the aforesaid settlement be approved
`
`by the Court.
`
`30.
`
`No previous application has been made for the relief requested herein.
`
`WHEREFORE, your affirmant respectfully requests an Order approving the
`
`proposed settlement, authorizing me to settle the action and execute documents necessary to release
`
`the defendants from any further liability and for such other and further relief as may be just, proper
`
`and equitable.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`August 21, 2013
`
`Eta’
`LETICIA HE
`
`P2
`ANDEZ
`
`- Z
`
`

`

`"443 west '2:-il-{D—S_TREET
`SUITE 13
`
`NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10011
`
`SUBJECT TO INVESTIGATION
`RETAINER
`
`The undersigned, residing at
`
`i7,§ 5251". /5/iITSé£_¢Z , [:3/(WK N Z: /57-V57
`
`hereby retains you to prosecute or adjust a claim for damages arising from -- personal
`
`injuries sustained by loss of services of ___g
`
`through the negligence of
`
`
`or other persons, and the undersigned hereby gives you the exclusive right to take all legal
`steps to enforce the said claim and hereby further agrees not to settle this action in any
`manner without your written consent.
`
`the
`In consideration of the services rendered and to be rendered by you,
`undersigned hereby agrees to pay you and you are authorized to retain out of any moneys
`that may come into your hand through judgment, settlement or otherwise by reason of the
`above claim:
`
`(i)
`(ii)
`(iii)
`(iv)
`(v)
`
`30 per cent on the first $250,000 of the sum recovered,
`25 per cent on the next $250,000 of the sum recovered,
`20 per cent on the next $500,000 of the sum recovered,
`15 per cent on the next $250,000 of the sum recovered,
`10 per cent on any amount over $1,250,000 of the sum
`recovered; or,
`
`Such percentage shall be computed on the net sum recovered after deducting from
`the amount recovered expenses and disbursements for expert testimony and investigative
`or other services properly chargeable to the enforcement of the claim or prosecution of the
`action.
`In computing the fee, the costs as taxed, including interest upon a judgement, shall
`be deemed part of the amount recovered. For the following or similar items there shall be
`no deduction in computing such percentages; liens, assignments or claims in favor of
`hospitals, for medical care and treatment by doctors and nurses, or self—insurers or
`insurance carriers.
`
`In the event extraordinary services are required you may apply to the Court for
`greater compensation pursuant to the Judiciary Law and the Special Rules of the Appellate
`Division regulating the conduct of Attorneys.
`
`If the
`to an Appellate Court.
`This agreement does not contemplate appeal
`undersigned desires to employ the law firm to prosecute an appeal in this action, a
`separate agreement with its own rate of compensation must be entered into.
`If I retain
`separate counsel to prosecute an appeal and the case is disposed of in my favor after that
`point, the law firm is entitled to be compensated for the time spent in handling the
`underlying and expenses from me and from the new attorney retained.
`
`

`

`The client(s) understand that a case involving negligence and/or medical
`malpractice in a hospital, nursing home, or doctor's offices involves a comprehensive
`review of medical records by lawyers and medical experts, and the investigation of same
`is extremely time consuming and costly. in addition, the investigation of every accident and
`incident is necessary before the case may be certified as meritorious. The undersigned
`client(s) agree(s) and understand(s) that this is a retainer and the handling of the case is
`subject to the review and approval by the attorney after the attorney has had the
`opportunity to do a sufficient review of the case to investigate whether the attorney will
`seek legal redress for ciient/injured person. The attorney retains the right to reject
`representation upon sufficient written notice to the undersigned.
`
`SURROGATE COURT PROCEEDINGS
`
`CHECK NUMBER ONE OR TWO BELOW:
`
`1. D The undersigned has retained you to secure Letters Testamentary or Letters
`of Administration and the fees for such services shall be 1,500.00 payable at the end of
`
`the case if the case has produced a recovery.
`
`The undersigned has not retained you to secure Letters Testamentary or
`2. CI
`Letters of Administration as such services are being provided by a different attorney
`retained by the client(s).
`
`2012
`
`Dated
`
`

`

`X l3——‘.’\'oti::e of Claim against The City of New York:
`Section 502 General Municipal Law. 6-83
`
`In the Matter ofthe Claim of
`STEVEN VIDAL on infant by his mother and natural guardian LETICIA HERNANDEZ
`
`against
`
`N YCHHC, LINCOLN HOSPITAL and BELLE VUE HOSPITAL
`
`TO: COMPTROLLER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the undersigned claimantfis) hereby rnake(s) claim and demand against the City ofNew
`Yorlt, asfollows: [Oflice ofthe Comptroller requests thefollowing additional information." in Section 2, specfiic defect (e.g. pothole) ifapplicable; in Section 3, street
`address wherever possible.]
`
`The name and post—ofi‘ice address ofeach claimant and claimant's attorney is:
`
`Steven Vidal and Leticia Hernandez
`175 E. 151th Street
`Apt. 3E
`Bronx, NY 10451
`
`The nature ofthe claim:
`
`The Law Oflice ofMartha Gold
`Attorneyfor Claimant
`445 West 23rd Street - Suite 1B
`New York, NY 10011
`
`This is a claim for medical malpractice, negligence and lack ofinform ed consent on the part ofNew York City Health
`and Hospitals Corporation, Lincoln Hospital and Bellevue Hospital in failing to properly and promptly diagnose and treat the infant
`claimant ’s infection causing permanent injury to him; in improperly performing surgery and procedures on the infant—claimant; causing
`_further injury including but not limited to infection, neurological iryury, and in causing and worsening the infant—claimant ’s condition and
`infection, failing to admit the infant-claimant; improperly discharging the infant claimant with said injuries andfailing to properly treat
`the infant claimant is complaints during all ofhis visits and admissions at Lincoln Hospital on August 14, 2012, August 16, 2012 , and
`August 18, 2012 through August 28, 2012 and at Bellevue on August 17, 2012 and August 31, 2012 through September 10, 2012 and
`allowing his condition to deteriorate and worsen.
`
`3. The time when, the place where and the manner in which the claim arose:
`
`The infant claimant 15' claim arose in Lincoln Hospital and Bellevue Hospital, their clinics, wards, halls and beds and
`all of the places where the defendants NYCHHC, Lincoln Hospital and Bellevue Hospital rendered care to the claimant on August 14,
`2012, August 16 — September 10, 2012, and continuing when the defendant negligentlyfailed to promptly andproperly diagnose and treat
`the claimant ’s infection whichfailure caused injury to his internal organs including his brain and neurological system, and improperly
`and negligently dischargedfrom, andfailed to admit the claimant to Lincoln Hospital on August 14, 2012, August 16, 2012, and Bellevue
`Hospital on August 17, 2012 and during the treatments at Lincoln Hospitalfrom August 18, 2012 through August 28, 2012 and Bellevue
`Hospitalfrom August 31, 2012 through September 10, .2012 and improperly discharging him andfailing to admit him and causing and
`failing to properly treat and improperly performing surgery and procedures; causing injuries to his internal organs causing infection.
`brain injury and causing his condition to deteriorate and worsen and causing the claimant to sustain serious and perm anent injuries due
`to the negligent and inadequate medical care provided by the defendants herein.
`
`4. The items ofdamage or injuries claimed are
`As a result ofthe aforementioned negligence. the infant claimant STEVEN VIDAL was caused to sustain injuries including brain
`damage, neurological damage, surgeries, surgeries, hospitalizations, and medical expenses. Claimant has sufiered damages in a sum
`exceeding thejurisdictional limitations ofall lower courts which would otherwise havejurisdiction.
`is s‘£;<>'i'9~0/l
`
`Cgfgflfi QALTT
`
`

`

`The undersigned claimantfs) therefore present this claimfor aafustment and payment. You are hereby notified that unless it
`5
`is aajfusted andpaid within the time provided by lawflrom the date ofpresentation, to you, the claimant(s) intend{s) to commence on action
`
`
`'11 rd‘ beneath
`signed nmsr 52'
`
`ETICIA HERNANDEZ
`
`
`
`at
`MARTHA G
`of New Y _
`Nda. Pufl-i
`~ Sta
`
`' w 2212:‘: ma-1
`E '
`,1
`L.‘ -_-fin-_;am[y
`
`
`My Can
`you fixtures 08l1 012009
`
`
`MARTHAGOLD
`mfiflb-SE16 Of-NEW 70?‘!
`'
`. °3_5°‘9°‘" 31
`IIINQU York_Gnnm_y
`uycbuyiuton oxpias ouuoreear 2013
`
`Dated: September I3, 2012
`New York, NY
`
`
`
`Office and Post Ofiice Address, Telephone Number
`445 West 23rd Street - Suite 1B
`
`New York,N}’
`1 001 l
`(212) 888—6068
`
`INDIVIDUAL VERIFICATION
`
`State ofNew York, County of
`
`ss.:
`
`being duly sworn, deposes and says that deponent is
`the claimant in the within action; that he has read the
`foregoing Notice of Claim and knows the contents
`thereof;
`that
`the same is true to deponents own
`knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be
`alleged on information and belief and that as to those
`matters deponent believes is to be true.
`
`CORPORATE VERIFICATION
`
`State ofNew York, County of
`
`ss. .'
`
`being duly sworn, deposes and says that deponent is the
`of
`corporate claimant named in the within action; that
`deponen! has read theforegoing Notice of Claim and
`knows the contents thereof and that the some is true to
`deponentis own knowledge. except as to the matters
`therein stated to be alleged upon information and
`belief and as to those matters deponent believes it to
`be true.
`
`This verification is made by deponent because
`said claimant is a
`corporation, and deponent
`and ofiicer thereof to wit its
`The grounds ofdeponent’s belief as to all matters not
`stated upon deponentis knowledge are asfollows:
`
`Sworn to before me, this
`day of
`20
`
`Sworn to before me, this
`day of
`20
`
`

`

`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF BRONX
`...................................................................... --x
`STEVEN VIDAL, an infant by his mother, and natural
`:
`guardian, LETICIA HERNANDEZ, and
`LETICIA HERNANDEZ, individually,
`
`—against-
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`:
`
`2
`
`Index No.: 200 G2 2 / 203
`
`Plaintifidesignates
`BRONX County as
`the place ofvenue
`
`The basis ofthe venue
`IsDefimdants place ofbusiness
`
`SUMMONS
`
`NEW YORK CITY HEALTH & HOSPITAL
`
`CORPORATION, LINCOLN HOSPITAL, and
`BELLEVUE HOSPITAL,
`
`——————————————————————————————————————————————
`
`To the above named Defendant
`
`Defendants.
`
`Plaintiflresides at
`
`175 East 151st Apt. 30,
`Bronx, NY 10451
`
`YOUARE IIEREBY SUMMONED to answer the complaint in this action and to
`serve a copy ofyour answer, or ifthe com laint is not served with this summons, to serve a
`notice ofappearance, on the Plainnfl’sAl1Ebr3ney(s) within 20 days afier the service ofthis
`summons, exclusive ofthe day ofservice (or within 30 days after the service is complete ifthis
`summon is notpersonally delivered to you within the State ofNew York); and in case ofyour
`failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by defaultfor the relief
`demanded in the complaint.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`January 7, 2012
`
`LAW OFFICE OF MARTHA GOLD
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`
`Defendants’ addresses:
`New York Health & Hospitals Corporation
`360 Broadway - Rm 600
`New York, NY 10013
`
`Oflice and P.O. Address
`445 West 23rd Street
`Suite 1-B
`New York, NY 10011
`
`Lincoln Hospital
`234 East 149th Street
`Bronx, NY 10451
`Bellevue Hospital
`462 First Avenue
`New York, NY 10010
`
`__
`
`-
`
`-_ ':’.
`I
`_,. :_-~.'
`
`U .i'D:>
`T.‘
`513 3, 12>
`
`

`

`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF BRONX
`_______________________________________________________________________-X
`
`STEVEN VIDAL, an infant by his mother and natural
`guardian, LETICIA HERNANDEZ, and
`LETICIA HERNANDEZ, individually
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Index No.: 200 In 3/203
`
`—against—
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`
`NEW YORK CITY HEALTH & HOSPITALS
`CORPORATION, LINCOLN HOSPITAL

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket