throbber
FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2018 11:44 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 226
`
`INDEX NO. 21203/2014E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2018
`
`Sl JPREME COlJRT OF THE STATE OF NE\V YORK
`COUNTY OF BRONX
`
`--------------------X
`CHETRAM ET\V AROO,
`AFFIDAVIT of EXPERT
`INDEX#: 2120:V20H
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`-ag-.unsl-
`
`PARKASH 2000, LLC, APPROVED OIL & SERVICE
`CO., THE APPROVED COMPANY OF BUILDING, INC.,
`BAUER \VELDING & BOILER REPAIRS, INC.,
`
`----------------------X
`
`Defendants.
`
`STATE OF NE\V YORK
`
`COlJNTY OF SUFFOLK
`
`) ss:
`)
`
`James Pugh, Ph.D., P.E., being duly sworn deposes and says under the penalties of
`
`peI]Ury:
`
`I.
`
`I mn a licensed professional engineer in the Stale of New York ;md maintain
`
`an ollicc al Inter-City Testing and Consulting Corporation, 60 East 42'"' Street, Suite ,t600,
`
`New York, New York.
`
`2.
`
`I received my S.B. degTec in Metallurgy ;md Materials Science from MIT in
`
`1968 mHI my Ph.D. dcgTee in Biomedical Engineering from MIT in 1972. Since 1986 I have
`
`served as the Director of Biomedical Engineerinw'Mctallur,w ,md Materials Science and
`
`En1,>ineering al Inter-City Testing and Consulting Corporation and serve as a Staff Specialist in
`
`Scientific Accident Reconstruction. I have held academic positions al the Hospital for Joint
`
`Diseases in Biomechanics and Bioen1,>ineering mid the Stale University of New York in the
`
`licld of orthopedic en1,>ineering. I have also held professorships al the Cooper l lnion School
`
`of Engineering in New York City, the City College of the City l lniversily of New York, mid
`
`New York Cniversity. My full credentials and experience ,UT set forth in my Curriculum
`
`Vitae attached hereto. I am a member of many scientific mid professional associations
`
`including the Americmi Concrete lnstilulc, the Society of Automotive Engineers, the
`
`

`

`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2018 11:44 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 226
`
`INDEX NO. 21203/2014E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2018
`
`
`
`Americ,m Association of Mechanical Engineers, and lhe American Association of Civil
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Engineers.
`
`
`
`
`
`in this maller I reviewed among :'l. As parl of my analysis and defect assessmenl
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`olher things, photographs sho\\ing lhe burns, leg-di documenls including depositions and Bills
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of Particulars, medical records, and other materials associated with lhe incident thal occurred
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I have Avenue, Bronx, NY. Further, on Aug11Sl a, 201a, in Apartment ,1C at 2000 Anthony
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`extensive experience over :'!O years of work as a licensed professional engineer in the analysis
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of human bodily i1\jury and the engineering principles associated therewith, including thennal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lrauma and water scalds and burns. This allidavil is submitted in support of the Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`judgm ent filed b y Dcfend,mts.
`Chetram Etwaroo ,me! is to oppose the molion for summary
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`,t.. It is understood that the Plaintiff Chetram Elwaroo, elate of birth April 10,
`
`I !H8, 5 feet 1-inches
`
`
`
`
`
`in height ,md 178 pounds in weighl, was siuing on a shower bench when
`
`
`
`
`
`hot water came out of the kmcl-held hose. He moved his !di foot out of the tub quickly but
`
`Because he had partial amputations of his
`his right foot stayed in the waler a !cw seconds.
`
`
`
`toes due to diabetic vascular insufficiency prior to the scalding event, and the burn was
`
`localized largely to the plantar aspect of the right foot, there was a thickening of the skin more
`
`so than normal plantar thickening. Because of lack of sensation, the Plaintiff did not notice
`
`the burn.
`
`
`
`On diagnosis". references an "inconsistent Arslanoglu 5. Further, defense expert
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the conlnu")', the medical records and photogTaphs show that lhe phmlar bum as either a
`
`second degree or third degree
`
`
`
`
`
`
`burn. Plaintitrs experl Colavito measured the temperatures
`
`
`
`
`
`shortly alier the incident and found them to be 1 -15 to 150 clegTees F.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ii. Further, the specilics of the i1\juries to the 1ighl foot as reported in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sloughing of the skin and the reported for two clays, records, because the burn W,L� not treated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and bleeding clown to the base of the burn clming debridement, arc all consistent "ith a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`second to third degree burn consistent "ith a waler temperature between 11-5-150 degrees F.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7.
`
`Significantly, contrary to Defendant's bio-mechanical expert, the burns
`
`2
`
`

`

`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2018 11:44 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 226
`
`INDEX NO. 21203/2014E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2018
`
`occurred on the bottom part of the foot as well. This is due to the fact of the positioning of
`
`the hose which was not in the bucket when the scalding hot water was delivered to the tub. It
`
`is axiomatic that the scalding hot water that is leaving the hose will fill the bottom of the tub
`
`where Plaintiffs foot was placed, thereby exposing the right foot to the scalding hot water and
`
`leading to an ulcer that has not healed. Additionally, there would also have been direct
`
`contact from the scalding hot water coming out from hose to the bottom part of the foot
`
`Finally, the hot water would have also burned the other portions of this foot by direct contact
`
`coming from the scalding hot water itself even without pulling in the bathtub.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8. Therefore, lo a reasonable clq,'Tee of engineering, scientific, ,md
`
`
`
`
`
`biomcchanical certainty, the scalding injuries sustained by Plaintiff were due lo excessive
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`waler temperatures in the range of HS lo 150 degrees F.
`
`
`
`9. Further, had ,m anti-scald device been installed m the shower, the i1\juries
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`would not have been sustained because the waler temperature would have been limited to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`120 degrees F.
`
`
`
`degree of arc lo a reasonable 10. All of the opinions rendered in this allidavit
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`engineering, scientific, and biomechm1ical certainty. It is my opinion lo a reasonable degree
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of engineering, scientific, mHl biomechm1ical certainly that plaintiff was exposed lo water 115
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lo 150 degrees F for a few seconds for the reasons cited above and per the exphmalions cited
`
`
`
`
`
`above.
`
`3
`
`

`

`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2018 11:44 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 226
`
`INDEX NO. 21203/2014E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2018
`
`
`
`I sayeth not. 11. Further, at this juncture,
`
`
`
`
`
`Sworn to before me this
`
`
`20"' clay of.July 20 I 8
`
`4
`
`

`

`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2018 11:44 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 226
`
`INDEX NO. 21203/2014E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2018
`
`(This is a Sample CV, please refer to our website for a complete listing of all CVs.)
`
`Expert CV Dr. James Pugh, P.E.(condensed)
`
`EXPERTISE
`Analysis and evaluation of personal injuries and causal relationship of injuries to the
`accident events and environment. Specialist in scientific accident reconstruction,
`metallurgy and material science. Analysis of sports injuries, automotive defects &
`seatbelt performance in vehicular accidents; injuries sustained by failure of medical
`devices. Member ASTM Slip and Fall Committee.
`
`EDUCATION
`1972 Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the Department of Metallurgy and Materials
`Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Mass.
`1968 B.S. in Metallurgy & Materials Science from Department of Metallurgy & Materials
`Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (MIT), Cambridge, Mass.
`
`EXPERIENCE
`1986 - Present Director, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Science & Engineering
`InterCity Testing & Consulting Corporation; Staff Specialist in Scientific Accident
`Reconstruction; Regular attendee at Stapp Car Crash Conferences (SAE).
`1/1/85 - 10/1/86 State University of New York at Stony Brook
`Research Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine Professor of
`Materials Science and Engineering, Technical Director of Gait Laboratory, Director of
`Orthopaedic Engineering
`11/1/79 - 12/31/84 Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute
`Director, Division of Bioengineering
`Associate Director, Occupational & Industrial Orthopaedic Center
`9/1/72 - 10/31/79 Hospital for Joint Diseases & Medical Center
`Director, Biomechanics Laboratory
`
`PROFESSORSHIPS
`7/95 - Present Professor, Cooper Union School of Engineering, New York
`10/86 - 6/87 - Visiting Professor of Bioengineering
`The Cooper Union School of Engineering, New York City
`12/20/89 - Affiliate Professor/Bioengineering
`The University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
`1/85 - 10/86 - Research Professor, Department of Orthopaedics,
`School of Medicine, SUNY State University of New York at Stony Brook
`9/72 - 12/84 - Professorships at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, The Cooper Union
`School of Engineering, New York University, City College/University of NY.
`
`TEACHING & ACADEMIC ACTIVITIES
`Adjunct Professor - Cooper Union School of Engineering; Teacher of in-company
`courses in finite-element analysis, strength and structural analysis, and human factors
`
`

`

`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2018 11:44 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 226
`
`INDEX NO. 21203/2014E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2018
`
`engineering. He has published on a variety of technical subjects in nationally recognized
`engineering journals and proceedings.
`
`PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
`American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
`American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
`American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
`Subcommittees: F4 Implant Devices and Materials, F8 Sports Equipment
`American Society for Metals (ASM)
`Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS)
`National Association of Professional Accident Reconstruction Specialists (NAPARS)
`National Society for Professional Engineers (NSPE)
`New York State Society for Professional Engineers (NYSSPE)
`Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)
`Society for Plastic Engineers
`
`LICENSES
`Professional Engineer (P.E.) New York State, Registered 1984, #0613911
`U.S. Coast Guard Operator's License, Issued 1984,
`Coastal, Up to Six Passengers, Up to 60 Tons Auxiliary Sail, Inland
`Private Pilot, Single Engine, Land, Licensed 1981
`
`For more information about this expert email InterCity at expt1@aol.com
`
`

`

`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2018 11:44 PM
`5/22/2018
`InterCity Testing & Consulting Corporation
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 226
`
`INDEX NO. 21203/2014E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2018
`
`Profile: InterCity Testing & Consulting Corporation
`Dr. Jeffrey Ketchman, P.E.
`Dr. James Pugh, P.E.
`Dr. Anthony Storace, P.E.
`Lawrence K. Schneider, P.E.
`
`1
`
`167 Willis Avenue
`Mineola, NY 11801
`Phone: (516) 747-8400
`Fax: (516) 746-0111/0121
`Published Cases
`$10,600,000 VERDICT - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - DEFECTIVELY DESIGNED COMMERCIAL STORAGE RACK - RACK
`COLLAPSES AFTER BEING STRUCK BY FORKLIFT - MULTIPLE LUMBAR VERTEBRA FRACTURES - FOUR-LEVEL
`LUMBAR FUSION PERFORMED - PERMANENT NEUROLOGICAL INJURIES - URINARY INCONTINENCE - SEXUAL
`IMPOTENCE - CONFINEMENT TO WHEELCHAIR - TOTAL DISABILITY FROM EMPLOYMENT.
`This was a products liability and negligence action brought against the manufacturer of an industrial warehouse storage rack as
`well as five other defendants. The other defendants including the owner of the facility where the incident occurred, several rack
`maintenance companies, and the installer and seller of the racking system, all settled the plaintiff’s claims shortly befor... - from
`The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (47638)
`CONFIDENTIAL RECOVERY Products liability - Defective design alleged - Kubota tractor falls over and kills
`operator while in use due to lack of roll bar.
`The plaintiff’s decedent was using the tractor manufactured by the defendant. The tractor rolled over and killed the decedent
`operator. The plaintiff alleged defective design since the vehicle was not equipped with a safety roll over bar. The defendant
`denied any product design defect.
`
`2
`
`3
`
`On April 2, 2003 the plaintiff’s 54-year-old decedent was using a Kubota Tractor Mode... (8640)
`$2,000,000 RECOVERY - FAILURE TO PLACE SAFETY CAGE ATTOP OF 29-FOOT TALL WALL-MOUNTED LADDER -
`LADDER USED BY PLAINTIFF STARTING UP RECENTLY INSTALLED HVAC SYSTEM - 24-FOOT FALL - BURST
`FRACTURE AT L-5 - FAILED INITIAL FUSION - CHRONIC PAIN SYNDROME - SHATTERED TIBIA/FIBULA - OPEN
`REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION - NON-UNION - INABILITY TO CONTINUE WORKING.
`The plaintiff HVAC mechanic in his early 30s was in the process of starting up a new HVAC system that had recently been
`installed in a warehouse that had been constructed in 1984. The plaintiff contended that the upper portions of a 29-foot tall wall-
`mounted ladder attached from the roof should have been equipped with a safety cage. The plaintiff, who was descending the
`ladder aft... - from The New Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (32916)
`$4,500,000 VERDICT - PRODUCT LIABILITY - ALLEGEDLY DEFECTIVE INFLATABLE DEVICE USED TO STOP
`WATER FLOW IN SEWER PIPES - DEVICE EXPLODES UPON OVERINFLATION - ORBITAL FRACTURE - ULNAR
`FRACTURE - CLOSED HEAD INJURY - BRAIN DAMAGE - COGNITIVE DEFICITS.
`The male plaintiff, age 34 years old at the time of injury, brought this action on theories of both strict liability and negligence.
`
`4
`
`5
`
`The defendants included the supplier and the manufacturer of an inflatable device known as a "muni ball." The device, which is
`used to halt the flow of liquid in large sewer pipes, exploded while being inflated by the plaintiff. The plaintiff cl... - from The
`Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (40909)
`$750,000 VERDICT - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - ALLEGEDLY DEFECTIVELY DESIGNED LAWN MOWER - FAILURE TO
`PROVIDE GUARD FOR DISCHARGE CHUTE - LACK OF ADEQUATE BOTTOM LIP - DISCHARGED NAIL STRIKES
`MINOR PLAINTIFF IN EYE - LOSS OF LEFT EYE.
`This action was filed on behalf of the minor male plaintiff, who was 11 years old when a small nail flew out from under a
`neighbor’s lawnmower, striking the plaintiff in the left eye. The injury became severely infected resulting in removal of the left eye.
`The defendants included the seller of the Craftsman lawn mower, the 15-year-old boy who was using the mower, and the
`homeowner whose grass w... - from The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (40055)
`$525,000 VERDICT - REAR END COLLISION - RIGHT SIDED ULNAR NEUROPATHY AND CARPAL TUNNEL
`SYNDROME SUFFERED BY PLAINTIFF REQUIRING EXTENSIVE USE OF RIGHT ARM AND HAND BECAUSE OF
`POLIO.
`http://www.jvra.com/expert/cases.aspx?ref=1532
`1/5
`
`6
`
`

`

`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`INDEX NO. 21203/2014E
`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2018 11:44 PM
`In this action, the plaintiff in his mid-50’s contended that the defendant driver struck him in the rear, propelling his right arm into
`5/22/2018
`InterCity Testing & Consulting Corporation
`the dashboard. The plaintiff, who suffered polio as a child, contended that he suffered right sided ulnar neuropathy and carpal
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 226
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2018
`tunnel syndrome. The plaintiff maintained that because the deficit in the left leg was particularly severe, he had alwa... - from The
`New Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (32508)
`$300,000 VERDICT - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - DEFECTIVE PUNCH PRESS - LACK OF GUARD OVER FOOT PEDAL -
`LACK OF POINT OF OPERATION GUARD - FAILURE TO WARN - TRAUMATIC AMPUTATION OF NON- DOMINANT
`INDEX FINGER - CRUSH INJURY TO LONG FINGER.
`The plaintiff, a 28-year-old inexperienced punch press operator, filed this action in strict liability against the manufacturer of a
`Niagara punch press and, under a negligence theory, against the owner of the machine. The plaintiff claimed that the punch
`press lacked adequate foot pedal and point of operation guards and that the defendants failed to warn of the dangerous
`conditio... - from The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (40194)
`DEFENDANT'S VERDICT - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - ALLEGED DEFECTIVE TABLE SAW - AMPUTATION OF RIGHT
`RING FINGER - FAILURE TO WARN - PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURIES.
`The plaintiff, a carpenter, alleged that a table saw manufactured by the defendant was defectively designed in that its blade
`guard was not suitable for all purposes for which the saw could be used. Specifically, the plaintiff claimed that the guard could not
`be used in a tilted position and was foreseeably removed by the plaintiff’s employer. As a result, the plaintiff sustained ... - from
`The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (35003)
`$85,000 GROSS VERDICT Products liability - Allegedly defective clamping device on splicing welder - Surgical
`amputation of non-dominant index finger.
`The male plaintiff, age 40 at the time of injury, filed this action against the defendant supplier of welding equipment on
`products liability and negligence theories. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant was responsible for the lack of a two- hand
`control on a clamping device for a splicing welder which crushed the plaintiff’s left index finger, resulting in its surgical amp... -
`from The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (35056)
`$1,500,000 VERDICT - TORT CLAIMS ACT - FAILURE TO CORRECT DANGEROUS CONDITION AT CURVE IN
`ROADWAY - SINGLE VEHICLE CRASH - TRAUMATIC AMPUTATION OF PINKIE, RING AND MIDDLE FINGERS OF
`NON-DOMINANT HAND.
`This was a Tort Claims Act case in which the plaintiff driver contended that as a result of the alleged palpably unreasonable
`failure of the state to correct a dangerous condition involving ruts on the roadway at a curve, he hydroplaned during rainy road
`conditions, striking a utility pole. The plaintiff also contended that the state acted in a palpably unreasonable manner in p... - from
`The New Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (31663)
`$2,800,000 RECOVERY DURING TRIAL - PLAINTIFF COURIER DRIVER CONTENDS THAT WHILE STOPPED IN
`TRAFFIC, HE IS STRUCK IN REAR INITIALLY BY FIRST DEFENDANT - SECOND DEFENDANT DRIVER THEN
`STRUCK THE FIRST DEFENDANT, PUSHING THE FIRST DEFENDANT'S VEHICLE IN REAR OF PLAINTIFF'S CAR -
`AGGRAVATION AND EXACERBATION OF PREVIOUSLY ASYMPTOMATIC DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE - "EGG-
`SHELL" PLAINTIFF - CERVICAL CORD COMPRESSION - POSTERIOR FUSION INVOLVING C3 THOUGH C7.
`The plaintiff van driver, 53-years old at the time of the accident and 57-years old at trial, contended that as he was stopped in
`traffic in his courier van, he was struck an initial time by the first defendant, and then moments later, he was struck a second time
`when the second defendant came upon the scene and struck the initial defendant, propelling his car into the plaintiff’s van. The
`plaint... - from The New York Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (48147)
`DEFENDANT''S VERDICT (cid:0)Products liability - Allegedly defectively designed fork lift - Plaintiff pinned against wall
`by machine - Ruptured colon - Cervical injuries.(cid:0)
`The plaintiff claimed that a forklift known as a "Walkie-Stacker" was defectively designed by the defendant Crown
`Equipment Corporation, resulting in the plaintiff being pinned against a wall. The seller of the forklift was also named as a
`defendant in the case. The defendants argued that the plaintiff’s injuries resulted from misuse of the machine.
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`The plaintiff was trained and a... - from The Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (41630)
`$778,875 VERDICT - REAR END COLLISION - LUMBAR DISC BULGE - LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION - CERVICAL
`STRAIN - THORACIC STRAIN - DIMINISHED EARNING CAPACITY FROM EMPLOYMENT AS TRUCK DRIVER -
`DAMAGES/CAUSATION ONLY.
`The plaintiff claimed that the delivery truck he was driving was stopped to make a left turn when it was struck from behind by the
`defendant’s pickup truck. The defendant admitted negligence, but disputed the causation and seriousness of the plaintiff’s
`injuries.
`
`14
`
`The plaintiff was a 40-year-old, full-time driver for a beer distributor and was in the course and scope of his em... - from The
`Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (26960)
`$14,000,000 RECOVERY - FALLING OBJECT - PRODUCT LIABILITY - DEFECTIVE DESIGN AND SALE OF HOIST -
`FAILURE TO INCLUDE BALLAST BLOCKS AND BALLAST BOX AS STANDARD EQUIPMENT - HOIST FALLS FROM
`ROOF AND STRIKES PLAINTIFF IN THE HEAD - CRUSH INJURY TO SKULL - TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY -
`PERMANENT LEFT-SIDED HEMIPLEGIA - LOSS OF USE OF LEFT ARM.
`This was a product liability action brought against the defendant manufacturer and distributor of an Aeroil RB-3 Hoist which
`catapulted from a roof and struck the plaintiff in the head. The plaintiff claimed that the hoist was defective in that it lacked ballast
`http://www.jvra.com/expert/cases.aspx?ref=1532
`2/5
`
`

`

`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`INDEX NO. 21203/2014E
`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2018 11:44 PM
`blocks and a ballast box as standard equipment and that it lacked on-product instructions regarding the amount of cou... - from
`5/22/2018
`InterCity Testing & Consulting Corporation
`The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (40618)
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 226
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2018
`$525,000 RECOVERY - FAILURE OF MALL TO MAINTAIN VESTIBULE AREA BETWEEN INNER AND OUTER DOORS
`- ELDERLY PLAINTIFF TRIPS ON BUCKLED CARPET SQUARE AND FALLS FORWARD - ENUCLEATION OF EYE -
`LOSS OF SENSE OF SMELL.
`In this action, the plaintiff, age 77 at the time of the incident and 80 at trial, contended that the defendant mall negligently failed to
`maintain the carpeting situated in the vestibule between the outer and inner doors. The plaintiff contended that the carpeting,
`which consisted of a series of carpet squares attached to the floor with adhesive material, frequently buckled, c... - from The New
`Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (32416)
`$1,700,000 RECOVERY - REAR END COLLISION - CERVICAL HERNIATION - SEVERE SOFT TISSUE WRIST INJURY
`NECESSITATING FUSION - TALUS FRACTURE - UNSUCCESSFUL FUSION.
`In this action, the female plaintiff in her 50s contended that as a result of the negligence of the defendant truck driver, who
`struck her in the rear while she was stopped at a traffic light, she sustained a cervical herniation requiring fusion surgery, severe
`tendon and ligament damage to the left, non- dominant wrist which also required a fusion and a chondryl fracture to the... - from
`The New Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (32084)
`$4,025,000 VERDICT - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - AUTO DEFECT - SEATBELT DEFECT - DEFECTIVELY DESIGNED
`PICK-UP TRUCK - CENTER SEAT BELT BUCKLE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH DRIVER'S RECEPTACLE -
`PLAINTIFF INEBRIATED CENTER SEAT PASSENGER INADVERTENTLY PLACES BELT INTO RECEPTACLE OF
`UNBELTED DRIVER - QUADRIPLEGIA SUFFERED UPON SINGLE VEHICLE ROLL-OVER COLLISION - ENHANCED
`INJURIES CAUSED BY DEFECT.
`This was an action involving a plaintiff passenger in a Toyota pick-up truck who contended that the truck was defectively
`designed because the center seat belt buckle was not interchangeable with the driver’s receptacle. The plaintiff, who was a
`commercial fisherman, contended that he was in the center of the bench seat as he was leaning against the duffel bag to his
`right, mai... - from The New Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (31910)
`$1,356,507 VERDICT - PEDESTRIAN ALLEGEDLY STRUCK BYBUS DRIVER AS BUS IS TURNING AND PEDESTRIAN
`EITHER ON SIDEWALK OR DIRECTLY NEXT TO CURB - DEATH ACTION - INTOXICATED DECEDENT.
`This was a death action in which the plaintiff contended that the defendant bus driver negligently made a right hand turn
`while he was too close to the curb and negligently failed to make observations in his sideview mirror. The plaintiff contended that
`as a result, the 50-year-old decedent was struck when he was either standing on the curb or directly next to it while in the street
`a... - from The New York Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (33162)
`$2,280,000 VERDICT - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - MOTORCYCLE DEFECT - FAILURE TO PROVIDE KICK STAND
`WHICH WOULD RETRACT UPON CONTACTING GROUND IN EVENT OPERATOR FAILED TO ELEVATE KICK-STAND
`- INCOMPLETE AMPUTATIONS OF DOMINANT ARM AT ELBOW AND 1/2 OF FOOT - FUTURE CONFINEMENT TO
`WHEELCHAIR.
`This was an action in which the plaintiff motorcycle passenger contended that the motorcycle was defectively designed because
`of the absence of a device which would retract the kick-stand, situated on the left side of the motorcycle, if it struck the ground as
`an operator was turning left. The plaintiff also contended that the co-defendant motorcycle operator negligently failed... - from
`The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (29992)
`$5,930,499 VERDICT - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - VOLKSWAGEN JETTA - DESIGN DEFECT - UNSAFE RESTRAINT
`SYSTEM - PARAPLEGIC INJURY SUFFERED BY 16-YEAR-OLD PLAINTIFF IN ROLLOVER ACCIDENT.
`This products liability action involved a minor male plaintiff, age 16 when he suffered paralysis at the T-8 level as a result of
`being ejected from a 1987 Volkswagen Jetta during a rollover accident. The vehicle was equipped with the VW passive restraint
`system consisting of a single strap attached to the door. The plaintiff’s cause of action, brought against the defendants Vo... -
`from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (29688)
`$90 VERDICT - REAR END COLLISION - ALLEGED BULGING CERVICAL DISC - MILD CHRONIC CERVICAL
`RADICULOPATHY - CERVICAL SPRAIN AND STRAIN.
`The female plaintiff, age 32 at the time of injury, alleged a permanent cervical injury as a result of a rear end collision by the
`defendant driver. The defendant stressed the lack of property damage to the vehicles involved and evidence of the plaintiff’s
`involvement in four subsequent accidents to argue that she sustained, at most, a mild cervical strain in the collision. The ... - from
`The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (34856)
`$10,000 GROSS VERDICT - MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE - INTERSECTION COLLISION - SEPARATED
`SHOULDER.
`The 31-year-old driver contended that as a result of the negligence of the defendant driver, who failed to stop at a red light
`and who was speeding, his car was struck, causing him to suffer a shoulder dislocation. The plaintiff and his passenger
`contended that the defendant had the red light and was traveling at a much greater speed than permitted in the 30 mph zone.
`The plai... - from The New York Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (25300)
`$3,030,000 VERDICT - NEGLIGENCE OF HOUSING AUTHORITYEMPLOYEE WHO TURNS ON GAS TWO DAYS
`AFTER PLAINTIFF''S DETECTION OF ODOR PROMPTS FIRE DEPARTMENT TO SHUT OFF GAS - EXPLOSION -
`PLAINTIFF PROPELLED ACROSS ROOM - LUMBAR HERNIATION NECESSITATING INITIAL SURGERY AND
`SECOND OPERATION BECAUSE OF DEVELOPMENT OF INFECTION - NO SIGNIFICANT BURN INJURIES.
`http://www.jvra.com/expert/cases.aspx?ref=1532
`
`3/5
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`

`

`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`INDEX NO. 21203/2014E
`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2018 11:44 PM
`The female plaintiff, in her early 50s, a public housing resident, contended that two days after the Fire Department had turned off
`5/22/2018
`InterCity Testing & Consulting Corporation
`her gas upon her detection of an odor, the defendant New York City Housing Authority’s maintenance worker negligently
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 226
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2018
`determined that there was no leak and turned the gas back on. The plaintiff maintained that a leak was, in fact, present and that
`an expl... - from The New York Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (42471)
`$1,800,000 VERDICT - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - STRICT LIABILITY - COMMON LAW NEGLIGENCE - BREACH OF
`IMPLIED WARRANTY - BABY RECEIVES SECOND AND THIRD DEGREE BURNS OVER 30% OF BODY FROM
`SCALDING WATER FROM ELECTRIC COFFEE URN.
`The plaintiff, a nine-month-old baby, was crawling on the floor of her family’s kitchen. Her older sister, a minor, was making a
`bottle for the plaintiff by using the hot water in a 12 to 30 cup electric coffee urn. The cup on the urn tipped over and the baby
`was scalded over 30% of her body with second and third degree burns. The plaintiff, by her parents, sued the defendants sel... -
`from The New York Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (34060)
`$2,045,000 VERDICT - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - DEFECTIVE DESIGN OF "TILTING" KETTLE - MANUFACTURING
`DEFECT - INADEQUATE WARNINGS - HOT SOUP SPILLS ON PLAINTIFF CAUSING SECOND AND THIRD DEGREE
`BURNS.
`The plaintiff was employed at a restaurant/delicatessen where a 60-gallon "tilting" kettle of hot soup tilted and spilled onto his
`legs and feet, causing significant burn injuries. The defendants in the case included the manufacturer of the tilting industrial soup
`kettle as well as the company which installed and maintained the unit. The plaintiff asserted negligence claims as ... - from The
`Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (26841)
`$300,000 RECOVERY Products liability - Defective insect fogger - Use of flammable propellant - Fire - Burn injuries
`to leg.
`The female plaintiff contended that the defendant’s home insect fogger or roach bomb, marketed as "La Bomba," was
`defective because it utilized propane as a propellant. The plaintiff contended that alternative, non-flammable propellants were
`available and should have been utilized. The plaintiff related that she had turned off the pilot light for the top of her range, but not
`f... - from The New York Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (23395)
`$2,000,000 RECOVERY DURING TRIAL - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - SWEATER MADE OF COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL -
`SEVERE BURN INJURIES - PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION OF IMPORTED SWEATER AT ISSUE.
`This was a products liability action in which the female plaintiff in her mid-30’s contended that the sweater sold by the
`defendant retailer and distributed by the defendant importer, which was manufactured in mainland China, was defective because
`it was comprised of highly flammable material. The plaintiff contended that as a result, the sweater became engulfed in flames as
`sh... - from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (28187)
`$525,000 RECOVERY - FAILURE OF MALL TO MAINTAIN VESTIBULE AREA BETWEEN INNER AND OUTER DOORS
`- ELDERLY PLAINTIFF TRIPS ON BUCKLED CARPET SQUARE AND FALLS FORWARD - ENUCLEATION OF EYE -
`LOSS OF SENSE OF SMELL.
`In this action, the plaintiff, age 77 at the time of the incident and 80 at trial, contended that the defendant mall negligently failed to
`maintain the carpeting situated in the vestibule between the outer and inner doors. The plaintiff contended that the carpeting,
`which consisted of a series of carpet squares attached to the floor with adhesive material, frequently buckled, c... - from The New
`Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (32416)
`$170,000 RECOVERY Products Liability - Improper design of cooking brandy bottle - Bottle contains spout and
`handle which encourages pouring into pan - Failure to warn of potential flashback - Burns to upper torso.
`The male plaintiff, a chef in his mid-30’s, contended that after he removed a pan from the flame to pour brandy for flambee,
`a flashback occurred, causing an explosion within the bottle which resulted in second and third degree burns to the torso. The
`plaintiff maintained that the defendant had encouraged users to pour the brandy directly from the bottle into the pan by providi... -
`from The New Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (19595)
`$5,930,499 VERDICT - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - VOLKSWAGEN JETTA - DESIGN DEFECT - UNSAFE RESTRAINT
`SYSTEM - PARAPLEGIC INJURY SUFFERED BY 16-YEAR-OLD PLAINTIFF IN ROLLOVER ACCIDENT.
`This products liability action involved a minor male plaintiff, age 16 when he suffered paralysis at the T-8 level as a result of
`being ejected from a 1987 Volkswagen Jetta during a rollover accident. The vehicle was equipped with the VW passive restraint
`system consisting of a single strap attached to the door. The plaintiff’s cause of action, brought against the defendants Vo... -
`from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (29688)
`
`29
`
`30
`
`Home
`My Account
`Verdict Search
`Publish Your Case
`Publications & Services
`Expert Witnesses
`Subscribe Now
`http://www.jvra.com/expert/cases.aspx?ref=1532
`
`4/5
`
`

`

`FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2018 11:44 PM
`About Us
`5/22/2018
`InterCity Testing & Consulting Corporation
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 226
`FAQ
`Terms & Conditions
`Privacy Policy
`Trademarks
`Opt Out
`
`Copyright © 2018 Jury Verdict Review Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.
`
`INDEX NO. 21203/2014E
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2018
`
`http://www.jvra.com/expert/cases.aspx?ref=1532
`
`5/5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket