throbber
FILED: DUTCHESS COUNTY CLERK 01/31/2022 12:12 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 2022-50309
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Index No.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF DUTCHESS
`
`
`
`
`
`JOSEPH DENES,
`
`
`
`
`
`TWEE T. DO, M.D.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, Joseph Denes, by his attorneys, Dennis Kenny Law, as and for his Complaint,
`
`alleges as follows:
`
`1.
`
`At all times mentioned herein, plaintiff Joseph Denes was and is a resident of
`
`the county of Dutchess and state of New York.
`
`2.
`
`At all times mentioned herein, defendant Twee T. Do, M.D. is an Orthopedic
`
`Surgeon and with office located in the county of Dutchess and state of New York.
`
`3.
`
`On September 21, 2021 plaintiff Joseph Denes appeared for an independent
`
`medical examination to be conducted by defendant Twee T. Do, M.D. on behalf of a worker’s
`
`compensation carrier concerning a November 1, 2014 injury sustained to his left shoulder on
`
`November 1, 2014.
`
`4.
`
`During the course of plaintiff’s examination, Dr. Do did forcibly manipulate
`
`plaintiff’s left arm and forced the arm behind and in back of the head causing plaintiff to immediately
`
`suffer two (2) sharp excruciating pains, which injuries have left plaintiff with permanent damage to his
`
`left shoulder.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 of 3
`
`

`

`FILED: DUTCHESS COUNTY CLERK 01/31/2022 12:12 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 2022-50309
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2022
`
`5.
`
`As a result of defendant’s excessive force and battery, plaintiff sustained a new
`
`tear of the biceps tendon and a full thickness tear at repair site of plaintiff’s June 4, 2021 left shoulder
`
`rotator cuff revision surgery, which now requires a second revision surgery.
`
`6.
`
`The accident and events described herein resulted in serious permanent injuries
`
`to plaintiff and incurred without any negligence on the part of plaintiff contributing thereto.
`
`
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Negligence)
`
`7.
`
`Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1
`
`through 6 above as if more fully set forth herein.
`
`8.
`
`Defendant Twee T. Do, M.D. negligently, recklessly and carelessly caused
`
`injury to plaintiff.
`
`9.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of defendant’s negligence, plaintiff was caused
`
`to suffer injuries to his mind and body.
`
`10.
`
`By reason of the foregoing, plaintiff has been obligated for diverse sums of
`
`money for medical care and for property damage and will continue to incur such expenses into the
`
`future.
`
`11.
`
`By reason of the foregoing, plaintiff Joseph Denes sustained a limitation of
`
`activities, depression, loss of quality of life, and will continue to suffer and sustain such losses into the
`
`future.
`
`12.
`
`This action falls within one or more of the exceptions of the CPLR § 1601 as set
`
`forth in CPLR § 1602.
`
`13.
`
`By reason of the foregoing, plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be
`
`determined by a jury but in excess of the jurisdictional limits of this Court.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`2 of 3
`
`

`

`FILED: DUTCHESS COUNTY CLERK 01/31/2022 12:12 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 2022-50309
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2022
`
`
`
`SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Battery)
`
`14.
`
`Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1
`
`through 6 above as if more fully set forth herein.
`
`15.
`
`At all times mentioned herein, defendant Twee T. Do, M.D. during the course of
`
`plaintiff’s examination did forcibly take plaintiff’s arm and forced the arm behind and in back of the
`
`head and forced the arm behind the arm causing plaintiff to sustain two (2) sharp pains which has left
`
`him with permanent damage to his left shoulder.
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff did not consent to defendant’s use of extreme force and defendant
`
`battered plaintiff causing him to suffer serious physical harm.
`
`17.
`
`Defendant Twee T. Do, M.D. is liable for his battery on plaintiff in an amount to
`
`be determined by a jury but in excess of the jurisdictional limits of this Court.
`
`WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment against defendant as follows:
`
`(a)
`
`
`(b)
`
`
`(c)
`
`On the First Cause of Action in favor of the plaintiff for a sum to be determined by
`a jury;
`
`On the Second Cause of Action in favor of the plaintiff for a sum to be determined
`by a jury; and
`
`all of the foregoing with such interest, costs and disbursements as are appropriate to
`the action.
`
`
`Dated: Goshen, New York
`
`January 31, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TO: TWEE T. DO, M.D.
`
`389 Hooker Avenue, Suite #3
`
`Poughkeepsie, NY 12603
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DENNIS KENNY LAW
`
`
`
`By:
`s/ Evan M. Foulke
`Evan M. Foulke, Esq.
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`55 Main Street
`Goshen, NY 10924
`845-294-4308
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket