throbber
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INDEX NO.: 500608/2024
`
`
`AMENDED
`VERIFIED ANSWER
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF KINGS
`______________________________________________
`
`JANIS R. SMITH, as Executor of the Estate of
`SHELDON L. SMITH, deceased,
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`-against-
`
`MAIMONIDES HOSPITAL, HAYM SOLOMON
`HOME FOR THE AGED LLC, HAYM SOLOMON
`HOME FOR THE AGED LLC d/b/a HAYM SALOMON
`HOME FOR NURSING & REHABILITATION, CNH
`OPERATING, LLC, CNH OPERATING, LLC d/b/a
`THE CHATEAU AT BROOKLYN REHABILITATION
`AND NURSING CENTER, THE CHATEAU AT
`BROOKLYN REHABILITATION AND NURSING
`CENTER,
`
`
`Defendants.
`______________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER
`
`i/s/h/a MAIMONIDES
`
`HOSPITAL, by its attorneys, McALOON & FRIEDMAN, P.C., as and for its Amended
`
`Verified Answer to the Verified Complaint of the plaintiffs, respectfully alleges upon information
`
`and belief as follows:
`
`ANSWERING THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`1.
`
`Denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each
`
`and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,
`
`18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43,
`
`44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69,
`
`70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95,
`
`96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, of plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`1 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`2.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 5 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`ANSWERING THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`3.
`
`The answering defendant repeats and reiterates each and every denial or
`
`denial of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each of the allegations of the
`
`Complaint repeated and realleged by plaintiffs in Paragraph 106 of the Verified Complaint.
`
`4.
`
`Denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each
`
`and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 107, 108, 109, 110, 126, 111 and 112 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`ANSWERING THE THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`5.
`
`The answering defendant repeats and reiterates each and every denial or
`
`denial of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each of the allegations of the
`
`Complaint repeated and realleged by plaintiffs in Paragraph 113 of the Verified Complaint.
`
`6.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 114, 115, 116,
`
`117, 118, 119 and 120 of plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`ANSWERING THE FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`7.
`
`The answering defendant repeats and reiterates each and every denial or
`
`denial of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each of the allegations of the
`
`Complaint repeated and realleged by plaintiffs in Paragraph 121 of the Verified Complaint.
`
`8.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 122 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`2 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`9.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 123 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint except admits that defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, is/was
`
`a licensed New York State hospital corporation.
`
`10.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 126 and 127 of
`
`plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`11.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 130 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint and refers the question of “control” to the court.
`
`12.
`
`Denies in the form alleged each and every allegation set forth in
`
`Paragraphs 131 and 132 of plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`13.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 133 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint except admits that defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, is/was
`
`a licensed New York State hospital corporation.
`
`14.
`
`Admits each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 134 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint only as to the specific dates listed and denies as to all other dates “prior
`
`and/or subsequent thereto.”
`
`15.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 135, 136 and 137
`
`of plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint except admits that patient, SHELDON L. SMITH, was treated at
`
`defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, by qualified and competent healthcare
`
`professionals who met the standards of care.
`
`16.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 138, 139, 140,
`
`141 and 142 of plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`
`
`
`
`3 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`ANSWERING THE FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`17.
`
`The answering defendant repeats and reiterates each and every denial or
`
`denial of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each of the allegations of the
`
`Complaint repeated and realleged by plaintiffs in Paragraph 143 of the Verified Complaint.
`
`18.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 144, 145, 146,
`
`147, 148 and 149 of plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`19.
`
`The action is time-barred by the applicable statutes of limitations.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`20.
`
`The defendant’s liability, if any, is limited pursuant to CPLR §1600, et seq.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`21.
`
`Defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, does not maintain
`
`insurance for gross negligence.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`22.
`
`Plaintiffs fail to assert a valid cause of action for damages for gross
`
`negligence.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`23.
`
`Any verdict or judgment should be reduced by the amounts of past or
`
`future collateral source reimbursements of alleged special damage pursuant to CPLR §4545(c).
`
`
`
`
`
`4 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`24.
`
`Plaintiffs’ Fourth Cause of Action, if any, is barred pursuant to §2805-d of
`
`the Public Health Law to the extent that plaintiffs are or may be claiming lack of informed
`
`consent against defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER.
`
`AS AND FOR A SEVENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`25.
`
`Plaintiffs failed to mitigate damages.
`
`AS AND FOR A EIGHTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`26.
`
`If any one of the parties or non-parties settles with plaintiffs, defendant is
`
`entitled to an offset under G.O.L. §15-108.
`
`AS AND FOR A NINTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`27.
`
`The injuries and damages of the plaintiff, for which these causes of action
`
`have been instituted, were caused wholly or in part through the culpable conduct and
`
`contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff and therefore the amount of damages, if any, shall
`
`be diminished in the proportion which said conduct attributable to plaintiff bears to the
`
`defendant’s conduct, if any, which caused the damages.
`
`AS AND FOR AN TENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`28.
`
`The plaintiff’s right to recover damages is barred in whole or in part
`
`pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 26 USC Section 5000A.
`
`
`
`
`
`5 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`
`AS AND FOR A ELEVENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`29.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then these claims must be
`
`dismissed on the basis of the absolute and qualified immunities granted by Governor Cuomo’s
`
`March 7, 2020 and subsequent Executive Orders (“EO”), Article 30-D, §3082(2) of the Public
`
`Health Law [now known as the Emergency or Disaster Treatment Protection Act (“EDTPA”)]
`
`and Good Samaritan doctrine and laws.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWELFTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`30.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then these claims must be
`
`dismissed in whole or in part pursuant to the EDTPA, which affords absolute and/or qualified
`
`immunity from the allegations in the claims, including any claims that allegedly pre-date March
`
`7, 2020, as such claims are covered under the EDTPA and amount to allegations of staffing or
`
`resource shortage which is subject to an absolute immunity.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`31.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then these claims must be
`
`dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction, failure to comply with conditions precedent and the
`
`immunities granted by the PREP Act (42 U.S.C. §247d-6d).
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTHEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`32.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then the PREP Act
`
`provides for the exclusive remedy for these claims, which are subject to a “no fault” fund. This
`
`Court lacks jurisdiction over this matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`6 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`33.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then the defendant acted
`
`at all times within the proper standards of care generally, as well as the standards of care in place
`
`in the locality in question at the time of the COVID-19 emergency.
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`34.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then these claims are
`
`barred in whole or in part by the error in judgment doctrine and/or in the unprecedented and
`
`extenuating circumstances of COVID-19, which render the defendant’s judgment proper and
`
`within the standards of care concerning accepted medical practice generally and/or in place at the
`
`locality where the alleged acts or omissions occurred during the COVID-19 emergency.
`
`AS AND FOR AN SEVENTEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`35.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then the defendant
`
`followed Executive Orders, Federal mandates, as well as the guidance issued by the NY DOH,
`
`the CDC, the W.H.O., the federal COVID-19 task force and other state and federal agencies.
`
`AS AND FOR AN EIGHTEENTH, SEPARATE,
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`36.
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims regarding COVID-19, if any, are not subject to any
`
`community standard, due to the novel, evolving nature of COVID-19 at all relevant times, and
`
`the defendant was at all times practicing in conformity with all recommendations, guidelines and
`
`protocols.
`
`
`
`
`
`7 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A NINETEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`37.
`
`Defendant acted at all times within the proper standards of care generally,
`
`as well as the standards of care in place in the locality in question at the time of the COVID-19
`
`emergency.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTIETH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`38.
`
`The defendant followed Executive Orders, Federal mandates, as well as
`
`the guidance issued by the NY DOH, the CDC, the W.H.O., the federal COVID-19 task force
`
`and other state and federal agencies.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTIETH FIRST, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`39.
`
`The defendant is immune from civil liability pursuant to Executive Order
`
`202.10 and its progeny pursuant to PHL §3080.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTIETH SECOND, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`40.
`
`Plaintiffs lack the authority and capacity to have commenced and to
`
`prosecute this action.
`
`WHEREFORE, the answering defendant demands judgment dismissing plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint, together with the costs and disbursements of this action.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`McALOON & FRIEDMAN, P.C.
`
`By:_______________________________
`JULIANA CARAN
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER
`i/s/h/a MAIMONIDES HOSPITAL
`One State Street Plaza, 23rd Floor
`New York, NY 10004-1561
`Tel. (212) 732-8700
`
`8 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`ATTORNEY’S VERIFICATION
`
`
`
`)
`STATE OF NEW YORK
` : SS.:
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
`
`I, the undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice in the Courts of New York State, state
`
`that I am a member of the firm of McALOON & FRIEDMAN, P.C., attorneys of record for the
`
`defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, in the within action; I have read the
`
`foregoing ANSWER and know the contents thereof; the same is true to my own knowledge,
`
`except as to the matters therein alleged to be on information and belief, and as to those matters I
`
`believe it to be true. The reason this verification is made by me and not by defendant is because
`
`defendant resides outside the county where deponent maintains her office.
`
`The grounds of my belief as to all matters not stated upon my own knowledge are as
`
`follows: all records, reports and documents maintained by deponent in her file.
`
`I affirm that the foregoing statements are true, under the penalties of perjury.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`March 25, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
` JULIANA CARAN, ESQ.
`
`9 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`____________________________________________________________________________________________
` Index No.: 500608
`Year 2024
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF KINGS
`____________________________________________________________________________________________ _
`JANIS R. SMITH, as Executor of the Estate of SHELDON L. SMITH, deceased,
`
`
`-against-
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`MAIMONIDES HOSPITAL, HAYM SOLOMON HOME FOR THE AGED LLC, HAYM SOLOMON HOME
`FOR THE AGED LLC d/b/a HAYM SALOMON HOME FOR NURSING & REHABILITATION, CNH
`OPERATING, LLC, CNH OPERATING, LLC d/b/a THE CHATEAU AT BROOKLYN REHABILITATION AND
`NURSING CENTER, THE CHATEAU AT BROOKLYN REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER,
`
`
`Defendants.
`___________________________________________________________________________________________ __
`
`AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER
`_________________________________________________________________________________________ ____
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER i/s/h/a MAIMONIDES HOSPITAL
`Office and Post Office Address, Telephone
`One State Street Plaza, 23rd Floor
`New York, New York 10004-1561
`(212) 732-8700 (212) 227-2903
`___________________________________________________________________________________________ __
`Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, the undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice in the courts of New York State, certifies that, upon
`information and belief and reasonable inquiry, the contentions contained in the annexed document are not frivolous.
`Dated: March 25, 2024
`Signature:
`
`
`
`
`Print Signer’s Name: JULIANA CARAN
`
`___________________________________________________________________________________________ __
`To
`Attorney(s) for
`____________________________________________________________________________________________ _
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Service of a copy of the within
`Attorney(s) for
`
`
`
`Dated,
`
`
`___________________________________________________________________________________________ __
`Sir: - Please take notice
`[ ] Notice of Entry
`
`is hereby admitted.
`
`duly entered in the office of the clerk of the
`
`that the within is a (certified) true copy of a
`within named court on 20
`
`
`
`
`
`that an order
`to the HON.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of which the within is a true copy will be presented for settlement
` one of the judges of the within named court,
`
`at
`on 20 at M.
`
`
`
`Yours, etc.,
`
` [
`
` ] Notice of Settlement
`
`
`
`
`Dated,
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CETER
`Office and Post Office Address, Telephone
`One State Street Plaza, 23rd Floor
`New York, New York 10004-1561
`Tel. (212) 732-8700
`
`10 of 10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket