`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INDEX NO.: 500608/2024
`
`
`AMENDED
`VERIFIED ANSWER
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF KINGS
`______________________________________________
`
`JANIS R. SMITH, as Executor of the Estate of
`SHELDON L. SMITH, deceased,
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`-against-
`
`MAIMONIDES HOSPITAL, HAYM SOLOMON
`HOME FOR THE AGED LLC, HAYM SOLOMON
`HOME FOR THE AGED LLC d/b/a HAYM SALOMON
`HOME FOR NURSING & REHABILITATION, CNH
`OPERATING, LLC, CNH OPERATING, LLC d/b/a
`THE CHATEAU AT BROOKLYN REHABILITATION
`AND NURSING CENTER, THE CHATEAU AT
`BROOKLYN REHABILITATION AND NURSING
`CENTER,
`
`
`Defendants.
`______________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER
`
`i/s/h/a MAIMONIDES
`
`HOSPITAL, by its attorneys, McALOON & FRIEDMAN, P.C., as and for its Amended
`
`Verified Answer to the Verified Complaint of the plaintiffs, respectfully alleges upon information
`
`and belief as follows:
`
`ANSWERING THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`1.
`
`Denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each
`
`and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,
`
`18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43,
`
`44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69,
`
`70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95,
`
`96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, of plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`1 of 10
`
`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`2.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 5 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`ANSWERING THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`3.
`
`The answering defendant repeats and reiterates each and every denial or
`
`denial of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each of the allegations of the
`
`Complaint repeated and realleged by plaintiffs in Paragraph 106 of the Verified Complaint.
`
`4.
`
`Denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each
`
`and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 107, 108, 109, 110, 126, 111 and 112 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`ANSWERING THE THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`5.
`
`The answering defendant repeats and reiterates each and every denial or
`
`denial of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each of the allegations of the
`
`Complaint repeated and realleged by plaintiffs in Paragraph 113 of the Verified Complaint.
`
`6.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 114, 115, 116,
`
`117, 118, 119 and 120 of plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`ANSWERING THE FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`7.
`
`The answering defendant repeats and reiterates each and every denial or
`
`denial of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each of the allegations of the
`
`Complaint repeated and realleged by plaintiffs in Paragraph 121 of the Verified Complaint.
`
`8.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 122 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`2 of 10
`
`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`9.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 123 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint except admits that defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, is/was
`
`a licensed New York State hospital corporation.
`
`10.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 126 and 127 of
`
`plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`11.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 130 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint and refers the question of “control” to the court.
`
`12.
`
`Denies in the form alleged each and every allegation set forth in
`
`Paragraphs 131 and 132 of plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`13.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 133 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint except admits that defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, is/was
`
`a licensed New York State hospital corporation.
`
`14.
`
`Admits each and every allegation set forth in Paragraph 134 of plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint only as to the specific dates listed and denies as to all other dates “prior
`
`and/or subsequent thereto.”
`
`15.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 135, 136 and 137
`
`of plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint except admits that patient, SHELDON L. SMITH, was treated at
`
`defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, by qualified and competent healthcare
`
`professionals who met the standards of care.
`
`16.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 138, 139, 140,
`
`141 and 142 of plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`
`
`
`
`3 of 10
`
`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`ANSWERING THE FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`17.
`
`The answering defendant repeats and reiterates each and every denial or
`
`denial of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each of the allegations of the
`
`Complaint repeated and realleged by plaintiffs in Paragraph 143 of the Verified Complaint.
`
`18.
`
`Denies each and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 144, 145, 146,
`
`147, 148 and 149 of plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`19.
`
`The action is time-barred by the applicable statutes of limitations.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`20.
`
`The defendant’s liability, if any, is limited pursuant to CPLR §1600, et seq.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`21.
`
`Defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, does not maintain
`
`insurance for gross negligence.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`22.
`
`Plaintiffs fail to assert a valid cause of action for damages for gross
`
`negligence.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`23.
`
`Any verdict or judgment should be reduced by the amounts of past or
`
`future collateral source reimbursements of alleged special damage pursuant to CPLR §4545(c).
`
`
`
`
`
`4 of 10
`
`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`24.
`
`Plaintiffs’ Fourth Cause of Action, if any, is barred pursuant to §2805-d of
`
`the Public Health Law to the extent that plaintiffs are or may be claiming lack of informed
`
`consent against defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER.
`
`AS AND FOR A SEVENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`25.
`
`Plaintiffs failed to mitigate damages.
`
`AS AND FOR A EIGHTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`26.
`
`If any one of the parties or non-parties settles with plaintiffs, defendant is
`
`entitled to an offset under G.O.L. §15-108.
`
`AS AND FOR A NINTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`27.
`
`The injuries and damages of the plaintiff, for which these causes of action
`
`have been instituted, were caused wholly or in part through the culpable conduct and
`
`contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff and therefore the amount of damages, if any, shall
`
`be diminished in the proportion which said conduct attributable to plaintiff bears to the
`
`defendant’s conduct, if any, which caused the damages.
`
`AS AND FOR AN TENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`28.
`
`The plaintiff’s right to recover damages is barred in whole or in part
`
`pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 26 USC Section 5000A.
`
`
`
`
`
`5 of 10
`
`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`
`AS AND FOR A ELEVENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`29.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then these claims must be
`
`dismissed on the basis of the absolute and qualified immunities granted by Governor Cuomo’s
`
`March 7, 2020 and subsequent Executive Orders (“EO”), Article 30-D, §3082(2) of the Public
`
`Health Law [now known as the Emergency or Disaster Treatment Protection Act (“EDTPA”)]
`
`and Good Samaritan doctrine and laws.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWELFTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`30.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then these claims must be
`
`dismissed in whole or in part pursuant to the EDTPA, which affords absolute and/or qualified
`
`immunity from the allegations in the claims, including any claims that allegedly pre-date March
`
`7, 2020, as such claims are covered under the EDTPA and amount to allegations of staffing or
`
`resource shortage which is subject to an absolute immunity.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`31.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then these claims must be
`
`dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction, failure to comply with conditions precedent and the
`
`immunities granted by the PREP Act (42 U.S.C. §247d-6d).
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTHEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`32.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then the PREP Act
`
`provides for the exclusive remedy for these claims, which are subject to a “no fault” fund. This
`
`Court lacks jurisdiction over this matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`6 of 10
`
`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`33.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then the defendant acted
`
`at all times within the proper standards of care generally, as well as the standards of care in place
`
`in the locality in question at the time of the COVID-19 emergency.
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`34.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then these claims are
`
`barred in whole or in part by the error in judgment doctrine and/or in the unprecedented and
`
`extenuating circumstances of COVID-19, which render the defendant’s judgment proper and
`
`within the standards of care concerning accepted medical practice generally and/or in place at the
`
`locality where the alleged acts or omissions occurred during the COVID-19 emergency.
`
`AS AND FOR AN SEVENTEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`35.
`
`If there is any impact or effect from COVID-19, then the defendant
`
`followed Executive Orders, Federal mandates, as well as the guidance issued by the NY DOH,
`
`the CDC, the W.H.O., the federal COVID-19 task force and other state and federal agencies.
`
`AS AND FOR AN EIGHTEENTH, SEPARATE,
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`36.
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims regarding COVID-19, if any, are not subject to any
`
`community standard, due to the novel, evolving nature of COVID-19 at all relevant times, and
`
`the defendant was at all times practicing in conformity with all recommendations, guidelines and
`
`protocols.
`
`
`
`
`
`7 of 10
`
`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A NINETEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`37.
`
`Defendant acted at all times within the proper standards of care generally,
`
`as well as the standards of care in place in the locality in question at the time of the COVID-19
`
`emergency.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTIETH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`38.
`
`The defendant followed Executive Orders, Federal mandates, as well as
`
`the guidance issued by the NY DOH, the CDC, the W.H.O., the federal COVID-19 task force
`
`and other state and federal agencies.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTIETH FIRST, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`39.
`
`The defendant is immune from civil liability pursuant to Executive Order
`
`202.10 and its progeny pursuant to PHL §3080.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTIETH SECOND, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`40.
`
`Plaintiffs lack the authority and capacity to have commenced and to
`
`prosecute this action.
`
`WHEREFORE, the answering defendant demands judgment dismissing plaintiffs’
`
`Verified Complaint, together with the costs and disbursements of this action.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`McALOON & FRIEDMAN, P.C.
`
`By:_______________________________
`JULIANA CARAN
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER
`i/s/h/a MAIMONIDES HOSPITAL
`One State Street Plaza, 23rd Floor
`New York, NY 10004-1561
`Tel. (212) 732-8700
`
`8 of 10
`
`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`ATTORNEY’S VERIFICATION
`
`
`
`)
`STATE OF NEW YORK
` : SS.:
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
`
`I, the undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice in the Courts of New York State, state
`
`that I am a member of the firm of McALOON & FRIEDMAN, P.C., attorneys of record for the
`
`defendant, MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, in the within action; I have read the
`
`foregoing ANSWER and know the contents thereof; the same is true to my own knowledge,
`
`except as to the matters therein alleged to be on information and belief, and as to those matters I
`
`believe it to be true. The reason this verification is made by me and not by defendant is because
`
`defendant resides outside the county where deponent maintains her office.
`
`The grounds of my belief as to all matters not stated upon my own knowledge are as
`
`follows: all records, reports and documents maintained by deponent in her file.
`
`I affirm that the foregoing statements are true, under the penalties of perjury.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`March 25, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
` JULIANA CARAN, ESQ.
`
`9 of 10
`
`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/25/2024 10:00 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 500608/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/25/2024
`
`____________________________________________________________________________________________
` Index No.: 500608
`Year 2024
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF KINGS
`____________________________________________________________________________________________ _
`JANIS R. SMITH, as Executor of the Estate of SHELDON L. SMITH, deceased,
`
`
`-against-
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`MAIMONIDES HOSPITAL, HAYM SOLOMON HOME FOR THE AGED LLC, HAYM SOLOMON HOME
`FOR THE AGED LLC d/b/a HAYM SALOMON HOME FOR NURSING & REHABILITATION, CNH
`OPERATING, LLC, CNH OPERATING, LLC d/b/a THE CHATEAU AT BROOKLYN REHABILITATION AND
`NURSING CENTER, THE CHATEAU AT BROOKLYN REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER,
`
`
`Defendants.
`___________________________________________________________________________________________ __
`
`AMENDED VERIFIED ANSWER
`_________________________________________________________________________________________ ____
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER i/s/h/a MAIMONIDES HOSPITAL
`Office and Post Office Address, Telephone
`One State Street Plaza, 23rd Floor
`New York, New York 10004-1561
`(212) 732-8700 (212) 227-2903
`___________________________________________________________________________________________ __
`Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, the undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice in the courts of New York State, certifies that, upon
`information and belief and reasonable inquiry, the contentions contained in the annexed document are not frivolous.
`Dated: March 25, 2024
`Signature:
`
`
`
`
`Print Signer’s Name: JULIANA CARAN
`
`___________________________________________________________________________________________ __
`To
`Attorney(s) for
`____________________________________________________________________________________________ _
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Service of a copy of the within
`Attorney(s) for
`
`
`
`Dated,
`
`
`___________________________________________________________________________________________ __
`Sir: - Please take notice
`[ ] Notice of Entry
`
`is hereby admitted.
`
`duly entered in the office of the clerk of the
`
`that the within is a (certified) true copy of a
`within named court on 20
`
`
`
`
`
`that an order
`to the HON.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of which the within is a true copy will be presented for settlement
` one of the judges of the within named court,
`
`at
`on 20 at M.
`
`
`
`Yours, etc.,
`
` [
`
` ] Notice of Settlement
`
`
`
`
`Dated,
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CETER
`Office and Post Office Address, Telephone
`One State Street Plaza, 23rd Floor
`New York, New York 10004-1561
`Tel. (212) 732-8700
`
`10 of 10
`
`