throbber
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/27/2023 12:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17
`
`INDEX NO. 504555/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2023
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF KINGS
`-------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`SEAN GERTY,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`
`
`ELVA LIN and CHRISTINE PAOLOLLO,
`
`
`Index No.: 504555/2023
`
`
`
`RESPONSE TO DEMAND
`FOR VERIFIED BILL OF
`PARTICULARS AS TO
`DEFENDANT’S
`AFFIRMATIVE DFENSES
`
`Defendants,
`-------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`Defendant, CHRISTINE PAOLILLO i/s/g/a CHRISTINE PAOLOLLO, by her
`
`attorneys, THE LAW OFFICE OF ERIC D. FELDMAN, as and for its response to plaintiff’s
`
`Demand for Verified bill of Particulars as to Affirmative Defenses dated August 27, 2023, states
`
`the following, upon information and belief:
`
`
`
`1.
`
`The acts and/or omissions which the defendant claims were the contributory
`
`negligence, assumption of risk, culpable conduct, negligence, carelessness and recklessness of the
`
`plaintiff, SEAN GERTY, consisted of one or some of the acts as hereinafter alleged: The plaintiff
`
`acted negligently, reckless and carelessly in acting in a manner inconsistent with the actions of a
`
`reasonable person; if in fact the incident occurred in the manner described by the plaintiff, said
`
`plaintiff acted negligently, recklessly and carelessly in failing to pay adequate attention to the
`
`roadway upon which he was traveling; the plaintiff acted negligently, recklessly and carelessly in
`
`failing to see what was there to be seen; negligence, carelessness and recklessness: in the ownership,
`
`operation, management and control of the motor vehicle; in following too closely; in failing to keep
`
`the vehicle under proper, prudent and reasonable control; in operating the said motor vehicle at an
`
`excessive and unlawful rate of speed under the conditions and circumstances prevailing at or prior
`
`to the said occurrence; in failing to keep a proper lookout; in failing to see; in failing to observe the
`
`1 of 5
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/27/2023 12:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17
`
`INDEX NO. 504555/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2023
`
`roadway; in failing to observe the other motor vehicle; in failing to stop; in failing to apply the
`
`brakes; in failing to give any sign, signal or warning of the approach of their motor vehicle
`
`
`
`2. CPLR §4545 (c) specifically provides that in actions for personal
`
`injury where the plaintiff seeks to recover for the cost of medical care, dental care, loss of
`
`earnings or other economic loss, if the Court finds that any such cost or expense was or will, with
`
`reasonable certainty, be replaced or indemnified from any collateral source, it shall reduce the
`
`amount of award by such finding, minus an amount equal to the premiums paid by the plaintiff
`
`for such benefits for the two year period immediately preceding the accrual of such action and
`
`minus an amount equal to the projected future cost to the plaintiff of maintaining such benefits.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`Answering defendant object to plaintiff’s demand for affirmative defense
`
`with respect to CPLR Article 16 on the ground that it is plaintiff’s burden of proof to set forth the
`
`exception applicable to said Section and calls for a legal conclusion. Without waiving said
`
`objection, defendants allege that should either defendant be found less than 50% culpable, that
`
`defendants will only be responsible for the amount of non-economic damages in proportion to
`
`their determined negligence, if any. This defendant believes she has no culpability.
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Answering defendant objects to this demand as it goes beyond the scope
`
`of CPLR 3043 and is in the form of an improper interrogatory request.
`
`
`
`5.
`
`Plaintiff failed to take all steps to mitigate damages by not receiving
`
`proper and necessary medical care; in not doing everything that doctors and therapists told him
`
`to do; in not seeing doctors and therapists with the frequency that they requested; in not doing
`
`the exercises and follow the instructions given to him by his doctors and therapists; in not taking
`
`all of the medication that he was told to take; in not resting and staying off his feet as directed by
`
`his physicians and therapists; alternatively, by seeing his physicians and therapists an excessive
`
`2 of 5
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/27/2023 12:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17
`
`INDEX NO. 504555/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2023
`
`amount of time over an excessive period of time and by not doing everything that he could have
`
`done to reduce any special damages or the continuing and permanency of any injuries claimed by
`
`plaintiff.
`
`
`
`6.
`
`Information responsive to this demand cannot be determined until the
`
`completion of further discovery.
`
`
`
`7.
`
`Information responsive to this demand cannot be determined until the
`
`completion of further discovery.
`
`
`
`
`
`8.
`
`If it is contended the motor vehicle in which the plaintiff was an occupant
`
`and was equipped with a seat belt and/or restraining device. The failure of the plaintiff to wear a
`
`seatbelt was a direct and proximate cause of all injuries as alleged in the plaintiff’s Bill of
`
`Particulars; the failure of said plaintiff to utilize the seatbelt in the vehicle in which the plaintiff
`
`was riding let to plaintiff getting thrown forward and/or to the sides of the vehicle and sustaining
`
`the alleged injuries. The utilization of the seat belts would have precluded and prevented the
`
`plaintiff from sustaining said injuries; the plaintiff failed to use and/or misused available
`
`seatbelts in that he was not utilized in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommended
`
`procedure; had he been utilized in a proper, prudent and/or reasonable manner, the alleged
`
`injuries of the plaintiff would have been substantially reduced or eliminated.
`
`
`
`9.
`
`Information responsive to this demand cannot be determined until the
`
`completion of further discovery.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3 of 5
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/27/2023 12:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17
`
`INDEX NO. 504555/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2023
`
`
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that defendant, CHRISTINE PAOLILLO i/s/g/a
`
`CHRISTINE PAOLOLLO reserves its rights to supplement or amend this response, up to and
`
`including the date set for trial of the within action.
`
`Yours, etc.
`
`The Law Office Of
`ERIC D. FELDMAN
`
`
`
`_____________________________________
`By: EMMA HICKS PEARCE
`Attorneys for Defendant
`CHRISTINE PAOLILLO i/s/g/a
`CHRISTINE PAOLOLLO
`Mailing Address1
`P.O. Box 2903
`Hartford, CT 06104-2903
`T: (917) 778-6600
`F: (877) 890-1328
`Matter No.: 2023039451
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`October 27, 2023
`
`
`
`
`TO:
`
`JAMES J. BROWN, ESQ.
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`177 Beach 116th Street – Suite 4
`Rockaway Park, New York 11694
`862-258-0844
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Office Address: 485 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10017
`
`4 of 5
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/27/2023 12:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17
`
`INDEX NO. 504555/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2023
`
`JAMES G. BILELLO & ASSOCIATES
`Attorneys for Defendant
`ELVA LIN
`1400 Old Country Road, Suite 201
`Westbury, New York 11590
`(516) 861-1781
`Stuthill@geico.com
`File No.: 23-0026860
`Claim No.: 0599279060101019
`
`5 of 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket