throbber
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF KINGS
`------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`LYDIA ALVAREZ,
`
` Plaintiff,
` -against-
`
`THE CITY OF NEW YORK,
`
` Defendant.
`------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`
`
`
` SUMMONS
`
`
`
` Index No.
`
` Venue Pursuant to CPLR Sec. 504 (3)
`
`
`TO: The Defendant:
`
`
`
`You are hereby summoned to answer the complaint in this action, and to serve a copy of
`
`your answer or, if the complaint is not served with this summons, to serve a notice of appearance
`
`on the Plaintiff’s attorneys within twenty (20) days after the service of this summons exclusive
`
`of the day of service where service is made by delivery upon you personally within the state, or
`
`within thirty (30) days after completion of service where service is made in any other manner. In
`
`case of your failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the
`
`relief demanded in the complaint.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`April 24, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants’ Addresses:
`
`
`THE CITY OF NEW YORK,
`100 Church Street
`New York, New York 10007
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yours, etc.
`
`LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW J. CARBOY LLC
`
`By:____________________
`
`ANDREW J. CARBOY
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`One Liberty Plaza
`
`23rd floor
`New York, New York 10006
`(212) 520-7565
`
`
`
`2
`
`2 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF KINGS
`------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`LYDIA ALVAREZ,
`
` Plaintiff,
` -against-
`
`THE CITY OF NEW YORK,
`
` Defendant.
`------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`
`
`
`
` VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
` Index No.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, LYDIA ALVAREZ (“Ms. Alvarez” or “Plaintiff”), by her attorneys, LAW
`
`OFFICES OF ANDREW J. CARBOY LLC, as and for her Verified Complaint, at all times
`
`hereinafter mentioned, and upon information and belief, alleges as follows
`
`Introduction
`
`1. This is Plaintiff’s verified complaint against defendant THE CITY OF NEW
`
`YORK (“CITY”) (“defendant”).
`
`2. Plaintiff brings this action for damages for: A) severe and permanent personal
`
`injuries including, but not limited to: injuries to her left arm, including fractures of the radius,
`
`ulna and olecranon, among other fractures, and fractures to her other extremities; open reduction
`
`and internal fixation under general anesthesia; need for rehabilitation, occupational and physical
`
`therapy; pain and suffering; other injuries; loss of enjoyment of life; loss of range of motion and
`
`sensation; confinement; and permanent disability; and B) resulting economic loss, including out
`
`of pocket medical and associated costs, as well as the obligation to repay a substantial healthcare
`
`lien, all sustained in consequence of the affirmative negligence and negligence of defendant
`
`CITY in its ownership, design, lease, inspection, management, construction, installation,
`
`3 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`maintenance, repair and operation, of a public sidewalk, tree well and walking surfaces located
`
`on 36th Street, Brooklyn, New York.
`
`3. Upon information and belief, the incident occurred in or at a tree well located along
`
`the sidewalk of 36th Street, Brooklyn, New York in front of the property known as 454 36th
`
`Street, a location between 4th and 5th Avenues
`
`4. Plaintiff is a resident of Brooklyn, New York.
`
`5. This claim concerns the ownership, design, lease, inspection, management,
`
`construction, installation, maintenance, repair and operation of a tree well and walking surfaces
`
`located on 36th Street, Brooklyn, New York, located adjacent to the sidewalk at the address, set
`
`forth above.
`
`6. Administrative Code of the City of New York § 7–210(a) places the duty to maintain a
`
`sidewalk in a reasonably safe condition on the owner of the property abutting the sidewalk, and
`
`provides for civil liability for injuries proximately caused by the failure to so maintain the sidewalk.
`
`However, the statute does not extend that duty of maintenance to City-owned tree wells or provide
`
`for civil liability for injuries occurring in City-owned tree wells. The subject tree well is owned by
`
`defendant CITY and defendant CITY is responsible for Ms. Alvarez’ injuries resulting from the
`
`dangerous and defective condition of the subject tree well.
`
`7. Defendant CITY was also affirmatively negligent in bringing about the defect, as set
`
`forth below.
`
`8. As more fully detailed below, on February 4, 2020, at approximately 1:00 p.m.,
`
`while lawfully present on a public sidewalk on 36th Street, between 4th and 5th Avenues,
`
`Brooklyn, New York, and through no fault of her own, Ms. Alvarez was caused to fall and
`
`
`
`2
`
`4 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`sustain serious and permanent personal injuries as a result of the affirmative negligence and
`
`negligence of defendant CITY, its agents, servants, and/or employees.
`
`9.
`
` On February 4, 2020, at approximately 1:00 p.m., Ms. Alvarez was lawfully
`
`walking on the aforementioned sidewalk. At the location described and set forth above, and
`
`depicted in the photograph, below, she tripped because of a tree well, rectangular in shape, that is
`
`not flush or level with the adjacent sidewalk.
`
`10. The dirt or soil surrounding the tree in the tree well is below the level of the
`
`adjacent sidewalk. This is hazardous.
`
`11.
`
` The tree well has no fence, barricade, in place barrier or other barrier to prevent
`
`inadvertent walking at that location. These conditions, too, are hazardous
`
`12.
`
` Further, the tree well lacks stonework, grating or other features to make it flush or
`
`level with the adjacent sidewalk. The defective aspect of the tree well is an at least two-inch
`
`vertical “edge”, presenting a tripping or stumbling hazard to pedestrians walking by it.
`
`13. The hazardous aspects of the tree well, described above, are further disguised or
`
`hidden by accumulations of loose leaves, litter or even heavy rainfall or drainage.
`
`14. The defect is not readily apparent. Unless one is looking down at her feet, while
`
`walking a pedestrian could not appreciate, in advance of approaching the tree well, that it
`
`presented a height differential along its borders.
`
`15. No reasonable pedestrian expects such a “step down” (and a manmade one at that)
`
`just along the edge of the walking surface of the sidewalk, well away from the curb of the
`
`roadway.
`
`16. There were no warnings or markings to alert Ms. Alvarez of the defect.
`
`
`
`3
`
`5 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`17. The defective and dangerous condition of the tree well, resulting from the
`
`negligence of defendant CITY, caused Ms. Alvarez to fall very hard and sustain fractures and
`
`other permanent injuries.
`
`18.
`
` The tree well presented a hazard to pedestrians, caused the Plaintiff to fall, and its
`
`creation and condition, at the time of the incident and well before, were negligent.
`
`19. The subject fall took place on what defendant CITY knew and should have known
`
`was a walking surface.
`
`20. Walking surfaces at the subject location were hazardous and caused Ms. Alvarez to
`
`fall.
`
`21. The defect impeded her safe passage across a walking surface. Plaintiff, like other
`
`pedestrians, had no reason to suspect or expect that such a tripping hazard would exist in her
`
`pathway.
`
`22. At the subject location, defendant was affirmatively negligent in bringing about the
`
`defect (tripping hazard).
`
`23. Defendant was further negligent in failing to address and/or correct the defect,
`
`including leveling the surface of the tree well, through a variety of means so that it became flush
`
`or even with adjacent sidewalk flags and surfaces.
`
`24. Defendant was also negligent in failing to warn of the existence of the defect.
`
`25.
`
` The existence of the defect was a longstanding condition.
`
`26. Defendant CITY knew or should have known of the existence of the defect.
`
`27.
`
` Defendant CITY knew, by virtue of its creation of the defect, of its existence.
`
`28.
`
` Defendant CITY remains responsible for the injuries sustained by Plaintiff as it
`
`had actual written notice of the hazardous condition detailed herein in the form of previous
`
`
`
`4
`
`6 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`claims or a claim and/or written complaints or inspection or repair records and/or written
`
`acknowledgement of the hazard, and failed to make repairs within fifteen (15) days of such
`
`notice. (New York City Code Sec. 7-201).
`
`29. Defendant CITY received formal written notice of the sunken, hazardous and/or
`
`defective tree well, described above, nearly seventeen (17) years before Ms. Alvarez’ fall.
`
`30. On the 14th day of November 2003 (November 14, 2003), a map and legend, copies
`
`of which are annexed hereto as Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1 were filed with the New York City
`
`Department of Transportation at Volume 6A, page 22 for the County of Kings. (Exhibit 1) This
`
`filing provided actual written notice of the hazardous condition at the location of Ms. Alvarez’
`
`fall.
`
`31. Plaintiff does not contend or concede that prior written notice of hazardous
`
`conditions concerning tree wells are required.
`
`32. On February 4, 2020 the subject location was a public thoroughfare.
`
`33. On February 4, 2020 the subject location was a public sidewalk.
`
`34. On February 4, 2020 the subject tree remained the obligation of defendant CITY to
`
`install, maintain, inspect and repair.
`
`35. Administrative Code of the City of New York § 7–210, which became effective
`
`September 14, 2003, shifted tort liability for injuries arising from a defective sidewalk from the
`
`City to the abutting property owner (see Vucetovic v. Epsom Downs, Inc., 10 N.Y.3d 517, 521,
`
`860 N.Y.S.2d 429, 890 N.E.2d 191). However, a tree well does not fall within the applicable
`
`Administrative Code definition of “sidewalk,” and thus, “section 7–210 does not impose civil
`
`liability on property owners for injuries that occur in city-owned tree wells” Iskhakbayev v Casol
`
`
`
`5
`
`7 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`Realty, LLC, 183 AD3d 706, 707 [2d Dept 2020] The civil liability remains that of defendant
`
`CITY.
`
`36. A photograph of the subject location, including the location of the Plaintiff’s fall
`
`and tree well, with defect, appears below:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`37. The defect is approximately several inches in depth when compared to adjacent
`
`sidewalk walking surfaces.
`
`
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`38. At all relevant times, Ms. Alvarez was, and continues to be, a resident of Brooklyn,
`
`New York.
`
`
`
`6
`
`8 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`39. At all relevant times, defendant CITY was and still is a municipal corporation, duly
`
`organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York.
`
`40. Prior to the commencement of this action, and on December 16, 2020 the Plaintiff
`
`filed with the CITY a written, verified Notice of Claim setting forth the time when and the
`
`location where the accident, which is the subject of this lawsuit, occurred, including the nature
`
`and extent of the injuries and damages sustained, and the amount claimed.
`
`41. Such claim was presented within ninety (90) days from the date of the occurrence as
`
`follows. This Notice of Claim was filed within ninety (90) days of the subject incident (February
`
`4, 2020) as a result of Governor Cuomo’s Executive Order 202.8, which tolled statutes of
`
`limitation and time limits for conditions precedent as of March 20, 2020 and forward, and
`
`subsequent Executive Orders, including Order 202.67, which further extended the tolls up to and
`
`including November 3, 2020.
`
`42. On or about March 1, 2021, defendant CITY conducted a statutory hearing pursuant
`
`to General Municipal Law Section 50-h.
`
`43. More than thirty (30) days have elapsed since the presentation of said claim, and the
`
`defendant, CITY, has not adjusted the same and has failed and neglected to make any payment of
`
`such claim and cause of action.
`
`44. This action is being commenced within one year and ninety days from the date of
`
`the occurrence.
`
`45. Defendant CITY remains responsible for the injuries sustained by Plaintiff as it had
`
`actual written notice of the hazardous condition detailed herein in the form of previous claims or
`
`a claim and/or written complaints or
`
`inspection or
`
`repair
`
`records and/or written
`
`
`
`7
`
`9 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`acknowledgement of the hazard, and failed to make repairs within fifteen (15) days of such
`
`notice. (New York City Code Sec. 7-201).
`
`46. Defendant CITY is also responsible for the injuries sustained by Plaintiff as it was
`
`affirmatively negligent in bringing about the hazard that caused her to trip and fall.
`
`47. Upon information and believe, the defendant CITY negligently created the hazard at
`
`issue, and/or had prior notice, in writing, of the defective condition. Plaintiff further alleges that
`
`CITY was negligent, careless and reckless in its ownership, operation, maintenance, repair and
`
`control of the aforesaid tree well in violation of the New York City Administrative Code §19-
`
`152 and §7-210 and the New York City Charter §2904. Because the defect at issue is not
`
`technically part of any sidewalk and was brought about by affirmative negligence and the other
`
`reasons set forth above, defendant CITY is absolutely liable for the existence of this hazardous
`
`condition irrespective of its receipt of prior written notice or the involvement of its contractors.
`
`48. At all relevant times, defendant CITY, through its agents, servants, contractors
`
`and/or employees was careless, reckless and negligent in its supervision, management, control,
`
`construction, excavation and repair of the tree well and walking path in the subject location.
`
`49. On February 4, 2020, defendant CITY owned the aforedescribed location, including
`
`the tree well.
`
`50. On February 4, 2020, defendant CITY operated the aforedescribed location,
`
`including the tree well.
`
`51. On February 4, 2020, defendant CITY controlled the aforedescribed location,
`
`including the tree well.
`
`52. On February 4, 2020, defendant CITY maintained the aforedescribed location,
`
`including the tree well.
`
`
`
`8
`
`10 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`53. On February 4, 2020, defendant CITY managed the aforedescribed location,
`
`including the tree well.
`
`54. Prior to February 4, 2020, defendant CITY repaired the aforedescribed location,
`
`including the tree well.
`
`55. On February 4, 2020, defendant CITY controlled the aforedescribed location,
`
`including the tree well.
`
`56. On February 4, 2020, and prior thereto, the defendant, CITY, carelessly,
`
`negligently, and recklessly permitted the aforedescribed location to become and remain in a
`
`defective, dangerous, and hazardous condition.
`
`57. On February 4, 2020, and prior thereto, defendant CITY caused and created the
`
`aforesaid location to become and remain in a defective, hazardous, and dangerous condition.
`
`58. On February 4, 2020, and prior thereto, defendant CITY inspected the aforesaid
`
`location.
`
`59. This claim arises from the carelessness, recklessness, affirmative negligence and
`
`negligence of defendant CITY in its supervision, management, maintenance, control,
`
`construction and repair of the subject location.
`
`60. Because of the negligence, affirmative negligence, conduct, acts and omissions of
`
`the defendant, the walking surfaces and/or locations reasonably anticipated to be used by
`
`pedestrians became unsafe. Plaintiff, a pedestrian, was caused to trip and fall on a walking
`
`surface because of a hazard generated and/or produced by and/or associated with the actions and
`
`inactions of defendant CITY.
`
`
`
`9
`
`11 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`61.
`
` As a reasonable pedestrian, Ms. Alvarez had every expectation that the tree well
`
`was a safe walking surface, and that walking surfaces on the sidewalk and adjacent to it, save for
`
`the transition from curb to roadway, were flat, level, safe and traversable.
`
`62. Upon information and believe, the defendant CITY negligently created the hazard at
`
`issue, and/or had prior notice, in writing, of the defective condition. The trap-like condition
`
`could only have resulted from improperly performed tree well maintenance, failure to maintain
`
`or install grating/stonework and/or soil to bring the tree well level with the adjacent sidewalk,
`
`and failure to coordinate and/or be aware of sidewalk repairs that impacted upon the safety of the
`
`tree well. Defendant CITY was also negligent in failing to fence and/or barricade the tree well.
`
`63. Defendant CITY had actual written notice of the hazardous condition detailed
`
`herein in the form of previous claims or a claim and/or written complaints or inspection or repair
`
`records and/or written acknowledgement of the hazard, and failed to make repairs within fifteen
`
`(15) days of such notice. (New York City Code Sec. 7-201).
`
`
`
`64. Defendant CITY is also responsible for the injuries sustained by Ms. Alvarez as it
`
`was affirmatively negligent in bringing about the hazard that caused her to trip and fall.
`
`65. The incident, described above, occurred as a result of the negligence and
`
`carelessness of defendant CITY in the construction, modification, alteration, inspection,
`
`maintenance, operation, management and repair of the subject tree well in that defendant CITY:
`
`failed to provide Ms. Alvarez with a reasonably safe walking surface; failed to maintain and
`
`operate an appropriate and safe tree well; failed to design and construct the tree well in a reliable
`
`and safe manner; failed to warn Ms. Alvarez, and others like her, of defects known to it and/or
`
`created by it; failed to repair, correct and/or ameliorate the deteriorated and/or dangerous
`
`conditions existing at the time of the subject incident and well before; engaged in affirmative
`
`
`
`10
`
`12 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`negligence and creating a hazard, such as improperly filling the tree well, and failing to provide
`
`it with fencing, barricades, stonework, grating, sufficient soil and other features to make it flush
`
`and/or level with adjacent walking surfaces so as to not present a tripping hazard; failed to repair,
`
`correct and/or ameliorate the deteriorated conditions existing at the time of the subject incident
`
`and well before after receiving actual and written notice of the defect; in ignoring written notice
`
`of the defect; in failing to communicate with other branches of government and authorities
`
`concerning known conditions of the location; in failing to warn pedestrians of the dangers of the
`
`condition through means such as cones and saw horses or a traffic cone placed above and/or
`
`around the defect; allowed, permitted and/or created a hazardous and trap-like condition to exist
`
`at the subject location; allowed, permitted and/or created a hazardous location to exist adjacent to
`
`walking surfaces, endangering pedestrians; failed to maintain and repair its tree well so that there
`
`were not sudden, abrupt and hazardous changes in height differential(s); failed to provide
`
`pedestrians with a safe way to walk along 36th Street at the subject location; provided
`
`pedestrians with an unreasonably hazardous means of traveling upon 36th Street at the subject
`
`location; failed to inspect the subject location; failed to barricade the subject location; failed to
`
`warn pedestrians, including Ms. Alvarez, of the hazard; failed to heed inspection reports
`
`describing defects at the subject location; failed to maintain the subject location in a reasonable
`
`and accepted manner; failed to employ and deploy an adequate number of trained personnel to
`
`inspect and repair the tree well; failed to prevent injury to the Ms. Alvarez; and failed to design
`
`and construct the subject tree well in a reliable and safe manner.
`
`66. These acts and omissions of negligence and recklessness brought about the claimed
`
`injuries and damages.
`
`
`
`11
`
`13 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`67. These acts and omissions of negligence and recklessness brought about the claimed
`
`injuries and damages.
`
`68. The acts and omissions describe above constitute negligence on the part of
`
`defendants and caused Plaintiff to fall and sustain serious and permanent injuries.
`
`69. Had defendants not been negligent as described above, Plaintiff would not have
`
`fallen and sustained serious and permanent injuries.
`
`70. Plaintiff fell and sustained injuries through no fault of her own.
`
`71. As a result of the aforementioned occurrence, Plaintiff sustained injuries.
`
`72. As a result of the aforementioned occurrence, Plaintiff became seriously injured.
`
`73. The aforementioned occurred as a result of the negligence, affirmative negligence,
`
`carelessness and recklessness of all of the named defendants, their agents, servants, contractors
`
`and/or employees in the ownership, maintenance, and repair of the aforementioned location.
`
`74. As a result of the aforementioned occurrence, Plaintiff: sustained serious permanent
`
`personal injuries with resulting and ongoing conscious pain and suffering; became sick, sore,
`
`lame and disabled, and sustained injuries of a permanent and lasting nature; was and continues to
`
`be obliged to incur and expend large sums of money for medical care and attention in an
`
`endeavor to cure herself from the injuries she sustained; and was and continues to be
`
`incapacitated from attending to her usual activities, all with loss of income and out of pocket
`
`expenses.
`
`12
`
`14 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`75. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount in excess of
`
`the jurisdictional limits of all lower courts in which this action may otherwise have been brought.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants in sums that exceed
`
`the jurisdictional limits of all lower courts and which will be determined by a jury at the time of
`
`trial, together with the costs and disbursements of this action.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`April 24, 2021
`
`Yours, etc.
`
`LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW J. CARBOY LLC
`
`By:____________________
`ANDREW J. CARBOY
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`One Liberty Plaza
`23rd floor
`New York, New York 10006
`(212) 520-7565
`
`13
`
`15 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`
`
` VERIFICATION
`
`ANDREW J. CARBOY, an attorney duly admitted to practice law before the Courts of
`
`the State of New York affirms the following under the penalty of perjury:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I am the principal of the LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW J. CARBOY LLC, attorneys for
`
`the Plaintiff herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I have read the foregoing COMPLAINT and know the contents thereof, and upon
`
`information and belief, deponent believes the matters alleged therein to be true.
`
`
`
`
`
`The reason this verification is made by affirmant and not by Plaintiff is that the Plaintiff
`
`is in a County other than the one in which Plaintiff’s attorneys maintain their office.
`
`
`
`
`
`The source of affirmant’s information and the grounds of his belief are communications,
`
`papers, reports, and investigations contained in the file.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`New York, New York
`April 24, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________
`
`ANDREW J. CARBOY
`
`
`
`14
`
`16 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04m2021 04:29 P I
`NYSCEF DOC. NO.
`1
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`INDEX NO- 509630/2021
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`17 of 23
`17 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`BIG
`
`APPLE
`
`P OTHOLE
`& SIDEWALK
`PROTECTION
`COMMITTEl
`132 NASSAU
`STREET. NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10038-2486 - (212) 349-f 896 - FAX (212) 571-5304
`
`ASSISTANT D1RECTOR
`Andree Kinloch
`
`Weinshall
`
`Department
`
`of
`
`Transportation
`
`Iris
`Commissioner
`of New York
`City
`40 Woith
`New York,
`
`Street
`NY 10012
`
`Dear
`
`Commissioner
`
`Weinshall:
`
`Pursuant
`
`to
`
`the
`
`General
`
`Municipal
`
`of Chapter
`
`2 of
`
`the
`
`Administrative
`
`Law
`
`Code
`
`Section
`
`of
`
`the
`
`notify
`section
`
`you
`
`of
`
`the
`
`defect(s)
`
`represented
`
`on
`
`the
`
`of:
`
`Brooklyn
`
`50-g
`
`City
`enclosed
`
`and
`Section
`of New York,
`maps
`
`(2003)
`
`7-201
`we
`
`hereby
`
`of
`
`a
`
`VOLUME:
`
`6A
`
`PAGES:
`
`1-64
`
`a
`
`Sincerely
`
`A11drea
`
`Kinloch
`
`Assistant
`
`Director
`
`DEPARTMENT
`DATE
`STAMP
`
`OF TRANSPORTATION
`
`.
`
`18 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`KEY TO MAP SYMBOLS
`& SIDEWALK
`PROTECTION
`POTHOLE
`OF PAVEMENT
`DEFECTS
`SUFFICIENT
`
`BlG APPLE
`SURVEY
`
`CORPORATION
`TO CAUSE
`A HAZARD
`
`-
`
`I
`
`Sidewalks,
`
`or
`
`= Raised or uneven portion
`
`of sidewalk
`
`I
`
`= Extended
`
`section
`
`of
`
`raised or uneven sidewalk
`
`= Cracked
`
`sidewalk
`
`= Extended
`
`section
`
`of cracked
`
`sidewalk
`
`Charlotte
`North Carolina
`
`Colorado Springs
`Colorado
`
`Columbus
`chio
`
`Pelham
`New York
`
`Rochester
`New York
`
`San Antonio O
`
`Texas
`
`St.Louis
`Missouri
`
`Bogotá
`Colombia
`
`Mumbal
`India
`
`X
`
`O
`
`O
`
`X
`
`UC
`
`NS
`
`OK
`
`OB
`
`CS
`
`V
`
`= Hole or hazardous
`C = Extended
`= Obstruction
`
`section
`
`depression
`
`of holes or hazardous
`
`depressions
`
`protruding
`
`from sidewalk
`
`= Extended
`
`section
`
`of obstructions
`
`protruding
`
`from sidewalk
`
`= Extended
`
`section
`
`of cracks and holes
`
`in sidewalk
`
`=oeticiencies
`
`pertaining
`
`to metai doors and frames
`
`For Curbs
`
`= Broken, misaligned,
`
`or uneven curb
`
`X
`
`= Extended
`
`section
`
`of broken, misaligned,
`
`or uneven curb
`
`Pedestrian
`
`Crosswalks
`
`= Pothole
`
`or other hazard
`
`= Extended
`
`section
`
`of potholes
`
`or other hazards
`
`Other
`
`= Area Under Construction
`
`= No Sidewalk
`
`= Block Satisfactory
`
`= Area Obstructed
`from view by cars or other objects
`therefore
`unable to be inspected
`
`and is
`
`= Sidewalk
`
`area that
`
`is primarily
`
`constructed
`
`of cobblestones
`
`= Tree wells without
`
`a "fence"
`
`or
`
`in place barrier
`
`Rev.
`
`10/00
`
`629 Fifth Avenue + Pelham, NY 19803 + Tel: 914.738.1649 + Fax: 914.738.1680 + Toll Free: 800.930.3298 + www.sanborn.com
`19 of 23
`
`

`

`LCYm0C.S1Go.mNKaO
`I
`0
`.D.D
`Y.FN
`Lm.
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`
`”.th
`
`finM“wow._mm,ap
`TIZIQm.mfifi...Ixxxxa
`
`3.....n)lllll'll‘.Wm:Wukkflwuw
`
`
`
`\SW.(MNan“.a
`
`D
`
`A
`R.'.
`
`A
`
`
`_.m“m4.aw.MI-—__._4_
`2.0E..=2~rd.‘.KI
`PM...>hkLm...I'll,.p0......_.gnawr9MVI..m.MMI.%%\@M_u..812...01%..‘NMQQERKQ.5.:a...
`1.EEI.
`
`
`
`U.aM-a.
`
`
`
`_.
`
`R
`
`
`
`R
`
`R,
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
` 1.HAn.llImm”22H[HUM/“IIHIII‘AwMc(‘x32u%Mn.
`00VA».5..I..34.anll—.T.a,ummo.sg,“rm”
`
`X«vm.0.0M,I..5..
`3Vfr”?#Uwank...PmD..mJv1.
`
`.._..mm.q.I_mwEm..um...”.h.Lmn8..
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`am"Makm‘JxlflwflilfiT-E.anuh.fix“.“3.3mgfiskaEula1.5%..Ormwm.:3.unmwwha“Swan.
`
`V
`
`O F T 5
`
`
`
`
`
`20 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`Û G
`
`If
`A-
`G OWANU S
`
`ane
`el
`
`of
`
`A
`ExPy
`
`BROOKLYN
`
`pwy
`
`3
`
`RD
`
`'J-"-
`
`AV
`
`™™*
`
`.1
`
`,
`
`too
`
`E
`
`.
`
`ut
`
`au
`
`L.aasexis
`
`21 of 23
`
`

`

`If V
`t-st_·ve
`I™~h7¿~~I
`I
`|
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`u
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`(.
`
`AV.
`
`978
`
`913
`
`on
`
`(
`
`t)
`ate 60
`
`ft.
`
`a
`3
`
`15ste
`F a
`
`F
`
`art
`
`C
`
`*
`
`.5
`
`g
`
`SALe R 4
`s-uss
`
`•
`
`. D
`
`3
`
`Ms..tot.
`
`I
`
`reaNstr
`2uxc
`S ysTEM
`
`22 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/24/2021 04:29 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 509630/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2021
`
`,
`
`(
`
`r.:)
`
`c.
`
`Í-'Å
`
`aÀ
`
`a-s
`
`700
`
`s.c.-me
`(es
`mà
`
`1
`
`, q
`cr
`o
`
`3
`
`o
`
`g
`
`e
`..e
`
`,,,
`r,
`
`705
`--
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`STOE.
`
`Lar
`Sret.
`
`----
`
`PARK'G
`
`aos
`
`K
`
`F
`
`*
`
`23 of 23
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket