throbber
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/23/2017 01:05 PM
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10312017 01:05 PM
`NYSC 3F DOC. NO. 28
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`r
`
`r
`
`IND
`EX NO.
`514518/2017
`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`
` VYSC
`
` flIV flD
` 3F:
`
`10/23/2017
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2017
`
`Exhibit B
`
`

`

`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/23/2017 01:05 PM
`,
`-,
`-:
`”"
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`INDEX NO. 51451 /2017
`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 099l2;£017
`INDEX NO. 514518 2017
`
`
`
`
`RaCaIVaD vYSCEF:
`1
`2
`2017
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2017
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF KINGS
`
`___________________________________________________________________________X
`
`ARKADY ZELDIN,
`
`Index No.: 5145181201?
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`VERIFIED ANSWER TO
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`
`against-
`
`PIER ASSOCIATES AND SHEEPSHEAD APPLE, LLC
`D/B/A APPLEBEE’S,
`
`Defendants.
`___________________________________________________________________________X
`
`Defendant, PIER ASSOCIATES, answering the verified complaint by its attorneys,
`
`MALAPERO & PRISCO LLP, respectfully sets forth:
`1.
`Denies having knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`the allegations contained in the paragraphs designated as “1”, “2”, “7”, “8” and “9” of the verified
`
`complaint and respectfully refers all questions of law to the Court at the time of trial.
`
`2.
`
`Denies each and every allegation contained in the paragraphs designated as
`
`“3”, “4”, “5”, “6”, “10”, “1 1”, “the second number 12 (misnumbered by plaintiffs attorney)”,
`
`“13”, “14”, “15”, “16”, “17”, “18”, “the second ‘18” (misnumbered by plaintiff’s attorney)", “20”,
`
`“21”, “23 (misnumbered by plaintiff‘s attorney [as there is no number ‘22’])”, “24”, “25”, “26”,
`
`and “27” of the verified complaint and respectfully refers all questions of law to the Court at the
`
`time of trial.
`
`3.
`
`Denies each and every allegation contained in the first paragraph of the two
`
`paragraphs designated as “12” of the verified complaint and respectfiilly refers the Court to the
`
`subject written agreement, if any, for its content, meaning and interpretation at the time oftrial.
`
`4.
`
`Denies each and every allegation contained in the paragraph designated as
`
`“28", “29”, “30”, “31", “32” and “33” of the verified complaint.
`
`lof47
`
`-1- (82-923 ecf)
`
`

`

`
`.
`A m n
`n
`n -
`n .,
`2017
`:=:::YF';§TI£. ILIIL-Zr—n" ‘-. T.
`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`
`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/23/2017 01:05 PM
`
`I
`h%%3§XN139'siié 31%
`017
`
`
`.‘
`'
`1-3.1
`'
`'
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2017
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`O asset‘s-assessWWW
`
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`1.
`
`That the plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRNIATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`1.
`
`That the answering defendant, pursuant to CPLR Section 1412, alleges upon
`
`information and belief, that if the plaintiff sustained any injuries or damages at the time and place
`
`alleged in its complaint, such injuries or damages were as a result of the culpable conduct of the
`
`plaintiff and/or because of the plaintiff’s assumption of risk.
`
`2.
`
`Should it be found, however, that the answering defendant is liable to
`
`plaintiff herein, any liability being specifically denied, then the answering defendant alleges that
`
`if any damages are found, they are to be apportioned among the plaintiff and answering defendant
`
`according to the degree ofresponsibility that each is found to have for the occurrence, in proportion
`
`to the entire measure of responsibility for the occurrence.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`3.
`
`Any‘past or future costs or expenses incurred, or to be incurred, by the
`
`plaintiff for medical care, dental care, custodial care or rehabilitative services, loss of earnings or
`
`other economic loss that has been or may be replaced or indemnified, in whole or in part, from a
`
`collateral source as defined in CPLR Section 4545(c) shall not be recoverable from the answering
`
`defendant and the amount of such damages will be diminished by the amount of the funds which
`
`plaintiff has or may receive from such collateral source.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`4.
`
`That plaintiff has failed to mitigate its damages.
`
`2 of 47
`
`-2- (82-923 est)
`
`

`

`
`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/23/2017 01:05 PM
`
`
`A
`INDEX 130.514
`‘
`_f‘—“‘1—HWr‘-—r:“+_7 ;
`7
`7
`7
`7
`7
`7
`‘
`INDEX N .
`
`
`
`
`
`l
`NlflMflgfig
`A "°‘,
`RilcillvilD \lYSCEF:
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2017
`NYSCEF DOC. No.
`8
`K
`)
`O REC IVED NYSCEF: 09
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`5.
`
`While the answering defendant denies
`
`the plaintiff’s allegation of
`
`negligence and liability, any injury and damages, if proven, were the result of intervening and/or
`
`interceding acts of superseding negligence and liability on the part of parties over which this
`
`answering defendant neither has control nor had the right to control, and for which acts or
`
`omissions these answering defendant is not legally responsible.
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`6.
`
`This answering defendant has no statutory or common-law duty to the
`
`plaintiff.
`
`AS AND FOR A SEVENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`7.
`
`That the plaintiff has failed to join all necessary parties.
`
`AS AND FOR AN EIGHTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`8.
`
`That the condition which allegedly gave rise to plaintiff s claimed injuries
`
`was “open and obvious” and not actionable as a matter of law.
`
`AS AND FOR A NINTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`9.
`
`That the injuries or damages complained of were caused in whole or part by
`
`plaintiff’s own culpable conduct or the culpable conduct of others for whom the answering
`
`defendant has no legal responsibility.
`
`3 of 47'
`
`-3- (82.923 ect)
`
`

`

`
`
`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/23/2017 01:05 PM
`
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK lug-$1020170].: 05 PM
`IND-3X NO 514518/2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inns -mss‘es; H ‘
`a“
`.IvVINDEXSN83'F 51i8i§éi9tl7
`.,
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2017
`NYSCEF DOC. NO.
`8
`K
`.23
`"W(_\ RECEIVEDD NYSCEF: 09/12/2017
`
`AS AND FOR A TENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRNIATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`10.
`
`That if the plaintiff has received sums of money in settlement of the claims
`
`asserted herein, by reason thereof, the answering defendant is entitled to the protection, provisions
`
`and limitations of Section 15-108 of the General Obligations Law of the State of New York in
`
`reducing the claim of the plaintiff against the answering defendant, by the amount stipulated in
`
`any release, the amount of consideration paid for it or the amount of the equitable share of the
`
`damages of any released entities, whichever is the greatest.
`
`AS AND FOR AN ELEVENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`11.
`
`That the liability of the defendant, if any, does not exceed fifty percent
`
`(50%) of the liability assigned to all persons, if any, and that the liability of the defendant, if any,
`
`for non-economic loss is limited pursuant to CPLR Article 16.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWELFTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`12.
`
`That this Court lacks jurisdiction over answering defendant.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`13.
`
`That the plaintiff lacks standing to maintain this action.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`14.
`
`That this action is frivolous as against answering defendant, and as such,
`
`answering defendant is entitled to an award of sanctions not to exceed $10,000 pursuant to CPLR
`
`§8303-a.
`
`40f 47
`
`-4- (82-923 act)
`
`

`

`INDEX NO
`5
`m
`H
`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/23/2017 01:05 PM
`
`
`
`
`INDEX N0
`51
`' at:.;.\!;c:l::-!.ruga.-:1L
`
`
`a
`Au '
`'
`'
`
`
`R C IV D \IYSCnF
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2017
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTEENTH, SEPARATE
`AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`15.
`
`Plaintiff’s complaint fails to consecutively number allegations pursuant to
`
`CPLR §3014 and is defective.
`
`AS AND FOR A CROSS-COMPLAINT
`AGAINST CO-DEFENDANT, SHEEPSHEAD APPLE, LLC, D/B/A APPLEBEE’S:
`
`16.
`
`That if plaintiff’s damages as alleged in the complaint were caused through
`
`negligence other than plaintiff’s own negligence, carelessness and recklessness, said damages were
`
`sustained due to the primary and active, negligent, careless and reckless acts of omission or
`
`commission of the co—defendant, SHEEPSHEAD APPLE, LLC, D/B/A APPLEBEE’S with the
`
`negligence, if any, of the answering Defendant, PIER ASSOCIATES, being secondary and for
`
`derivative only.
`
`17.
`
`That if plaintiff should recover judgment against this answering defendant,
`
`PIER ASSOCIATES, then co-defendant, SHEEPSHEAD APPLE, LLC, D/B/A APPLEBEE‘S,
`
`shall be liable to said answering defendant for the full amount of said judgment or on the basis of
`
`apportionment of responsibility of the alleged occurrence, answering defendant, PIER
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`is entitled to indemnification from and judgment over and against the co-
`
`defendant, SHEEPSHEAD APPLE, LLC, D/B/A APPLEBEE’S, for all or part of any verdict or
`
`judgment which plaintiff may recover in such amounts as a jury or Court may direct.
`
`.
`AS AND FOR A SECOND CROSS-COMPLAINT
`AGAINST CO—DEFENDANT, SHEEPSHEAD APPLE, LLC, D/BIA APPLEBEE’S:
`
`18.
`
`That prior to the date of the subject incident, co-defendant, SHEEPSHEAD
`
`APPLE, LLC, D/B/A APPLEBEE’S, entered into a contract wherein it agreed to perform certain
`
`services at the subject premises known as 2505 Emmons Avenue, Brooklyn, New York and the
`
`abutting sidewalk on Bedford Avenue.
`
`50f 47
`
`—5— (82—923 ect)
`
`

`

`IND3X NO. 514518/2017
`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/23/2017 01:05 PM
`
`
`
`-~————‘.—-———-—.——-—-—,—
`__.___._.___'
`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`
`
`Nlasgflgggstgmg
`.—
`.
`R .c .Iv .D \IYSC3F: 10/23/2017
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2017
`NYSCEF DOC. NO.
`8
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2017
`Q
`,l
`,l
`
`19.
`That under the terms, conditions and provisions of said contracts, co-
`defendant, SHEEPSHEAD APPLE, LLC, D/B/A APPLBBEE’S, was obligated to indemnify and
`
`save the answering defendant, PIER ASSOCIATES, harmless from all liability and loss because
`
`of injury, including death, to any person, or damage to any property that may occur or may be
`
`alleged to have occurred as a result, directly or indirectly, of their respective fault or negligence
`
`and to defend all suits and claims alleging such injury or damage and to pay all charges of
`
`attorneys, court costs, and all other costs and expenses in connection therewith.
`
`20.
`
`That if answering defendant, PIER ASSOCIATES is held liable for the
`
`damage allegedly sustained by the plaintiff herein, such liability will have been brought about by
`
`and caused in whole or in part as a result ofthe carelessness, recklessness, negligence and/or breach
`
`of contract of the co-defendant, SHEEPSHEAD APPLE, LLC, D/B/A APPLEBEE’S, its agents,
`
`servants and/or employees without any fault or negligence of the part of answering defendant,
`
`PIER ASSOCIATES, contributing thereto.
`
`21.
`
`That by reason of the foregoing, the co-defendant, SHEEPSHEAD APPLE,
`
`LLC, D/B/A APPLEBEE’S, is liable to the answering defendant, PIER ASSOCIATES, in whole
`
`or in part for the claim made against them by the plaintiff in this action.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD CROSS-COMPLAINT
`
`AGAINST CO-DEFENDANT, SHEEPSHEAD APPLE, LLC,
`was:
`
`22.
`
`That, upon information and belief, pursuant to the above contract(s) entered
`
`into by co-defendant, SHEEPSHEAD APPLE, LLC, D/B/A APPLEBEE’S, was obligated to
`
`purchase insurance for the protection of answering defendant, PIER ASSOCIATES, covering
`
`claims for bodily injury which arise out of or by reason of or in the course of performance of work
`
`by Answering defendant.
`
`6 of 47
`
`—6- (82-923 ecf)
`
`

`

`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/23/2017 01:05 PM
`
`
`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`-
`
`
`
`
`N\
`a:
`.
`\
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2017
`(\H R.C.Iv.D \IYSCEF: 10/23/2017
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2017
`NYSCEF DOC. No.
`8
`f
`_)
`
`23.
`
`That upon information and belief, co-defendant, SHEEPSHEAD APPLE,
`
`LLC, D/B/A APPLEBEE’S, failed to purchase such insurance for the protection of answering
`
`defendant, PIER ASSOCIATES, pursuant to their obligations under their contract(s).
`
`24.
`
`As a result of co—defendant, SHEEPSHEAD APPLE, LLC, D/B/A
`
`APPLEBEE’S ’s breach of contract in failing to purchase insurance for the protection of answering
`
`defendant, PIER ASSOCIATES, answering defendant has been and will continue to be damaged
`
`as a result of the claim of plaintiff, in that it will be required to expend attorney’s fees and other
`
`expenses for its own defense in the within action and will or may be subject to liability to plaintiffs
`
`all of which costs and expenses would have been defrayed and covered by liability insurance that
`
`was obligated to purchase.
`
`25.
`
`That as a result of co-defendant’s breach of contractual obligations
`
`regarding the purchase of insurance, answering defendant, PIER ASSOCIATES is entitled to be
`
`reimbursed for the amount ofany judgment or damages they are obligated to pay plaintiffincluding
`
`the cost of a settlement, if any, and in addition thereto, are entitled to be reimbursed for the costs
`
`of attorneys” fees and defense costs associated with defense of the instant action.
`
`WHEREFORE, defendant PIER ASSOCIATES, demands judgment dismissing
`
`the complaint, and further demands judgment over and against the co-defendant, SHEEPSHEAD
`
`APPLE, LLC, D/B/A APPLEBEE’S, on the cross—complaints, together with the costs and
`
`disbursements of this action.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`September 12, 2017
`
`Yours etc.,
`
`MALAPERO & PRISCO LLP
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`PIER ASSOCIATES
`185 Madison Avenue
`
`New York, New York 10016
`(212) 661-7300
`
`7 of 47
`
`-7- (82—923 ect)
`
`

`

`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/23/2017 01:05 PM
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 514518/ 017
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2017
`0 RC.Iv.D \IYSCEF: 10/23 2017
`NYCEF DOC. NO. 8
`Q
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2017
`
`TO:
`
`Ymiy Prakhin, Esq.
`LAW OFFICE OF YURIY PRAKHIN, P.C.
`Attorneys for Plaintiff ARKADY ZELDIN
`1883 861h Street, 2nd Floor
`Brooklyn, New York 11214
`(718) 946-5099
`Our File No.: IG04282017
`
`(NONuREGISTERED ECF USER)
`
`SHEEPSHEAD APPLE, LLC
`550 Marnaroneck Avenue, Suite 301
`Harrison, New York 10528
`
`8 of 47
`
`-8- (82-923 est)
`
`

`

`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/23/2017 01:05 PM
`INDEX NO. 514518/2017
`.
`\
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 514518 2017
`—‘——
`
`
`Nl§lflflgflfiflififié
`.
`fl
`R«C«.IV«.D \IYSCEF: 10/2/3/2017
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2017
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2017
`NEF DOC. N0.
`8
`b
`J
`
`VERIFICATION:
`
`ss:
`
`) )
`
`STATE OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
`
`ANDREW L. KLAUBER, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
`
`That I am one of the attorneys for the answering defendant in the within action; that I
`
`have read the foregoing ANSWER TO VERIFIED COMPLAINT and know the contents thereof;
`
`that the same are true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on
`
`information and belief, and that as to those matters I believe them to be true.
`
`The reason this Verification is made by deponent and not by the answering defendant
`
`is that said defendants are not within the County in which deponent ha
`
`s we The facts set forth
`
`.herein are upon information and belief derived from the records
`
`.d pap s in deponent’s office.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`September 12, 2017
`
`ANDREW L. KLAUBER
`
`90f 47
`
`-9- (82—923 cot)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket