throbber
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/17/2016 01:41 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67
`
`INDEX NO. 519534/2016
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/17/2016
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 112016 01:41 P
`NYSCEF DOC. NO.
`67
`
`INDEX NQ~ 519534/2016
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`RmCmIVmD WYSCEF: 11/17/2016
`,
`.V‘
`I
`_.
`'
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF KINGS
`
`______________________________________________________________________X
`
`SAMUEL TAUBER,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`~against-
`
`CENTRAL YETEZ LEV SATMAR MEAT AND
`
`POULTRY and 684 MYRTLE, LLC.
`
`______________________________________________________________________X
`
`Defendants.
`
`S I R S :
`
`ORDER WITH
`NOTICE OF ENTRY
`
`INDEX NO.: 3217/08
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the within is a true copy of a Decision and Order
`
`of Honorable Richard N. Allman, dated November 19, 2008 and entered in the office of
`
`the Clerk of the within named Court on April 23, 2009.
`
`Dated: Brooklyn, New York
`April 29, 2009
`
`
`
`OBLEY, ESQ.
`FRIEDMAN, KHAFIF & SANCHEZ, LLP
`Attorjiieys for Plaintiff
`16 Court Street, 26‘“ Floor
`Brooklyn, New York 11241
`(718) 797—2488
`
`TO:
`
`CENTRAL YETEZ LEV
`
`SATMAR MEAT & POULTRY
`
`684 Myrtle Avenue
`Brooklyn, NY 11205
`
`684 MYRTLE, LLC
`199 Lee Avenue
`
`Brooklyn, NY 11211
`
`

`

`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF KINGS
`________________________________________________________________________X
`
`SAMUEL TAUBER,
`
`'
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-against-
`
`CENTRAL YETEZ LEV SATMAR MEAT AND
`POULTRY and 684 MYRTLE, LLC.
`
`Defendants.
`
`______________________________________________________________________“X
`
`RICHARD N. ALLMAN, REFEREE:
`
`Index No. 3217/08
`
`On June 30, 2008, a default judgment was awarded against both defendants in this action.
`
`Thereafter, on November 5, 2008, an inquest was held to determine if damages should be awarded
`
`to the plaintiff. The only witness to testify at the inquest was the plaintiff, Samuel Tauber. The
`
`inquest was adjourned at the plaintiffs request to November 19, 2008 so that counsel for the plaintiff
`
`could submit verdict reports in support of the damage request that was made.
`
`Tauber testified that he was injured on October 19, 2007 while working as a volunteer at 684
`
`Myrtle Avenue. He was moving a case in the store when he leaned against the storefiont window
`
`and the window shattered. Glass fell onto Tauber cutting his forehead, his eyebrow and cheek, his
`
`hand and his right foot. Tauber was taken to Bellevue Hospital, where he received thirty stitches in
`
`his hand/wrist, fifteen stitches for two cuts on his face, two stitches on his foot and one long stitch
`
`with “seventeen overlaps” on “his head.” In addition to these stitches, Tauber learned that six
`
`ligaments in his wrist were cut. Tauber testified that because of this condition, he could no move
`
`his right hand or four of the fingers on that hand.
`
`About ten days after the accident, Tauber went to see Dr. Mark Pruzansky, who is affiliated
`
`with Mt. Sinai Hospital. Pruzansky took removed the stitches and arranged to perform surgery to
`
`repair Tauber’s hand. The surgery was performed in December 2007. Two weeks after the surgery,
`
`

`

`infected and Pruzansky performed a second operation, which was successful. Tauber continued in
`
`therapy for “a few months” and then stopped it.
`
`Tauber displayed the scars from the accident to this Court. This Court noted that Tauber has
`
`a one and one—half inch vertical scar on the right side of his forehead above his eye, acne—half inch
`
`scar between the eyebrows and a one inch horizontal scar below his right eye. The scar on Tauber’s
`
`wrist is much more pronounced than the scars on his head. The wrist scar extends across the top of
`
`Tauber’s wrist from one side to the other.
`
`Tauber testified that he is left handed. This Court asked him to demonstrate how his right
`
`hand. is restricted since the accident. This Court saw that Tauber could make a fist and move each
`
`ofhis fingers. He could bend the wrist backwards in a normal manner but when he tried to bend the
`
`wrist forward (so that his fingertips moved toward the underside of his arm), the movement was
`
`restricted: Tauber could bend the wrist about a third of the distance he was able to bend his left wrist.
`
`Tauber also testified that the injury to his wrist made it more difficult to do the daily chores of life
`
`— he could not carry heavy objects in the right hand without feeling pain and he could not turn a
`
`screwdriver easily with this hand and this was something he was expected to do as part ofhis job as
`
`an HVAC technican.
`
`V
`
`At the end of the inquest, counsel for plaintiff requested that this Court award $900,000 to
`
`the plaintiff. This Court asked whether this damage request was discounted to take into effect that
`
`the injury suffered was to the plaintiff’ s non—dominant hand and whether counsel could produce any
`
`verdict reports showing that this award was appropriate.
`
`Based on this Court’s own review of the verdict reports and its own observations of the
`
`plaintiff’ s current condition, it finds that an award of $200,000 is appropriate. Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that Central Yetez Lev Satmar Meat and Poultry and 684 Myrtle LLC must pay
`
`Samuel Tauber $200,000 in damages; it is further
`
`ORDERED that Central Yetez Lev Satmar Meat and Poultry and 684 Myrtle LLC arejointly
`
`and severally liable for this $200,000 debt; it is further
`
`

`

`ORDERED that Central Yetez Lev Satmar Meat and Poultry and 684 Myrtle LLC must pay
`
`nine percent (9 %) interest on the $200,000 debt from June 30, 2008 until the obligation is satisfied,
`
`Van Nostrand v. Froehlich, 44 A.D.3d 54, 57-58 (2d Dept. 2007), appeal dismissed, 10 N.Y.3d 837
`
`(2008); it is further
`
`ORDERED that the clerk is directed to enter judgment; and it is further
`
`ORDERED that plaintiff must file and serve a copy of this order with notice of entry to the
`
`defendants within thirty days of its entry.
`
`Dated: Brooklyn, New York
`November 19, 2008
`
`ZCQDL
`
`Referee
`
`

`

`AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE
`
`STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF KINGS ss.:
`
`FABIEN A. ROBLEY, an attorney duly admitted to practice before the Courts of this
`
`State, affirms the truth of the following under the penalties of perjury:
`
`That on the rZ/clday of April, 2009, I served a true copy of the annexed
`
`ORDER WITH NOTICE OF ENTRY
`
`by sending the same via regular mail, in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid thereon, in a
`
`post office or official depository of the US. Postal Service within the State of New York,
`
`addressed to:
`
`CENTRAL YETEZ LEV
`
`SATMAR MEAT & POULTRY
`
`684 Myrtle Avenue
`Brooklyn, NY 11205
`
`684 MYRTLE, LLC
`199 Lee Avenue
`
`Brooklyn, NY 1 121 1
`
`2’ ‘7 2009
`Dated: April
`Brooklyn, New York
`
`~
`
`
`
`(-14
`
`£1") L .~--.m--—-.~<7
`FABIElx/trROBLBY, ESQ.
`
`
`
`N
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket