`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67
`
`INDEX NO. 519534/2016
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/17/2016
`
`FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 112016 01:41 P
`NYSCEF DOC. NO.
`67
`
`INDEX NQ~ 519534/2016
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`RmCmIVmD WYSCEF: 11/17/2016
`,
`.V‘
`I
`_.
`'
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF KINGS
`
`______________________________________________________________________X
`
`SAMUEL TAUBER,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`~against-
`
`CENTRAL YETEZ LEV SATMAR MEAT AND
`
`POULTRY and 684 MYRTLE, LLC.
`
`______________________________________________________________________X
`
`Defendants.
`
`S I R S :
`
`ORDER WITH
`NOTICE OF ENTRY
`
`INDEX NO.: 3217/08
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the within is a true copy of a Decision and Order
`
`of Honorable Richard N. Allman, dated November 19, 2008 and entered in the office of
`
`the Clerk of the within named Court on April 23, 2009.
`
`Dated: Brooklyn, New York
`April 29, 2009
`
`
`
`OBLEY, ESQ.
`FRIEDMAN, KHAFIF & SANCHEZ, LLP
`Attorjiieys for Plaintiff
`16 Court Street, 26‘“ Floor
`Brooklyn, New York 11241
`(718) 797—2488
`
`TO:
`
`CENTRAL YETEZ LEV
`
`SATMAR MEAT & POULTRY
`
`684 Myrtle Avenue
`Brooklyn, NY 11205
`
`684 MYRTLE, LLC
`199 Lee Avenue
`
`Brooklyn, NY 11211
`
`
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF KINGS
`________________________________________________________________________X
`
`SAMUEL TAUBER,
`
`'
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-against-
`
`CENTRAL YETEZ LEV SATMAR MEAT AND
`POULTRY and 684 MYRTLE, LLC.
`
`Defendants.
`
`______________________________________________________________________“X
`
`RICHARD N. ALLMAN, REFEREE:
`
`Index No. 3217/08
`
`On June 30, 2008, a default judgment was awarded against both defendants in this action.
`
`Thereafter, on November 5, 2008, an inquest was held to determine if damages should be awarded
`
`to the plaintiff. The only witness to testify at the inquest was the plaintiff, Samuel Tauber. The
`
`inquest was adjourned at the plaintiffs request to November 19, 2008 so that counsel for the plaintiff
`
`could submit verdict reports in support of the damage request that was made.
`
`Tauber testified that he was injured on October 19, 2007 while working as a volunteer at 684
`
`Myrtle Avenue. He was moving a case in the store when he leaned against the storefiont window
`
`and the window shattered. Glass fell onto Tauber cutting his forehead, his eyebrow and cheek, his
`
`hand and his right foot. Tauber was taken to Bellevue Hospital, where he received thirty stitches in
`
`his hand/wrist, fifteen stitches for two cuts on his face, two stitches on his foot and one long stitch
`
`with “seventeen overlaps” on “his head.” In addition to these stitches, Tauber learned that six
`
`ligaments in his wrist were cut. Tauber testified that because of this condition, he could no move
`
`his right hand or four of the fingers on that hand.
`
`About ten days after the accident, Tauber went to see Dr. Mark Pruzansky, who is affiliated
`
`with Mt. Sinai Hospital. Pruzansky took removed the stitches and arranged to perform surgery to
`
`repair Tauber’s hand. The surgery was performed in December 2007. Two weeks after the surgery,
`
`
`
`infected and Pruzansky performed a second operation, which was successful. Tauber continued in
`
`therapy for “a few months” and then stopped it.
`
`Tauber displayed the scars from the accident to this Court. This Court noted that Tauber has
`
`a one and one—half inch vertical scar on the right side of his forehead above his eye, acne—half inch
`
`scar between the eyebrows and a one inch horizontal scar below his right eye. The scar on Tauber’s
`
`wrist is much more pronounced than the scars on his head. The wrist scar extends across the top of
`
`Tauber’s wrist from one side to the other.
`
`Tauber testified that he is left handed. This Court asked him to demonstrate how his right
`
`hand. is restricted since the accident. This Court saw that Tauber could make a fist and move each
`
`ofhis fingers. He could bend the wrist backwards in a normal manner but when he tried to bend the
`
`wrist forward (so that his fingertips moved toward the underside of his arm), the movement was
`
`restricted: Tauber could bend the wrist about a third of the distance he was able to bend his left wrist.
`
`Tauber also testified that the injury to his wrist made it more difficult to do the daily chores of life
`
`— he could not carry heavy objects in the right hand without feeling pain and he could not turn a
`
`screwdriver easily with this hand and this was something he was expected to do as part ofhis job as
`
`an HVAC technican.
`
`V
`
`At the end of the inquest, counsel for plaintiff requested that this Court award $900,000 to
`
`the plaintiff. This Court asked whether this damage request was discounted to take into effect that
`
`the injury suffered was to the plaintiff’ s non—dominant hand and whether counsel could produce any
`
`verdict reports showing that this award was appropriate.
`
`Based on this Court’s own review of the verdict reports and its own observations of the
`
`plaintiff’ s current condition, it finds that an award of $200,000 is appropriate. Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that Central Yetez Lev Satmar Meat and Poultry and 684 Myrtle LLC must pay
`
`Samuel Tauber $200,000 in damages; it is further
`
`ORDERED that Central Yetez Lev Satmar Meat and Poultry and 684 Myrtle LLC arejointly
`
`and severally liable for this $200,000 debt; it is further
`
`
`
`ORDERED that Central Yetez Lev Satmar Meat and Poultry and 684 Myrtle LLC must pay
`
`nine percent (9 %) interest on the $200,000 debt from June 30, 2008 until the obligation is satisfied,
`
`Van Nostrand v. Froehlich, 44 A.D.3d 54, 57-58 (2d Dept. 2007), appeal dismissed, 10 N.Y.3d 837
`
`(2008); it is further
`
`ORDERED that the clerk is directed to enter judgment; and it is further
`
`ORDERED that plaintiff must file and serve a copy of this order with notice of entry to the
`
`defendants within thirty days of its entry.
`
`Dated: Brooklyn, New York
`November 19, 2008
`
`ZCQDL
`
`Referee
`
`
`
`AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE
`
`STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF KINGS ss.:
`
`FABIEN A. ROBLEY, an attorney duly admitted to practice before the Courts of this
`
`State, affirms the truth of the following under the penalties of perjury:
`
`That on the rZ/clday of April, 2009, I served a true copy of the annexed
`
`ORDER WITH NOTICE OF ENTRY
`
`by sending the same via regular mail, in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid thereon, in a
`
`post office or official depository of the US. Postal Service within the State of New York,
`
`addressed to:
`
`CENTRAL YETEZ LEV
`
`SATMAR MEAT & POULTRY
`
`684 Myrtle Avenue
`Brooklyn, NY 11205
`
`684 MYRTLE, LLC
`199 Lee Avenue
`
`Brooklyn, NY 1 121 1
`
`2’ ‘7 2009
`Dated: April
`Brooklyn, New York
`
`~
`
`
`
`(-14
`
`£1") L .~--.m--—-.~<7
`FABIElx/trROBLBY, ESQ.
`
`
`
`N
`
`