throbber
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO.
`2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`
`EXHIBIT “A”
`EXHIBIT “A”
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`SUPREME
`
`COURT OF THE STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY
`
`OF NASSAU
`
`JANE
`
`DOE,
`
`Index
`
`No.:
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`SUMMONS
`
`EAST MEADOW UNION
`MEADOW
`
`HIGH
`
`TECHNOLOGY,
`
`-against-
`
`FREE
`
`SCHOOL
`
`DISTRICT,
`
`NEW YORK
`
`INSTITUTE
`
`EAST
`
`OF
`
`ZINNO,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Plaintiff
`COUNTY
`
`designates
`
`OF NASSAU
`
`as the place
`
`of
`
`trial.
`
`The
`
`basis
`
`of
`
`the
`
`venue
`
`is
`
`PLAINTIFF'S
`
`PLACE
`
`OF RESIDENCE
`
`SCHOOL,
`AND PETER
`
`To
`
`the
`
`above-named
`
`Defendants:
`
`YOU ARE HEREBY
`
`SUMMONED
`
`to answer
`
`the
`
`complaint
`
`in this
`
`action
`
`and
`
`to serve
`
`a copy
`
`of
`
`your
`
`answer,
`
`or,
`
`if
`
`the
`
`complaint
`
`is not
`
`served
`
`with
`
`this
`
`summons,
`
`to serve
`
`a notice
`
`of
`
`appearance,
`
`on
`
`the
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`within
`
`20
`
`days
`
`after
`
`the
`
`service
`
`of
`
`this
`
`summons,
`
`Attorney(s)
`
`exclusive
`
`of
`
`the
`
`day
`
`of
`
`service
`
`(or within
`
`30 days
`
`after
`
`the
`
`service
`
`is complete
`
`if
`
`this
`
`summons
`
`is
`
`not
`
`personally
`
`delivered
`
`to you within
`
`the State
`
`ofNew
`
`York);
`
`and in case
`
`of your
`
`failure
`
`to appear
`
`or
`
`to
`
`answer,
`
`judgment
`
`will
`
`be
`
`taken
`
`against
`
`you
`
`by
`
`default
`
`for
`
`the
`
`relief
`
`demanded
`
`in
`
`the
`
`complaint.
`
`Dated:
`
`Carle
`
`Place,
`
`New York
`
`August
`
`10, 2021
`
`aron
`
`Ferri
`
`Attorney(s)
`
`LEEDS
`
`One Old
`
`for
`
`Plaintrff
`BROWN LAW,
`
`P.C.
`
`Country
`
`Road,
`
`Suite
`
`347
`
`Carle
`
`(516)
`
`Place,
`
`873-9550
`
`New York
`
`11514
`
`To:
`
`EAST MEADOW UNION
`
`FREE
`
`SCHOOL
`
`DISTRICT
`
`718
`
`The
`
`Plain
`
`Road
`
`Westbury,
`
`New York
`
`11590
`
`1
`
`1 of 2
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`EAST MEADOW HIGH
`
`SCHOOL
`
`101 Carman
`
`Avenue
`
`East Meadow,
`
`NY 11554
`
`NEW YORK INSTITUTEOF
`
`TECHNOLOGY
`
`PO Box
`
`8000
`
`Northern
`
`Boulevard
`
`Old Westbury,
`
`NY 11568
`
`PETER
`
`ZINNO
`
`ADDRESS
`
`UNKNOWN
`
`2
`
`2 of 2
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`SUPREME
`
`COURT
`
`OF THE STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY
`
`OF NASSAU
`
`--
`
`JANE
`
`DOE,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-against-
`
`X
`
`Index
`
`No.:
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Jury
`
`Trial
`
`Demanded
`
`EAST MEADOW UNION
`EAST MEADOW HIGH
`
`FREE
`
`INSTITUTE
`
`SCHOOL,
`OF TECHNOLOGY,
`
`SCHOOL
`
`DISTRICT,
`NEW YORK
`
`and PETER
`
`ZINNO,
`
`--------------------------------------------------X
`
`Defendants.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`JANE
`
`DOE,
`
`by
`
`and through
`
`her
`
`attorneys,
`
`LEEDS
`
`BROWN
`
`LAW,
`
`P.C.,
`
`alleges
`
`upon
`
`knowledge
`
`as to herself
`
`and
`
`her
`
`own
`
`actions,
`
`and
`
`upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief
`
`as to all
`
`other
`
`matters,
`
`as follows:
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`This
`
`is a revival
`
`action
`
`brought
`
`pursuant
`
`to New York
`
`Child
`
`Victims
`
`Act,
`
`CPLR
`

`
`214-g. When
`
`she was
`
`a minor,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`assaulted
`
`and
`
`abused
`
`repeatedly
`
`sexually
`
`by Peter
`
`Zinno
`
`("Mr.
`
`Zinno"),
`
`a track
`
`coach
`
`at New York
`
`Institute
`
`of Technology
`
`("NYIT"),
`
`and
`
`a teacher
`
`under
`
`the
`
`supervision
`
`and
`
`control
`
`of
`
`the
`
`East Meadow
`
`Union
`
`Free
`
`School
`
`District,
`
`who
`
`was
`
`assigned
`
`to East Meadow
`
`High
`
`School
`
`("East
`
`Meadow
`
`H.S.").
`
`PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is an individual,
`
`who
`
`currently
`
`resides
`
`in Halesite,
`
`New York.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`born
`
`on October
`
`2, 1963.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`relevant
`
`and material
`
`hereto,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`a minor
`
`child.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`relevant
`
`and material
`
`hereto,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`a resident
`
`of Nassau
`
`County,
`
`Long
`
`Island,
`
`and
`
`a student
`
`of East Meadow
`
`H.S.
`
`Page
`
`1 of 21
`
`1 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`3.
`
`The
`
`Defendant,
`
`EAST MEADOW UNION
`
`FREE
`
`SCHOOL
`
`DISTRICT,
`
`(the
`
`"School
`
`District")
`
`was
`
`and
`
`still
`
`is a domestic
`
`municipal
`
`corporation
`
`that
`
`is created,
`
`organized
`
`and
`
`existing
`
`under
`
`and
`
`by
`
`virtue
`
`of
`
`the
`
`laws
`
`of
`
`the
`
`State
`
`of New York,
`
`with
`
`its
`
`principal
`
`place
`
`of
`
`business
`
`located
`
`at 718
`
`The
`
`Plain
`
`Road, Westbury,
`
`New York
`
`11590.
`
`The
`
`Defendant
`
`School
`
`District
`
`controls
`
`nine
`
`schools
`
`within
`
`4.
`
`East Meadow
`
`and
`
`Westbury,
`
`Nassau
`
`County.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material
`
`to
`
`the
`
`Complaint,
`
`the
`
`School
`
`District
`
`was
`
`responsible
`
`for managing
`
`and
`
`directing
`
`the public
`
`schools
`
`located
`
`within
`
`its jurisdiction.
`
`5.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material
`
`to the Complaint,
`
`the School
`
`District
`
`had
`
`the power
`
`to employ
`
`individuals
`
`working
`
`with
`
`and/or
`
`alongside
`
`children
`
`within
`
`the
`
`district,
`
`including
`
`those
`
`at East
`
`Meadow
`
`through
`
`their
`
`and/or
`
`School
`
`District
`
`had
`
`H.S.
`
`and,
`
`agents,
`
`servants,
`
`employees,
`
`the
`
`control
`
`over
`
`school
`
`related
`
`activities
`
`involving
`
`children.
`
`6.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material
`
`to the Complaint,
`
`Defendant,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`was
`
`and
`
`is a
`
`public
`
`educational
`
`institution,
`
`located
`
`at
`
`101
`
`Carman
`
`Avenue,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`New
`
`York
`
`11554.
`
`At
`
`all material
`
`times,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.
`
`was
`
`and
`
`still
`
`is a New York
`
`State
`
`Public
`
`School,
`
`managed,
`
`supervised,
`
`overseen,
`
`governed
`
`and/or
`
`administered
`
`owned,
`
`operated,
`
`School
`
`District.
`
`by Defendant
`
`7.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material
`
`to the Complaint,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S. was
`
`under
`
`the
`
`control
`
`of
`
`the Defendant
`
`School
`
`District
`
`and
`
`operated
`
`for
`
`their
`
`benefit.
`
`8.
`
`The
`
`Defendant
`
`NYIT
`
`was
`
`and
`
`still
`
`is
`
`a private
`
`not-for-profit
`
`university
`
`that
`
`is
`
`created,
`
`organized,
`
`and
`
`existing
`
`under
`
`and by
`
`virtue
`
`of
`
`the
`
`laws
`
`of
`
`the State
`
`of New York,
`
`with
`
`its
`
`Page
`
`2 of 21
`
`2 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`principal
`
`place
`
`of
`
`business
`
`located
`
`at Northern
`
`Boulevard,
`
`P.O.
`
`Box
`
`8000
`
`Old Westbury,
`
`NY
`
`11568-8000.
`
`9.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material
`
`to the Complaint,
`
`NYIT
`
`had
`
`the
`
`power
`
`to employ
`
`individuals
`
`working
`
`with
`
`and/or
`
`alongside
`
`students
`
`within
`
`the
`
`university
`
`and,
`
`through
`
`their
`
`agents,
`
`servants,
`
`and/or
`
`employees,
`
`NYIT
`
`had
`
`control
`
`over
`
`all university
`
`related
`
`activities.
`
`10.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material
`
`to the Complaint,
`
`Defendant
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`was
`
`an adult
`
`over
`
`the
`
`age of 21
`
`and was
`
`an agent,
`
`servant,
`
`and/or
`
`employee
`
`of both
`
`the School
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`and NYIT.
`
`Specifically,
`
`the
`
`relevant
`
`period,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`taught
`
`social
`
`studies
`
`at East
`
`during
`
`Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`and was
`
`the Men's
`
`Track
`
`Coach
`
`at NYIT.
`
`11.
`
`During
`
`the
`
`relevant
`
`period,
`
`the
`
`School
`
`District
`
`and
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`assigned
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`to East Meadow
`
`H.S.
`
`and
`
`placed
`
`him in positions
`
`where
`
`he had
`
`immediate
`
`access
`
`to
`
`children.
`
`12.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material
`
`to the Complaint,
`
`while
`
`an agent,
`
`servant
`
`and/or
`
`employee
`
`of
`
`the
`
`School
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`remained
`
`under
`
`their
`
`direct
`
`supervision,
`
`employ,
`
`and/or
`
`control.
`
`13.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material
`
`to the Complaint,
`
`while
`
`an agent,
`
`servant
`
`and/or
`
`employee
`
`of
`
`the NYIT,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`remained
`
`under
`
`its direct
`
`supervision,
`
`employ,
`
`and/or
`
`control.
`
`Page
`
`3 of 21
`
`3 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`AND VENUE
`
`14.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`is brought
`
`pursuant
`
`to the Child
`
`Victims
`
`Act
`
`("CVA").
`
`See CPLR
`

`
`214-g
`
`and
`
`22
`
`NYCRR
`
`202.72;
`
`as
`
`it
`
`alleges
`
`physical,
`
`psychological,
`
`and
`
`emotional
`
`injuries/damages
`
`suffered
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`conduct
`
`âgainst
`
`a minor
`
`child
`
`that
`
`constitutes
`
`one
`
`or more
`
`sexual
`
`offenses
`
`as defined
`
`in Article
`
`130
`
`of
`
`the New York
`
`Penal
`
`Law.
`
`15.
`
`This
`
`Court
`
`has Personal
`
`Jurisdiction
`
`over
`
`Defendants
`
`pursuant
`
`to New York
`
`CPLR
`
`§§
`
`302
`
`and
`
`301
`
`as each
`
`Defendant
`
`is either
`
`present
`
`and
`
`domiciled
`
`in
`
`the
`
`State
`
`of New York,
`
`transacts
`
`or,
`
`at
`
`relevant
`
`times,
`
`transacted
`
`business
`
`within
`
`the
`
`state,
`
`and/or
`
`committed
`
`the
`
`tortious
`
`acts
`
`that
`
`give
`
`rise
`
`to the
`
`claims
`
`asserted
`
`herein
`
`within
`
`the State
`
`of New York.
`
`16.
`
`Venue
`
`of
`
`this
`
`action
`
`lies
`
`in Nassau
`
`County
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR
`
`and
`
`504
`
`as
`
`the
`
`government-entity
`
`Defendants
`
`reside
`
`in Nassau
`
`County
`
`and
`
`have
`
`their
`
`principal
`
`place
`
`of
`
`business
`
`located
`
`therein,
`
`and
`
`a substantial
`
`part
`
`of
`
`the
`
`events
`
`or omissions
`
`giving
`
`rise
`
`to this
`
`action
`
`occurred
`
`there.
`
`§§ 503
`
`FACTUAL
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`17.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`began
`
`attending
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.
`
`in the
`
`fall
`
`of
`
`1978.
`
`18.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`first
`
`met Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`in
`
`or
`
`around
`
`the winter
`
`of
`
`1979/1980,
`
`when
`
`East
`
`Ken
`
`Meadow
`
`H.S.'s
`
`track
`
`coach,
`
`Sicoli
`
`("Sicoli")
`
`asked
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`to assist
`
`the
`
`track
`
`team
`
`at a
`
`track
`
`clinic
`
`held
`
`at
`
`the
`
`school.
`
`At
`
`the time,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`16 years
`
`old
`
`and
`
`a high
`
`school
`
`junior.
`
`19.
`
`During
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`junior
`
`year, Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`began
`
`taking
`
`a keen
`
`interest
`
`in Plaintiff
`
`and became
`
`increasingly
`
`flirtatious
`
`with
`
`her
`
`and began
`
`grooming
`
`her
`
`for
`
`sexual
`
`abuse.
`
`Page
`
`4 of 21
`
`4 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`20.
`
`That
`
`year,
`
`Sicoli,
`
`advised
`
`and permitted
`
`Plaintiffto
`
`practice
`
`almost
`
`exclusively
`
`with
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`and NYIT
`
`men's
`
`track
`
`teaml
`
`instead
`
`of with
`
`the East Meadow
`
`H.S.
`
`track
`
`team2.
`
`After
`
`school,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`transported
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.
`
`to NYIT
`
`and
`
`then
`
`back
`
`home
`
`on
`
`a regular
`
`basis.
`
`During
`
`these
`
`car
`
`rides,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`held
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`hand
`
`and
`
`told
`
`her
`
`that
`
`he loved
`
`her.
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`also
`
`took
`
`21.
`
`During
`
`this
`
`time
`
`period,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`to
`
`various
`
`NYIT
`
`track
`
`competitions
`
`where
`
`he took
`
`her
`
`out
`
`to eat and plied
`
`her with
`
`wine.
`
`22.
`
`On May
`
`31,
`
`1980,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`won
`
`the
`
`Nassau
`
`County
`
`Track
`
`Championship.
`
`Subsequently,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`was
`
`interviewed
`
`by Newsday
`
`about
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`championship
`
`where
`
`he
`
`stated
`
`that
`
`he "saw
`
`this
`
`cute
`
`girl
`
`and
`
`asked
`
`her
`
`to be[his]
`
`guinea
`
`pig."
`
`23.
`
`Later
`
`that month,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`wrote
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a love
`
`letter
`
`"[T]he
`
`strength
`
`of my
`
`fondness
`
`for
`
`you
`
`grows,
`
`as you
`
`grow:
`
`(you['re]
`
`net
`
`just
`
`a "16
`
`yr old
`
`kid"!)
`
`Like
`
`it or not
`
`you
`
`are a young
`
`wom[ain
`
`...
`
`intelligent,
`
`incredibly
`
`attractive,
`
`etc,
`
`etc
`
`(and
`
`those
`
`are
`
`your
`
`bad
`
`points!)
`
`Anyway,
`
`hopefully
`
`the
`
`dialogue
`
`has only
`
`just
`
`beg[u]n."
`
`to Plaintiff,
`
`telling
`
`her,
`
`24.
`
`In
`
`June
`
`of
`
`1980,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`attended
`
`the East Meadow
`
`H.S.
`
`sports
`
`dinner
`
`banquet
`
`Zinno.
`
`After
`
`the
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`offered
`
`to drive
`
`Plaintiff
`
`with
`
`Mr.
`
`banquette,
`
`home.
`
`This
`
`occurred
`
`in
`
`front
`
`of
`
`teachers
`
`and
`
`students.
`
`On his way
`
`to
`
`drive
`
`Plaintiff
`
`home,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`parked
`
`at Maria
`
`Regina
`
`High
`
`School
`
`where
`
`he
`
`engaged
`
`in
`
`sexual
`
`intercourse
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff
`
`without
`
`her
`
`legal
`
`'
`
`2
`
`At
`
`the time, NYIT
`
`did not have
`
`a women's
`
`track
`
`team.
`
`During
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`senior
`
`year, East Meadow
`
`H.S.'s
`
`women's
`
`track
`
`coach,
`
`Charles
`
`Dinkermeyer
`
`also
`
`advised
`
`Plaintiff
`
`of
`
`the same.
`
`Page
`
`5 of 21
`
`5 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`consent
`
`in violation
`
`of New York
`
`Penal
`
`Law Article
`
`130.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`16 years
`
`old
`
`at
`
`the
`
`time.
`
`This
`
`was Plaintiff's
`
`first
`
`sexual
`
`experience.
`
`25.
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`continued
`
`to abuse
`
`Plaintiff
`
`throughout
`
`her
`
`junior
`
`and
`
`senior
`
`year.
`
`The
`
`abuse
`
`included
`
`multiple
`
`instances
`
`of
`
`sexual
`
`intercourse
`
`and
`
`occurred
`
`in
`
`various
`
`locations,
`
`including
`
`most
`
`disturbingly,
`
`on East Meadow
`
`H.S.
`
`and NYIT
`
`property.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`Senior
`
`the Defendants
`
`allowed
`
`Mr.
`
`to remove
`
`26.
`
`Throughout
`
`year,
`
`Zinno
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`her
`
`last
`
`period
`
`class
`
`and
`
`transport
`
`her
`
`from
`
`school
`
`to NYIT
`
`and
`
`back
`
`home.
`
`This
`
`occurred
`
`on
`
`a regular
`
`basis. While
`
`transporting
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`East Meadow
`
`to NYIT,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`would
`
`park
`
`his
`
`car
`
`on the
`
`street
`
`in Old Westbury
`
`and
`
`have
`
`sexual
`
`intercourse
`
`and
`
`oral
`
`sex with
`
`Plaintiff
`
`in the front
`
`seat ofhis
`
`car. Upon
`
`information
`
`and belief,
`
`several
`
`of
`
`these
`
`incidents
`
`occurred
`
`still
`
`16 years
`
`old.
`
`while
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`27.
`
`During
`
`the
`
`1980 men's
`
`fall
`
`cross-country
`
`season,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`who
`
`does
`
`not
`
`run
`
`cross-
`
`country,
`
`also
`
`traveled
`
`with Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`and
`
`the NYIT
`
`men's
`
`cross-country
`
`team to their
`
`out-of-state
`
`meets.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`the
`
`only
`
`female
`
`traveling
`
`with
`
`the
`
`team. NYIT
`
`trainer,
`
`David
`
`Markowitz
`
`was
`
`also
`
`present
`
`during
`
`these
`
`trips.
`
`28.
`
`On these
`
`trips,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`took
`
`Plaintiff
`
`out
`
`to eat alone,
`
`supplied
`
`her with
`
`alcohol,
`
`and
`
`and
`
`had
`
`intercourse
`
`with
`
`her
`
`in her
`
`hotel
`
`room.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`belief,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`paid
`
`for
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`hotel
`
`room,
`
`food,
`
`and
`
`alcohol
`
`using
`
`NYIT's
`
`expense
`
`account.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`16 years
`
`old
`
`at
`
`the
`
`time.
`
`29.
`
`During
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`senior
`
`year
`
`of high
`
`school,
`
`Zinno
`
`also
`
`entered
`
`NYIT's
`
`women's
`
`locker
`
`room
`
`and
`
`had
`
`intercourse
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`Page
`
`6 of 21
`
`6 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`30.
`
`The
`
`School
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`and NYIT
`
`had
`
`the
`
`responsibility
`
`to
`
`supervise
`
`and/or
`
`direct
`
`its
`
`employees
`
`and/or
`
`agents
`
`serving
`
`at
`
`the
`
`school,
`
`and
`
`specifically,
`
`had
`
`a
`
`duty
`
`not
`
`to aid
`
`individuals
`
`such
`
`as Mr.
`
`Zinno,
`
`by
`
`assigning,
`
`maintaining
`
`and/or
`
`appointing
`
`him to
`
`a position
`
`with
`
`access
`
`to minors.
`
`31.
`
`By
`
`holding
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`out
`
`as
`
`safe
`
`to work
`
`with
`
`children
`
`and,
`
`by
`
`undertaking
`
`the
`
`the School
`
`East Meadow
`
`custody,
`
`supervision
`
`of,
`
`and/or
`
`care
`
`of
`
`the minor
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`both
`
`District,
`
`H.S.,
`
`and NYIT
`
`entered
`
`into
`
`a fiduciary
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`being
`
`a
`
`minor,
`
`and
`
`by
`
`undertaking
`
`the
`
`care
`
`and
`
`guidance
`
`of a vulnerable
`
`minor,
`
`the School
`
`District,
`
`East
`
`Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`and NYIT
`
`held
`
`a position
`
`of power
`
`over
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`32.
`
`The
`
`School
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`and NYIT
`
`had
`
`a special
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`The
`
`School
`
`and NYIT
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`of
`
`33.
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`a duty
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`because
`
`they
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`reasonably
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`about
`
`the risk
`
`that Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`posed
`
`to Plaintiff,
`
`the risk
`
`of abuse
`
`generally
`
`in their
`
`programs,
`
`and/or
`
`the
`
`risks
`
`that
`
`their
`
`facilities
`
`posed
`
`to minor
`
`children.
`
`34.
`
`Furthermore,
`
`the School
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`and NYIT
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a
`
`duty
`
`of
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`because
`
`it solicited
`
`youth
`
`and parent(s)
`
`and/or
`
`guardian(s)
`
`for
`
`participation
`
`youth
`
`and
`
`and/or
`
`to
`
`the
`
`youth
`
`in
`
`its
`
`youth
`
`programs;
`
`encouraged
`
`parent(s)
`
`guardian(s)
`
`have
`
`participate
`
`in its programs;
`
`undertook
`
`custody
`
`of minor
`
`children,
`
`including
`
`Plaintiff;
`
`promoted
`
`its
`
`facilities
`
`and
`
`programs
`
`as being
`
`safe
`
`for
`
`children;
`
`held
`
`its agents,
`
`including
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno,
`
`out
`
`as safe
`
`to work
`
`with
`
`children;
`
`encouraged
`
`parent(s)
`
`and/or
`
`guardian(s)
`
`and
`
`children
`
`to spend
`
`time
`
`with
`
`its
`
`agents;
`
`and/or
`
`encouraged
`
`its
`
`agents,
`
`including
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno,
`
`to spend
`
`time
`
`with,
`
`interact
`
`with,
`
`and
`
`Page
`
`7 of 21
`
`7 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`recruit
`
`children.
`
`35.
`
`The
`
`School
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`and NYIT
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`to protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`harm because
`
`their
`
`actions
`
`and/or
`
`inactions
`
`regarding
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno's
`
`hiring,
`
`retention,
`
`and
`
`supervision,
`
`created
`
`a foreseeable
`
`risk
`
`of harm
`
`to Plaintiff.
`
`36.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`relevant
`
`and material
`
`hereto,
`
`the Defendants
`
`were
`
`responsible
`
`and/or
`
`liable
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno's
`
`actions,
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to respondeat
`
`superior.
`
`The
`
`School
`
`and NYIT
`
`knew
`
`and/or
`
`37.
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`reasonably
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known,
`
`and/or
`
`knowingly
`
`condoned,
`
`and/or
`
`covered
`
`up,
`
`the
`
`inappropriate
`
`and
`
`unlawful
`
`sexual
`
`activities
`
`of Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`who
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`38.
`
`The
`
`School
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`and NYIT's
`
`breach
`
`of
`
`their
`
`duties
`
`include,
`
`but
`
`are
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to:
`
`failing
`
`to have
`
`sufficient
`
`policies
`
`and
`
`procedures
`
`to prevent
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`implement
`
`the
`
`policies
`
`and
`
`procedures
`
`to prevent
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`abuse,
`
`failing
`
`to properly
`
`abuse,
`
`failing
`
`to take
`
`reasonable
`
`measures
`
`to make
`
`sure
`
`that
`
`the
`
`policies
`
`and
`
`procedures
`
`to prevent
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`were
`
`working,
`
`failing
`
`to adequately
`
`inform
`
`families
`
`and
`
`children
`
`of
`
`the
`
`risks
`
`of
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`abuse,
`
`failing
`
`to investigate
`
`risks
`
`of
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`abuse,
`
`failing
`
`to properly
`
`train
`
`the workers
`
`at
`
`institutions
`
`and programs
`
`within
`
`the school,
`
`failing
`
`to protect
`
`children
`
`in its programs
`
`from
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`of
`
`care
`
`for
`
`abuse,
`
`failing
`
`to adhere
`
`to the
`
`applicable
`
`standard
`
`child
`
`safety,
`
`misrepresenting
`
`the
`
`institutions,
`
`programs,
`
`leaders,
`
`and
`
`staff
`
`as safe,
`
`failing
`
`to train
`
`their
`
`employees
`
`properly
`
`to
`
`identify
`
`signs
`
`of
`
`child
`
`molestation
`
`by
`
`fellow
`
`employees.
`
`39.
`
`The
`
`School
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`and NYIT
`
`also
`
`breached
`
`their
`
`duties
`
`to
`
`Plaintiff
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to warn
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and Plaintiff's
`
`family
`
`of
`
`the
`
`risk
`
`that Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`posed
`
`and
`
`the
`
`Page
`
`8 of 21
`
`8 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`risks
`
`of
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`by
`
`their
`
`employees
`
`and/or
`
`agents.
`
`The
`
`School
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`and NYIT
`
`also
`
`failed
`
`to warn
`
`Plaintiff
`
`about
`
`any
`
`of
`
`the
`
`knowledge
`
`that
`
`they
`
`had
`
`about
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`abuse.
`
`40.
`
`The
`
`School
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`and NYIT
`
`also
`
`violated
`
`a legal
`
`duty
`
`by
`
`and/or
`
`abuse
`
`of
`
`children
`
`Zinno
`
`failing
`
`to report
`
`known
`
`suspected
`
`by Mr.
`
`and
`
`its other
`
`employees
`
`to
`
`the
`
`police,
`
`law
`
`enforcement,
`
`and/or
`
`the New
`
`York
`
`State
`
`Education
`
`Department
`
`during
`
`the
`
`relevant
`
`period.
`
`41.
`
`By
`
`employing
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`at
`
`the
`
`school,
`
`and
`
`other
`
`facilities
`
`under
`
`its
`
`supervision,
`
`the School
`
`District,
`
`East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`and NYIT,
`
`through
`
`its agents,
`
`affirmatively
`
`represented
`
`to
`
`Zinno
`
`did
`
`not
`
`pose
`
`a threat
`
`minor
`
`children
`
`and
`
`their
`
`families
`
`that Mr.
`
`to
`
`children,
`
`students
`
`and
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and Plaintiff's
`
`family
`
`were
`
`induced
`
`to rely
`
`on these
`
`affirmations
`
`and
`
`did
`
`rely
`
`on them.
`
`WE FOLLOWING
`FREE SCHOOL
`UNION
`H.S.
`DISTRICT.
`NEW YORK INSTITUTE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`CAUSES
`
`DEFENDANTS'
`
`EAST MEADOW
`ARE AS TO
`EAST MEADOW H.S. HIGH SCHOOL,
`OF TECHNOLOGY
`
`AND
`
`CAUSES
`
`OF ACTION
`
`FIRST
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION:
`
`NEGLIGEN_CE
`
`42.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats
`
`and re-alleges
`
`the
`
`allegations
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`in the preceding
`
`paragraphs.
`
`43.
`
`Defendants
`
`had
`
`to take
`
`reasonable
`
`steps
`
`to protect
`
`from
`
`a duty
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`a child,
`
`foreseeable
`
`harm
`
`when
`
`she was
`
`under
`
`their
`
`supervision
`
`and
`
`in their
`
`care,
`
`custody,
`
`and
`
`control.
`
`44.
`
`Defendants
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a
`
`duty
`
`of
`
`care
`
`because
`
`Defendants
`
`had
`
`a
`
`special
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`the Plaintiff
`
`who
`
`was
`
`a student
`
`at East Meadow
`
`H.S.
`
`and practiced
`
`and
`
`traveled
`
`with
`
`NYIT
`
`and
`
`established
`
`an in loco
`
`parentis
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`the Plaintiff.
`
`Page
`
`9 of 21
`
`9 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`45.
`
`Defendants
`
`also
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`arising
`
`from
`
`the
`
`special
`
`relationship
`
`that
`
`existed
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`the Plaintiff
`
`s parents,
`
`and
`
`other
`
`parents
`
`of
`
`young,
`
`innocent,
`
`vulnerable
`
`children
`
`in East
`
`Meadow
`
`H.S.
`
`and NYIT.
`
`Defendants
`
`failed
`
`to properly
`
`train
`
`and
`
`supervise
`
`its
`
`employees.
`
`This
`
`special
`
`relationship
`
`arose
`
`because
`
`of
`
`the
`
`high
`
`degree
`
`of
`
`vulnerability
`
`of
`
`the
`
`children
`
`entrusted
`
`to
`
`high
`
`and
`
`risk
`
`of
`
`sexual
`
`their
`
`care.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`of
`
`this
`
`degree
`
`of vulnerability
`
`abuse
`
`inherent
`
`in such
`
`a special
`
`relationship,
`
`Defendants
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`to establish
`
`measures
`
`of protection
`
`not
`
`necessary
`
`for
`
`persons
`
`who
`
`are older
`
`and
`
`better
`
`able
`
`to safeguard
`
`themselves.
`
`46.
`
`Defendants
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`to protect
`
`her
`
`from
`
`harm because
`
`the Defendants
`
`had
`
`a special
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`the
`
`employees.
`
`47.
`
`Defendants
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`of
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`because
`
`they
`
`solicited
`
`youths
`
`in their
`
`school
`
`and
`
`parents
`
`for
`
`participation
`
`and
`
`its programs;
`
`encouraged
`
`youths
`
`and
`
`parents
`
`to
`
`have
`
`the youth
`
`attend
`
`the
`
`school
`
`and its programs;
`
`undertook
`
`custody
`
`of minor
`
`children,
`
`including
`
`Plaintiff;
`
`promoted
`
`their
`
`school
`
`and
`
`employees
`
`as being
`
`safe
`
`for
`
`children;
`
`held
`
`their
`
`agents
`
`out
`
`as
`
`safe
`
`to work
`
`with
`
`children;
`
`encouraged
`
`parents
`
`and
`
`children
`
`to spend
`
`time
`
`with
`
`their
`
`agents;
`
`and/or
`
`encouraged
`
`their
`
`Mr.
`
`to
`
`spend
`
`time
`
`interact
`
`with
`
`educate
`
`agents,
`
`including
`
`Zinno,
`
`with,
`
`and
`
`children.
`
`48.
`
`Defendants
`
`also
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`to take
`
`reasonable
`
`steps
`
`to prevent
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`from using
`
`the tasks,
`
`premises,
`
`and
`
`instrumentalities
`
`ofhis
`
`position
`
`with
`
`the Defendants
`
`to target
`
`and
`
`sexually
`
`abuse
`
`children,
`
`including
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`49.
`
`Defendants
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`to take
`
`reasonable
`
`steps
`
`to protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`while
`
`she was
`
`a
`
`student
`
`and
`
`athlete,
`
`and was
`
`under
`
`Defendants'
`
`supervision,
`
`care,
`
`custody,
`
`and
`
`control.
`
`Page
`
`10 of 21
`
`10 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`50.
`
`Defendants
`
`had
`
`an express
`
`and/or
`
`implied
`
`duty
`
`to properly
`
`supervise
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`provide
`
`a reasonably
`
`safe
`
`environment
`
`for
`
`children
`
`who
`
`participated
`
`in the
`
`schools'
`
`activities.
`
`51.
`
`Defendants
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`to exercise
`
`the
`
`same
`
`degree
`
`of
`
`care
`
`over minors
`
`under
`
`their
`
`control
`
`as a reasonably
`
`prudent
`
`person
`
`would
`
`have
`
`exercised
`
`under
`
`similar
`
`circumstances.
`
`52.
`
`It was
`
`reasonably
`
`foreseeable
`
`that
`
`Defendants'
`
`breach
`
`of
`
`these
`
`duties
`
`of care would
`
`result
`
`in the
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`others.
`
`duties
`
`53.
`
`Each
`
`Defendant
`
`breached
`
`its
`
`to Plaintiff.
`
`Defendants
`
`failed
`
`to use
`
`ordinary
`
`care
`
`in
`
`determining
`
`whether
`
`their
`
`facilities
`
`were
`
`safe
`
`and/or
`
`determining
`
`whether
`
`they
`
`had
`
`sufficient
`
`information
`
`to
`
`represent
`
`their
`
`facilities
`
`as
`
`safe.
`
`Defendants'
`
`breach
`
`of
`
`their
`
`duties
`
`include,
`
`but
`
`are
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to:
`
`failure
`
`to protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`a known
`
`danger,
`
`failure
`
`to have
`
`sufficient
`
`policies
`
`and procedures
`
`in place
`
`to prevent
`
`child
`
`sex abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to properly
`
`implement
`
`to prevent
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`failure
`
`to take
`
`reasonable
`
`policies
`
`and
`
`procedures
`
`abuse,
`
`measures
`
`to ensure
`
`that
`
`policies
`
`and procedures
`
`to prevent
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`abuse
`
`were
`
`working,
`
`failure
`
`to adequately
`
`inform
`
`families
`
`and children
`
`of
`
`the risks
`
`of child
`
`sex abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to investigate
`
`risks
`
`of child molestation,
`
`failure
`
`to
`
`properly
`
`train
`
`the
`
`employees
`
`at
`
`institutions
`
`and
`
`programs
`
`within
`
`Defendants'
`
`geographical
`
`confines,
`
`failure
`
`to train
`
`the minors
`
`within
`
`Defendants'
`
`geographical
`
`confines
`
`about
`
`the
`
`dangers
`
`of
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`by
`
`teachers,
`
`failure
`
`to
`
`have
`
`any
`
`outside
`
`agency
`
`test
`
`their
`
`safety
`
`from
`
`procedures,
`
`failure
`
`to protect
`
`the
`
`children
`
`in their
`
`programs
`
`child
`
`sex abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to adhere
`
`to the
`
`applicable
`
`standard
`
`of
`
`care
`
`for
`
`child
`
`safety,
`
`failure
`
`to investigate
`
`the
`
`amount
`
`and
`
`type
`
`of
`
`information
`
`necessary
`
`to represent
`
`the
`
`institutions,
`
`programs,
`
`leaders
`
`and people
`
`as safe,
`
`failure
`
`to
`
`train
`
`their
`
`employees
`
`properly
`
`to identify
`
`signs
`
`of
`
`child
`
`molestation
`
`by
`
`fellow
`
`employees,
`
`failure
`
`by
`
`relying
`
`upon mental
`
`health
`
`professionals,
`
`and/or
`
`failure
`
`by
`
`relying
`
`on people
`
`who
`
`claimed
`
`that
`
`Page
`
`11 of 21
`
`11 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`they
`
`could
`
`treat
`
`child
`
`molesters.
`
`54.
`
`Defendants
`
`also
`
`breached
`
`their
`
`duty
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to warn
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`family
`
`of
`
`the
`
`risk
`
`that
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`posed
`
`and
`
`the
`
`risks
`
`of
`
`child
`
`abuse
`
`in
`
`schools.
`
`Defendants
`
`also
`
`failed
`
`to warn
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`family
`
`about
`
`any
`
`of
`
`the
`
`knowledge
`
`that
`
`sexual
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`that
`
`Defendants
`
`had
`
`about
`
`child
`
`abuse,
`
`including
`
`was
`
`occurring
`
`or
`
`had
`
`occurred
`
`within
`
`the School
`
`District.
`
`55.
`
`Defendants
`
`additionally
`
`violated
`
`a legal
`
`duty
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to
`
`report
`
`known
`
`and/or
`
`suspected
`
`abuse
`
`of
`
`children
`
`by Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`and/or
`
`its
`
`other
`
`agents
`
`to the
`
`police,
`
`law
`
`enforcement,
`
`and/or
`
`the New York
`
`State
`
`Education
`
`Department.
`
`56.
`
`As a direct
`
`and proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`Defendants'
`
`acts
`
`and
`
`which
`
`but
`
`were
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to
`
`negligent
`
`and/or
`
`grossly
`
`negligent
`
`conduct,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`groomed
`
`and
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`which
`
`caused
`
`her
`
`to
`
`suffer
`
`severe
`
`injuries
`
`and
`
`damages
`
`as described
`
`herein,
`
`including,
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to, mental
`
`and
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`physical
`
`injuries,
`
`despair
`
`and
`
`omissions,
`
`included
`
`shame.
`
`57.
`
`The
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`resulting
`
`injuries
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`caused
`
`solely
`
`and wholly
`
`by
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`negligent
`
`failures
`
`of
`
`the Defendants.
`
`NEGLIGENT
`
`HIRING.
`
`RETENTION,
`
`SUPERVISION,
`
`AND TRAINING
`
`SECOND
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION:
`
`58.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`re-alleges
`
`the
`
`allegations
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`in the preceding
`
`paragraphs.
`
`59.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`was
`
`employed
`
`by Defendants
`
`and was
`
`under
`
`the
`
`Defendant's
`
`direct
`
`supervision,
`
`employ,
`
`and
`
`control
`
`when
`
`he committed
`
`the unlawful
`
`acts
`
`alleged
`
`Page
`
`12 of 21
`
`12 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`herein.
`
`60.
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`would
`
`not
`
`and
`
`could
`
`not
`
`have
`
`been
`
`in
`
`a position
`
`to
`
`sexually
`
`abuse
`
`Plaintiff
`
`had
`
`he not
`
`been
`
`hired
`
`by
`
`the Defendants
`
`as an employee,
`
`mentor
`
`and/or
`
`counselor
`
`to
`
`students
`
`in the
`
`school,
`
`including
`
`the Plaintiff.
`
`61.
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`engaged
`
`in the wrongful
`
`conduct
`
`while
`
`acting
`
`in the
`
`course
`
`and
`
`scope
`
`of
`
`with
`
`Defendants
`
`and/or
`
`accomplished
`
`the sexual
`
`abuse
`
`virtue
`
`of his job-created
`
`his
`
`employment
`
`by
`
`authority
`
`over
`
`and
`
`access
`
`to Plaintiff.
`
`62.
`
`Through
`
`the
`
`exercise
`
`of
`
`reasonable
`
`diligence,
`
`Defendants
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`of
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno's
`
`propensity
`
`for
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`abuse.
`
`63.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`relevant
`
`times
`
`Defendants
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`to
`
`exercise
`
`due
`
`care
`
`in
`
`hiring,
`
`appointing,
`
`assigning,
`
`retention,
`
`supervision,
`
`training,
`
`and directing
`
`of Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`, to protect
`
`minor
`
`come
`
`into
`
`contact
`
`with
`
`and/or
`
`children,
`
`including
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`who
`
`were
`
`likely
`
`to
`
`him,
`
`under
`
`his
`
`influence
`
`or supervision,
`
`and
`
`to ensure
`
`that Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`did
`
`not
`
`use this
`
`assigned
`
`position
`
`to injure
`
`minors
`
`by
`
`sexual
`
`assault,
`
`contact,
`
`or abuse.
`
`64.
`
`Defendants
`
`were
`
`negligent
`
`and
`
`did
`
`not
`
`use
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`in their
`
`training
`
`of
`
`its
`
`teachers
`
`and/or
`
`adult
`
`staff
`
`about
`
`the
`
`risk
`
`of
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`in their
`
`school,
`
`signs
`
`of abuse,
`
`and
`
`their
`
`duty
`
`to report
`
`any
`
`suspicion
`
`that
`
`a minor
`
`may
`
`be getting
`
`abused,
`
`maltreated,
`
`groomed,
`
`or
`
`otherwise
`
`sexually
`
`abused.
`
`to identify
`
`65.
`
`The
`
`School
`
`District
`
`was
`
`negligent
`
`and
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`use
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`in
`
`hiring,
`
`appointing,
`
`assigning,
`
`and
`
`retention,
`
`of Mr.
`
`Zinno,
`
`failed
`
`to properly
`
`investigate
`
`his
`
`background
`
`and
`
`employment
`
`history,
`
`and/or
`
`hired,
`
`appointed
`
`and/or
`
`assigned
`
`him to the East Meadow
`
`H.S.,
`
`Page
`
`13 of 21
`
`13 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`when
`
`Defendants
`
`knew
`
`or should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`he was
`
`a danger
`
`to children.
`
`66.
`
`NYIT
`
`was
`
`negligent
`
`and
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`use
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`in
`
`hiring,
`
`appointing,
`
`assigning,
`
`and
`
`retention,
`
`of Mr.
`
`Zinno,
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`properly
`
`investigate
`
`his
`
`background
`
`and
`
`employment
`
`history,
`
`and/or
`
`hired,
`
`appointed
`
`and/or
`
`assigned
`
`him,
`
`when
`
`Defendants
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`he was
`
`a danger
`
`to children.
`
`a position
`
`where
`
`he
`
`67.
`
`Defendants
`
`negligently
`
`retained
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`in
`
`had
`
`access
`
`to
`
`children
`
`and
`
`could
`
`foreseeably
`
`cause
`
`harm,
`
`which
`
`Plaintiff
`
`would
`
`not
`
`have
`
`been
`
`subjected
`
`to if
`
`Defendants
`
`had
`
`taken
`
`reasonable
`
`care.
`
`68.
`
`In failing
`
`to timely
`
`remove
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`from
`
`working
`
`with
`
`children
`
`or
`
`terminate
`
`his
`
`employment,
`
`Defendants
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`exercise
`
`the
`
`degree
`
`of
`
`care
`
`that
`
`a reasonably
`
`prudent
`
`person
`
`exercise
`
`under
`
`similar
`
`circumstances.
`
`would
`
`69.
`
`Defendants
`
`also
`
`had
`
`duties
`
`arising
`
`from
`
`their
`
`special
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`parents,
`
`and
`
`other
`
`parents
`
`of young,
`
`innocent,
`
`and vulnerable
`
`children
`
`of East Meadow
`
`H.S.
`
`and NYIT
`
`to properly
`
`train
`
`and
`
`supervise
`
`its
`
`teachers
`
`and
`
`staff.
`
`These
`
`special
`
`relationships
`
`arose
`
`from
`
`the
`
`high
`
`degree
`
`of vulnerability
`
`of
`
`the
`
`children
`
`entrusted
`
`to their
`
`care.
`
`Defendants
`
`had
`
`measures
`
`of protection
`
`not
`
`for
`
`persons
`
`who
`
`are older
`
`and
`
`better
`
`able
`
`a duty
`
`to establish
`
`necessary
`
`to safeguard
`
`themselves.
`
`70.
`
`Defendants
`
`were
`
`negligent
`
`and
`
`did
`
`not
`
`use reasonable
`
`care
`
`in their
`
`supervision
`
`and
`
`direction
`
`of Mr.
`
`Zinno,
`
`failed
`
`to monitor
`
`his
`
`activities,
`
`failed
`
`to oversee
`
`the manner
`
`in which
`
`he
`
`carried
`
`out
`
`the
`
`duties
`
`to which
`
`Defendants
`
`assigned
`
`him,
`
`even
`
`though
`
`they
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`he posed
`
`a threat
`
`of
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`to minors;
`
`allowed
`
`the misconduct
`
`described
`
`above
`
`Page
`
`14 of 21
`
`14 of 21
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 03/31/2022 02:51 PM
`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 12:27 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 604266/2022
`INDEX NO. 900299/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/31/2022
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`to occur;
`
`failed
`
`to investigate
`
`his
`
`dangerous
`
`activities
`
`and
`
`remove
`
`him
`
`from
`
`their
`
`premises;
`
`and
`
`were
`
`otherwise
`
`negligent.
`
`71.
`
`Defendants
`
`were
`
`additionally
`
`negligent
`
`in
`
`failing
`
`to
`
`supervise,
`
`monitor,
`
`and/or
`
`investigate
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`and/or
`
`in failing
`
`to create,
`
`institute
`
`and
`
`enforce
`
`policies,
`
`rules,
`
`procedures,
`
`and
`
`regulations
`
`to prevent
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno's
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`of Plaintiff.
`
`In failing
`
`to properly
`
`supervise
`
`establish
`
`such
`
`programs
`
`and
`
`Mr.
`
`Zinno
`
`and
`
`in
`
`failing
`
`to
`
`training
`
`procedures
`
`and
`
`poli

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket