throbber
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2022 05:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NASSAU
`KALAMATA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC
`
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`
`
`
`Index No.:
`
`Plaintiff Date Purchased
`
`SUMMONS
`
`Plaintiff address is
`80 Broad St. Suite 1201
`New York, New York 10004
`
`INDEX NO. 610041/2022
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2022
`
`
`
`
`
`J & D RESTAURANT ENTERPRISES LLC D/B/A
`OLD SALEM CAFE ; OLD SALEM CAFE; J&D
`RESTAURANT ENT. LLC; OLD SALEM CAFE, INC.
`and
`DONNA L ARMSTRONG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants
`
`
`
`
`TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS:
`
`YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon Plaintiff attorney, at the
`
`address stated below, an answer to the attached complaint. If this summons was personally delivered
`upon you in the State of New York, the answer must be served within twenty days after such service
`of the summons, excluding the date of service. If the summons was not personally delivered to you
`within the State of New York, the answer must be served within thirty days after service of the
`summons is complete as provided by law.
`
`If you do not serve an answer to the attached complaint within the applicable time limitation
`stated above, a judgment may be entered against you, by default, for the relief demanded in the
`complaint, without further notice to you.
`
`The basis for venue is pursuant to the Contract entered into between the parties.
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`New York, New York
`July 29, 2022
`
`/s/ariel bouskila
`Ariel Bouskila, Esq.
`Berkovitch & Bouskila, PLLC
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`80 Broad St Suite 3303
`New York, New York 10004
`Phone:(212)729-1477
`Fax:(347)342-3192
`
`
`
`Defendants to be served:
`J & D RESTAURANT ENTERPRISES
`LLC D/B/A OLD SALEM CAFE ; OLD
`SALEM CAFE; J&D RESTAURANT
`ENT. LLC; OLD SALEM CAFE, INC.
`8162 BOTHA ROAD
`WARRENTON, VA 20186
`
`DONNA L ARMSTRONG
`4197 WINCHESTER ROAD
`MARSHALL, VA 20115
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 of 8
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2022 05:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 610041/2022
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2022
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NASSAU
`KALAMATA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC
`
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`Index No.:
`
`
`
`VERIFIED
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`J & D RESTAURANT ENTERPRISES LLC D/B/A OLD SALEM
`CAFE ; OLD SALEM CAFE; J&D RESTAURANT ENT. LLC;
`OLD SALEM CAFE, INC. and
`DONNA L ARMSTRONG
`
`
`
`Defendants
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff KALAMATA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC ("Plaintiff'), by its attorney, Ariel Bouskila
`
`Esq., for its complaint herein against J & D RESTAURANT ENTERPRISES LLC D/B/A OLD
`
`SALEM CAFE ; OLD SALEM CAFE; J&D RESTAURANT ENT. LLC; OLD SALEM CAFE,
`
`INC. (referred to collectively as "Company Defendant") and DONNA L ARMSTRONG
`
`("Guarantor(s)") (Company Defendant and Guarantor(s) collectively "Defendants"), alleges as
`
`follows:
`
`The Parties
`
`
`
`1.
`
`At all relevant times, Plaintiff was and is an entity authorized to do business in the
`
`State of New York, with its principal place of business in the State of New York.
`
`
`
`2.
`
`Upon information and belief, at all relevant times, Company Defendant was and is a
`
`company organized and existing under the laws of the State of VA.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, at all relevant times, Guarantor(s) were and are an
`
`individual residing in the State of VA.
`
` 4. Venue is proper in Nassau pursuant to the Agreements entered into by and between
`
`the parties.
`
`2 of 8
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2022 05:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 610041/2022
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2022
`
` 5. This Court maintains personal jurisdiction over the Defendants in this Action
`
`pursuant to the Agreements entered into by and between the parties.
`
`The Facts
`
`
`
`6.
`
`On or about September 20, 2021, Plaintiff and Defendants entered into an
`
`Agreement ("Agreement 1") whereby Plaintiff agreed to purchase all rights to Company Defendant's
`
`future receivables having an agreed upon value of $38,700.00. A copy of the Agreements is annexed
`
`hereto as Exhibit A.
`
` 7. On or about October 22, 2021, Plaintiff and Defendants entered into an Agreement
`
`("Agreement 2" collectively with Agreement 1 “Agreements”) whereby Plaintiff agreed to purchase
`
`all rights to Company Defendant's future receivables having an agreed upon value of $12,600.00. A
`
`copy of the Agreements is annexed hereto as Exhibit B.
`
`
`
`8.
`
`Pursuant to the Agreements, Company Defendant agreed to remit to Plaintiff 15%
`
`(“Specified Percentage”) of their receivables. Company Defendant further agreed to have one bank
`
`account approved by Plaintiff (the "Bank Account") from which Company Defendant authorized
`
`Plaintiff to make ACH withdrawals until $38,700.00 and $12,600.00 were fully paid to Plaintiff.
`
`Said withdrawals were a good faith estimate of the Specified Percentage of the Company
`
`Defendants’ receivables at the time the Agreements were entered into.
`
`
`
`9.
`
`In addition, Guarantor(s) agreed to guarantee any and all amounts owed to Plaintiff
`
`from Company Defendant upon a breach in performance by Company Defendant.
`
`
`
`10.
`
`Plaintiff remitted the Purchase Price for the future receivables to Company
`
`Defendant as agreed. Initially, Company Defendant met its obligations under the Agreements.
`
`
`
`11.
`
`Company Defendant ceased remitting to Plaintiff the Plaintiff’s share of Purchased
`
`Receivables and otherwise breached the Agreements by intentionally impeding and preventing
`
`3 of 8
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2022 05:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 610041/2022
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2022
`
`Plaintiff from receiving the Specified Percentage of Company Defendants’ receivables, while
`
`conducting regular business operations and collecting revenue.
`
`
`
`12.
`
`Company Defendant made remitted $25,972.00 of the receivables purchased by
`
`Plaintiff, leaving a balance of unremitted receivables in the amount of $12,728.00. In addition,
`
`pursuant to the Agreements, Company Defendant incurred NSF fees in the amount of $35.00 and
`
`Default Fees in the amount of $2,500.00.
`
` 13. Company Defendant made remitted $25,972.00 of the receivables purchased by
`
`Plaintiff, leaving a balance of unremitted receivables in the amount of $7,564.80. In addition,
`
`pursuant to the Agreements, Company Defendant incurred NSF fees in the amount of $35.00 and
`
`Default Fees in the amount of $2,500.00.
`
`
`
`14.
`
`Despite due demand, Company Defendant has failed to remit the purchased amount
`
`due and owing by Company Defendant to Plaintiff under the Agreements.
`
`
`
`15.
`
`Additionally, Guarantor(s) were responsible for all amounts incurred as a result of
`
`any breach of the Company Defendant.
`
`
`
`16.
`
`There remains a balance due and owing to Plaintiff on the Agreements in the amount
`
`of $22,833.00 plus interest, costs, and disbursements.
`
`AS AND FOR THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Breach of Contract)
`Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1
`
`
`
`17.
`
`through 14 of this complaint as though fully set forth at length herein.
`
`
`
`18.
`
`Plaintiff gave fair consideration to Company Defendant which was tendered for the
`
`right to receive the aforementioned receivables. Accordingly, Plaintiff fully performed under the
`
`Agreements.
`
`4 of 8
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2022 05:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 610041/2022
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2022
`
`
`
`19.
`
`Upon information and belief, Company Defendant is still conducting regular
`
`business operations and still collecting receivables.
`
`
`
`20.
`
`Company Defendant has materially breached the Agreements by failing to remit to
`
`Plaintiff the Plaintiffs share of Future Receivables, as required under the Agreements and otherwise
`
`intentionally impeding and preventing Plaintiff from receiving the proceeds of the receivables
`
`purchased by them.
`
`
`
`21.
`
`Upon information and belief, Company Defendant has also materially breached the
`
`Agreements by using more than one depositing bank (account which has not been approved by
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`
`
`22.
`
`By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of
`
`$22,833.00, plus interest, costs, and disbursements.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Personal Guarantee)
`
`
`
`23.
`
`Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1
`
`through 20 of this complaint as though fully set forth at length herein.
`
`
`
`24.
`
`Pursuant to the Agreements, Guarantor(s) personally guaranteed that Company
`
`Defendant would perform its obligations thereunder and that he would be personally liable for any
`
`loss suffered by Plaintiff as a result of a breach by Company Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`Company Defendant has breached the Agreements as detailed above.
`
`By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to judgment against Guarantor(s)
`
`based on his personal guarantee in the sum of $22,833.00, plus interest, costs, and disbursements.
`
`
`
`
`
` [THIS SPACE WAS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
`
`
`
`
`
`5 of 8
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2022 05:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 610041/2022
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2022
`
`WHEREFORE, plaintiff KALAMATA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC requests judgment against
`
`defendants J & D RESTAURANT ENTERPRISES LLC D/B/A OLD SALEM CAFE ; OLD
`
`SALEM CAFE; J&D RESTAURANT ENT. LLC; OLD SALEM CAFE, INC. and DONNA
`
`L ARMSTRONG as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`(i)
`
`On the first cause of action of the complaint, Plaintiff requests judgment against
`
`
`
`
`
`Company Defendant in the amount of $22,833.00, plus interest, costs, and
`
`disbursements;
`
`(ii)
`
`On the second cause of action of the complaint, Plaintiffs request judgment
`
`against Guarantor(s) in the amount of $22,833.00, plus interest, costs, and
`
`disbursements;
`
`(iv)
`
`For such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
`
`
`
`/s/ariel bouskila
`Ariel Bouskila, Esq.
`Berkovitch & Bouskila, PLLC
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`80 Broad St Suite 3303
`New York, New York 10004
`Phone:(212)729-1477
`Fax:(347)342-3192
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`New York, New York
`July 29, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6 of 8
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2022 05:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 610041/2022
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2022
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NASSAU
`KALAMATA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-against-
`
`
`
`
`
`J & D RESTAURANT ENTERPRISES LLC D/B/A OLD SALEM
`CAFE ; OLD SALEM CAFE; J&D RESTAURANT ENT. LLC;
`OLD SALEM CAFE, INC. and
`DONNA L ARMSTRONG
`
`
`
`
`
`Index No.:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants
`
`NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION
`SUBJECT TO MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING
`
`
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the matter captioned above, which has been commenced by
`filing of the accompanying documents with the County Clerk, is subject to mandatory electronic
`filing pursuant to Section 202.5-bb of the Uniform Rules for the Trial Courts. This notice is being
`served as required by Subdivision (b) (3) of that Section.
`The New York State Courts Electronic Filing System ("NYSCEF") is designed for the
`electronic filing of documents with the County Clerk and the court and for the electronic service of
`those documents, court documents, and court notices upon counsel and self-represented parties.
`Counsel and/or parties who do not notify the court of a claimed exemption (see below) as required
`by Section 202.5-bb(e) must immediately record their representation within the e-filed matter on
`the Consent page in NYSCEF. Failure to do so may result in an inability to receive electronic
`notice of document filings.
`Exemptions from mandatory e-filing are limited to: 1) attorneys who certify in good faith
`that they lack the computer equipment and (along with all employees) the requisite knowledge to
`comply; and 2) self-represented parties who choose not to participate in e-filing. For additional
`information about electronic filing, including access to Section 202.5-bb, consult the NYSCEF
`website at www.nycourts.gov/efile or contact the NYSCEF Resource Center at 646-386-3033 or
`efile@courts.state.ny.us.
`Dated: July 29, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ariel bouskila
`Ariel Bouskila, Esq.
` Berkovtich & Bouskila, PLLC
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`80 Broad St Suite 3303
`New York, New York 10004
`Phone:(212)729-1477
`Fax:(347)342-3192
`
`
`
`
`
`7 of 8
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2022 05:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 610041/2022
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2022
`
`STATE OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`
`)
`
`)
`
`ss.:
`
`BRANDON LAKS, being duly sworn, states:
`
`I am an authorized representative of Plaintiff KALAMATA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC in the
`
`within action. I have read the foregoing Verified Complaint and know the contents thereof; the same
`
`is true to my knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and
`
`belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true.
`
`The foregoing statements are true under penalties of perjury.
`
`By:
`
`BRANDON LAKS,
`
`Sworn to before me this
`
`July 29, 2022.
`
` ___________________________
`
`Notary Public
`
`8 of 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket