throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`
`STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`COURT
`SUPREME
`OF THE
`OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY
`_-_---......._____-------------------------..---------------------X
`TOWER
`GROUP
`INSURANCE
`REALTY
`
`LLC,
`
`a/s/o
`
`532
`
`39
`
`Index
`
`No.:
`
`150281/11
`
`-against-
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`NOTICE
`
`OF APPEAL
`
`LMW ENGINEERING
`JIEMING
`GROUP,
`KUANG
`SHINE
`WONG,
`INC.
`ZHI
`REALTY,
`STONE
`PANE
`CONSTRUCTION,
`INC.,
`YU,
`TAM ARCHITECT,
`SHIMING
`SHIMING
`TAM,
`HENG YONG CONSTRUCTION,
`INC. METAL
`JOHN
`STONE
`and
`CONSTRUCTION,
`
`INC.
`
`HSU,
`
`-----_.....----------------ยท------------------------------------X
`
`Defendants.
`
`PLEASE
`
`TAKE
`
`NOTICE
`
`that
`
`the
`
`defendant
`
`PANE
`
`STONE
`
`CONSTRUCTION,
`
`INC.
`
`hereby
`
`appeals
`
`to
`
`the
`
`Appellate
`
`Division,
`
`First
`
`Department,
`
`27 Madison
`
`Avenue,
`
`New
`
`York,
`
`New
`
`York,
`
`from
`
`an
`
`Order
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Supreme
`
`Court
`
`of
`
`the
`
`State
`
`of New
`
`York,
`
`New
`
`York
`
`(Hon.
`
`Ericka
`
`M.
`
`County
`
`Edwards)
`
`made
`
`in
`
`the
`
`above-entitled
`
`matter
`
`on March
`
`22,
`
`2018,
`
`which
`
`Order
`
`denied
`
`defendant
`
`PANE
`
`STONE
`
`CONSTRUCTION's
`
`post-trial
`
`motion
`
`to
`
`set
`
`aside
`
`the
`
`verdict
`
`pursuant
`
`to
`
`CPLR
`
`4404(a)
`
`and
`
`the
`
`post-trial
`
`motion
`
`of
`
`defendant
`
`METAL
`
`STONE
`
`CONSTRUCTION,
`
`INC.
`
`to
`
`set
`
`aside
`
`the
`
`verdict
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR
`
`4404(a).
`
`This
`
`appeal
`
`is
`
`taken
`
`from
`
`those
`
`parts
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Order
`
`which
`
`are
`
`adverse
`
`to
`
`defendant-appellant.
`
`1 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`
`Dated:
`
`New York,
`
`New York
`
`April
`
`26,
`
`2018
`
`)I
`
`C~
`
`THOMAS
`B. COPPOLA,
`SCHWAB
`KATZ
`LESTER
`Attorneys
`for
`Defendant
`STONE
`PANE
`CONSTRUCTION,
`100 Wall
`Street
`New York
`New York,
`212.341.4478
`
`ESQ.
`& DWYER,
`
`LLP
`
`INC.
`
`10005
`
`TO:
`
`Law Office
`Attorneys
`40 Wall
`New York,
`
`of Steven
`for
`Plaintiff
`28th
`
`Street,
`New York
`
`G.
`
`Fauth
`
`FlOOr
`10005
`
`Barry,
`Attorneys
`Metal
`2 Rector
`New York,
`
`McTiernan
`for
`
`& Moore
`Defendant
`
`Stone
`
`14th
`
`Street,
`New York
`
`FlOOr
`10006
`
`LLP
`
`Gogick,
`Attorneys
`
`O'
`& O'Neill,
`Byrne
`Defendants
`for
`Tam and
`Shiming
`Shiming
`Room
`1560
`11 Broadway,
`New York,
`New York
`10004
`
`& Henderson
`Rawle
`Attorneys
`for
`Defendants
`LMW Engineering
`14 Wall
`Street,
`New York
`New York,
`
`27th
`
`Group
`FlOOr
`
`10005
`
`Tam Architects
`
`and
`
`Jieming
`
`Wang
`
`Shine
`Realty,
`No appearance
`
`Inc.
`
`Zhi
`Kuang
`No appearance
`
`Yu
`
`Heng
`Yong
`No appearance
`
`Construction,
`
`Inc.
`
`2 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`NEW YORK
`FILED:
`96
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`NO.
`
`COTINTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03/27
`
`/2018
`
`03
`
`: 21
`
`PM
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`INDEX
`NO.
`150281/2011
`
`RBCEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2018
`
`COURT OF THE STATE
`SUPREME
`OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY
`---------------------------------------------------------------------X
`of New York
`
`Tower
`
`532
`
`Insurance
`39th REALTY
`
`Company
`LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-against-
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`X Index
`รขโ‚ฌโ€รขโ‚ฌโ€รขโ‚ฌโ€
`
`No.:
`
`150281/11
`
`a/s/o
`
`NOTICE
`
`OF ENTRY
`
`LMW ENGINEERING
`GROUP
`JIEMING
`LLC,
`YU, PANE
`KUANG
`ZHI
`SHINE
`REALTY,
`INC.,
`STONE
`SHIMING
`CONSTRUCTION
`TAM,
`PC, HENG YONG
`SHIMING
`TAM,
`ARCHITECT,
`STONE
`INC., METAL
`CONSTRUCTION
`and JOHN HSU,
`CONSTRUCTION
`INC.
`
`INC.,
`
`WANG,
`
`Defendants.
`_________________________..-------------._______
`TAKE
`
`PLEASE
`
`NOTICE
`
`________-----------..---X
`---
`the within
`that
`is a true
`
`-รขโ‚ฌโ€
`
`copy
`
`of
`
`an Order
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Honorable
`
`Erika
`
`M. Edwards
`
`of
`
`the Supreme
`
`Court
`
`of
`
`the State
`
`of New York
`
`for
`
`the
`
`County
`
`of New York,
`
`dated
`
`March
`
`22,
`
`2018
`
`and
`
`entered
`
`in the
`
`office
`
`of
`
`the Clerk
`
`of
`
`the County
`
`of New York
`
`on March
`
`27,
`
`2018.
`
`Dated:
`
`New York,
`March
`27,
`
`New York
`2018
`
`LAW OFFICE
`
`OF STEVEN
`
`G. FAUTH,
`
`LLC
`
`I
`
`/
`
`By:
`
`G. Monaco,
`Esq.
`28th Floor
`40 Wall
`Street,
`New York
`New York,
`400-7154
`(212)
`Attorneys
`for
`
`10005
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Russell
`
`of
`10
`1
`3 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`: NEW YORK
`FILED
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`NO.
`96
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03
`
`/27
`
`/2018
`
`03
`
`: 21
`
`PM|
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`INDEX
`150281/2011
`NO.
`
`RECEIVED,
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2018
`
`TO:
`
`Katz
`
`& Dwyer,
`
`Lester
`Schwalb
`120 Broadway
`NY 10271
`New York,
`Attorneys
`for Pane Stone Construction
`and John Hsu
`
`McTiernan
`
`and Moore
`Barry
`2 Rector
`14th
`floor
`Street,
`NY 10006
`New York,
`Attorneys
`for Metal
`Stone Construction,
`
`Inc.
`
`Shiming
`Dismissed
`
`Tam & Shiming
`from
`Case
`
`Tam. Architect,
`
`PC
`
`LMW Engineering
`Dismissed
`from
`
`Group
`Case
`
`LLC & Jieming
`
`Wang
`
`Shine
`Realty,
`No Appearance
`
`Inc.
`
`Zhi Kuang
`Yu
`No Appearance
`
`10
`2 of
`4 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`NEW YORK
`|FILED:
`NYSCEF
`NO.
`96
`DOC.
`SUPREME
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03/27/2018
`
`32:22
`
`PBd
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`INDEX
`NO .
`15 0 2 8 1 / 2 0 11
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2018
`
`COURT
`OF THE
`NEW YORK
`
`STATE
`COUNTY
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`PRESENT:
`
`Hon.
`
`Paul A. Goetz.
`
`JSC
`
`Jus tice
`
`I
`
`: 150281/2011
`Number
`Index
`COMPANY
`TOWER
`INSURANCE
`vs
`LMW ENGINEERING
`: 003
`Sequence Number
`.
`OTHER RELIEFS
`
`GROUP
`
`LLC
`
`OF
`
`The following
`of Motion/Order
`Notice
`
`papers,
`
`, were read on this motion
`1 to ____.
`numbered
`- Exhibits
`to Show Cause - Affidavits
`
`to/for
`
`Answering
`
`Affidavits
`
`Replyina
`
`Affidavits
`
`-
`
`Exhibits
`
`Upon
`
`the foregoing
`
`papers,
`
`it
`
`is ordered
`
`that
`
`this motion
`
`is
`
`PART
`
`q โ€ 
`
`INDEX NO.
`
`MOTION DATE
`
`MOTION SEQ. NO.
`
`|No(s).
`
`|No(s).
`
`|No(s).
`
`DECIDED
`
`<,r-
`
`As PER ATTACHED
`rc<E sta&~
`
`Jl,s
`
`DECISION
`
`AND ORDER
`
`gA<'pb
`
`s/za(<I
`
`-
`
`, J.S.C.
`
`Hon.
`
`Paul A. Goetz.
`JSC
`0 NON-FINAL
`DISPOSITION
`D OTHER
`0GRANTED
`IN PART
`ยค SUBMIT ORDER
`~ REFERENCE
`APPOINTMENT
`
`+
`
`' L
`
`CASE DISPOSED
`ยค DENIED
`
`GRANTED
`
`J
`
`SETTLE ORDER
`
`DO NOT POST
`
`O FIDUCIARY
`
`5 of 13
`
`0I-
`CI
`W
`
`Z
`u- 0
`ro
`o
`Li
`
`CA
`Lu
`EO
`
`-'
`u.
`
`z
`
`Dated:
`
`3 2 2.
`
`( f
`
`1. CHECK ONE:
`
`.....................................................................
`2. CHECK AS APPROPRIATE:
`
`...........................MOTION
`
`IS:
`
`3. CHECK IF APP ROPRIATE:
`
`................................................
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`: NEW YORK
`FILED
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`NO.
`94
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03/27/2018
`
`B2
`
`: 22
`
`P1
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`INDEX
`NO.
`150281/2011
`
`REร“EIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2018
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`OF NEW YORK
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`COMPANY
`TOWER INSURANCE
`YORK
`532
`39 REALTY,
`a/s/o
`LLC,
`
`OF NEW
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Index
`
`No.:
`
`150281/2011
`
`DECISION/ORDER
`
`-against-
`
`Motion
`
`Sequences:
`
`002
`
`and
`
`003
`
`LMW ENGINEERING
`JIEMING
`GROUP,
`LLC,
`ZHI KUANG YU,
`WANG SHINE
`REALTY,
`INC.,
`STONE
`PANE
`CONSTRUCTION,
`INC.,
`TAM ARCHITECT,
`SHIMING
`SHIMING
`THAM,
`P.C., HENG YONG CONSTRUCTION,
`INC.,
`JOHN HSU,
`
`and
`
`Defendants.
`
`(I
`
`Recitation,
`
`as required
`
`by CPLR 2219(a),
`
`of
`
`the
`
`papers
`
`considered:in
`
`the
`
`review
`
`of
`
`this motion:
`
`Papers
`and Affidavits/Affirmations/
`of Motion
`of Law annexed
`Affidavits/Affirmations
`annexed
`Affidavits/Affirmations/Memos
`annexed
`
`Notice
`Memos
`Opposition
`of Law
`
`Reply
`Law
`
`ERIKA
`
`M. EDWARDS,
`
`J.S.C.:
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Tower
`
`Insurance
`
`this
`
`subrogation
`
`and Memo
`
`of
`
`a/s/o
`
`532
`
`Stone
`
`Numbered
`
`1, 2
`
`3, 4
`
`5, 6
`
`action
`
`Inc.
`
`insured's
`
`Construction,
`for
`its
`
`conducted
`
`tried
`
`before
`
`brought
`
`Metal
`
`Stone
`
`recover
`
`money
`construction
`
`Metal
`
`work
`were
`Stone
`The jury
`2017.
`$449,627.15
`
`rendered
`
`with
`
`Pane
`
`property
`adjacent
`on the
`on various
`a jury
`a verdict
`in Tower's
`Stone
`75% responsible
`
`of New York
`Company
`against
`Defendants
`Pane
`Stone"
`("
`("Metal
`Stone")
`("collectively
`in 2008
`damage
`building.
`
`39 Realty,
`Construction
`"Defendants"
`"Defendants"),
`caused
`by negligent
`against
`claims
`
`Tower's
`
`days
`
`favor
`
`September
`from
`Defendants
`against
`and Metal
`
`Stone
`
`being
`
`(" Tower"
`LLC ("Tower")
`Stone"
`("
`("Pane
`Stone"),
`to
`others
`
`and
`
`underpinning
`Stone
`Pane
`to October
`total
`amount
`25% responsible
`
`and
`
`4,
`of
`
`for
`
`15, 2017,
`in the
`
`being
`
`Tower's
`
`loss.
`
`Both
`
`Defendants
`
`now move
`
`for
`
`an order
`
`4404(a).
`damages'
`
`Under
`
`because
`
`motion
`it was
`
`sequence
`against
`
`Pane
`002,
`the weight
`
`evidence,
`
`excessive
`
`setting
`Stone moves
`of
`the
`
`aside
`
`the
`
`pursuant
`verdict,
`the jury's
`to set aside
`and
`speculative.
`
`to CPLR
`award
`of
`
`Under
`
`IPane Stone listed the damages
`
`award
`
`at $452,127.15,
`
`but
`
`it was actually
`
`449,627.15.
`
`6 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`NEW YORK
`FILED:
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`NO.
`96
`
`03
`
`27
`
`2018
`
`Ih3:32
`
`P
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`INDEX
`NO.
`150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2018
`
`motion
`weight
`
`or
`
`law,
`moves
`$200,000
`
`motions
`
`003, Metal
`sequence
`for
`of
`the
`evidence,
`for
`in the
`alternative,
`the jury's
`to set aside
`or
`to $238,000,
`and Pane
`Stone
`
`Stone moves
`
`an order
`an order
`damages
`
`finding
`granting
`award
`
`in the
`
`partially
`
`alternative,
`opposed
`
`for
`
`Metal
`
`the jury's
`
`liability
`
`verdict
`
`finding
`
`that Metal
`
`Stone
`
`was
`
`to set aside
`that Metal
`a new trial
`of $449,627.15
`a new trial
`Stone's
`
`as against
`as a matter
`Stone
`the
`
`the
`
`of
`
`also
`award
`
`both
`aside
`
`to
`
`the jury's
`
`verdict
`
`liability
`negligent
`not
`was
`Stone
`as to negligence.
`to Tower,
`on damages.
`
`or
`Tower
`
`motion
`25% liable
`
`as it pertained
`
`for
`
`Tower's
`
`Metal
`to reduce
`opposes
`to setting
`damages.
`
`For
`
`the
`
`reasons
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`herein,
`
`the court
`
`denies
`
`Defendants'
`
`motions
`
`in their
`
`entirety.
`
`the jury's
`
`of
`
`against
`
`argues
`
`in
`
`Stone
`
`does
`
`not
`
`dispute
`
`Pane
`that
`
`substance
`
`the jury's
`it was
`since
`speculative
`of damages
`true measure
`insured's
`actual
`cost
`of
`
`was
`award
`on estimates
`
`against
`
`apportionment
`the weight
`opinion.
`
`and
`on the evidence
`
`liability
`the
`of
`evidence,
`further
`Stone
`
`Pane
`
`have
`
`been
`
`repair
`
`was
`
`$200,000
`
`based
`to $204,000
`
`and
`
`that
`
`demonstrating
`the
`diminution
`
`damages
`based
`
`solely
`should
`
`it, but
`excessive
`argues
`
`that
`
`the
`
`and
`
`that
`
`the
`
`of
`
`value
`
`was
`
`$200,000.
`
`Metal
`
`Stone
`it had
`
`substance
`that
`the New York
`City
`present
`at
`the
`site,
`and
`it owed
`no duty
`the underpinning
`work
`and Pane
`contractor
`
`was
`
`Stone
`
`the jury's
`because
`
`being
`hired
`
`disputes
`verdict
`no liability
`it only
`Department
`of Buildings.
`it had
`no supervisory
`authority
`to Tower
`Shine
`or
`insured.
`its
`performed.
`
`over
`
`the
`
`Realty
`
`Shine
`
`Realty
`Construction
`
`and
`on liability
`filed
`the PW2,
`not
`perform
`
`It did
`
`which
`was
`any work
`underpinning
`was
`the owner
`Pane
`
`hired
`
`damages.
`
`Metal
`
`Stone
`
`argues
`
`the work
`
`permit
`
`in
`for
`
`not
`
`at
`
`of
`
`Stone
`
`it was
`
`where
`
`the
`site,
`work
`or subcontractor
`the property
`as its general
`work.
`
`Metal
`
`that
`
`the
`
`damages
`
`award
`
`argues
`also
`to use the proper
`failed
`of
`the reasonable
`cost
`evidence
`demonstrated
`work
`to repair
`
`measure
`
`of damages
`Metal
`Tower's
`
`repair.
`that
`
`needed
`
`the
`
`roof
`
`Heng
`
`Yong
`
`to perform
`
`the
`
`underpinning
`
`should
`was
`
`be set aside
`the
`lesser
`of
`
`which
`
`or
`
`reduced
`
`diminution
`the
`in substance
`
`because
`
`the jury
`in value
`or
`
`that
`
`the
`
`both
`
`argue
`
`the
`for
`seven
`
`for
`
`repairs,
`windows
`
`there
`
`for
`
`was
`a total
`
`additional
`of
`
`Stone
`insured
`at $20,000
`
`Stone
`
`and Pane
`paid
`$200,000
`$500
`each
`
`and
`
`$23,500.
`
`diminution
`inflated
`
`defense
`The
`in value
`
`experts
`to be $200,000.
`
`estimated
`
`it
`
`included
`
`some
`
`items
`
`the
`
`repairs
`
`costs
`
`to be $204,000
`
`and
`
`Metal
`
`claims
`Stone
`were
`which
`
`not
`
`that
`
`Tower's
`
`expert's
`
`$238,000
`estimate
`
`the jury's
`
`and
`
`the
`
`was
`damages
`
`because
`should
`
`verdict
`
`be set aside
`
`as against
`
`the weight
`
`the court
`
`should
`
`reduce
`
`the
`
`award
`
`to $200,000
`
`damaged.
`
`of
`the
`evidence
`to $238,000,
`
`or
`
`on damages.
`
`Therefore,
`and
`because
`
`it was
`
`in the
`
`alternative,
`
`excessive
`or
`a new trial
`
`order
`
`CPLR 4404(a)
`and
`that
`direct
`
`thereon
`law or
`interest
`as determined
`
`it can
`of
`
`order
`
`justice,
`
`by
`
`permits
`judgment
`a new
`or where
`the
`court
`
`trial
`
`where
`the jury
`(CPLR
`
`the
`
`verdict
`
`agree
`
`cannot
`4404[a]).
`
`a trial
`
`court
`be entered
`
`verdict
`
`to set aside
`a jury
`of a party
`in favor
`entitled
`to the weight
`is contrary
`together
`after
`being
`
`or any
`to judgment
`of
`the
`
`judgment
`
`entered
`
`of
`
`as a matter
`in the
`time
`
`evidence,
`a reasonable
`
`kept
`
`for
`
`is permitted
`court
`The
`the
`the weight
`of
`factors"
`of many
`
`is against
`
`balancing
`
`evidence
`(Cohen
`
`to set aside
`and
`
`a verdict
`"involves
`
`it
`
`and
`
`a new trial
`order
`is in large
`part
`45 NY2d
`
`the jury's
`where
`a discretionary
`499
`[1978]
`
`verdict
`
`[internal
`
`493,
`
`what
`
`Inc.,
`
`v Hallmark
`
`Cards,
`
`2
`
`7 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`: NEW YORK
`|F ILED
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`NO.
`94
`
`CLERK
`
`03
`
`/27
`
`/ 2 018
`
`tR2 : 2 2
`
`PM)
`
`goUNTy'
`COUNTY
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`INDEX
`150281/2011
`NO.
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2018
`
`citations
`
`omitted]).
`
`For
`
`to determine
`
`that
`
`that
`find
`permissible
`jury"
`
`the
`
`by
`to reach
`
`(id.).
`
`the
`
`result
`
`by
`
`sufficient
`
`simply
`to the
`(people]
`not
`be utterly
`conclude
`that
`
`evidence,
`no valid
`line
`conclusion
`
`of
`
`irrational
`
`the
`
`verdict
`
`quotation
`
`and
`
`citation
`
`a court
`court
`
`the
`
`must
`
`and
`
`reasoning
`reached
`a jury
`for
`is as a matter
`omitted]).
`
`of
`
`law not
`
`supported
`
`of
`
`as a matter
`based
`on the
`
`inferences
`
`could
`
`law a jury
`presented
`evidence
`which
`
`verdict
`
`is not
`
`supported
`
`possibly
`of
`fact
`. the
`
`at
`
`"there
`
`is
`
`trial,
`lead
`"it would
`
`rational
`
`and
`
`.
`
`.
`
`court
`
`may
`
`not
`
`(id.
`
`[internal
`
`there
`
`If
`it has determined
`
`is a question
`upon
`evidence"
`
`by
`
`the
`
`favorable
`
`It
`
`for
`
`requires
`
`to view
`the court
`to assume
`the movant
`the
`
`the evidence
`
`facts
`
`testified
`
`party,
`and
`
`Kornblum
`verdict
`
`weight
`AD2d
`
`to grant
`
`all
`
`favorable
`Co.
`
`Metals
`
`inferences
`v Intsel
`where
`
`Corp.,
`issues
`
`is not
`appropriate
`to be accorded
`the
`[1" Dept
`700
`
`699,
`
`testimony
`1972]).
`
`flowing
`38 NY2d
`376
`of credibility
`are within
`the province
`
`in the
`to by
`the
`
`light
`
`most
`
`the
`
`prevailing
`to the
`evidence
`
`to the
`
`prevailing
`to be true
`witnesses
`
`party's
`
`prevailing
`
`party
`
`(see S.
`
`from
`
`[1976]).
`
`Judgment
`
`are involved
`
`of
`
`notwithstanding
`as matters
`and
`of credibility
`v Carucci,
`the jury
`(Bodlovich
`
`the
`
`the
`
`38
`
`When
`
`applying
`the jury's
`
`that
`
`these
`
`legal
`
`verdict
`
`principles
`on liability
`the motions
`denies
`negligent
`
`to the
`and
`
`evidence
`
`presented
`
`at
`
`the
`
`court
`
`was
`
`not
`
`the
`
`or
`
`verdict,
`to reduce
`
`for
`
`of
`
`the
`
`for
`
`and
`
`the
`
`court
`
`Stone
`
`was
`
`not
`
`determines
`
`evidence
`that Metal
`
`damages
`to set aside
`of
`as a matter
`
`law,
`
`trial,
`the weight
`against
`a new trial,
`damages
`the jury's
`
`an order
`award.
`
`Here,
`evidence
`
`the
`
`could
`
`not
`
`have
`
`Defendants
`
`by
`
`showing
`reached
`
`its
`
`failed
`
`the
`
`that
`
`the jury's
`verdict
`so greatly
`interpretation
`of
`
`to demonstrate
`preponderated
`evidence
`that
`fair
`conclusion
`on any
`verdict
`
`the jury's
`
`in favor
`
`of Tower
`
`was
`
`against
`
`in their
`
`favor
`
`the
`
`of
`
`the weight
`that
`the jury
`there
`was
`to Pane
`
`evidence.
`Here,
`on 75% liability
`in the
`amount
`
`of
`
`based
`
`award
`
`and
`
`ample
`
`Stone
`
`credit
`
`to support
`evidence
`and 25% liability
`$449,627.15.
`After
`considering
`drawn
`from
`the
`in favor
`evidence
`and
`the testimony
`damages.
`
`to Metal
`
`Stone
`
`and
`
`the jury's
`
`damages
`
`the
`
`credibility
`of Tower,
`evidence
`
`it
`
`documentary
`
`the witnesses
`of
`is easy
`submitted
`
`to understand
`by Tower
`
`the
`
`reasonable
`the jury
`why
`to substantiate
`
`inferences
`
`appeared
`
`to
`
`liability
`
`and
`
`As
`
`noted
`on the
`
`based
`
`Tower
`
`and Pane
`
`Stone,
`that Metal
`
`revealed
`
`the jury
`Stone
`
`found
`
`Metal
`
`Stone
`
`filed
`
`the
`
`to be 25% liable
`for
`the work
`
`permit,
`
`by both
`evidence
`which
`by a Metal
`As
`the
`
`it was
`
`signed
`
`superintendent.
`
`site
`
`visits
`
`to supervise
`
`Stone
`
`construction
`the work,
`
`employee
`
`who
`
`listed
`
`Metal
`
`Stone
`
`application
`as the
`
`construction
`
`superintendent,
`underpinning.
`
`including
`
`Metal
`
`Stone
`
`was
`
`required
`
`to conduct
`
`daily
`
`as the
`
`client
`
`support
`
`of excavation
`
`plans.
`
`engineer's
`on the
`a long-term
`
`Metal
`
`he had
`
`Stone
`
`and whenever
`he called
`properly,
`He believed
`
`Metal
`
`with
`Stone,
`relationship
`he saw that
`the
`sub-contractor
`a supervisor
`Stone
`to send
`the
`general
`
`Metal
`
`was
`
`contractor
`
`that
`
`he
`
`was
`
`to the
`for
`
`him prior
`
`to the
`
`start
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Stone
`to contact
`
`was
`listed
`also
`in substance
`
`Stone,
`
`paid
`
`Stone
`
`Metal
`engineer
`testified
`by Metal
`the
`performing
`and
`a representative
`
`hired
`
`The
`
`was
`not
`
`site
`
`the
`
`foundation
`
`underpinning
`
`that
`by Metal
`work
`underpinning
`each
`time.
`came
`that Metal
`
`and
`
`work
`
`work.
`
`Stone
`
`was
`
`required
`
`3
`
`8 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`NEW YORK
`DOC.
`NO.
`94
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03
`
`/27
`
`2018
`
`B2
`
`: 2 2
`
`PM|
`
`[FILED:
`NYSCEF
`
`Additionally,
`interrelated
`
`the
`
`address
`
`and
`
`have
`
`significantly
`the
`same
`
`evidence
`as they
`the
`
`demonstrated
`are owned
`by
`employees.
`
`same
`
`that Metal
`the
`same
`
`Stone
`
`and Pane
`
`person,
`
`they
`
`share
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`INDEX
`NO.
`
`150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2018
`
`are
`Stone
`the
`same
`
`office,
`
`have
`
`Damages
`
`experts
`
`from
`
`demonstrated
`
`that
`
`it paid
`
`its
`
`all parties
`$449,627.15
`insured
`
`testified
`
`at
`
`trial.
`
`to settle
`
`and
`
`testimonial
`
`amount
`
`Based
`the damages
`on their
`
`on the
`
`evidence,
`claim.
`
`Tower
`
`Tower
`
`presented
`
`was
`
`based
`
`detailed
`
`expert's
`damaged
`
`It
`
`documentary
`inspection
`was
`a compromise
`
`of
`
`the premises
`
`reached
`
`that
`evidence
`an itemized
`
`this
`estimate
`
`and
`
`of
`
`the cost
`
`after
`negotiating
`evidence
`revealed
`
`with
`
`the
`
`insured's
`
`that
`
`the
`
`insured
`
`did
`
`not
`
`use
`
`to repair
`expert
`
`the
`
`and
`
`property.
`after
`
`and
`attorney
`all
`the money
`problems
`
`his
`
`legal
`
`concerns.
`
`to repair
`
`he
`and
`
`fees
`The
`
`that
`
`building
`that
`
`he still
`is still
`
`not
`
`even
`
`after
`
`because
`
`Tower's
`
`The
`the
`
`depreciation.
`but
`with
`
`off
`paid
`his mortgage
`
`deducting
`the property,
`was
`having
`then
`spent
`approximately
`testified
`in substance
`
`insured
`
`$200,000
`that
`
`needed
`level
`
`the
`
`the
`
`windows,
`with
`
`building's
`
`company.
`
`outstanding
`He used
`that
`on repairs
`he had
`yet
`
`primarily
`completed
`a staircase.
`and
`
`and windows.
`
`He
`
`not
`capstones
`
`the doors
`
`will
`
`still
`
`additional
`to avoid
`mortgage
`off
`some
`of
`to pay
`the money
`dealt
`with
`safety
`all necessary
`repairs,
`the
`He said
`that
`stated
`in substance
`to its pre-accident
`condition
`
`to repair
`roof,
`and there
`are problems
`all
`repairs
`are made,
`and
`the facade
`corniches
`structural
`engineer
`
`testified
`
`incident
`cracks
`
`because
`to grow
`
`the
`
`and
`
`building
`the
`
`building
`
`building
`can
`never
`in substance
`that
`is in continuing
`to shift
`over
`
`not
`be replaced
`
`be restored
`to their
`
`the repair
`
`structural
`time.
`
`original
`
`costs
`decline
`
`condition.
`
`increased
`
`from
`
`and
`
`erosion
`
`Additionally,
`the
`date
`caused
`
`which
`
`of
`
`the
`
`initial
`
`the
`
`As Tower
`argues,
`nor
`did
`provide
`they
`to its pre-accident
`Tower
`
`premises,
`premises
`by others.
`defense
`
`claims
`were
`
`not
`
`experts
`
`an itemized
`condition.
`the jury
`structural
`
`that
`
`They
`credited
`
`Defendants'
`
`experts
`
`list
`
`not
`
`conduct
`did
`of estimated
`
`a detailed
`
`repairs
`their
`
`needed
`
`conclusions
`
`inspection
`to restore
`on reports
`
`of
`
`the
`
`the
`prepared
`
`over
`builders.
`
`the
`
`defense
`
`Based
`
`experts
`on the
`
`because
`
`the
`it was
`
`based
`
`largely
`its experts
`or expert
`
`reasonable
`
`for
`
`testimonial
`
`evidence
`
`the jurors
`to credit
`by Defendants.
`
`presented
`
`engineers
`Tower's
`
`and
`
`documentary
`
`evidence,
`evidence
`over
`
`the
`
`As mentioned
`the province
`within
`of
`the evidence,
`Defendants
`permissible
`were
`
`inferences
`liable
`
`not
`
`be 75% liable
`
`the weight
`to be given
`to set aside
`a verdict.
`no valid
`there
`is simply
`jurors
`to conclude
`of $449,627.15,
`for
`such
`damages.
`
`to testimony
`Therefore,
`line
`of
`
`are
`based
`
`reasoning
`that Defendants
`Pane
`
`Stone
`
`held
`
`on
`and
`
`to
`
`with
`
`above,
`the jury
`failed
`
`of credibility
`issues
`cannot
`be a basis
`and
`to demonstrate
`that
`
`and
`
`which
`
`could
`
`possibly
`in the
`claims
`25% held
`
`Stone
`
`rational
`amount
`
`lead
`
`total
`to be liable
`
`for Tower's
`and Metal
`
`Therefore,
`
`the
`
`court
`
`denies
`
`Defendants'
`
`motions
`
`in their
`
`entirety
`
`with
`
`prejudice.
`
`As
`
`such,
`
`it
`
`is hereby
`
`ORDERED
`the
`that
`the verdict
`as to damages
`is further
`and
`it
`costs;
`
`aside
`without
`
`Defendant
`denies
`court
`sequence
`under motion
`
`Pane
`002
`
`Construction's
`Stone
`in its entirety
`
`with
`
`motion
`prejudice
`
`to set
`and
`
`4
`
`'5
`
`<xft
`
`18)
`
`9 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`FILED
`: NEW YORK
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`96
`NO.
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03 / 27 / 2018
`
`B2 : 2 2
`
`P$
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`INDEX
`150281/2011
`NO.
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2018
`
`ORDERED
`denies
`court
`the
`and
`on liability
`the jury's
`aside
`verdict
`and without
`in its entirety
`with
`prejudice
`
`that
`
`Defendant
`damages
`costs.
`
`Date: March
`
`22,
`
`2018
`
`Metal
`for
`
`Construction's
`Stone
`motion
`other
`relief
`under
`
`motion
`to set
`sequence
`003
`
`and
`
`I-IH N.
`
`RIKA
`
`M.M.
`
`D
`
`5
`
`10 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`: NEW YORK
`FILED
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`NO.
`96
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`INDEX
`150281/2011
`NO.
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2018
`
`PM|
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03
`
`/27
`
`2018
`
`03
`
`: 21
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`OF NEW YORK
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`Index
`
`No.:
`
`150281/11
`
`Tower
`532
`
`Insurance
`39th REALTY
`
`Company
`LLC,
`
`of New York
`
`a/s/o
`
`-against-
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`LMW ENGINEERING
`KUANG YU,
`PANE
`TAM,
`ARCHITECT,
`CONSTRUCTION
`
`GROUP
`JIEMING
`WANG,
`LLC,
`STONE
`CONSTRUCTION
`INC.,
`PC, HENG YONG CONSTRUCTION
`and JOHN HSU,
`INC.
`Defendants.
`
`SHINE
`REALTY,
`SHIMING
`TAM,
`INC., METAL
`
`INC.,
`SHIMING
`STONE
`
`ZHI
`
`AFFIDAVIT
`
`OF SERVICE
`
`ss.:
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY
`
`OF WESTCHESTER
`
`I, Tabitha
`
`L. Castignoli,
`
`being
`
`duly
`
`sworn,
`
`depose
`
`and
`
`say:
`
`I am not
`
`to this
`
`am over
`
`of
`
`and
`
`reside
`
`c/o
`
`Law
`
`a party
`
`action,
`
`18 years
`
`age
`
`at
`
`Office
`
`of Steven
`
`G. Fauth,
`
`LLC,
`
`54 North
`
`Broadway,
`
`Tarrytown,
`
`New York
`
`10591.
`
`On March
`
`27,
`
`2018,
`
`I served
`
`a true
`
`copy
`
`of
`
`the within
`
`Notice
`
`of Entry
`
`upon:
`
`SEE ANNEXED
`
`RIDER
`
`by placing
`
`same
`
`in a properly
`
`addressed
`
`and stamp
`
`envelope
`
`and
`
`depositing
`
`same
`
`in a United
`
`States
`
`Post Office
`
`mailbox
`
`within
`
`the
`
`tate o
`
`w Yor
`
`.
`
`)
`
`I/
`
`abitha
`
`L. Castignoli
`
`Sworn
`1
`27
`
`day
`
`to before me this
`2018
`of March,
`
`Notary
`
`Public
`
`ONElDA ACOSTA
`Notary PubHc. State of New York
`No. 01AC6158350
`Q ualified in Westchester County
`Commhasion Expires January 2, 20
`
`10
`of
`9
`11 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`NEW YORK
`FILED:
`NYSCEF
`96
`DOC.
`NO.
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03
`
`/27
`
`/2018
`
`03
`
`: 21
`
`PM|
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`150281/2011
`INDEX
`NO.
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2018
`
`TO:
`
`McTiernan
`and Moore
`Barry
`2 Rector
`14th
`floor
`Street,
`New York, NY 10006
`for Metal
`Attorneys
`Stone
`
`(Via
`
`ECF & US Mail)
`
`Construction,
`
`Inc.
`
`(Via
`
`US Mail
`
`Only)
`
`4 Dwyer,
`Katz
`Schwab
`Lester
`27"'
`100 Wall
`Floor
`27
`Street,
`New York, NY 10005-3701
`Attorneys
`for
`Pane
`Stone
`and
`John
`Hsu
`
`Construction
`
`Shiming
`Dismissed
`
`Tam & Shiming
`from
`Case
`
`Tam. Architect,
`
`PC
`
`LMW Engineering
`Group
`Dismissed
`from Case
`
`LLC & Jieming
`
`Wang
`
`Shine
`Realty,
`No Appearance
`
`Inc.
`
`Zhi Kuang
`Yu
`No Appearance
`
`10
`of
`10
`12 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2018 02:53 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2018
`
`NYSCEF
`
`- New York
`
`County
`
`Supreme
`
`Court
`
`,'
`
`Confirmation
`
`Notice
`
`fth
`N;/
`
`is an automated
`This
`filed
`electronically
`
`response
`documents
`
`for Supreme
`for
`the following
`
`Court
`case.
`
`cases.
`
`The NYSCEF
`
`site has received
`
`your
`
`150281/2011
`
`Tower
`
`Insurance
`
`Company
`
`of New York
`
`a/s/o
`
`532 39th Realty
`et al
`
`LLC - v.
`
`- LMW Engineering
`
`Grup
`
`LLC
`
`Documents
`
`Received
`
`on
`
`03/27/2018
`
`03:21
`
`PM
`
`Assigned
`
`Judge:
`
`Paul Goetz
`
`#
`
`Doc
`96
`
`Document
`NOTICE
`
`Type
`OF ENTRY
`
`Motion
`
`#
`
`Does
`
`not contain
`
`an SSN or CPI as defined
`
`in 202.5(e)
`
`or 206.5(e)
`
`Filing
`
`User
`
`Russell
`
`G Monaco
`
`Name:
`
`Phone
`
`#:
`
`9142609850
`
`E-mail
`
`Address:
`
`russgm@gmall.com
`
`Fax #:
`
`Work Address:
`
`37 Blue Mountain
`CT 06851
`Norwalk,
`
`Road
`
`E-mail
`
`Notifications
`
`An e-mail
`
`notification
`
`regarding
`
`this filing
`
`has been
`
`sent
`
`to the following
`
`address(es)
`
`on
`
`03/27/2018
`
`03:21
`
`PM:
`
`COLLESANO,
`
`COPPOLA,
`
`MARK A - mcollesano@bmmflrm.com
`- tcoppola@lskdnylaw.com
`THOMAS
`BLASE
`G - postmaster@sgflaw.com
`D - aluls@rawle.com
`- dmanakhimova@rawle.com
`DIANA
`G - russgm@gmall.com
`
`FAUTH,
`
`LUIS,
`
`STEVEN
`
`ANTHONY
`
`MANAKHIMOVA,
`
`MONACO,
`
`RUSSELL
`
`If submitting
`NOTE:
`as a notification
`
`a working
`firmly
`
`copy
`affixed
`
`page
`
`this
`of
`thereto
`
`filing
`a copy
`
`you must
`to the
`court,
`of
`this Confirmation
`
`include
`Notice.
`
`Hon. Milton A. Tingling, New York County Clerk and Clerk of the Supreme Court
`Website: http://www.nycourts.gov/courts/1jd/supctmanh/county_clerk_operations.shtml
`Phone: 646-386-5956
`
`NYSCEF
`Phone:
`
`Center
`Resource
`386-3033
`
`(646)
`
`- EFile@nycourts.gov
`Fax:
`401-9146
`(212)
`
`Website:
`
`www.nycourts.gov/efile
`
`Page 1
`
`of
`
`1
`
`13 of 13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket