throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK'me-2014 03:26 P l
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/12/2014 03:26 PMFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/09/2014 01:29 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO.
`2
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7
`
`INDEX N05157729/2014
`INDEX NO. 157729/2014INDEX NO. 157729/2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: me/m2/2014
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/12/2014RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/09/2014
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`_________________________________________________________________X
`
`PEI JUN LL
`
`Index No.: 157729/14
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`.
`—aga1nst—
`
`VERIFIED ANSWER
`_____________
`
`THE SALVATION ARMY,
`
`_________________________________________________________________X
`
`Defendant.
`
`Defendant THE SALVATION ARMY, as and for its Verified Answer to the Verified
`
`Complaint of plaintiff, respectfully sets forth:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in paragraph “1”.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in paragraphs “2”, “3”, “5”, “6” and “7”.
`
`Admits the allegations contained in paragraph “4”.
`
`
`FACTS
`
`4.
`
`Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in paragraphs “8” through “21” and “23” through “28”, and refers all questions of law
`
`to this Honorable Court at the time of trial.
`
`5.
`
`Denies the allegations contained in paragraphs “22” and “29” through “43”, and
`
`refers all questions of law to this Honorable Court at the time of trial.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`6.
`
`Upon information and belief, any injuries and/or damages sustained by the
`
`plaintiff herein were not caused by the wrongdoing of the answering defendant,
`
`its agents,
`
`servants and/or employees, but were caused solely by the wrongdoing of the plaintiff and that
`
`

`

`such conduct requires diminution of any award, verdict or judgment that plaintiff may recover
`
`against said answering defendant.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`7.
`
`Plaintiff’s damages for medical care and treatment, custodial care, rehabilitation,
`
`loss of earnings and other economic loss, and all related special damages, whether incurred in the
`
`past or to be incurred in the future, was or will, with reasonable certainty, be replaced or
`
`indemnified from collateral sources and, pursuant
`
`to CPLR 4545(0), will be subject
`
`to
`
`appropriate offset and reduction.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`8.
`
`The claims and causes of action against the answering defendant is meritless and
`
`frivolous and warrant dismissal and the award of appropriate costs and sanctions.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`9.
`
`At the time and place mentioned in the Complaint, the answering defendant was
`
`not guilty of any negligence which was a proximate cause of the alleged accident, injuries and
`
`damages of any other party.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`10.
`
`The answering defendant violated no legal duty owing by them to any other party.
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`11.
`
`Other parties were guilty of comparative negligence of a greater degree than the
`
`negligence of the answering defendant which is denied.
`
`AS AND FOR A SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`12.
`
`The alleged damages sustained are the proximate result of the acts and/or
`
`omissions of parties over which these parties exercised no control.
`
`2
`
`

`

`AS AND FOR AN EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`13.
`
`Upon information and belief, in the event that a judgment is rendered against
`
`answering defendant, shall not be responsible for more than their proportionate share of liability
`
`pursuant to Section 1601, et. seq. of the CPLR.
`
`AS AND FOR A NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`14.
`
`Upon information and belief, plaintiffs economic loss, if any, as specified in
`
`Section 4545 of the CPLR, was replaced or indemnified, in whole or in part, from collateral
`
`sources, and the answering defendant
`
`is entitled to have the Court consider the same in
`
`determining such special damages as provided in Section 4545 of the CPLR.
`
`AS AND FOR A TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`15.
`
`Upon information and belief, answering defendant has no liability to plaintiff by
`
`reason of plaintiff having undertaken conduct such as to have assumed the risk of all that conduct
`
`complained of by plaintiff having flowed therefrom.
`
`AS AND FOR AN ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`16.
`
`Upon information nand belief, the Verified Complaint fails to state a cause of
`
`action upon which relief may be granted.
`
`DEFENSES RESERVED
`
`17.
`
`Answering defendant hereby give notice that they intend to rely upon any other
`
`defenses that may become available or apparent during the discovery proceedings in this matter,
`
`and hereby reserve their right to amend their Answer and to assert any such defense.
`
`

`

`WHEREFORE, defendant THE SALVATION ARMY, demands:
`
`Judgment dismissing the Verified Complaint.
`
`Dated:
`
`New York, New York
`August 12, 2014
`
`FRENC
`
`
`
`
`THE SALVATION ARMY
`29 Broadway, 27th Floor
`New York, New York 10006
`(212) 797-3544
`Our File #: 7300.1014
`
`To:
`
`Adam B. Ross, Esq.
`Novo Law Firm, P.C.
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`299 Broadway, 17th Floor
`New York, New York 10007
`(212) 233—6686
`
`

`

`VERIFICATION FOR ATTORNEY
`
`The undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice law in the State of New York, affirms:
`
`That the undersigned is a member of the firm of FRENCH & CASEY, LLP, attorneys of
`
`record for defendant THE SALVATION ARMY in the within action; that the undersigned has
`
`read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof; that the same are true to affirmant’s own
`
`knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief; and as
`
`to those matters affirmant believes them to be true.
`
`The undersigned further states that the reason this Verification is being made by the
`
`undersigned and not by defendant is because said party does not reside or maintain a place of
`
`business in New York County where your affirmant’s office is located.
`
`The grounds of affirmant‘s belief as to all matters not stated to be upon affirmant’s
`
`knowledge are materials contained in affirmant’s file.
`
`The undersigned affirms that the foregoing statements are true, under the penalty of
`
`perjury.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`August 12, 2014
`
`
`
`

`

`AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
`
`ss:
`
`) )
`
`STATE OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
`
`Vimla Ramdhani, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
`
`That I am not a party to the within action, am over 18 years of age and reside in Queens
`County, New York.
`
`That on August 12, 2014, deponent served the within VERIFIED ANSWER upon the
`attorneys and parties listed below by United States prepaid mail by placing same in a mailbox in
`the State of New York to:
`
`Adam B. Ross, Esq.
`Novo Law Firm, PC.
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`299 Broadway, 17th Floor
`New York, New York 1.0007
`
`(212) 233—6686
`
`Sworn to before me this
`8th day of August, 2014
`
`Wafim
`
`OTARY PUBLIC
`
`Susan A. Romano
`
`Notary Public, State of New York
`No.02R05074359
`
`Qualified in Richmond County
`Commission Expires March 10, 2015
`
`0 ‘
`Vimla Rani
`
`i
`
`‘
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket