throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/04/2014
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06m2014
`NYSC 3F DOC. NO.
`69
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 69
`
`IND
`EX NO.
`159201/2012
`INDEX NO. 159201/2012
`
` VYSC
`
` flIV flD
` 3F:
`
`06/04/2014
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/04/2014
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`(33300300070):
`TOTAL magma“ CLAIMED?“
`In; ms "
`fiMj’l‘lion Dollars
`
`And for {he Ciainmm, Marilyn Zic, for the"), SSiUf conscirt'iumyrsociew and companionship of her
`husband, Vclimir Zita in an amount not less than 53250300000.
`‘A
`«a: m4 «3;: m W.»tsAn-$¢ wf i‘Pr-r WM 63::
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

` V,omvmummn
`
`
`
`
`hennagnomémz,GEO.»zmz
`
`
`
`mom,3.3m,imammcummmm
`
`Amflmw
`
`
`
`.ué€2.25.2EEEm
`
`32um,mmcuofiq
`
`,mungflmwunowmeofifi
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`,mmmimuwfiiwvfimmoamniGEM.”wewwmo
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT B
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12512012
`NYSCEF DOC. NO.
`1
`
`INDEX NO~ ”9201/2012
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/26/2012
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`
`
`VELIMIR ZIC and MARILYN ZIC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`~against-
`
`THE CITY OF NEW YORK; THE METROPOLITAN
`TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; THE NEW
`YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY; TISHMAN
`CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION; AECOM
`TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION; CITNALTA
`CONSTRUCTION CORP; JUDLAU
`CONTRACTING, INC; THE NEW YORK TIMES
`COMPANY; FOREST CITY RATNER COMPANIES;
`FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES; AMEC
`CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC; BOSTON
`PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; QUEENS
`BALLPARK COMPANY, LLC.; HUNT
`
`CONSTRUCTION GROUP; LEND LEASE
`CORPORATION LIMITED f/k/a BOVIS LEND
`
`LEASE LMB, INC; and TOTAL SAFETY
`CONSULTING,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`Index No.
`
`Date purchased:
`
`Plaintiff(s) designate(s)
`New York
`
`County as the place of trial
`
`The bests 0f the venue is
`Flam“ f1” 5 place of miury
`
`Sunummo
`
`Plaintiffs reside at
`39 Mabaline Road
`Old Bridge, NJ 08857
`County of MIDDLESEX
`
`To the above named Defendant (s)
`yaw axe W omnmaned to answer the complaint in this action and to serve a copy of
`your answer, or, if the complaint is not served with this summons, to serve a notice of appearance, on
`the Plaintiffs’ Attorneys within twenty (20) days after the service of this summons, exclusive of the
`day of service (or within 30 days’ after the service is complete if this summons is not personally
`delivered to you within the State of New York); and in case of your failure to appear or answer,
`judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the complaint.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`November 7, 2012
`
`Defendants’ addresses:
`
`'
`
`STEPHEN M. CANTOR, P.C.,
`ATTORNEY AT LAW
`
`The City of New York
`1 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007
`The Metropolitan Transportation Authority
`
`347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 en M. Cantor, Esq.
`
`
`
`

`

`Office and Post Office Address
`
`325 Broadway, Suite 502
`New York, New York 10007-1 187
`(212) 732—8456
`
`The New York City Transit Authority
`130 Livingston Street, Brooklyn, NY 1 1201
`Tishman Construction Corporation
`100 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017
`AECOM Technology Corporation
`100 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017
`Citnalta Construction Corp.
`1601 Locust Avenue, Bohemia, NY 11716
`Judlau Contracting, Inc.
`26-15 Ulmer Street, College Point, NY 11354
`The New York Times Company
`620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018
`Forest City Ratner Companies
`1 Metro Tech Center North, Brooklyn, NY 1 1201
`Forest City Enterprises
`1100 Terminal Tower, 50 Public Square, Cleveland, 01-1 44113-2203
`Amec Construction Management, Inc.
`etcher Avenue, 6 F
`2200 F1
`loor, Fort Lee, NJ 07024
`Boston Properties Limited Partnership
`599 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022—6004
`Queens Ballpark Company, LLC.,
`123—01 Roosevelt Avenue, Flushing, NY 11368
`Hunt Construction Group
`752 Pacific Street, 61 Floor, Brooklyn, NY 1 1238
`Lend Lease Corporation Limited
`200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166
`Total Safegg Consulting
`6 Highland Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10301
`
`
`
`

`

`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`______________________________________________________________________X
`
`VELIMIR ZIC and MARILYN ZIC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Index No.
`
`-against—
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`
`THE CITY OF NEW YORK; THE METROPOLITAN
`TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; THE NEW YORK
`CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY; TISHMAN
`CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION; AECOM
`TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION; CITNALTA
`CONSTRUCTION CORR; JUDLAU CONTRACTING,
`INC; THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY; FOREST
`CITY RATNER COMPANIES; FOREST CITY
`ENTERPRISES; AMEC CONSTRUCTION
`MANAGEMENT, INC; BOSTON PROPERTIES
`
`LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; QUEENS BALLPARK
`COMPANY, LLC.; HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP;
`LEND LEASE CORPORATION LIMITED f/k/a BOVIS
`
`LEND LEASE LMB, INC; and TOTAL SAFETY
`CONSULTING,
`
`Defendants.
`_______________________________________________________________________ X
`
`Plaintiffs, VELIMIR ZIC and MARILYN ZIC, by their attorneys Stephen M. Cantor,
`PC, Attorney at Law, as and for their Verified Complaint against the defendants,
`respectfully show and allege:
`
`w
`
`1. At all times relevant hereto, plaintiff, VELIMIR ZIC, was and is a resident of the
`
`County of Middlesex, State of New Jersey.
`
`2. At all times relevant hereto, plaintiff; MARILYN ZIC, was and is the lawful wife
`
`of the plaintiff VELIMIR ZIC.
`
`3. That plaintiff, VELIMIR ZIC, from June 11, 2001 and continuing thereafter for
`
`almost ten (10) years, as a member of Local 806 Bridge Painters Union, employed by L
`
`& L Painting Co., Inc., 900 South Oyster Bay Road, Hicksville, NY 11801, was
`
`employed as a lead paint abatement worker, painter and foreman and was assigned to
`
`work on numerous days, within the following time spans, at the following sites:
`
`the
`
`
`
`

`

`Interlocking Track/Atlantic Avenue NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY
`
`(NYCTA) project, from June 11, 2001 to August 9, 2004; the deck replacement on the
`
`Harlem River Drive, from December 16, 2002 to October 24, 2005; the Battery Maritime
`
`Building, from May 10, 2004 to October 17, 2005; the 59th Street Bridge, from July 26,
`
`2004 to July 20, 2009; The New York Times Building, from December 5, 2005 to
`
`January 8, 2007; the Bronx Park East (NYCTA) Station, from June 18, 2007 to August
`13, 2007; the US. Post Office at 90 Church Street in New York County, from August 20,
`
`2007 to April 7, 2008; Citi Field, from October 15, 2007 to May 11, 2009; the Brooklyn
`
`Navy Yard, from September 28, 2009 to October 19, 2009; the Rehabilitation of 7
`
`Stations Project (NYCTA), West End Line, in Kings County, from January 11, 2010 to
`
`December 6, 2010; and the Thurgood Marshall US. Courthouse in New York County,
`
`from August 9, 2010 to April 18, 2011.
`
`4. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, THE CITY OF
`
`NEW YORK, owns, operates, manages and maintains the 59‘h Street Bridge, known
`
`officially as the Ed Koch Queensboro Bridge, the Harlem River Drive,
`
`the Battery
`
`Maritime Building and the Brooklyn Navy Yard and, as such, was and is responsible for
`
`planning and supervising all lead paint abatement, painting, demolition and construction
`
`activities on the deck replacement on the Harlem River Drive, from December 16, 2002
`
`to October 24, 2005; the Battery Maritime Building, from May 10, 2004 to October 17,
`
`2005; the 59th Street Bridge, from July 26, 2004 to July 20, 2009; and the Brooklyn Navy
`
`Yard from September 28, 2009 to October 19, 2009.
`
`5. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, the
`
`METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (MTA) was and is an authority
`
`and agency of New York State, located at 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017,
`
`and, as such, leases, owns, operates and manages the NYCTA facilities, stations and
`
`lines, among others, and, as such, was and is responsible for planning and supervising all
`
`lead paint abatement, painting, demolition and construction activities for NYCTA
`
`stations, lines, structure steel and other locations on the Interlocking Track/Atlantic
`
`Avenue (NYCTA) project, from June 11, 2001 to August 9, 2004; the Bronx Park East
`
`(NYCTA) Station, from June 18, 2007 to August 13, 2007; and the Rehabilitation of 5
`
`

`

`and 7 Stations Projects, West End Line, in Kings County from January 11, 2010 to
`
`December 6, 2010.
`
`6. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, the NEW YORK
`
`CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY (NYCTA), now known popularly as MTA New York
`
`City Transit, was and is a public benefit corporation, controlled by and an affiliate of the
`
`MTA, located at 130 Livingston Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, and, as such, leases, owns,
`
`operates and manages NYCTA facilities, stations, subway and elevated lines and, as
`
`such, was and is responsible for planning and supervising all lead paint abatement,
`
`painting, demolition and construction activities for NYCTA stations, lines, structure steel
`
`and other locations on the Interlocking Track/Atlantic Avenue NYCTA project, from
`
`June 11, 2001 to August 9, 2004; the Bronx Park East NYCTA Station, from June 18,
`
`2007 to August 13, 2007; and the Rehabilitation of 5 and 7 Stations NYCTA Projects,
`
`West End Line, in Kings County from January 11, 2010 to December 6, 2010.
`
`7. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, TISHMAN
`
`CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, owned by and a subsidiary of AECOM
`
`TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, was and is a corporation licensed to do construction,
`
`demolition and rehabilitation work in the City and State of New York, with offices at 100
`
`Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017, and, as such, was responsible, as the General
`
`Construction Contractor for hiring sub-contractors, and for planning, supervising and
`
`overseeing certain lead paint abatement, painting, demolition and construction activities
`
`at the Battery Maritime Building in the County, City and State of New York from May
`
`10, 2004 to October 17, 2005.
`
`8. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, AECOM
`TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, with offices at 100 Park Avenue, New York, NY
`
`10017, as the owner of its subsidiary, TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION,
`
`which was a corporation licensed to do construction, demolition and rehabilitation work
`
`in the City and State of New York, and, as such, was responsible, as the General
`
`Construction Contractor for hiring subcontractors, and for planning, supervising and
`
`overseeing certain lead paint abatement, painting, demolition and construction activities
`
`at the Battery Maritime Building in the County, City and State of New York from May
`
`10, 2004 to October 17, 2005.
`
`

`

`9. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, CITNALTA
`
`CONSTRUCTION CORR, was and is a corporation licensed to perform construction,
`
`demolition and rehabilitation work in the City and State of New York, with headquarters
`
`at 1601 Locust Avenue, Bohemia, NY 11716, and, as such, was responsible, as the
`
`General Construction Contractor in a Joint Venture with JUDLAU CONTRACTING,
`
`INC., for hiring sub—contractors, and for planning, supervising and overseeing certain
`
`lead paint abatement, painting, demolition and construction activities for NYCTA
`
`stations, lines, structure steel and other locations on the Interlocking Track/Atlantic
`
`Avenue NYCTA project, from June 11, 2001 to August 9, 2004; the Bronx Park East
`
`NYCTA Station, from June 18, 2007 to August 13, 2007; and the Rehabilitation of 5 and
`
`7 Stations NYCTA Projects, West End Line, in Kings County from January 1 1, 2010 to
`
`December 6, 2010.
`
`10. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, JUDLAU
`
`CONTRACTING, INC, was and is a corporation licensed to perform construction,
`
`demolition and rehabilitation work in the City and State of New York, with headquarters
`
`at 26-15 Ulmer Street, College Point, NY 11354, and, as such, was responsible, as the
`
`General Construction Contractor in a Joint Venture with CITNALTA CONSTRUCTION
`
`CORP, for hiring sub—contractors, and for planning, supervising and overseeing certain
`
`lead paint abatement, painting, demolition and construction activities at NYCTA stations,
`
`lines, structure steel and other locations on the Interlocking Track/Atlantic Avenue
`
`NYCTA project, from June 11, 2001 to August 9, 2004; the Bronx Park East NYCTA
`
`Station, from June 18, 2007 to August 13, 2007; and the Rehabilitation of5 and 7
`
`Stations NYCTA Projects, West End Line, in Kings County from January 11, 2010 to
`
`December 6, 2010.
`
`11. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, THE NEW YORK
`
`TIMES COMPANY, was and is a corporation and owner of the New York Times
`
`Building, located at 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018, and, as such, was
`
`responsible, as the building owner for hiring contractors and for planning, supervising
`
`and overseeing all lead paint abatement, painting, demolition and construction activities
`
`at the New York Times Building from December 5, 2005 to January 8, 2007.
`
`

`

`12. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, FOREST CITY
`
`RATNER COMPANIES, located at 1 MetroTech Center North, Brooklyn, NY 1 1201, a
`
`wholly owned subsidiary of FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, was and is a business,
`
`company, corporation and owner of the New York Times Building, located at 620 Eighth
`
`Avenue, New York, NY 10018, and, as such, was responsible, as a building owner for
`
`hiring contractors and for planning, supervising and overseeing all painting, demolition
`
`and construction activities at the New York Times Building from December 5, 2005 to
`
`January 8, 2007.
`
`13. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, FOREST CITY
`
`ENTERPRISES, 1100 Terminal Tower, 50 Public Square, Cleveland, OH 44113-2203,
`
`was and is an enterprise, business, company and corporation and as the sole owner of
`
`FOREST CITY RATNER COMPANIES was and is an owner of the New York Times
`
`Building, located at 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018, and, as such, was
`
`responsible, as a building owner for hiring contractors and for planning, supervising and
`
`overseeing all painting, demolition and construction activities at the New York Times
`
`Building from December 5, 2005 to January 8, 2007.
`
`14. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, AMEC
`
`CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., was and is a corporation licensed to perform
`
`construction, demolition and rehabilitation work in the City and State of New York,
`
`located at 2200 Fletcher Avenue, 6th Floor, Fort Lee, NJ 07024, and, as such, was
`
`responsible, as the General Construction Contractor, for hiring sub-contractors and for
`
`planning, supervising and overseeing certain painting, demolition and construction
`
`activities at the New York Times Building from December 5, 2005 to January 8, 2007.
`
`15. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, BOSTON
`
`PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, was and is a limited partnership, business,
`
`company and corporation licensed to do construction, demolition and rehabilitation work
`
`in the City and State of New York, with offices located at 599 Lexington Avenue, New
`
`York, NY 10022-6004 , and, as such, was responsible, as the General Construction
`
`Contractor, for hiring sub—contractors, and for planning, supervising and overseeing
`
`certain lead paint abatement, painting, demolition and construction activities at the US.
`
`
`
`

`

`Post Office located at 90 Church Street in the County, City and State of New York from
`
`August 20, 2007 to April 7, 2008.
`
`16. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, QUEENS
`
`BALLPARK COMPANY, LLC., located at 123-01 Roosevelt Avenue, Flushing, NY
`
`11368, was and is an enterprise, business, company and corporation and owner of Citi
`
`Field, located at 12001 Roosevelt Avenue, Corona, NY 11368, and, as such, was
`
`responsible, as the owner of Citi Field for hiring contractors and for planning, supervising
`
`and overseeing all painting, demolition and construction activities at Citi Field from
`
`October 15, 2007 to May 11, 2009.
`
`17. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, HUNT
`
`CONSTRUCTION GROUP, was and is a corporation licensed to do construction,
`
`demolition and rehabilitation work in the City and State of New York, with headquarters
`
`at 6720 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 300, Scottsdale, Arizona 85253, and offices at 752
`
`Pacific Street, 6‘h Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11238, and, as such, was responsible, as the
`
`General Construction Contractor in a joint venture with LEND LEASE CORPORATION
`
`LIMITED f/k/a Bovis Lend Lease LMB, for hiring sub—contractors, and for planning,
`
`supervising and overseeing all painting, demolition and construction activities at Citi
`
`Field, located at 12001 Roosevelt Avenue, Corona, NY 11368, from October 15, 2007 to
`
`May 11, 2009.
`
`18. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, LEND LEASE
`
`CORPORATION LIMITED f/k/a Bovis Lend Lease LMB, was and is a corporation
`
`licensed to do construction, demolition and rehabilitation work in the City and State of
`
`New York, located at 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166, and, as such, was
`
`responsible, as the General Construction Contractor in a joint venture with HUNT
`
`CONSTRUCTION GROUP, for hiring sub—contractors, and for planning, supervising and
`
`overseeing all painting, demolition and construction activities at Citi Field, located at
`
`12001 Roosevelt Avenue, Corona, NY 11368, from October 15, 2007 to May 11, 2009.
`
`19. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, LEND LEASE
`
`CORPORATION LIMITED f/k/a Bovis Lend Lease LMB, was and is a corporation
`
`licensed to do construction, demolition and rehabilitation work in the City and State of
`
`New York, located at 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166, and, as such, was
`
`

`

`responsible, as the General Construction Contractor for hiring sub-contractors, and for
`
`planning, supervising and overseeing all lead paint abatement, painting, demolition and
`
`construction activities at the Thurgood Marshall US. Courthouse in the County, City and
`
`State ofNew York from August 9, 2010 to April 18, 2011.
`
`20. That at all times relevant hereto, upon information and belief, TOTAL SAFETY
`
`CONSULTING, located at 6 Highland Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10301, was and is a
`business, company and corporation licensed to do safety consulting for lead paint
`N
`
`abatement, painting, construction, demolition and rehabilitation work in the City and
`
`State of New York, and, as such, was responsible, as the safety consultant, for planning,
`
`supervising and overseeing safety procedures for all lead paint abatement, painting,
`
`demolition and construction activities at the Thurgood Marshall US. Courthouse in the
`
`County, City and State of New York from August 9, 2010 to April 18, 2011.
`
`21. That heretofore, on or about the 27th day of June, 2012, and within 90 days after
`
`the claims herein arose, plaintiffs caused a notice of claim in writing, sworn to by and on
`
`behalf of the claimants, to be duly served upon the defendant, THE CITY OF NEW
`
`YORK, by delivering a copy thereof to said defendant personally, which notice of claim
`
`set forth the name and post office address of the claimants, their attorney, the nature of
`
`their claims, the time and location where and the manner in which said claims arose and
`
`described the known damages and injuries sustained by plaintiffs, to date; that at least
`
`thirty days have elapsed since the service of said notice; and that this action is being
`
`commenced within one year and 90 days after the happening of the event upon which the
`
`claim is based.
`
`22. That heretofore, on or about the 27th day of June, 2012, and within 90 davs after
`
`the claims herein arose, plaintiffs caused a notice of claim in writing, sworn to by and on
`
`behalf of the claimants, to be duly served upon the defendant, THE METROPOLITAN
`
`TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, by delivering a copy thereof to said defendant
`
`personally, which notice of claim set forth the name and post office address of the
`
`claimants, their attorney, the nature of their claims, the time and location where and the
`
`manner in which said claims arose and described the known damages and injuries
`
`sustained by plaintiffs, to date; that at least thirty days have elapsed since the service of
`
`
`
`

`

`said notice; and that this action is being commenced within one year and 90 days after the
`
`happening of the event upon which the claim is based.
`
`23. That heretofore, on or about the 27th day of June, 2012, and within 90 days after
`
`the claims herein arose, plaintiffs caused a notice of claim in writing, sworn to by and on
`
`behalf of the claimants, to be duly served upon the defendant, THE NEW YORK CITY
`
`TRANSIT AUTHORITY, by delivering a copy thereof to said defendant personally,
`
`which notice of claim set forth the name and post office address of the claimants, their
`
`attorney, the nature of their claims, the time and location where and the manner in which
`
`said claims arose and described the known damages and injuries sustained by plaintiffs,
`
`to date; that at least thirty days have elapsed since the service of said notice; and that this
`
`action is being commenced within one year and 90 days after the happening of the event
`upon which the claim is based.
`LL
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`24. Plaintiffs repeat, reallege and reaffirm each and every allegation contained in
`
`Paragraphs “1” through “23” of this Verified Complaint, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`25. That plaintiff, VELIMIR ZIC, from June 11, 2001 to April 18, 2011, while doing
`
`assigned work as a lead paint abatement worker, painter and foreman at said projects, and
`
`solely as a result of the negligence of the above-named defendants, jointly and severally,
`
`sustained severe personal injuries, including lung cancer and lead poisoning, as a result of
`
`his exposure, inhalation and handling of painting materials, including, but not limited to,
`
`paints, solvents, lacquer thinner, benzene, paint thinner and chemical strippers, and as a
`
`result of his exposure and inhalation of lead fumes, lead smoke, lead dust and lead
`
`particles, among others, resulting, in part, if not wholly, from his exposure during lead
`
`paint abatement with, among others, chemicals, abrasives and power tools, and there was
`
`no proper monitoring of the air quality for dangerous contaminants at said sites, he was
`
`not provided with proper respiratory equipment and proper fit tests, which negligence
`
`caused permanent and acute symptoms, severe injuries and substantial pain and suffering
`
`as a result of his injuries.
`
`26. The negative conduct of defendants, THE CITY OF NEW YORK; THE
`
`METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; THE NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT
`
`AUTHORITY; TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION; AECOM TECHNOLOGY
`
`
`
`

`

`CORPORATION; CITNALTA CONSTRUCTION CORP.; JUDLAU CONTRACTING, INC;
`
`THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY; FOREST CITY RATNER COMPANIES; FOREST
`
`CITY ENTERPRISES; AMEC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.; BOSTON
`
`PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; QUEENS BALLPARK COMPANY, LLC.; HUNT
`
`CONSTRUCTION GROUP; LEND LEASE CORPORATION LIMITED; and TOTAL
`SAFETY CONSULTING, violated, among others, but not limited to, sections of the New York
`
`State Labor Law: Section 200, §t_s_e_q., the general duty of the building owners and contractors to
`
`protect the health and safety of employees; and Section 241 (6) and New York Codes, Rules and
`
`Regulations promulgated thereunder, requiring areas in which construction or demolition work is
`
`being performed to be operated so as to provide reasonable and adequate protection and safety to
`
`persons employed therein; in negligently, recklessly and carelessly permitting and allowing the
`
`aforesaid areas to remain in a dangerous, defective, hazardous and unsafe condition, and
`
`generally dangerous to persons or workers lawfully working in said areas; defendants failed to
`
`make adequate and sufficient inspection of the aforesaid areas; defendants failed to properly
`
`monitor the air for toxic contaminants in said areas; defendants failed to take proper means and
`
`precautions to prevent the said areas from becoming and remaining dangerous to workers;
`
`defendants failed to properly supervise demolition/construction activities, including lead paint
`
`abatement and painting, in which plaintiff and other workers were involved; and in otherwise
`
`being careless and negligent.
`
`27. The negligent conduct of defendants, THE CITY OF NEW YORK; THE
`
`METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; THE NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT
`
`AUTHORITY; TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION; AECOM TECHNOLOGY
`
`CORPORATION; CITNALTA CONSTRUCTION CORP; JUDLAU CONTRACTING, INC.;
`
`THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY; FOREST CITY RATNER COMPANIES; FOREST
`
`CITY ENTERPRISES; AMEC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.; BOSTON
`
`PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; QUEENS BALLPARK COMPANY, LLC.; HUNT
`
`CONSTRUCTION GROUP; LEND LEASE CORPORATION LIMITED; and TOTAL
`
`SAFETY CONSULTING, violated the above—mentioned New York State Labor Law Section
`
`241(6) and New York Codes, Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder, including, but not
`
`limited to:
`
`

`

`12 NYCRR Subpart 23 — 1.2 (t) Finding of fact: Persons employed in
`demolition operations are exposed to various hazards, including exposure
`to the elements and air contaminants.
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 23 ~— 1.5 (a) General responsibility of employers,
`owners and contractors: Required to provide safe working conditions,
`personal protective equipment and safe places to work;
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 23 — 1.5 (b) General responsibility of employers,
`owners and contractors: General requirement of competency;
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 23 w 1.5 (c) (3) General responsibility of employers,
`owners and contractors: All safety devices, safeguards and equipment in
`use must be kept sound and operable, and shall be immediately repaired or
`restored or immediately removed from the job site if damaged;
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 23 — 1.7 (g) Protection from general hazards. Air
`contaminated or oxygen deficient work areas: The atmosphere of any
`unventilated confined area...where dangerous air contaminants may be
`present...shall be tested by the employer,...or by a designated person
`before any person is permitted to work;
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 23 —— 1.8 (b) (1) Personal protective equipment.
`Respirators: Where this Part requires a respirator to be provided, the
`employer shall furnish and the employee shall use an approved respirator.
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 12 ~ 1.1 Finding of fact.
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 12 — 1.2 Application.
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart l2 — 1.4 (a) Prevention of air contamination.
`General: All operations which produce air contaminants shall be so
`conducted that the generation, release or dissemination of such air
`contaminants is kept at the lowest practicable level in compliance with this
`Part (rule) using proper control or protective procedures and equipment.
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 12 — 1.4 (b) (1) Responsibility of employers. Every
`employer shall effect compliance with the provisions of this Part (rule)
`relating to the prevention and removal of air contaminants,...and the
`provision, installation, operation and maintenance of control or protective
`equipment.
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 12 ~ 1.4 (b) (2) Responsibility of employers. Every
`employer shall instruct his employees as to the hazards of their work, the
`use of the control or protective equipment and their responsibility for
`complying with the provisions of this Part (rule).
`
`

`

`12 NYCRR Subpart 12 — 1.4 (b) (4) Responsibility of employers. No
`employer shall...permit dangerous air contaminants to accumulate or
`remain in any place or area subject to the provisions of this Part (rule).
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 12 — 1.4 (0) Responsibility of employees. Every
`employee shall use the control and protective equipment provided for his
`protection...
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 12 — 1.5 (a) (1) Personal respiratory protective
`equipment. Use: Personal respiratory protective equipment shall not be
`used in lieu of other control methods, except for protection of employees
`in emergencies...
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 12 —— 1.5 (a) (2) Personal respiratory protective
`equipment. Approval: Personal respiratory protective equipment shall be
`of a type approved by the board for the particular class of substance or
`substances constituting the air contaminant.
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 12 — 1.5 (a) (3) Personal respiratory protective
`equipment. Maintenance: Personal respiratory protective equipment shall
`be stored in air—tight containers or cabinets or in an uncontaminated area.
`Such equipment shall be cleaned, serviced and repaired to maintain it in
`effective working condition and it shall be sterilized before use by any
`person other than the last wearer.
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 12 — 1.6 (a) General control methods. One or more
`of the following methods shall be used to prevent, remove, or control
`dangerous air contaminants:
`(1) Substitution of a material or a method which does not produce
`dangerous air contaminants.
`(2) Local exhaust ventilation...
`(3) Dilution ventilation.
`(4) Application of water or other wetting agent.
`(5) Enclosure or isolation.
`(6) Other methods approved by the board.
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart 12 — 1.6 (c) Isolation or segregation of operations.
`All...0perations releasing or disseminating dangerous air contaminants
`shall be isolated, enclosed or otherwise segregated insofar as practicable.
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart l2 — 1.9 (a) (l) Entering confined spaces. Confined
`spaces where dangerous air contaminants...are present or could be
`introduced from potential sources shall not be entered by any person for
`any reason until the atmosphere of such confined spaces has been tested
`and found free of dangerous air contaminants. If, however, due to
`
`
`
`

`

`emergency conditions, any such confined, space cannot be cleared of
`dangerous air contaminants by mechanical ventilation or equivalent
`means, any person entering such confined space shall be provided with
`and shall use an approved air line respirator, approved hose mask or
`approved self-contained breathing apparatus.
`
`12 NYCRR Subpart l2 - 3.1 Evidence of dangerous air contaminants.
`General: The existence of air contaminants in quantities greater than those
`set forth in listed tables shall constitute prima facie evidence that such
`contaminants are dangerous air contaminants.
`
`28. That by reason of the foregoing, the plaintiff, VELIMIR ZIC, was rendered sick
`
`and sore and was caused to suffer severe injuries of a permanent nature and character.
`
`29. As a result of defendants’ negligence, plaintiff, VELIMIR ZIC, suffered
`
`permanent physical injuries in an amount to be determined in excess of Five Million
`:;
`
`($5,000,000.00) Dollars.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`30. Plaintiffs repeat, reallege and reaffirm each and every allegation contained in
`Paragraphs “1” through “29” of this Verified Complaint, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`31. While defendants, THE CITY OF NEW YORK; THE METROPOLITAN
`
`TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; THE NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY;
`
`TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION; AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION;
`
`CITNALTA CONSTRUCTION CORR; JUDLAU CONTRACTING, INC; THE NEW YORK
`
`TIMES COMPANY; FOREST CITY RATNER COMPANIES; FOREST CITY
`
`ENTERPRISES; AMEC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.; BOSTON PROPERTIES
`
`LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; QUEENS BALLPARK COMPANY, LLC.; HUNT
`
`CONSTRUCTION GROUP; LEND LEASE CORPORATION LIMITED; and TOTAL
`
`SAFETY CONSULTING, were engaged in supervising and overseeing certain lead paint
`
`abatement, painting, demolition and construction activities at said sites and time periods said
`
`defendants negligently failed to properly supervise the lead paint abatement workers and
`
`painters, including the plaintiff, VELIMIR ZIC, at said locations to ensure that their work was
`
`performed in a safe manner, by failing to properly monitor the air quality for dangerous
`
`contaminants, failing to provide proper respiratory equipment and proper fit tests for the lead
`
`paint abatement workers, painters and foremen, and failing to use proper methods to prevent,
`
`remove and control substantial quantities of dangerous air contaminants, including painting
`
`
`
`

`

`materials, painting material fumes, paint fumes, lead fumes, lead dust, lead particles and lead by-
`
`products, from being inhaled by the lead paint abatement workers, painters and foremen,
`
`including the plaintiff, VELIMIR ZIC, for more than ten (10) years.
`
`32. As a result of the negligence of defendants, THE CITY OF NEW YORK; THE
`
`METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; THE NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT
`
`AUTHORITY; TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION; AECOM TECHNOLOGY
`
`CORPORATION; CITNALTA CONSTRUCTION CORP; JUDLAU CONTRACTING, INC;
`
`THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY; FOREST CITY RATNER COMPANIES; FOREST
`
`CITY ENTERPRISES; AMEC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC; BOSTON
`
`PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; QUEENS BALLPARK COMPANY, LLC.; HUNT
`
`CONSTRUCTION GROUP; LEND LEASE CORPORATION LIMITED; and TOTAL
`
`SAFETY CONSULTING, in failing to properly and adequately supervise the lead paint
`
`abatement, painting, demolition and construction work, the plaintiff, VELIMIR ZIC, suffered
`
`severe permanent physical injuries and substantial pain and suffering for which he se

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket