throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/01/2024 03:19 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 87
`
`INDEX NO. 161626/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2024
`
`
`
`
`Index No.: 161626/2023
`
`
`AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT
`
`
`
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`-------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`SEQUAN MARTIN
`TYRONE PEART
`
` The “Individual Defendants”
`
` -and-
`
`ABU MUHAMMAD M HAQUE MD, PC,
`ACE EMERGENT MEDICAL CARE PC,
`ACTIVE LIFE CHIROPRACTIC, PC,
`ADVANCED HEALING, INC,
`AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER OF BROOKLYN,
`LLC,
`AR REHAB PT PC,
`BEACH MEDICAL REHABILITATION, PC,
`BSD OS LLC,
`
`CADS ANESTHESIA SERVICES PLLC,
`CHESTER MEDICAL SERVICE PC,
`COMPLETE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, P.C. D/B/A
`PSYCHOLOGY 21 PC,
`DARA KHATIB MD,
`DAVID CARMILI PHYSICIAN, PC,
`DULEX PHARMACY INC, d/b/a ABC DRUGS,
`ELECTROMEG SUPPLY CORP,
`
`ETMC PHARMACY, INC,
`FIRST STOP PT, PC,
`FIVE STAR PHARMACY, INC,
`FIVE TOWNS PHYSICIANS PC,
`GLENN H. WHITNEY DC, PC,
`GLOBAL VERSUS INC,
`HEALTH HEAVEN SERVICES, INC,
`HEALTHY ELITE, INC,
`INTEGRATED MEDICAL REHABILITATION &
`DIAGNOSTICS, PC,
`JAMAICA HOSP ER DEPT,
`JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER,
`JHMC HOSP CO BETZ MITCHELL,
`JPRL, INC,
`
`KUMAN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC,
`LENOX HILL RADIOLOGY AND MEDICAL IMAGING
`ASSOCIATES, PC d/b/a LENOX HILL RADIOLOGY
`MEDICAL IMAGING,
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/01/2024 03:19 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 87
`
`INDEX NO. 161626/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2024
`
`LIJ MEDICAL CENTER a/k/a LONG ISLAND JEWISH
`MEDICAL CENTER a/k/a NSLIJ LONG ISLAND
`JEWISH,
`LOCAS PHARMACY INC,
`LONGEVITY MEDICAL SUPPLY INC,
`NORTH SHORE-LIJ MEDICAL, PC,
`NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL,
`PARS MEDICAL, PC,
`RIGHT CHOICE PHARMACY, INC,
`ROSE CHIROPRACTIC HEALTH & WELLNESS PC,
`SCOB, LLC, a/k/a SURGICARE OF BROOKLYN,
`SKYLINE BK, INC,
`SMART INSPIRE PHYSICAL THERAPY, PC,
`STAR MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC, PC,
`
`STAY WELL CHIROPRACTIC, PC,
`
`SUNFARM ENTERPRISES INC,
`SUPPLY CHOICE NYC INC,
`THE AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTER OF EAST
`TREMONT MEDICAL CENTER a/k/a EAST
`TREMONT AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTER
`a/k/a UPTOWN HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT, INC
`a/k/a EAST TREMONT MEDICAL CENTER
`THE JAMAICA HOSPITAL,
`TOPAZ V INC,
`TOWN RX, INC,
`TRI- BOROUGH NY MEDICAL PRACTICE, PC, a/k/a
`BRONX MEDICAL,
`WALTON MEDICAL PLAZA PC,
`
` The “Medical Provider Defendants”.
`-------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`STATE OF NEW YORK
`
`
`
`
`COUNTY OF QUEENS
`
`
`
`
`JORONDA MCBURNIE being duly sworn, deposes and says the following:
`
`1.
`
`I am employed by HEREFORD Insurance Company (hereinafter “HEREFORD”),
`
`and I have been employed as such for all times pertinent to this statement. I am currently employed
`
`as the No-Fault Claims Supervisor. Prior to that, I was employed as a Senior No-Fault Adjuster.
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`ss:
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/01/2024 03:19 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 87
`
`INDEX NO. 161626/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2024
`
`2.
`
`I was the adjuster assigned to claim number 103844, and as such I am familiar with
`
`the facts of the instant action based upon my personal handling and review of the claim file.
`
`3.
`
`As both a Senior No-Fault adjuster and the No-Fault Claims Supervisor, my duties
`
`include the identification of fraud indicators in accident reports and claim submissions, reviewing
`
`and investigation of claims, conducting and attending EUOs and IMEs of insured owners, drivers,
`
`and No-Fault claimants, opening and maintaining SIU cases after review of accident reports,
`
`claimants’ alleged injuries, and medical facilities where claimants are treating, and determining if
`
`the claims are covered events.
`
`4.
`
`Once I have fully reviewed and investigated a claim file, I make a determination
`
`regarding whether or not the collision was a staged event, whether fraud was involved in any aspect
`
`of the claim, whether or not the collision was an insurable event, and whether or not the injuries
`
`alleged by the Claimants are causally related to the underlying collision.
`
`5.
`
`All of my duties are circumscribed by the protocols, customs, and practices required
`
`by HEREFORD, of which I am fully familiar and abiding.
`
`6.
`
`16.
`
`I submit this affidavit in support of HEREFORD’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
`
`In this action, HEREFORD seeks a declaration that it has no obligation to provide
`
`coverage to the Defendants relating to the alleged May 28, 2023, collision, under HEREFORD
`
`claim number 103844 involving TYRONE PEART (“PEART”) and SEQUAN MARTIN’s
`
`(“MARTIN”, referred to collectively with PEART as “Claimants”).
`
`INSURANCE POLICY INFORMATION AND MOTOR VEHICLE INCIDENT
`
`17.
`
`HEREFORD claim number 103844 involves an alleged automobile incident, which
`
`reportedly occurred on May 28, 2023 (the “subject loss”).
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/01/2024 03:19 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 87
`
`INDEX NO. 161626/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2024
`
`18.
`
`HEREFORD received multiple Police Reports for the subject loss. According to
`
`the first Police Report (the “1st Report”), at the time of the alleged loss, non-party Mohammad
`
`Hossain (“Hossain”) was driving a 2017 Toyota livery vehicle (the “insured vehicle”), registered
`
`to and insured by Sayeda Family Corp, when the insured vehicle was rear-ended by an adverse
`
`vehicle on the Van Wyck Expressway in Queens, New York. The adverse vehicle then fled the
`
`scene without exchanging information or awaiting police arrival. According to the 1st Report, in
`
`MARTIN was the only passenger in the insured vehicle at the time of the loss. The 1st Report states
`
`one person injured but does not list any injuries for MARTIN or Hossain and does not state that
`
`either party requested or received any medical attention at the scene. See Police Reports, annexed
`
`hereto as Exhibit “F”.
`
`19.
`
`HEREFORD received a second Police Report (the “2nd Report”). The 2nd Report
`
`states that MARTIN was also in the vehicle at the time of the loss and was taken to the hospital
`
`prior to police arrival. The 2nd Report states that two people were injured but does not list any
`
`injuries or identify who was injured. See Police Reports, annexed hereto as Exhibit “F”.
`
`7.
`
`Claimants later alleged to have sustained significant bodily injuries as a result of
`
`the collision, and HEREFORD assigned claim number 103844 to all No-Fault claims relating to
`
`the subject loss. See Claimants’ Applications for No-Fault Benefits (“NF-2s”) and letters of
`
`representation, annexed as Exhibit “G”.
`
`8.
`
`Claimants began receiving extensive medical treatments from, inter alia, ABU
`
`MUHAMMAD M HAQUE MD, PC; ACE EMERGENT MEDICAL CARE PC; ADVANCED
`
`HEALING, INC; AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER OF BROOKLYN, LLC; AR REHAB
`
`PT PC; BEACH MEDICAL REHABILITATION, PC; BSD OS LLC; CADS ANESTHESIA
`
`SERVICES
`
`PLLC;
`
`CHESTER MEDICAL
`
`SERVICE
`
`PC;
`
`COMPLETE
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/01/2024 03:19 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 87
`
`INDEX NO. 161626/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2024
`
`NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, P.C. D/B/A PSYCHOLOGY 21 PC; DARA KHATIB MD; DULEX
`
`PHARMACY INC D/B/A ABC DRUGS; ELECTROMEG SUPPLY CORP; FIRST STOP PT,
`
`PC; FIVE TOWNS PHYSICIANS PC; GLOBAL VERSUS INC; JPRL, INC; LENOX HILL
`
`RADIOLOGY AND MEDICAL IMAGING ASSOCIATES, PC D/B/A LENOX HILL
`
`RADIOLOGY MEDICAL
`
`IMAGING; RIGHT CHOICE PHARMACY,
`
`INC; ROSE
`
`CHIROPRACTIC HEALTH & WELLNESS PC; STAR MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC, PC; STAY
`
`WELL CHIROPRACTIC, PC; SUNFARM ENTERPRISES INC; SUPPLY CHOICE NYC INC;
`
`TOPAZ V INC; and WALTON MEDICAL PLAZA PC (the “Medical Provider Defendants”).
`
`9.
`
`HEREFORD assigned claim number 103844 to the May 28, 2023, loss involving
`
`the Claimants. As there were multiple claimants reporting injuries for the loss, HEREFORD
`
`assigned the -03 suffix to claim number 103844 for all claims of PEART, and -06 to the claims of
`
`MARTIN.
`
`10.
`
`Prior to May 28, 2023, HEREFORD issued a “New York For Hire” automobile
`
`insurance policy number CA310695 (the “Policy”) to non-party Sayeda Family Corp for a
`
`HEREFORD insured livery vehicle (the “insured vehicle”), covering any occupants of the insured
`
`vehicle for any medically necessary and causally related medical expenses suffered arising out of
`
`the use or operation of the insured vehicle as a result of an accidental collision or any other person
`
`who sustains personal injury arising out of the use or operation of the insured vehicle in New York
`
`State. The Policy also includes uninsured, supplementary uninsured, underinsured, and liability
`
`coverage.
`
`11.
`
`The HEREFORD vehicle was in New York at the time of the loss and insured under
`
`a New York State motor vehicle policy of insurance. Therefore, the New York No-Fault regulation
`
`applies.
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/01/2024 03:19 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 87
`
`INDEX NO. 161626/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2024
`
`12.
`
`The Claimants and the Medical Provider Defendants, acting as the assignees of the
`
`Claimants, have sought to obtain the applicable coverage under the Policy and its endorsements
`
`and/or under the New York State No-Fault Regulation.
`
`HEREFORD’S REASONABLE BASIS FOR REQUESTING EUOS OF THE CLAIMANTS
`
`20.
`
`The circumstances surrounding the alleged May 28, 2023, collision raised a strong
`
`possibility that the collision did not occur as the Claimants alleged and/or that the Claimants’
`
`alleged injuries and any subsequent treatment by the Medical Provider Defendants were not
`
`causally related to the alleged May 28, 2023, collision, both of which would be considered non-
`
`covered events under the No-Fault Regulation and the Policy.
`
`21.
`
`Upon receiving notice of the accident, Plaintiff began an investigation As part of
`
`its investigation, HEREFORD obtained a sworn statement from Hossain, which stated the impact
`
`was not hard, there was no damage to the insured vehicle, and that he does not believe either
`
`passenger was injured. See Driver’s Affirmation, annexed as Exhibit “H”.
`
`22.
`
`HEREFORD had, and continues to have, a reasonable basis to request the EUO of
`
`the Claimant and because, in addition to the sheer magnitude of the claims submitted, the claim’s
`
`legitimacy was questionable because the injuries appeared to be exaggerated compared to the
`
`severity of the alleged accident. Specifically,
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`That there were different Police Reports for the alleged loss.
`
`The loss involved a hit and run vehicle, which fled the scene. This is a common
`
`pattern in staged losses investigated by HEREFORD.
`
`a. MARTIN did not request or receive medical treatment at the scene, yet thereafter
`
`claimed extensive injuries.
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/01/2024 03:19 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 87
`
`INDEX NO. 161626/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2024
`
`b. There was no damage to the insured vehicle as a result of the loss, yet the Claimants
`
`were receiving excessive and boiler-plate No-Fault treatment.
`
`c. The driver of the insured vehicle was not claiming injuries, only the Claimants.
`
`d. Claimants began treating at a medical facility that HEREFORD is/was investigation
`
`for concerns regarding billing practices and ownership and control of said entity.
`
`25.
`
`Based on these facts, HEREFORD, pursuant to its rights under the No-Fault
`
`Regulation, requested the Claimants submit to EUOs in order to:
`
`a. Verify and confirm the true facts and circumstances surrounding the May 28, 2023,
`
`loss;
`
`b. Verify the alleged medical treatment and services allegedly provided, as the
`
`collision was minor in nature, yet the Claimants were making extensive claims of
`
`injury;
`
`c. verify whether the incident was covered under the HEREFORD policy of
`
`insurance; and
`
`d. determine whether the Claimants were eligible to collect No-Fault benefits pursuant
`
`to 11 N.Y.C.R.R. § 65-3.16(a)(12) and Insurance Law 3102(a)(1).
`
`26.
`
`As such, HEREFORD assigned counsel, Goldberg, Miller & Rubin, PC (“GMR”)
`
`to conduct the Claimants’ EUOs.
`
`EUO OF CLAIMANTS
`
`1.
`
`On August 24, 2023, HEREFORD received a bill from Defendant ACTIVE LIFE
`
`CHIROPRACTIC, for a diagnostic ultrasound (CPT code 76999) rendered to PEART on August
`
`24, 2024. On August 29, 2023, HEREFORD received a bill from Defendant Staywell Chiropractic
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/01/2024 03:19 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 87
`
`INDEX NO. 161626/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2024
`
`for a diagnostic ultrasound (CPT code 76999) administered to MARTIN on Juny 29, 2023. See
`
`bill, annexed hereto as Exhibit “H”.
`
`2.
`
`Claimants appeared for their EUOs. However, their testimony raised additional
`
`issues as to the legitimacy of the accident and medical necessity of the purported medical
`
`treatments, which further contributed to a strong possibility that the Claimants’ submitted
`
`treatments were not causally related to the alleged collision, were exaggerated, and/or did not arise
`
`from an insured incident.
`
`3.
`
`In particular:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a. Each Claimant testified to not receiving significant portions of the medical
`records billed to HEREFORD.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`i. PEART admitted that he did not understand the paperwork he signed at the
`clinic and that no one was there to assist him.1
`
`ii. PEART testified to not receiving the results of multiple medical tests
`administered to him.2
`
`iii. MARTIN is scheduled for right knee surgery, but does not know the issue
`with his knee, the surgeon, or where he would go to have the surgery done.3
`
`iv. MARTIN could not recall receiving the results of at least two sets of tests
`that were administered to him.4
`
`v. MARTIN denied receipt of several items of medical equipment, for which
`HEREFORD received billing for.5
`
`b. Claimants provided conflicting and convoluted timelines for the periods
`immediately before and after the accident, evidencing that their sole purpose for
`hiring the HEREFORD taxi was to stage this accident:
`
`
`
`i. Claimants both testified that they arrived together to a club together prior to
`ordering a ride with the insured vehicle. However, PEART testified they
`
`
`1 See PEART EUO Transcript, annexed as Exhibit “J”, pg. 45-46.
`2 Exhibit “J”, pg. 54-55 (nerve testing); pg. 58, lns 11-21 (CT scan); pg. 61-62 (ultrasound).
`3 See MARTIN EUO Transcript, annexed as Exhibit “K”, pg. 58-60.
`4 Exhibit “K”, pg. 60-62.
`5 Exhibit “K”, pg. 63-64.
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/01/2024 03:19 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 87
`
`INDEX NO. 161626/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2024
`
`were at the club for “[p]robably two and a half to three hours”6 while
`MARTIN testified that they only stayed “[a]bout 20, 30 minutes.”7
`
`ii. Based on MARTIN’s timeline, Claimants did not meet until around 4:00
`am or 4:30am and the accident occurred within 30 minutes of their
`meeting.8
`
`c. Both Claimants testified that from the impact to the rear of the HEREFORD
`vehicle they were flung forward in contradiction to physical laws.9
`
`
`d. Each claimant described choosing their respective medical treatment location
`independently of one another.10 Yet, each treated with five of the same medical
`providers. Exhibit “E”.
`
`
`
`27.
`
`Based on its investigation into the collision and Claimants’ EUO testimony,
`
`HEREFORD maintains a founded belief that the Claimants’ alleged injuries and any subsequent
`
`No-Fault treatment submitted by the Medical Provider Defendants was not causally related to the
`
`May 28, 2023, collision and/or not actually provided, and has denied the Medical Provider
`
`Defendants’ claims on this basis.
`
`MARTIN FAILED TO RETURN A SUBSCRIBED TRANSCRIPT
`
`28.
`
`After MARTIN’s EUO, by letter dated November 13, 2023, HEREFORD
`
`forwarded MARTIN and his attorney, Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & Decicco, a copy of MARTIN’s
`
`EUO transcript along with a request to subscribe to same. The request also informed MARTIN’s
`
`and his counsel that per the No-Fault regulation, MARTIN required to subscribe said transcript
`
`and failure to do so could result in denial of coverage. See Subscription Requests, annexed as
`
`Exhibit “L”.
`
`29.
`
`HEREFORD did not receive a response to this request.
`
`
`
`6 Exhibit “J”, pg. 31-32.
`7 Exhibit “K”, pg. 22, lns 15-18.
`8 Exhibit “K”, pg. 23-24
`9 Exhibit “J”, pg. 21-22; and Exhibit “K”, pg. 14, lns 13-19.
`10 Exhibit “J”, pg. 43-44; and Exhibit “K”, pg. 34-35.
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/01/2024 03:19 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 87
`
`INDEX NO. 161626/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2024
`
`30.
`
`Accordingly, by letter dated December 13, 2023, HEREFORD sent a follow-up
`
`request toto subscribe to MARTIN and his counsel.
`
`31.
`
`HEREFORD did not receive a response to this request.
`
`32. MARTIN failed to execute and return his transcript to HEREFORD, breaching a
`
`condition precedent to coverage. HEREFORD denied Medical Provider Defendants’ claims on
`
`this basis.
`
`33.
`
`All of the notices sent from HEREFORD were prepared and sent in the ordinary
`
`course of business utilizing the standard practices and procedures within HEREFORD for
`
`generation and mailing of same.
`
`34.
`
`Based on the above and its investigation into the collision, and the Claimants’
`
`violations of the No-Fault Regulation and applicable policy, HEREFORD is entitled to default
`
`judgment on the causes of action in its complaint, declaring it has no obligation to pay the
`
`Defaulting Defendants’ claims, including any and all No-Fault claims; any and all uninsured,
`
`underinsured, supplementary-uninsured, or supplementary-underinsured motorist-benefit claims;
`
`any and all medical-payment claims; any and all property-damage claims; and any and all bodily-
`
`injury-liability benefits under the Policy arising from the May 28, 2023 collision under claim
`
`number 103844-03 and 103844-06.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/01/2024 03:19 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 87
`
`INDEX NO. 161626/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2024
`
`35.
`
`As such, this affidavit is respectfully submitted in support of HEREFORD’s Motion
`
`______________________________
`Joronda McBurnie
`
`for Default Judgment.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sworn to before me this __ day
`of _______________, 2024
`
`_____________________________
`Notary Public
`
`Harlan R. Schreiber
`Notary Public, State of New York
`No. 02SC0001438
`Qualified in New York County
`Commission Expires February 13, 2027
`
`
`23
`
`February
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/01/2024 03:19 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 87
`
`INDEX NO. 161626/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2024
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`-----------------------------------------------------------------X
`HEREFORD INSURANCE COMPANY,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Index No.: 161626/2023
`
`WORD COUNT
`
`CERTIFICATTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SEQUAN MARTIN
`TYRONE PEART
`
` The “Individual Defendants”
`
` -and-
`
`ABU MUHAMMAD M HAQUE MD, PC, et. al.
` The “Medical Provider Defendants”.
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`Pursuant to Section 202.8-b of the Uniform Rules of the Supreme and County Courts, the
`undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice law in the State of New York, hereby certifies that
`the affidavit of Joronda McBurnie dated February 23, 2024 was prepared on a computer in 12-
`point Times New Roman font, is double spaced and contains 2504 words, a number generated by
`the word-processing system used to generate the document, Microsoft Word, and relied upon in
`preparing this certification. I further certify that the document complies with the word count limit
`as established by Section 202.8-b.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_______________________________
`
`
`
`Zachary Whiting, Esq.
`
`Dated: March 1, 2024
` New York, New York
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket