throbber
GRINDING METAL WITH CARBORUNDUM.
`BLACK MAGIC DIAMOND WHEEL
`WORK PRACTICE STUDY
`Prepared by
`® | William E. Longo, Ph.D.
`Richard L. Hatfield
`May, 1999
`Materials Analytical Services, Inc.
`; Raleigh Office: Atlanta Office:
`616 Hutton Street * Suite 101 3945 Lakeheld Court
`Raleigh, NC 27606 Suwanec, Georgia 3(K24
`(919) 829-7041 » FAX (919) 829-5518 / (770) 866-3200 * FAX (770) 866-3259
`
`* FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/29/2024 07:20 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 188
`
`INDEX NO. 190088/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2024
`
`

`

`Work Practice Study of Asbestos Exposure while Grinding
`with a Carborundum Black Magic Diamond Wheel
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
`A Carborundum Black Magic grinding wheel was provided to MAS in order to perform a
`grinding work practice simulation. An analysis of the grinding wheel confirmed that the
`inner portion of wheel contained approximately 35% by volume of chrysotile asbestos.
`The grinding section of the wheel which contains the diamond material, was found to be
`negative for asbestos. The Carborundum Black Magic Diarnond wheel was placed on a
`Cincinnati #2 Tooling and Cutter Grinder and a tungsten carbide strip was used for
`grinding. A machinist with 18 years experience provided the expertise to run the
`grinding operation.
`Air samples taken during this work place simulation provided the following results:
`AVERAGE ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR AIR SAMPLES
`Number
`of PCM TEM (all)
`Samples | fibers/cc | Structures/cc
`Background sampies 3 0.001 0.000
`-| Before Grinding Operation .
`3 0.047
`Area Samples During Grinding 0.000
`| Personnel Samples During Grinding 6 0.029 0.000
`As can be seen from these results, the fibers detected by PCM is well below any current
`or past OSHA standards. Furthermore, the TEM results show that the fibers detected
`by PCM were in fact, all non-asbestos in nature. In conclusion, these results show that
`when the asbestos containing Carborundum Black Magic Diamond wheel is used in the
`work place, asbestos fibers are not released into that environment.
`*
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/29/2024 07:20 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 188
`
`INDEX NO. 190088/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2024
`
`

`

`INDEX NO. 190088/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2024
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/29/2024 07:20 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 188
`
`Work Practice Study of Asbestos Exposure While
`Grinding with a Carborundum Black Magic Diamond Wheel
`This study was designed and conducted by Richard Hatfield, William Longo and Ben Adair
`Study Design and Methodology
`The study was performed in an isolation chamber constructed using typical asbestos
`abatement protocols. The size of the chamber is approximately 15’x 20’x 8’. The
`chamber is constructed with two. viewing windows for video taping purposes and has an
`air exchange rate of approximately 200 cubic feet per minute with two primary inlet
`sources and a negative air machine that produces a constant flow during the workplace
`study. After the study, the inside of the chamber was decontaminated by standard
`asbestos decontamination methods including HEPA vacuuming of all dust and debris
`and wet wiping of all surfaces.
`During video taping of the work practice study, lighting is utilized inside the chamber to
`enhance the possibile observations of dust release during the work practice. Previous
`studies have shown that the use of, what is commonly referred to, as the “Tyndall light
`phenomena” is an effective method of displaying respirable airborne dust generated
`from workplace actives.!24
`A grinding machine was provided to Materials Analytical Services (MAS) by Adair's
`Machine Service, Inc. The grinding machine was a Cincinnati #2 Tooling and Cutter
`Grinder. Ben Adair of Adair’s Machine Service also provided two tungsten carbide (C-2
`grade) strips (%" x %" x 6"). A (7"x%") Carborundum Black Magic Diamond grinding
`wheel was provided to MAS by Mr. Thomas Tardy of Forman, Perry, Watkins, Krutz, &
`Tardy, PLLC.
`During the study, air samples were collected using 25mm air cassettes containing 0.8
`micron pore mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filters and a 5.0 micron backing pad. The air
`sampling pumps were calibrated both before and after the sample collection. - High |
`volume pumps were used for area or bystander air samples during the simulation. The
`pumps were located outside the chamber and connected to the air sample cassettes by
`Tygon tubing through the wails of the chamber. The three area air samples were
`located near the North, South, and West walls of the chamber. The air sampling
`cassettes were located approximately five feet from the floor and 5 to 8 feet from the
`work activity. The high volume pumps were calibrated to a flow rate of 10 liters per
`minute. The machinist performing the work place simulation as well as the two
`investigators observing the work were each fitted with two personnel air samplers
`attached to the left and right shoulder area to sample in the breathing zone during the
`' Surgen Commander, P.G. Harris, “The Effects and Control of Disease Associated with Exposure in Devonport
`Dockyard.” Doctoral Dissertation.
`~ C. Dermchi & K.5. Lane, “Asbestos Toxicology Report,” Union Carbide Corporation.
`~ D.T, Chambers, “Dust Control Development in Asbestos”, Volume 2, Properties, Applications, and Hazards, p.
`193, 1983.
`
`\*
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/29/2024 07:20 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 188
`
`work place simulations. The personnel air samples were collected with battery operated
`Gillian pumps, calibrated to a flow rate of 2 liters per minute. Before each work place
`simulation, background samples were run both inside and outside the chamber. The air
`samples were collected in general accordance with methods outlined in NIOSH’s 582
`“Sampling and Evaluating Airborne Asbestos Dust”.
`The individuals working inside the chamber wore Tyvek suits under cotton/polyester
`work cloths and were protected with either Powered Air Purifying Respirators or Self-
`Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA). The chamber design included
`decontamination areas for clothing removal and for a shower to remove any residual
`asbestos contamination before the workers left the chamber area. A fabric sample from
`the work clothes of the machinist was collected to measure for any possible asbestos
`contamination.
`The work practice studied was the grinding of the tungsten carbide strip with a
`Carborundum Black Magic Diamond Wheel. Mr. Ben Adair installed the grinding wheel
`on the grinding machine and set-up the tungsten carbide strip for grinding. The %”
`surface of the strip was the surface which was ground. Mr. Ben Adair, who has 18
`years experience as a machinist, operated the grinding machine during the work
`practice study. During the grinding, the strip was passed under the grinding wheel
`along the 6” length of the strip. The %" edge was ground a number of times 1/1000”
`each time. Fifteen or more passes were necessary to complete a removal of 1/1000”
`from the %” edge. The diamond grinding wheel required cleaning periodically
`throughout the process. The cleaning was performed by placing an aluminum oxide bar
`in contact with the wheel.
`_ The filters were analyzed by the NIOSH 7400 method for PCM using A counting rules.
`The TEM air samples for analysis were prepared using a redeposit method as detailed
`in the ASTM method D-5595. For TEM analysis, a modified Yamate EPA level fl indirect
`air sample analysis was performed. The fabric sample collected from Mr. Adair’s work
`clothes was analyzed by the Chatfield method.
`Samples of the grinding surface and from the hub of the grinding wheel were removed,
`were collected after the completion of the study. These samples were analyzed by
`Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) to determine the asbestos content. Upon completion
`of the workplace simulation study, the chamber was compietely decontaminated. The
`black cloth sheeting on the inside surfaces of the chamber was removed and disposed.
`All surfaces were HEPA vacuumed and wet wiped according to standard asbestos
`abatement technology.
`*
`
`INDEX NO. 190088/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2024
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket