`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 105
`
`INDEX NO. 190109/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/30/2020
`
`NYCAL
`
`Index No. 190109/20
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
`OF SERVICE
`
`x:
`
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`x
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`---------------------------------------------------------------------
`TED G. EVERHART and BETTIE EVERHART,
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`- against -
`
`84 LUMBER COMPANY, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`----------------------------------------------------------------------
`
`1.
`
`Defendant Honeywell International, Inc., formerly known as AlliedSignal
`
`Inc., as successor-in-interest to the Bendix Corporation (hereinafter “Honeywell”), hereby
`
`acknowledges receipt of the Verified Complaint in the instant action.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant, Honeywell answers the Verified Complaint by reference to its
`
`Standard Answer to Meirowtiz & Wasserberg, LLP’s Standard Asbestos Complaint for Personal
`
`Injury No. 1, and pursuant to NYCAL Case Management Order under the Main Index
`
`No. NYCAL 40,000/88 and repeats, reiterates and incorporates by reference as if set forth herein
`
`at length each and every answer, affirmative defense, cross-claim and answer to cross-claim
`
`contained therein.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`June 30, 2020
`
`________________________________
`Donald R. Pugliese, Esq.
`McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP\
`340 Madison Avenue
`New York, New York 10173
`(212) 547-5400
`Attorneys for Defendant Honeywell International, Inc.,
`f/k/a AlliedSignal, Inc., as successor-in-interest to The
`Bendix Corporation
`
`DM_US 156484531-1.091479.1287
`
`1 of 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
