`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03m2018 01:23 PM
`NYSC 3F DOC. NO. 1107
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1107
`
`IND
`EX NO.
`190219/2016
`INDEX NO. 190219/2016
`
` VYSC
`
` flIV flD
` 3F:
`
`03/27/2018
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2018
`
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2018 01:23 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1107
`
`INDEX NO. 190219/2016
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2018
`
`FILED
`NYSCEF
`
`: NEW YORK
`DOC.
`NO.
`1005
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03/06/2018
`
`06:14
`
`PM|
`
`INDEX
`
`NO.
`
`190219/2016
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/06/2018
`
`:
`:
`:
`
`Index
`Date
`
`No.:
`Filed:
`
`190219/2016
`08/01/2016
`
`: :
`
`ORDER WITH
`OF ENTRY
`: NOTICE
`
`:
`:
`
`: :
`
`OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`SUPREME
`COURT
`OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------------x
`NEW YORK
`ASBESTOS
`CITY
`LITIGATION
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------------x
`ANN MARIE
`of
`as Executrix
`the Estate
`MCGLYNN,
`
`IDELL,
`Deceased,
`
`of THOMAS
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`-against-
`
`AERCO
`
`INTERNATIONAL,
`
`INC.,
`
`et al.
`
`Defendants.
`
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`PLEASE
`TAKE
`the within
`that
`
`NOTICE,
`
`is a true
`
`copy
`
`of an Order
`
`dated March
`
`6,
`
`2018
`
`and entered
`
`in the Office
`
`of
`
`the Clerk
`
`of Court
`
`on March
`
`6, 2018.
`
`Date:
`
`New York
`New York,
`March
`6, 2018
`
`CONROY
`
`HANLY
`SIMMONS
`for Plaintiffs
`Attorneys
`112 Madison
`Avenue
`New York, NY 10016-7416
`84-6400
`(212)
`
`es M. Kramer,
`
`Esq.
`
`1 of
`
`3
`
`
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2018 01:23 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1107
`
`INDEX NO. 190219/2016
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2018
`
`FILED:
`NIdLM
`
`NEW YORK
`UUL.
`NU.
`1UUO
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03/06/2018
`
`06:14
`
`PM|
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC. NO.
`
`1004
`
`.
`
`SUPREME
`PRESENT:
`
`COURT
`
`OF THE STATE
`HON. MARTIN
`
`OF NEW YORK
`SHULMAN
`
`Just/ce
`
`- NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY
`
`INDEX
`
`NO.
`
`190219/2016
`
`REGE
`
`X
`
`. 190ÖË9
`
`50Ÿr
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/06/2018
`
`PART
`
`1
`
`Ann Marie
`
`ldell,
`
`et al,
`
`- v -
`
`Aerco
`
`International,
`
`et al.
`
`INDEX
`
`NO.
`
`190219i16
`
`Motion
`
`Seq.
`
`042
`
`The following
`
`papers, numbered
`
`1 to 4 were read on this motion
`
`to reargue
`
`- Affirmations
`of Motion
`Notice
`Aff./Cross-Motion
`Answering
`- Exhibits
`Aff.
`A-D
`Reply
`
`- Exhibits
`- Exhibits
`
`A-Y (NYSCEF
`961-988)
`of Law (NYSCEF
`1-6; Mem.
`
`990-997)
`
`Cross-Motion:
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`PAPERSMUMBERED
`
`12
`3'
`3
`4
`
`(asbestos
`
`action,
`plaintiff
`for
`
`for
`
`pain
`
`14*
`
`and
`
`In this
`returned
`alia
`inter
`a jury
`products
`exposure)
`liability
`on August
`verdict
`Thomas
`$1.8
`McGlynn
`17,
`2017,
`then-living
`(plaintiff)
`awarding
`$1.5 million
`million
`future
`pain
`and
`to cover
`and
`for
`and
`pain
`past
`suffering
`suffering
`up to a maximum
`parties
`year.
`Both
`period
`of one
`minimum
`and
`period
`of six months
`issued
`a bench
`on December
`filed
`decision
`14, 2017
`this
`post-verdict
`and
`court
`motions,
`14th
`defendant
`(Dec.
`for
`motion
`Jenkins
`Bros.'s
`decision),
`(Jenkins)
`entirely
`denying
`CPLR §5501[c]
`judgment
`of dismissal
`plaintiff's
`the
`but
`verdict,
`granting
`notwithstanding
`motion
`decretal
`the Dec.
`appropriate
`decision
`additur.
`directives,
`Reciting
`to $4 million
`increased
`damages
`for
`past
`and
`for
`future
`awards
`suffering
`and
`to $2.5 million.
`suffering
`
`a
`
`pain
`
`a
`
`a
`
`x
`0.
`
`uj u)
`
`ce L
`z+
`O
`
`~+
`
`- 9
`
`0
`~
`O
`f
`m w
`+>
`
`O
`
`u
`a.
`
`o
`
`02
`
`without
`submitted
`stipulate
`this
`court
`reargue
`"new"
`
`sums
`
`this
`to
`
`to either
`additur
`to these
`stipulate
`deadline
`Under
`time
`30 day
`court's
`this
`for
`a re-trial
`or opt
`on damages,
`its appeal
`Jenkins
`to perfecting
`prejudice
`to extend
`cause
`to show
`its time
`to consider
`a proposed
`whether
`order
`to
`of $6.5 million.
`At a court
`to the
`on
`increased
`award
`16, 2018,
`January
`hearing
`to
`was
`extension
`to its time
`Jenkins
`in addition
`learned
`that
`request,
`seeking
`14th decision
`bolster
`its potential
`this
`and
`appellate
`record
`with
`court's
`Dec.
`the
`prior
`it was
`capable
`of presenting
`arguments
`and
`documentation
`during
`fully
`to sign
`of post-verdict
`to show
`this
`the
`order
`round
`motion
`practice.
`cause,
`refusing
`By
`Jenkins'
`reargument
`court
`to negotiate
`directed
`parties
`but
`the
`denied
`motion,
`implicitly
`Jenkins'
`On January
`extension
`time
`request.
`written
`agreement
`31,
`2018,
`regarding
`"Jenkins'
`to decide
`time
`whether
`stipulation
`court
`so-ordered
`a two
`extending
`attorney
`jury's
`award
`to the Court's
`the
`or before
`.
`stipulate
`. to a date
`on
`.
`additur
`increasing
`fourteen
`decision
`to be announced
`by the Appellate
`days
`the
`Division,
`(14)
`following
`Jenkins'
`14th
`appeal
`First
`in
`[this
`court's
`Dec.
`Department,
`pending
`currently
`Decision]."
`
`of
`
`again
`Jenkins
`satisfied,
`Apparently
`cause
`show
`additional
`the
`identical
`seeking
`arguments
`show
`cause
`and
`after
`hearing
`14th decision
`its Dec.
`that
`the
`last word
`was
`post-verdict
`Jenkins
`motion.
`Parenthetically,
`raise
`and/or
`conceivable
`argument
`every
`trial
`judgment
`of dismissal
`notwithstanding
`verdict
`plaintiff's
`additur
`jury
`deny
`the
`proposed
`order
`declining
`could
`remedies
`pursuant
`
`not
`
`and
`to sign
`exercise
`
`its
`
`proposed
`submitted
`order
`a second
`proposed
`relief
`order
`in its first
`sought
`on February
`made
`this
`court
`14,
`2018,
`in
`raised
`and
`issue
`on every
`argued
`was
`fair
`a full
`and
`afforded
`opportunity
`a post-
`submit
`to support
`documentation
`verdict
`the
`to sustain
`and,
`alternatively,
`motion.
`court
`issued
`a decision
`this
`Thus,
`Jenkins'
`to show
`cause.
`counsel
`was
`advised
`to CPLR §5704(a),
`it deemed
`it appropriate.
`
`if
`
`to
`to
`it clear
`Jenkins'
`
`to
`
`the
`
`that
`
`it
`
`1 of
`
`2
`
`2 of
`
`3
`
`
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2018 01:23 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1107
`
`INDEX NO. 190219/2016
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2018
`
`FILED:
`NYSCEF
`
`NEW YORK
`DOC.
`NO.
`1005
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`1004
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03/06/2018
`
`06:14
`
`PM|
`
`INDEX
`
`NO.
`
`190219/2016
`
`RECEIIWDBXNM6ÇEf9021%f
`
`18
`
`RECEIVED
`
`03/06/2018
`
`re-formatted
`Jenkins
`Instead,
`to a motion
`renewal
`reargument/
`affirmation
`an emergent
`annexed
`the Dec.
`its appeal
`of
`perfect
`time
`and money
`expend
`filing
`cross-motion
`for
`sanctions.
`disposition.
`
`145
`
`of
`and
`
`are
`
`to
`to
`
`a
`
`NYSCEF:
`its second
`for
`cause
`to show
`order
`proposed
`on February
`Jenkins
`2018.
`returnable
`28,
`Incredibly,
`on a looming
`deadline
`of
`its own making
`grounded
`This
`left
`but
`no choice
`decision.
`plaintiff's
`counsel
`law in opposition
`and
`a memorandum
`perforce
`make
`Both
`the motion
`cross-motion
`consolidated
`for
`
`This
`
`or overlook
`not misapprehend
`did
`court
`140
`decision.
`the Dec.
`reasons
`proffered
`underlying
`addressed
`1979)(motions
`for
`(1st Dept
`reargument,
`to establish
`a party
`an opportunity
`to afford
`designed
`or misapplied
`misapprehended
`the
`relevant
`facts,
`"new"
`verdicts
`evidence
`and
`material
`damages
`(e.g.,
`of plaintiff's
`legal
`if any,
`and
`the
`evidence
`impact,
`of
`in support
`produced
`were
`all capable
`of being
`14*
`Jenkins
`the Dec.
`decision.
`issuance
`the
`of
`Illustratively,
`of
`the Snowdale
`judicial
`court
`to take
`notice
`the
`apprising
`parties'
`submitted.
`post
`verdict
`motions
`were
`the
`fully
`
`any
`
`law or mistakenly
`facts
`any
`68 AD2d
`v Roche,
`See
`Foley
`discretion
`of
`to the
`the
`court,
`the
`court
`overlooked
`that
`principle
`controlling
`in Snowdale,
`Andrucki,
`death
`the August
`after
`Jenkins'
`post-verdict
`could
`verdict
`
`or
`
`558
`are
`
`The
`as
`
`or
`law).
`as well
`verdict)
`well
`before
`a letter
`the
`time
`
`of
`
`2017
`motion
`sent
`at
`
`have
`rendered
`
`court
`"new"
`
`This
`its
`adequate.
`
`unmindful
`is not
`to the
`record
`matter
`adding
`Jenkins'
`than
`Nonetheless,
`untimely.
`Accordingly,
`substantivally
`"new"
`information
`the
`must
`reject
`Jenkins'
`of
`in support
`affirmation
`and
`post-verdict
`original
`motion),
`with
`arguments
`consider
`new
`court
`the Dec.
`time
`in rearguing
`the
`first
`disguised
`as a renewal
`reargument
`
`that
`
`on
`
`Jenkins
`otherwise
`is
`
`from
`more
`
`the
`
`this
`now makes
`attempt
`
`third
`
`for
`
`at
`
`its declination
`prevented
`orders
`its planned
`which
`was
`appeal,
`motion
`record
`appellate
`bolstering
`this
`purposes
`court
`of appellate
`and
`for
`review,
`various
`exhibits
`annexed
`to the Dinunzio
`those
`(i.e,
`Jenkins'
`discussed
`never
`in
`proffered
`and
`motion
`Nor will
`dehors
`same
`record.
`deem
`alleged
`support
`Jenkins
`documentary
`Jenkins'
`14*
`decision.
`Accordingly,
`is denied.
`motion
`
`to reargue
`made
`attempts
`the multiple
`despite
`Finally,
`grounds
`pursuant
`proper
`upon
`predicated
`was
`of which
`which
`documentation
`could
`and
`arguments
`new
`declination
`orders
`motion
`this
`court's
`practice),
`in its quixotic
`no choice
`defendant
`Jenkins
`Bros.,
`been
`its
`would
`have
`to file
`The
`better
`practice
`must
`be denied.
`for
`costs
`plaintiff's
`cross-motion
`
`none
`
`presenting
`post-verdict
`for
`counsel
`for
`its appeal.
`time.
`Thus,
`
`the Dec.
`decision,
`to CPLR 2221
`(e.g.,
`have
`been
`presented
`left Clyde
`8 Co US,
`to expand
`quest
`reargument
`motion
`
`145
`
`during
`LLP,
`the
`record
`the
`first
`
`Accordingly,
`
`it
`
`is
`
`ORDERED
`
`that
`
`Jenkins
`
`Bros.'
`
`motion
`
`is denied;
`
`and
`
`it
`
`is further
`
`ORDERED
`
`that
`
`plaintiff's
`
`cross-motion
`
`for
`
`sanctions
`
`is also
`
`denied.
`
`The
`
`foregoing
`
`is this
`
`court's
`
`decision
`
`and
`
`order.
`
`Dated:
`
`March
`
`2, 2018
`
`Check
`
`Check
`
`one:
`
`C FINAL
`if appropriate:
`
`DISPOSITION
`O DO NOT POST
`
`NON-FINAL
`
`DISPOSITION
`U REFERENCE
`
`Martin
`
`hulman,
`
`J.S.C.
`
`2 of
`
`2
`
`3
`
`of
`
`3
`
`