throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`
`Exhibit 4
`
`

`

`11/02/2018
`CLERK
`COUNTY
`NEW YORK
`07:02
`FILED:
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`PM)
`NYSCEF
`1
`DOC.
`NO.
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`
`INDEX
`655482/2018
`NO.
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`RECEIVED
`NYSCEF:
`11/02/2018
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`OF NEW YORK
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`BALLYBEG
`
`ENTERTAINMENT
`
`LLC,
`
`Index
`
`Number
`
`-against-
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`SUMMONS
`
`ADVANCE
`ENTERTAINMENT
`and KID
`
`SHELLEEN,
`
`MELI,
`
`LLC,
`
`JOSEPH
`
`LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`To
`
`the
`
`above-named
`
`Defendants:
`
`YOU ARE HEAREBY
`
`SUMMONED
`
`to
`
`answer
`
`the
`
`complaint
`
`in
`
`this
`
`action
`
`and
`
`to
`
`serve
`
`a
`
`copy
`
`of
`
`your
`
`answer,
`
`or,
`
`if
`
`the
`
`complaint
`
`is not
`
`served
`
`with
`
`this
`
`summons,
`
`to
`
`serve
`
`a notice
`
`of
`
`on
`
`the
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`attorneys
`
`within
`
`20
`
`days
`
`after
`
`the
`
`service
`
`of
`
`this
`
`appearance,
`
`summons,
`
`exclusive
`
`of
`
`the
`
`day
`
`of
`
`service
`
`(or within
`
`30 days
`
`after
`
`the
`
`service
`
`is complete
`
`if
`
`this
`
`summons
`
`is
`
`delivered
`
`to you
`
`within
`
`the State
`
`of New York).
`
`In
`
`case
`
`of
`
`your
`
`failure
`
`to appear
`
`judgment
`
`will
`
`be
`
`taken
`
`against
`
`you
`
`by
`
`default
`
`for
`
`the
`
`relief
`
`demanded
`
`in
`
`the
`
`not
`
`or
`
`personally
`
`answer,
`
`complaint.
`
`Dated:
`
`November
`New York,
`
`2, 2018
`New York
`
`ENGEL
`
`THORNBURGH
`
`& McCARNEY
`
`LLP
`
`E. Engel
`57th
`
`16th
`
`Street,
`New York
`10019
`546-6215
`
`(212)
`for
`Plaintiff
`Entertainment
`
`LLC
`
`Thomas
`152 West
`New York,
`Telephone:
`Attorneys
`
`Ballybeg
`
`By:
`
`1
`
`1 of
`
`18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`
`
`TO: ADVANCE ENTERTAINMENT LLC
`
`c/o New York Secretary of State
`
`One Commerce Plaza, 99 Washington Avenue
`
`Albany, NY 12231
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOSEPH MELI
`c/o United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg
`2400 Robert F. Miller Drive
`Lewisburg, PA 17837
`
`KID SHELLEEN, LLC
`c/o The Corporation Trust Company
`1209 Orange Street, Corporate Trust Center
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`2 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`
`
`BALLYBEG ENTERTAINMENT LLC,
`
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`ADVANCE ENTERTAINMENT LLC, JOSEPH
`MELI, and KID SHELLEEN, LLC,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`Index Number ____________________
`
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Ballybeg Entertainment LLC, through its undersigned counsel, alleges the
`
`following for its Complaint against defendants Advance Entertainment LLC, Joseph Meli, and
`
`Kid Shelleen, LLC (collectively “Defendants”).
`
`NATURE OF THE COMPLAINT
`
`1)
`
`This action arises out of a classic Ponzi scheme orchestrated by Defendant Joseph
`
`Meli (“Meli”) and furthered by the knowing assistance and participation of Meli’s company
`
`defendant Advance Entertainment LLC
`
`(“Advance”).
`
` By means of Defendants’
`
`misrepresentations, lies, forged agreements, and bogus due diligence, Defendants defrauded
`
`investors of more than $95 million for a purported high-end live event ticket resale business
`
`which did not, in fact, exist.
`
`2)
`
`In January 2017, Ballybeg invested $500,000, purportedly to be used by Meli’s
`
`company, Advance, towards the purchase of ticket blocks for an upcoming national tour of the
`
`music group Metallica and a series of scheduled live events at the newly renovated Nassau
`
`Coliseum. According to the investment agreements, the tickets purchased by Advance and Meli
`
`
`
`1
`
`3 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`would then be resold to the public, and Ballybeg, as an investor, would receive 10% annualized
`
`return on its investment from proceeds of the ticket re-sales.
`
`3)
`
`In determining whether or not to fund these investments, Ballybeg relied on
`
`Meli’s relationship with Advance and the blessing and participation of third parties CVC Capital
`
`Partners and DTI Management LLC, a well-known player in the live event ticket resale industry.
`
`By reason of DTI’s appointment of Meli as a director and top executive, along with DTI’s status
`
`as a portfolio company of global private equity firm CVC, Ballybeg was led to believe that Meli
`
`and Advance, a relatively unknown entity in the industry, were: (1) authorized to solicit
`
`investments on behalf of DTI; (2) thoroughly vetted by CVC; and (3) backed by the financial
`
`capital necessary to be a major player in the industry.
`
`4)
`
`Ultimately, however, after investing $500,000 with Meli and Advance, Ballybeg
`
`discovered that Meli had no agreements in place for the purchase of Metallica or Nassau
`
`Coliseum tickets. Instead, Ballybeg’s $500,000 investment apparently was used to pay off
`
`previous investors, including defendant Kid Shelleen, LLC (“Kid Shelleen”), in furtherance of
`
`the Ponzi scheme and in direct violation of the investment agreements between Ballybeg,
`
`Advance, and Meli.
`
`5)
`
`On January 27, 2017, just two days after Ballybeg invested with Meli and his
`
`company Advance, Meli was arrested for violations of federal wire and securities fraud crimes
`
`used to perpetuate the Ponzi scheme. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission
`
`(“SEC”) filed civil claims against Meli, and the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”)
`
`initiated an investigation into Meli’s fraudulent scheme and filed a criminal complaint.
`
`6)
`
`Following his arrest, Meli was indicted by the United States Department of
`
`Justice for conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud. In October 2017, Meli pled
`
`
`
`2
`
`4 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`guilty to securities fraud and ultimately was sentenced on April 3, 2018 to 6.5 years
`
`imprisonment and payment of $58.8 million in restitution.
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`7)
`
`Plaintiff Ballybeg is a Delaware limited liability company formed in 2010 and
`
`located at 630 Ninth Avenue, Suite 610, New York, New York.
`
`8)
`
`Defendant Advance is a Delaware limited liability company organized in 2011
`
`and controlled by Joseph Meli, its sole and managing member, with its principal place of
`
`business located at 95 Horatio Street, Apartment 701, New York, New York.
`
`9)
`
`Defendant Meli is a resident of New York, New York, is the managing member
`
`and 100% owner of Defendant Advance and, at all material times, was a director, senior
`
`executive and the head of the Entertainment Division of defendant DTI.
`
`10) Defendant Kid Shelleen is a Delaware limited liability company organized and
`
`controlled by Paul Tudor Jones and Tudor Investment Corporation, with its principal place of
`
`business in the state of Connecticut.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`11)
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the Defendants because the Defendants transacted
`
`business within this state under CPLR 302(a)(1) and are located in New York such as to be
`
`subject to general jurisdiction under CPLR 301.
`
`12) Venue is proper in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York
`
`County, because defendants Advance and Meli are located in the County and State of New York,
`
`conduct business in the County and State of New York, and because the fraudulent actions
`
`described herein involve events in and communications to and from New York. Moreover,
`
`plaintiff Ballybeg delivered the payments to fund its investments by wire transfer to defendant
`
`
`
`3
`
`5 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`Advance’s Bank of America/Merrill Lynch account in New York, New York, and by check to
`
`defendant Meli individually in New York, New York.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`I.
`
`The Ponzi Scheme
`
`13) As detailed in the complaints filed on January 27, 2017 by the DOJ and the SEC,
`
`and in the indictment filed on September 5, 2017 (the “Superseding Indictment”), from January
`
`2015 through January 2017, Meli orchestrated a Ponzi scheme intended to lure individual and
`
`institutional investors into a purported ticket resale business for widely popular Broadway
`
`shows, concerts, and other live entertainment events.
`
`14)
`
`In reality, however, the funds invested by these investors—including plaintiff
`
`Ballybeg—were not used to purchase tickets for resale as promised in Meli’s funding agreements
`
`but instead were funneled to prior investors to create the illusion of profitable returns, as well as
`
`to Meli and his co-conspirators for their own personal use.
`
`15) Meli enticed his investors by claiming to have exclusive access to bulk premium
`
`tickets to some of the most popular live entertainment events in the United States. Additionally,
`
`Meli knowingly misrepresented to investors that he had developed a unique model for
`
`purchasing block tickets to live events, in most cases from an event sponsor or promoter, in
`
`advance of an event, and then being repaid when those tickets were sold to the secondary market
`
`at a profit. Investors then entered into written contracts that promised full repayment of principal
`
`plus a 10% annualized profit. In addition, investors were promised 50% of any profits from the
`
`ticket re-sales that remained after investors received their return of principal and return.
`
`16) As detailed in the SEC and DOJ complaints, in total, Meli and his co-conspirators
`
`offered and sold a total of over $95 million from investors between January 2015 and January
`
`
`
`4
`
`6 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`2017. Those investments were spread across four different entities, including Meli’s company,
`
`Advance. At least $48 million of incoming funds from apparent investors was used to repay and
`
`provide purported investment returns to other investors—not to purchase blocks of tickets as
`
`Meli had represented. Meli and his co-conspirators also diverted investor funds for their own
`
`personal use, including lavish jewelry and automobile purchases, extravagant vacations, and
`
`private school tuition.
`
`17) On January 26, 2017, Meli was indicted for conspiracy to commit securities fraud
`
`and wire fraud (Count I), securities fraud (Count II), and wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343
`
`(Counts III and IV). See, U.S. v. Steven Simmons and Joseph Meli, Case No. 1:17-cr-00127-
`
`KMW (S.D.N.Y).
`
`18) On January 27, 2017, the SEC filed a complaint against Meli for (1) fraud in the
`
`offer or sale of securities under Section 17(a)(1)-(3) of the Securities Act, and (2) fraud in
`
`connection with the purchase of sale of securities under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and
`
`Rules 10b-5(a)-(c). See, SEC v. Meli, et al., Case No. 17-cv-632-LLS (S.D.N.Y.).
`
`19) On September 5, 2017, the DOJ filed a Superseding Indictment amending the
`
`criminal charges to include an additional count of securities fraud against Meli (Count V) for:
`
`“(a) employing devices, schemes and artifices to defraud; (b) making untrue statements of
`
`material fact and omitting to state material fact necessary in order to make the statements made,
`
`in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, and (c) engaging in
`
`acts, practices and courses of business which operated and would operate as a fraud and deceit
`
`upon persons, to wit, MELI, utilizing false representations, obtained funds from investors and
`
`then utilized those funds to make payments to earlier investors and otherwise misappropriated
`
`those funds for his personal benefit.” See, Superseding Indictment (Dkt. 58) at pp. 12-13, U.S. v.
`
`
`
`5
`
`7 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`Steven Simmons and Joseph Meli, case no. 1:17-cr-00127-KMW (S.D.N.Y). The Superseding
`
`Indictment also added a sixth count against Meli for identity theft. Id. at pp. 13-14.
`
`20) According to the Superseding Indictment, Meli defrauded approximately 130
`
`investors of at least $95 million and utilized a “substantial portion” of those funds for personal
`
`expenses, including a $3 million house in East Hampton, New York, a 2017 Porsche convertible,
`
`and expensive watches and jewelry. He also made payments “in a Ponzi-like manner” to
`
`previous investors in his ticket fraud scheme and in his other fraudulent investment schemes.
`
`21) On October 31, 2017, Meli appeared before a United States Magistrate Judge in
`
`the District Court for the Southern District of New York and entered a plea of guilty to Count V
`
`of the Superseding Indictment. In his statement, Meli admitted that:
`
`Starting in about 2015, I misled investors, and I took inappropriate
`business by soliciting their investments with false documents. I
`represented to certain investors that I had formal written contracts
`to purchase bulk tickets to live events. Those formal contracts did
`not always exist as I represented. In some cases, I showed
`investors contracts that appeared to be signed by people who had
`not signed them. And in some cases, those contracts did not
`accurately reflect the true agreements related to my bulk purchases
`of live events. I knew what I was doing was wrong . . .
`
`See, Transcript (Dkt. 89-1) at p. 22, U.S. v. Steven Simmons and Joseph Meli, case no.
`
`
`
`1:17-cr-00127-KMW (S.D.N.Y).
`
`22)
`
`In his guilty plea, Meli agreed to accept up to 97 months of imprisonment,
`
`$5,000,000 in fines, and $65,000,000 in forfeitures. On April 3, 2018, Meli was sentenced by
`
`the Honorable Kimba Wood, Senior United States District Judge of the United States District
`
`Court for the Southern District of New York, to 6 ½ years imprisonment and payment of $58.8
`
`million in restitution.
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`8 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`II. Meli’s Pitch to Ballybeg
`
`23)
`
`Since its formation in 2010, Ballybeg has been in the business of investing in
`
`strategic investments and projects, primarily in the entertainment industry.
`
`24)
`
`In or around April 2016, Meli set his sights on Ballybeg as the next target in his
`
`Ponzi scheme. Meli requested a meeting in person with executives from Ballybeg where he
`
`described how he and his company Advance were in the business of buying blocks of tickets for
`
`popular live entertainment events and re-selling them in the secondary market.
`
`25) Meli misrepresented that the business was already profitable and that Ballybeg
`
`had an opportunity to participate. Meli explained that he was expanding his business into
`
`Broadway ticket sales and would like Ballybeg and its CEO, Jeremiah Harris, to help him to
`
`assist in breaking into the Broadway ticket market.
`
`26)
`
`To sweeten the deal, Meli explained that he had a close and successful
`
`relationship with DTI. DTI is one of the largest suppliers of live event ticket inventory to online
`
`ticket marketplaces in the country. DTI streamlines live event ticket distribution and facilitates a
`
`secondary market environment for sports teams, event producers and promoters, music artists,
`
`venues, and ticket brokers to conduct ticket sales across secondary marketplaces. DTI also
`
`supplies ticket inventory to popular online re-sale platforms such as StubHub, SeatGeek, and
`
`Ticketmaster.
`
`27) On June 10, 2016, Meli sent an e-mail to Ballybeg entitled “It’s On,” attaching for
`
`Ballybeg’s review a term sheet dated June 10, 2016, and addressed to Curtis Cheng, CEO of DTI
`
`(the “DTI Term Sheet”). The DTI Term Sheet was an agreement between Meli and DTI
`
`proposing that Advance purchase DTI for $63 million in cash and $15 million in Advance stock.
`
`Meli intended that the DTI Term Sheet would defraud Ballybeg into believing that his company,
`
`
`
`7
`
`9 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`Advance, which had no real history or track record in the industry, was legitimate and financially
`
`capable of purchasing all or part of DTI.
`
`28) Approximately two weeks later, on or around June 22, 2016, Meli sent to
`
`Ballybeg a presentation entitled “Project Takedown” which included a full review of DTI’s
`
`business activities and strategies and misrepresented that DTI would be a fully integrated and
`
`operational division of Advance following the acquisition contemplated in the DTI Term Sheet.
`
`III. CVC and the DTI/Advance Reorganization
`
`29) On or around July 11, 2016, Meli sent another presentation to Ballybeg, again
`
`misrepresenting the supposed “merger strategy of DTI and AE [Advance]”. This time, however,
`
`Meli represented that he was waiting to receive a term sheet (the “CVC Term Sheet”) from
`
`Christopher Stadler, Managing Partner at CVC, a globally known private equity firm managing
`
`capital of approximately $80 million on behalf of over 300 institutional, governmental, and
`
`private investors worldwide.
`
`30) According to Meli, the prospect for the acquisition of by Advance had changed,
`
`but for the better. On July 18, 2016, Meli forwarded to Ballybeg the CVC Term Sheet via an e-
`
`mail entitled “Check it out.” Rather than Meli’s company, Advance, simply purchasing DTI as
`
`previously contemplated by the DTI Term Sheet, CVC would now make a substantial investment
`
`in DTI (the “CVC Investment”), and Advance would receive an equity interest in that entity
`
`through its position in CVC’s new investment vehicle. Meli represented, falsely, that he would
`
`now be “in charge of DTI” with $75 million of capital backing from CVC and New Amsterdam
`
`Growth Capital.
`
`31)
`
`From approximately July 18 to August 25, 2016, Meli continued to update
`
`Ballybeg on the status of these transactions. Meli forwarded to Ballybeg the draft purchase
`
`
`
`8
`
`10 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`agreements prepared by CVC’s lawyers, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, which
`
`outlined the method by which Advance would acquire its equity interest in DTI (the
`
`“DTI/Advance Reorganization”).
`
`32)
`
`Following the completion of the DTI/Advance Reorganization on August 25,
`
`2016, Meli shared with Ballybeg the news of Advance’s new equity stake in DTI along with a
`
`copy of his services agreement as an employee and co-CEO with Cheng of CVC’s new
`
`investment vehicle, NAGC DTI LLC (“NAGC DTI”).
`
`33)
`
`The $75 million CVC Investment was completed and closed in October 2016.
`
`CVC’s managing partner, Christopher Stadler, became a director of DTI and, it would later be
`
`discovered, personally invested—and was immediately repaid—approximately $200,000 in one
`
`of Meli’s ticket investments.
`
`34) Meli now apparently possessed the authority, resources, and financial capital of
`
`DTI and CVC necessary to persuade the previously reluctant Ballybeg to invest in his Ponzi
`
`scheme. As a result of the CVC Investment and the assurances of Meli and Advance, Ballybeg
`
`was satisfied that Meli and Advance were operating in a manner consistent with the standards of
`
`a CVC portfolio company and that the new investment vehicle had been properly vetted.
`
`IV.
`
`Ballybeg’s Investment
`
`35)
`
`Throughout December 2016, Meli was in discussions with Ballybeg regarding
`
`two investment opportunities—one involving tickets for an upcoming, unannounced national
`
`tour of the music group Metallica, and another involving tickets for a series of live events
`
`scheduled to take place at the newly renovated Nassau Coliseum over the next two years.
`
`36) On January 25, 2017, Ballybeg executed an agreement with Advance and Meli by
`
`which Ballybeg invested $500,000 towards the purchase of the Metallica and Nassau Coliseum
`
`
`
`9
`
`11 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`tickets in exchange for 10% return on its investment (the “Ballybeg Investment”). The Ballybeg
`
`Investment was structured in two parts (collectively, the “Agreement”): (1) a Funding
`
`Agreement dated January 16, 2017 (the “Funding Agreement”)(Exhibit A); and (2) a promissory
`
`note personally guaranteed by Meli (the “Note”)(Exhibit B).
`
`37)
`
`In the Funding Agreement, Meli and Advance represented to Ballybeg that:
`
`Meli has an opportunity to purchase tickets in bulk to an upcoming
`(but as of yet unannounced) tour of Metallica in the United States
`currently anticipated to take place in up to 25 North American
`cities between May and October of 2017 as set forth in greater
`detail below (the “Tour”), such tickets to the Tour referred to
`herein as the “Tickets”;
`
`Upon receipt of the Funds, Meli hereby agrees to use the Funds
`exclusively to purchase the Tickets for a price per Ticket that does
`not exceed the face value of the tickets either individually or in the
`aggregate.
`
`
`Pursuant to the Funding Agreement, on January 25, 2017, Ballybeg wired
`
`
`and that,
`
`
`38)
`
`$300,000 for the Metallica tickets to Advance’s Bank of America/Merrill Lynch account in New
`
`York. Additionally, $200,000 was paid by check to Meli personally in exchange for the Note.
`
`39)
`
`The following day, January 26, 2017, Advance wired $1,250,000, including the
`
`proceeds of Ballybeg’s $500,000 investment, to Kid Shelleen.
`
`40) Only two days after execution of the Agreement and payment of Ballybeg’s
`
`$500,000 investment, Meli was arrested and indicted, and Ballybeg learned that it, like Meli’s
`
`other investors, had been swindled by Meli’s Ponzi scheme. Meli never purchased—nor did he
`
`ever intend to purchase—the Metallica or Nassau Coliseum tickets. Ballybeg had fallen victim
`
`not only to Meli’s persistent lies and promises, but also to CVC’s endorsement of Meli and his
`
`Ponzi scheme.
`
`
`
`10
`
`12 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`41)
`
`Ballybeg has received no return on its investment or evidence that its funds will
`
`be returned.
`
`42)
`
`Two similar and related actions have been filed and consolidated previously and
`
`are currently pending in this Court: TGT, LLC v. Advance Entertainment LLC, et al., (Index no.
`
`650633/2017); and Vincent V. Hodes Family Irrevocable Trust v. Advance Entertainment LLC,
`
`et al., (Index no. 151712/2017) (collectively, the “Related Actions”). These Related Actions
`
`involve different victims but arise from the same or similar events and make similar allegations
`
`against Meli and Advance as does the instant action.
`
`43)
`
` On April 5, 2018, following oral arguments heard on November 28, 2017, the
`
`Honorable Andrea Masley of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New
`
`York, issued an order in the Related Actions (the “April 5 Order”) denying in part defendants’
`
`motions to dismiss and upholding the plaintiffs’ claims for fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, and
`
`breach of contract. See, Order dated April 5, 2018, TGT, LLC v. Advance Entertainment LLC, et
`
`al., (Index No. 650633/2017, Dkt. #126).
`
`44) Additionally, the April 5 Order held that “[t]he Proposal for the CVC transaction
`
`contemplated reorganizing DTI with ‘ongoing execution’ of Advance deals devised by Meli,
`
`which further ‘baited’ [plaintiff] and other investors into placing funds into Advance’s ticket
`
`schemes,” and that “the allegations in both [Related Actions] are sufficient to infer general
`
`knowledge and substantial assistance in a manner beyond just performing routine business
`
`services.” Id. at p. 13.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`13 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`Fraud against Defendants Advance and Meli
`
`Ballybeg incorporates by reference the averments contained in the preceding
`
`45)
`
`paragraphs above, as if set forth fully herein.
`
`46) Defendants Meli and Advance committed fraud against Ballybeg by falsely
`
`representing the investment opportunities in the Metallica tour and Nassau Coliseum events. In
`
`fact, Meli and Advance did not have options or agreements in place to purchase tickets for those
`
`events and did not use Ballybeg’s investment to purchase tickets as promised under the
`
`Agreement. Instead, they used Ballybeg’s investment for their own benefit.
`
`47) Additionally, Meli and Advance falsely represented to Ballybeg that Meli was
`
`acting on behalf of DTI and that DTI had approved and authorized the proposed investments in
`
`the Metallica and Nassau Coliseum tickets.
`
`48) Meli and Advance knew the falsity of their material representations and of the
`
`documents presented to obtain Ballybeg’s investment.
`
`49) Meli and Advance knew
`
`that Ballybeg was relying on
`
`the material
`
`misrepresentations and documents presented to them by Meli and Advance when deciding to
`
`invest $500,000 under the Agreement.
`
`50) Had defendants Meli and Advance not made the false representations set forth
`
`herein, Ballybeg would not have entered into the Agreement and would not have made its
`
`investment.
`
`51) As a direct and proximate result of the fraud committed by Advance and Meli,
`
`plaintiff Ballybeg has suffered and/or incurred economic damages in the amount of $500,000.
`
`
`
`12
`
`14 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`52) Defendants acted at all times in furtherance of their Ponzi scheme willfully,
`
`wantonly, and maliciously, and their conduct against Ballybeg does not appear to be their first
`
`fraudulent scheme of this type. Advance and Meli will continue to engage in such conduct until
`
`they are deterred in the form of the most severe civil and criminal remedies available.
`
`53)
`
`By reason of the foregoing, Ballybeg requests that the Court award punitive
`
`damages against Advance and Meli in an amount to be determined at trial but believed to be in
`
`excess of $4.5 million.
`
`SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`Breach of Contract against Defendants Advance and Meli
`
`Ballybeg incorporates by reference the averments contained in the preceding
`
`54)
`
`paragraphs above, as if set forth fully herein.
`
`55)
`
`Ballybeg entered into the Agreement, consisting of a Funding Agreement with
`
`Advance and a Promissory Note with Meli, both valid and enforceable contracts, whereby
`
`Advance and Meli agreed to utilize Ballybeg’s funds to purchase tickets for the Metallica concert
`
`tour and Nassau Coliseum events described herein.
`
`56)
`
`Ballybeg performed its obligations under the Agreement by wiring $300,000 to
`
`Advance’s Bank of America/Merrill Lynch account, in accordance with the Funding Agreement,
`
`and by delivering a check for $200,000 to Meli under the Promissory Note.
`
`57) Advance and Meli materially breached the Agreement by failing to use
`
`Ballybeg’s funds to purchase the described tickets or to re-sell them to the secondary ticket
`
`market as required under the Agreement. Instead, Advance and Meli diverted those funds, along
`
`with funds from other defrauded investors, for their own purposes and in furtherance of their
`
`Ponzi scheme.
`
`
`
`13
`
`15 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2018 07:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`INDEX NO. 655482/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2018
`
`58) As a result of Advance’s breach of the Funding Agreement and Meli’s breach of
`
`the Promissory Note, plaintiff Ballybeg has been damaged in the amount of $300,000.
`
`THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`Conversion against All Defendants
`
`Ballybeg incorporates by reference the averments contained in the preceding
`
`59)
`
`paragraphs above, as if set forth fully herein.
`
`60) Defendants Advance and Meli have taken the $500,000 invested by Ballybeg
`
`through the Agreement and converted it for their own benefit and use rather than the use
`
`contracted for.
`
`61)
`
`Ballybeg’s right to possession of the invested funds is indisputable as the funds
`
`paid by Ballybeg to Advance and Meli are clearly traceable through bank records to wired funds
`
`Advance sent to Kid Shelleen on January 26, 2017, just one day after Ballybeg’s payment. By
`
`receiving and retaining those funds, Kid Shelleen converted those funds to its own use and
`
`benefit.
`
`62)
`
`The conversion of Ballybeg’s investment by Advance, Meli, and Kid Shelleen
`
`was carried out by means of intentionally wrongful fraudulent misrepresentations.
`
`63) As a direct and proximate cause of the conversion committed by Advance, Meli,
`
`and Kid Shelleen, Ballybeg has suffered and/or incurred economic damages in the amount of
`
`
`
`$500,000.
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`16 of 18
`
`

`

`NEW YORK
`COUNTY
`CLERK
`11/02/2018
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`[FILED
`:
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`NYSCEF
`NO.
`DOC.
`
`1
`
`07:
`
`02
`
`PM)
`
`INDEX
`
`6 55482
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`NO.
`/2018
`
`RECEIVED
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`11/02/2018
`NYSCEF:
`
`PRAYER
`
`FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Ballybeg
`
`requests
`
`that
`
`this
`
`Court
`
`enter
`
`judgment
`
`against
`
`the
`
`Defendants,
`
`jointly
`
`and
`
`severally,
`
`as
`
`follows:
`
`For
`
`damages
`
`in
`
`the
`
`amount
`
`of
`
`$500,000
`
`and
`
`all
`
`of
`
`plaintiff's
`
`attorneys'
`
`fees
`
`incurred
`
`in
`
`bringing
`
`this
`
`action
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`costs
`
`and
`
`disbursements
`
`incurred
`
`herein;
`
`(i)
`
`(ii)
`
`from
`
`of
`
`Ballybeg's
`
`initial
`
`(iii)
`
`(iv)
`
`(v)
`
`Pre-judgment
`
`interest
`
`running
`
`the
`
`date
`
`investment;
`
`Punitive
`
`damages
`
`against
`
`Defendants
`
`in
`
`the
`
`amount
`
`of
`
`$4,5000,000;
`
`and
`
`Such
`
`further
`
`and
`
`additional
`
`relief
`
`as
`
`the
`
`Court
`
`deems
`
`just
`
`and
`
`equitable.
`
`Dated:
`
`November
`New York,
`
`2018
`2,
`New York
`
`Respectfully
`
`submitted,
`
`ENGEL
`
`THORNBURGH
`
`& McCARNEY
`
`LLP
`
`By:
`
`Thomas
`
`E.
`
`Engel
`
`152 West
`
`57
`
`Street
`
`New York
`546-6215
`
`(212)
`
`10019
`
`(646)
`
`514-6798
`
`Floor
`16
`New York,
`Telephone:
`
`Facsimile:
`
`15
`
`17
`
`of
`
`18
`
`

`

`CLERK
`COUNTY
`: NEW YORK
`07
`018
`11/02
`[FILED
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2019 10:30 PM
`/2
`: 02
`PM|
`NYSCEF
`1
`DOC.
`NO.
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32
`
`INDEX
`655482/2018
`NO.
`INDEX NO. 654948/2018
`RECEIVED
`NYSCEF:
`11/02/2018
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2019
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`I, JEREMIAH
`
`HARRIS,
`
`of
`
`full
`
`age,
`
`verify
`
`as follõws:
`
`I am the
`
`reanaging
`
`member
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`Ballybeg
`
`Entertainment
`
`LLC,
`
`and
`
`I am fami!iar
`
`with
`
`the
`
`facts
`
`as set
`
`forth
`
`in the within
`
`Complair-t.
`
`I have
`
`read
`
`the Complaint
`
`and
`
`certify
`
`that
`
`the
`
`allegations
`
`ecstained
`
`in
`
`the Complaint
`
`are
`
`true
`
`except
`
`where
`
`made
`
`upon
`
`information
`
`belief,
`
`which
`
`allegations
`
`I believe
`
`to
`
`be
`
`true.
`
`I certify
`
`under
`
`penalty
`
`of
`
`perjury
`
`that
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`statements
`
`are true
`
`and that
`
`if any
`
`statement
`
`herein
`
`is willfülly
`
`false,
`
`I am subject
`
`to puni
`
`tracñt.
`
`JE
`
`ARRIS
`
`Sworn
`
`to and
`
`subsc

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket