throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`SUPREME
`
`COURT
`
`OF
`
`THE
`
`STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY
`NEW YORK
`OF
`------------------------------------X
`
`The
`
`Estate
`
`of
`
`Rudy
`
`Puccella,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-against-
`
`Index
`
`No.:
`
`SUMMONS
`
`Plaintiff
`Designates
`County
`trial.
`
`as
`
`NEW YORK
`place
`of
`
`The
`
`Rockefeller
`
`University
`
`Hospital,
`
`The
`is
`of
`
`basis
`the
`business
`
`.
`
`of
`Defendant'
`
`the
`
`venue
`place
`s
`
`Defendant
`
`.
`
`Place
`1230
`
`of
`
`business
`York
`Ave
`
`at
`
`------------------------------------X
`NY
`10065
`
`NY,
`To
`
`the
`
`above-named
`
`Defendant(s):
`
`action
`to serve
`this
`summons,
`summons
`this
`failure
`your
`demanded
`Dated:
`
`to answer
`is not
`within
`30 days
`the State
`against
`
`complaint
`the
`with
`served
`after
`20 days
`the
`service
`after
`ofNew
`York);
`by default
`you
`
`in this
`
`this
`summons,
`service
`the
`is complete
`and
`in case
`for
`the
`relief
`
`of
`if
`
`of
`
`SUMMONED
`if
`the
`complaint
`
`YOU ARE HEREBY
`to serve
`and
`of your
`a copy
`or,
`answer,
`a notice
`of appearance,
`on the
`plaintiff's
`attorney(s)
`(or within
`exclusive
`service
`of
`the
`of
`day
`is not
`to you within
`delivered
`personally
`to appear
`will
`be taken
`to answer,
`judgment
`in the
`complaint.
`New York
`White
`Plains,
`August
`11, 2021
`
`Very
`
`truly
`
`yours,
`
`JOSEPH
`
`A.
`
`ICA,
`
`P.C.
`
`By:
`
`Email:
`
`. MARIA
`JOSEPH
`ESQ.
`Road
`arrytown
`301 Old
`NY 10603
`White
`Plains,
`914-684-0333
`Phone:
`914-684-9772
`Fax:
`imari_ap_c@imariage.onmicrosoft.com
`
`To:
`
`The Rockefeller
`1230
`York
`New York,
`
`University
`
`Hospital
`
`Ave
`NY 10065
`
`1 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`COURT
`SUPREME
`OF THE STATE
`OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY
`-----------------------------------------------------
`OF RUDY PUCCELLA,
`THE ESTATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`X
`Index
`
`No.:
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`VERIFIED
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`-against-
`
`THE ROCKEFELLER
`
`UNIVERSITY
`
`HOSPITAL,,
`
`Defendant.
`---------------------------X
`
`The
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`The
`
`Estate
`
`of Rudy
`
`Puccella,
`
`by his
`
`attorneys,
`
`Joseph
`
`A. Maria,
`
`P.C.,
`
`alleges:
`
`NATURE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`is brought
`
`under
`
`the
`
`auspices
`
`of New York's
`
`Child
`
`Victims
`
`Act
`
`against
`
`The Rockefeller
`
`University
`
`Hospital.
`
`It concerns
`
`the
`
`repeated
`
`acts
`
`of
`
`sexual
`
`abuse,
`
`sexual
`
`harassment,
`
`and
`
`sexual
`
`exploitation
`
`committed
`
`the Defendant
`
`and/or
`
`its
`
`staff.
`
`by
`
`2.
`
`asserts
`
`state
`
`law claims
`
`for
`
`childhood
`
`sexual
`
`Plaintiff
`
`negligence,
`
`abuse,
`
`negligent
`
`retention,
`
`negligent
`
`supervision,
`
`negligent
`
`infliction
`
`of emotional
`
`distress,
`
`misrepresentation,
`
`assault,
`
`and
`
`battery,
`
`as well
`
`as violations
`
`of New York
`
`Social
`
`Services
`
`Law § 413.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`seeks monetary
`
`damages
`
`for
`
`the
`
`injuries
`
`they
`
`have
`
`suffered
`
`from
`
`the
`
`Defendants'
`
`negligence
`
`and
`
`from
`
`Defendant's
`
`Acts.
`
`PARTIES
`
`3.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`The Estate
`
`of Rudy
`
`Puccella,
`
`is a deceased
`
`having
`
`died
`
`in
`
`Westchester
`
`County.
`
`He
`
`died
`
`on March
`
`8, 2020,
`
`and
`
`his
`
`estate
`
`is open
`
`under
`
`file
`
`number
`
`2020-976
`
`in the County
`
`of Westchester
`
`Surrogate's
`
`Court.
`
`2 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`4.
`
`The Defendant,
`
`The Rockefeller
`
`University
`
`Hospital,
`
`is an entity
`
`duly
`
`licensed
`
`to do business
`
`in the State
`
`of New York,
`
`County
`
`of New York.
`
`5.
`
`The Defendant,
`
`the Rockefeller
`
`University
`
`Hospital,
`
`is a foreign
`
`entity
`
`duly
`
`licensed
`
`to do business
`
`in the State
`
`of New York,
`
`County
`
`of New York.
`
`FACTS
`
`The
`
`Estate
`
`of Rudy
`
`Puccella
`
`is the Plaintiff
`
`herein.
`
`His
`
`address
`
`was
`
`17 Batavia
`
`Place,
`
`Harrison,
`
`NY 10528.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`born
`
`on January
`
`27,
`
`1964.
`
`The Defendant
`
`had
`
`in their
`
`employment
`
`one Dr. Reginald
`
`Archibald,
`
`a
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`member
`
`of
`
`the Defendant's
`
`staff.
`
`10.
`
`The Defendant,
`
`The Rockefeller
`
`University
`
`Hospital,
`
`kept
`
`Dr. Reginald
`
`Archibald
`
`in their
`
`employment
`
`for
`
`forty
`
`(40)
`
`years
`
`with
`
`normal
`
`hospital
`
`review
`
`and
`
`repeated
`
`approval
`
`of his
`
`credentials.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`One
`
`of his
`
`specialties
`
`was
`
`the
`
`treatment
`
`of
`
`children
`
`with
`
`stunted
`
`growth.
`
`It
`
`is reported
`
`that
`
`the
`
`hospital
`
`knew
`
`of or clearly
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`of Dr.
`
`Reginald
`
`Archibald
`
`practices
`
`of
`
`sexual
`
`misconduct,
`
`and
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`towards
`
`many
`
`of his
`
`patients
`
`while
`
`employed
`
`by
`
`the Rockefeller
`
`University
`
`Hospital.
`
`13.
`
`The Rockefeller
`
`University
`
`Hospital
`
`had many
`
`reports
`
`and
`
`complaints
`
`against
`
`him at
`
`the
`
`hospital.
`
`14.
`
`In
`
`1960,
`
`the New York
`
`County
`
`District
`
`Attorney's
`
`Office
`
`presented
`
`information
`
`to a grand
`
`jury
`
`which
`
`did
`
`not
`
`indict
`
`but
`
`the Hospital
`
`had
`
`notice
`
`of
`
`these
`
`proceedings
`
`or should
`
`have
`
`had
`
`notice
`
`of
`
`these
`
`proceedings.
`
`2
`
`3 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`15.
`
`The
`
`physician-in-chief
`
`at
`
`the Rockefeller
`
`University
`
`Hospital
`
`(who
`
`was
`
`also
`
`a
`
`member
`
`of Defendant's
`
`staff)
`
`from
`
`1960
`
`to 1974
`
`had multiple
`
`complaints
`
`against
`
`Dr.
`
`Archibald
`
`and
`
`had
`
`or should
`
`have
`
`had
`
`reservations
`
`about
`
`Dr. Reginald
`
`Archibald's
`
`practices.
`
`16.
`
`The Rockefeller
`
`University
`
`Hospital
`
`should
`
`have
`
`taken
`
`action
`
`to stop
`
`the
`
`actions
`
`Archibald
`
`behavior
`
`pediatric
`
`and
`
`other
`
`patients.
`
`of Dr. Reginald
`
`towards
`
`17.
`
`The Rockefeller
`
`University
`
`Hospital
`
`knowingly
`
`employed
`
`a sexual
`
`predator
`
`on
`
`its
`
`staff.
`
`18.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`presented
`
`at
`
`the Rockefeller
`
`University
`
`Hospital
`
`for
`
`treatment
`
`his mother
`
`who
`
`trusted
`
`the Defendant
`
`and was
`
`concerned
`
`about
`
`his
`
`small
`
`nature
`
`physically.
`
`FIRST
`
`OF ACTION
`CAUSE
`NEGLIGENCE
`CHILDHOOD
`SEXUAL
`
`ABUSE
`
`19.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`in the
`
`preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`above
`
`further
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if more
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`here,
`
`and
`
`allege:
`
`20.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`relevant
`
`times
`
`alleged
`
`and
`
`detailed
`
`herein,
`
`the Defendant
`
`employees
`
`were
`
`given
`
`access
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`during
`
`the
`
`course
`
`and
`
`scope
`
`of
`
`their
`
`duties,
`
`when
`
`the Defendant
`
`knew,
`
`or should
`
`have
`
`known,
`
`its
`
`staff
`
`presented
`
`an unreasonable
`
`risk
`
`of harm to minors,
`
`the Plaintiff
`
`at
`
`the
`
`time.
`
`including
`
`who
`
`was
`
`a minor
`
`21.
`
`Because
`
`of
`
`the
`
`negligence
`
`of
`
`the Defendant,
`
`its
`
`staff
`
`was
`
`unchecked,
`
`allowing
`
`them to continue
`
`to molest
`
`and
`
`abuse
`
`Plaintiff
`
`over
`
`the
`
`course
`
`of alleged
`
`treatment.
`
`22.
`
`The Defendant
`
`had
`
`non-delegable
`
`duty
`
`to protect
`
`children
`
`within
`
`their
`
`control
`
`and
`
`purview,
`
`like
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`from
`
`unwanted
`
`sexual
`
`contact,
`
`sexual
`
`abuse,
`
`and
`
`the
`
`associated
`
`3
`
`4 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`trauma
`
`resulting
`
`therefrom.
`
`Here,
`
`the Defendant
`
`failed
`
`to take
`
`any
`
`reasonable
`
`steps
`
`to ensure
`
`the
`
`safety
`
`of
`
`children,
`
`and Plaintiff
`
`in particular,
`
`by providing
`
`Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`with
`
`unfettered
`
`and
`
`unsupervised
`
`access
`
`to children
`
`in his
`
`various
`
`capacities
`
`as their
`
`staff member
`
`in good
`
`standing.
`
`23.
`
`The Defendant,
`
`by and
`
`through
`
`their
`
`agents,
`
`servants
`
`and/or
`
`employees,
`
`had
`
`actual
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`its
`
`staff
`
`was
`
`dangerous
`
`and
`
`knowledge,
`
`knew,
`
`reasonably
`
`exploitative
`
`propensities
`
`and was
`
`an unfit
`
`employee
`
`because
`
`of
`
`their
`
`sexual
`
`interest
`
`in
`
`children.
`
`24.
`
`The
`
`Defendant
`
`breached
`
`the
`
`duty
`
`of
`
`care
`
`they
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to
`
`protect
`
`the Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`the
`
`foreseeable
`
`harm
`
`of
`
`sexual
`
`misconduct
`
`by Defendant's
`
`staff.
`
`25.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`and
`
`proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`above-described
`
`conduct,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has
`
`suffered
`
`great
`
`pain
`
`loss
`
`of self-
`
`of mind
`
`and
`
`body,
`
`shock,
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`embarrassment,
`
`esteem,
`
`disgrace,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and
`
`loss
`
`of enjoyment
`
`of
`
`life.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`death
`
`was
`
`caused
`
`in
`
`part
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`lack
`
`of
`
`respect
`
`of
`
`the Defendant
`
`and
`
`their
`
`staff.
`
`26.
`
`Per CPLR
`
`§ 1603,
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`cause
`
`of action
`
`is exempt
`
`from
`
`the
`
`operation
`
`of CPLR
`
`§ 1601
`
`reason
`
`of one
`
`or more
`
`of
`
`the
`
`exemptions
`
`provided
`
`under
`
`CPLR
`
`§ 1602,
`
`by
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to CPLR
`
`§§ 1602(2),
`
`and
`
`1602(7).
`
`SECOND
`CAUSE
`NEGLIGENT
`
`OF ACTION
`RETENTION
`
`27.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`in the
`
`preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`above
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if more
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`here.
`
`28.
`
`The Defendant
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`to protect
`
`them
`
`from
`
`harm
`
`inflicted
`
`by Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`in prognosis,
`
`testing,
`
`and
`
`treatment
`
`operated
`
`by
`
`the Defendant
`
`or Defendant's
`
`staff.
`
`4
`
`5 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`29.
`
`By
`
`virtue
`
`of
`
`that
`
`duty
`
`and Plaintiff
`
`special
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`the Defendant,
`
`and
`
`the Defendant's
`
`relationship
`
`to Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`as their
`
`agents
`
`and
`
`employees,
`
`the
`
`Defendant
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`duty
`
`to take
`
`care.
`
`30.
`
`Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`dañgerous
`
`and
`
`exploitative
`
`propensities
`
`to sexually
`
`abuse
`
`minors
`
`was
`
`an open
`
`secret
`
`in the
`
`community.
`
`The Defendant
`
`therefore
`
`knew
`
`or should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`of
`
`these
`
`dangerous
`
`and
`
`exploitative
`
`propensities
`
`had
`
`engaged
`
`meaningful,
`
`and
`
`adequate
`
`investigation
`
`of his
`
`background
`
`prior
`
`to retaining
`
`him in positions
`
`they
`
`in a reasonable,
`
`of employment.
`
`31.
`
`The Defendant
`
`was
`
`placed
`
`on actual
`
`or constructive
`
`notice
`
`that Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`was molesting
`
`minors
`
`during
`
`his
`
`employment
`
`the Defendant,
`
`by
`
`various
`
`means.
`
`The
`
`Defendant
`
`had
`
`actual
`
`or constructive
`
`knowledge
`
`of
`
`inappropriate
`
`conduct
`
`and molestations
`
`committed
`
`by Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`during
`
`their
`
`employment
`
`yet
`
`chose
`
`to allow
`
`him to remain
`
`in
`
`unrestricted
`
`with
`
`and
`
`allow
`
`where
`
`abused
`
`patients.
`
`contact
`
`the Plaintiff
`
`privacy
`
`he sexually
`
`32.
`
`The Defendant
`
`breached
`
`their
`
`duties
`
`of
`
`care
`
`owed
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`by negligently
`
`retaining
`
`Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`and
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`foreseeable
`
`harm
`
`of sexual
`
`misconduct
`
`of
`
`their
`
`respective
`
`employees
`
`or personnel.
`
`33.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`and
`
`proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`above-described
`
`conduct,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has
`
`suffered
`
`great
`
`pain
`
`of mind
`
`and
`
`body,
`
`shock,
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`embarrassment,
`
`loss
`
`of self-
`
`death
`
`caused
`
`in
`
`esteem,
`
`disgrace,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and
`
`loss
`
`of enjoyment
`
`of
`
`life.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`was
`
`part
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`lack
`
`of
`
`respect
`
`of
`
`the Defendant
`
`and
`
`their
`
`staff.
`
`34.
`
`Per CPLR
`
`§ 1603,
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`cause
`
`of action
`
`is exempt
`
`from
`
`the
`
`operation
`
`of CPLR
`
`§ 1601
`
`by
`
`reason
`
`of one
`
`or more
`
`of
`
`the
`
`exemptions
`
`provided
`
`under
`
`CPLR
`
`§ 1602,
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to CPLR
`
`§§
`
`1602(2),
`
`1602(7).
`
`5
`
`6 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`CAUSE
`THIRD
`NEGLIGENT
`
`OF ACTION
`SUPERVISION
`
`35.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`in the
`
`preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`above
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if more
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`here.
`
`36.
`
`The
`
`Defendant
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`to provide
`
`reasonable
`
`supervision
`
`of
`
`their
`
`employees
`
`and
`
`agents.
`
`37.
`
`It was
`
`reasonably
`
`foreseeable
`
`that
`
`those
`
`employees
`
`and
`
`agents
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Defendant
`
`those
`
`with
`
`a sexual
`
`interest
`
`in children,
`
`including
`
`staff,
`
`would
`
`act upon
`
`interests
`
`and
`
`sexually
`
`abuse
`
`children,
`
`including
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`unless
`
`properly
`
`supervised.
`
`38.
`
`The Defendant,
`
`by and
`
`through
`
`their
`
`respective
`
`agents,
`
`servants,
`
`and/or
`
`employees,
`
`had
`
`actual
`
`knowledge,
`
`knew,
`
`or
`
`reasonably
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known,
`
`of Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`and
`
`exploitative
`
`propensities
`
`and
`
`that
`
`staff
`
`was
`
`an unfit
`
`agent
`
`due
`
`to his
`
`sexual
`
`interest
`
`in
`
`children.
`
`39.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`relevant
`
`times,
`
`Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`was
`
`acting
`
`in the
`
`course
`
`and
`
`scope
`
`of
`
`his
`
`employment
`
`with
`
`the Defendant
`
`as their
`
`agent,
`
`apparent
`
`agent,
`
`servant,
`
`and/or
`
`employee.
`
`40.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`and
`
`proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`above-described
`
`conduct,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has
`
`suffered
`
`great
`
`pain
`
`of mind
`
`and
`
`body,
`
`shock,
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`embarrassment,
`
`loss
`
`of
`
`self-
`
`life.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`death
`
`was
`
`caused
`
`in
`
`esteem,
`
`disgrace,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and
`
`loss
`
`of enjoyment
`
`of
`
`part
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`lack
`
`of
`
`respect
`
`of
`
`the Defendant
`
`and
`
`their
`
`staff.
`
`41.
`
`Per CPLR
`
`§ 1603,
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`cause
`
`of action
`
`is exempt
`
`from
`
`the
`
`operation
`
`of CPLR
`
`§ 1601
`
`by
`
`reason
`
`of one
`
`or more
`
`of
`
`the
`
`exemptions
`
`provided
`
`under
`
`CPLR
`
`§ 1602,
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to CPLR
`
`§§
`
`1602(2),
`
`1602(7).
`
`6
`
`7 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`NEGLIGENT
`
`FOURTH
`INFLICTION
`
`OF ACTION
`CAUSE
`OF EMOTIONAL
`
`DISTRESS
`
`42.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`in the
`
`preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`above
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if more
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`here.
`
`43.
`
`By
`
`employing
`
`Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`and
`
`by
`
`choosing
`
`to place
`
`staff
`
`in a position
`
`where
`
`they
`
`could
`
`work
`
`unsupervised
`
`and
`
`in close
`
`proximity
`
`to children,
`
`and
`
`by allowing
`
`staff
`
`access
`
`to numerous
`
`children,
`
`the Defendant
`
`caused
`
`Plaintiff
`
`to be sexually
`
`abused.
`
`Further,
`
`by
`
`(i)
`
`covering
`
`up
`
`staff's
`
`wrongdoiñg
`
`(and/or
`
`failing
`
`to act upon
`
`numerous
`
`"red
`
`flags"
`
`of
`
`staff's
`
`sexual
`
`misconduct
`
`with
`
`minors);
`
`(ii)
`
`day
`
`examination;
`
`(iii)
`
`forcing
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`others
`
`to be
`
`sexually
`
`measured
`
`and
`
`observed
`
`at
`
`testing;
`
`(iv)
`
`thereafter
`
`failing
`
`to provide
`
`any
`
`counseling
`
`or
`
`to fear
`
`for
`
`their
`
`physical
`
`services
`
`to Plaintiff,
`
`the Defendant
`
`additionally
`
`caused
`
`Plaintiff
`
`safety
`
`as well
`
`suffer
`
`psychological
`
`and
`
`emotional
`
`injury.
`
`The Defendant
`
`negligence
`
`places
`
`Plaintiff
`
`in danger
`
`of bodily
`
`harm and
`
`thereby
`
`caused
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`to suffer
`
`extreme
`
`physical
`
`injury
`
`and
`
`emotional
`
`distress
`
`as a result.
`
`44.
`
`Indeed,
`
`even
`
`though
`
`the Defendant
`
`had
`
`been
`
`told
`
`Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`had
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`the Defendant
`
`still
`
`forced
`
`Plaintiff
`
`to continue
`
`treatment.
`
`This
`
`conduct
`
`-
`
`- even
`
`on its own
`
`suffices
`
`as negligent
`
`infliction
`
`of emotional
`
`distress.
`
`45.
`
`The Defendant
`
`repeated
`
`failures
`
`by employing,
`
`and
`
`continuing
`
`to employ,
`
`Defendant's
`
`staff,
`
`holding
`
`out
`
`their
`
`treatments
`
`as safe
`
`environments
`
`for
`
`children,
`
`despite,
`
`upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`having
`
`reason
`
`to know
`
`of
`
`the
`
`potential
`
`dangers
`
`to children
`
`at
`
`the
`
`hospital
`
`and
`
`its
`
`staff
`
`subjected
`
`Plaintiff
`
`to sexual
`
`harassment,
`
`abuse,
`
`and
`
`exploitation.
`
`7
`
`8 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`46.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`suffered
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`including
`
`fear
`
`for
`
`his
`
`safety,
`
`severe
`
`mental
`
`anguish,
`
`and
`
`physical
`
`injury,
`
`due
`
`to the Defendant
`
`negligence
`
`and
`
`extreme
`
`recklessness.
`
`47.
`
`Per CPLR
`
`§ 1603,
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`cause
`
`of action
`
`is exempt
`
`from
`
`the
`
`operation
`
`of CPLR
`
`§ 1601
`
`by
`
`reason
`
`of one
`
`or more
`
`of
`
`the
`
`exemptions
`
`provided
`
`under
`
`CPLR
`
`§ 1602,
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to CPLR
`
`§§ 1602(2),
`
`1602(7).
`
`FIFTH
`NEGLIGENT
`
`OF ACTION
`CAUSE
`MISREPRESENTATION
`
`48.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`in the
`
`preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`above
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if more
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`here.
`
`49.
`
`The Defendant
`
`affirmatively
`
`represented
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`their
`
`families
`
`that
`
`their
`
`hospital
`
`was
`
`a safe
`
`environment
`
`for
`
`child
`
`patients.
`
`50.
`
`The Defendant
`
`affirmatively
`
`represented
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`their
`
`families
`
`that
`
`they
`
`had
`
`sufficient
`
`policies
`
`and
`
`procedures
`
`in place
`
`to ensure
`
`that
`
`children
`
`were
`
`safe
`
`at
`
`the
`
`hospital.
`
`51.
`
`The Defendant
`
`represented
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`their
`
`family,
`
`through
`
`operation
`
`of
`
`their
`
`hospital,
`
`that
`
`they
`
`did
`
`not
`
`know
`
`or suspect
`
`the Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`had
`
`a history
`
`of
`
`molesting
`
`children,
`
`that
`
`he was
`
`he was molesting
`
`children
`
`under
`
`their
`
`employ,
`
`and/or
`
`that
`
`they
`
`knew
`
`or suspected
`
`that Defendant
`
`staff
`
`was
`
`a danger
`
`to children.
`
`52.
`
`53.
`
`Each
`
`representation
`
`was material
`
`and
`
`false.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`his
`
`family
`
`justifiably
`
`relied
`
`upon
`
`the Defendant's
`
`misrepresentations,
`
`which
`
`caused
`
`Plaintiff
`
`to suffer
`
`harassment,
`
`sexual
`
`abuse,
`
`and
`
`exploitation
`
`by Defendants
`
`staff,
`
`as well
`
`as suffer
`
`other
`
`damages
`
`described
`
`herein.
`
`8
`
`9 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`54.
`
`Per CPLR
`
`§ 1603,
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`cause
`
`of action
`
`is exempt
`
`from
`
`the
`
`operation
`
`of CPLR
`
`§ 1601
`
`by
`
`reason
`
`of one
`
`or more
`
`of
`
`the
`
`exemptions
`
`provided
`
`under
`
`CPLR
`
`§ 1602,
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to CPLR
`
`§§ 1602(2),
`
`1602(7).
`
`SIXTH
`
`OF ACTION
`CAUSE
`ASSAULT
`
`55.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`in the
`
`preceding
`
`with
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`here.
`
`paragraphs
`
`above
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if more
`
`fully
`
`56.
`
`Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`physical
`
`molestation
`
`and
`
`abuse
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`entirely
`
`unjustified
`
`and
`
`constitutes
`
`an intentional
`
`assault
`
`upon
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`57.
`
`Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`by
`
`their
`
`conduct,
`
`places
`
`Plaintiff
`
`in fear
`
`of
`
`imminent
`
`harm
`
`and
`
`offensive
`
`conduct.
`
`58.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`above-described
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has
`
`and
`
`conduct,
`
`suffered
`
`great
`
`pain
`
`of mind
`
`and
`
`body,
`
`shock,
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`embarrassment,
`
`loss
`
`of self-
`
`esteem,
`
`disgrace,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and
`
`loss
`
`of enjoyment
`
`of
`
`life.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`death
`
`was
`
`caused
`
`in
`
`part
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`lack
`
`of
`
`respect
`
`of
`
`the Defendant
`
`and
`
`their
`
`staff.
`
`SEVENTH
`
`CAUSE
`BATTERY
`
`OF ACTION
`
`59.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`each
`
`and
`
`allegation
`
`in the
`
`repeats
`
`realleges
`
`every
`
`preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`above
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if more
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`here.
`
`60.
`
`Battery
`
`is non-consensual,
`
`intentional,
`
`offensive
`
`physical
`
`contact
`
`with
`
`another
`
`person.
`
`61.
`
`Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`intentional
`
`physical
`
`molestation
`
`and
`
`abuse
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`entirely
`
`unjustified,
`
`offensive,
`
`done
`
`without
`
`consent
`
`and
`
`constituted
`
`battery
`
`upon
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`9
`
`10 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`62.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`and
`
`proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`above-described
`
`conduct,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has
`
`suffered
`
`great
`
`pain
`
`of mind
`
`and
`
`body,
`
`shock,
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`embarrassment,
`
`loss
`
`of self-
`
`esteem,
`
`disgrace,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and
`
`loss
`
`of enjoyment
`
`of
`
`life.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`death
`
`was
`
`caused
`
`in
`
`part
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`lack
`
`of
`
`respect
`
`of
`
`the Defendant
`
`and
`
`their
`
`staff.
`
`BREACH
`
`CAUSE
`EIGHTH
`OF STATUTORY
`UNDER
`SOC.
`SERV.
`
`OF ACTION
`DUTY
`TO REPORT
`LAW §§ 413,
`420
`
`ABUSE
`
`63.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`in the
`
`preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`above
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if more
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`here.
`
`64.
`
`The Defendant
`
`violated
`
`N.Y.
`
`SOC.
`
`SERV.
`
`LAW §§ 413,
`
`420,
`
`as the
`
`Defendant
`
`had
`
`a statutorily
`
`imposed
`
`duty
`
`to report
`
`reasonable
`
`suspicion
`
`of abuse
`
`of
`
`children
`
`in their
`
`care.
`
`65.
`
`The Defendant
`
`that
`
`to report
`
`breached
`
`duty
`
`knowingly
`
`and willfully
`
`failing
`
`reasonable
`
`suspicion
`
`of abuse
`
`by Defendant's
`
`staff
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`and/or
`
`other minor
`
`children
`
`under
`
`their
`
`care.
`
`66.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`and/or
`
`indirect
`
`result
`
`of
`
`said-conduct,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`subjected
`
`to
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`have
`
`suffered
`
`injuries
`
`and
`
`damages
`
`described
`
`herein.
`
`67.
`
`By reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`the Defendant
`
`is liable
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`for
`
`damages,
`
`together
`
`with
`
`interest
`
`and
`
`costs.
`
`compensatory
`
`68.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`and
`
`proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`above-described
`
`conduct,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has
`
`suffered
`
`great
`
`pain
`
`of mind
`
`and
`
`body,
`
`shock,
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`embarrassment,
`
`loss
`
`of self-
`
`esteem,
`
`disgrace,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and
`
`loss
`
`of enjoyment
`
`of
`
`life.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`death
`
`was
`
`caused
`
`in
`
`part
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`lack
`
`of
`
`respect
`
`of
`
`the Defendant
`
`and
`
`their
`
`staff.
`
`10
`
`11 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`69.
`
`Per CPLR
`
`§ 1603,
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`cause
`
`of action
`
`is exempt
`
`from
`
`the
`
`operation
`
`of CPLR
`
`§ 1601
`
`by
`
`reason
`
`of one
`
`or more
`
`of
`
`the
`
`exemptions
`
`provided
`
`under
`
`CPLR
`
`§ 1602,
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to CPLR §§
`
`1602(2),
`
`1602(7).
`
`PRAYER
`
`FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`respectfully
`
`request
`
`that
`
`the Court
`
`enter
`
`judgment
`
`in their
`
`favor
`
`against
`
`Defendant
`
`and
`
`issue
`
`an order
`
`containing
`
`the
`
`following
`
`relief:
`
`suit
`
`in
`
`(a) Companatory
`
`damages
`
`against
`
`the Defendant
`
`with
`
`interest
`
`and
`
`costs
`
`of
`
`excess
`
`of any
`
`jurisdictional
`
`amount
`
`requiring
`
`compulsory
`
`jurisdiction,
`
`or
`
`arbitration.
`
`(b) Plaintiff
`
`attorney
`
`fees
`
`and
`
`costs
`
`to the
`
`extent
`
`permitted
`
`by
`
`law.
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
`Prejudgment
`
`interest
`
`to the
`
`extent
`
`permitted
`
`by
`
`law.
`
`Such
`
`other
`
`and
`
`further
`
`relief
`
`as the Court
`
`may
`
`deem just
`
`and
`
`proper.
`
`DATED:
`
`White
`August
`
`NY
`Plains,
`11, 2021
`
`JOS
`
`A. MARIA,
`
`P.C.
`
`Esq.
`A. Maria,
`Road
`arrytown
`NY 10603
`
`Jose
`By:
`301 Old
`White
`Plains,
`914-684-0333
`jmariapc@jmariape.onmicrosoft.com
`
`11
`
`12 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/2021 04:36 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 951237/2021
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2021
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`ss.:
`
`STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY
`
`OF WESTCHESTER
`
`Joseph
`
`A. Maria,
`
`Esq,
`
`being
`
`duly
`
`sworn
`
`says:
`
`I am the
`attorney
`Estate
`The
`of Rudy
`annexed
`Summons
`true
`to my
`information
`as to
`those
`
`record
`of
`Puccella
`& Verified
`except
`knowledge,
`and
`and
`belief,
`matters
`therein
`
`the
`are
`on
`
`entitled
`read
`same
`alleged
`My
`belief,
`following.
`
`The
`for
`vs The
`
`Estate
`Rockefeller
`know
`Complaint,
`matters
`those
`as to those matters
`not
`states
`upon
`
`action
`in the
`Puccella
`of Rudy
`I have
`Hosnital.
`University
`and
`the
`thereof
`contents
`the
`are
`stated
`to be
`therein
`which
`I believe
`them to be true.
`is based
`upon
`
`knowledge,
`
`the
`
`The
`in the
`
`reason
`
`county
`
`I make
`that
`
`affidavit
`this
`I do business.
`
`instead
`
`of Arthur
`
`Fusco
`
`Luigi
`
`Lombardo
`
`as he is not
`
`Joseph
`
`A Maria,
`
`Esq.
`
`Sworn
`August
`
`to before
`2021.
`
`11,
`
`me on
`
`Notary
`
`Public
`
`MICHE
`
`ERO
`o o16415615
`Qualmed n Bronx
`
`5
`
`13 of 13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket