throbber
FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`

`

`
`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 05/01/2023 01:58 PMFILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 808449/2020INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2023RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`
`STATE
`SUPREME
`
`OF NEW YORK
`: COUNTY
`COURT
`
`OF ERIE
`
`T.S.,
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`ORDER
`
`Index
`
`No.
`
`808449/2020
`
`HOLLAND
`CENTRAL
`HOLLAND
`MIDDLE
`AND GIRLS
`BOYS
`& GIRLS
`and BOYS
`CLUB
`BOYS
`f/k/a
`
`DISTRICT,
`
`SCHOOL
`SCHOOL,
`CLUB
`OF HOLLAND,
`CLUB
`OF AMERICA,
`OF AMERICA,
`
`INC.,
`INC.
`
`Defendants.
`
`A motion
`
`having
`
`been
`
`filed
`
`by Defendant
`
`Holland
`
`Central
`
`School
`
`District
`
`on December
`
`8,
`
`2022,
`
`for
`
`an Order
`
`pursuant
`
`to Civil
`
`Practice
`
`Law and Rule
`
`3212
`
`dismissing
`
`the Second
`
`Amended
`
`.
`
`Complaint
`
`("Complaint")
`
`in this
`
`action
`
`as against
`
`the Defendants
`
`Holland
`
`Central
`
`School
`
`District
`
`and Holland
`
`Middle
`
`School
`
`(NYSCEF
`
`motion
`
`005),
`
`and
`
`supported
`
`by
`
`a Notice
`
`of Motion,
`
`a
`
`Statement
`
`of Material
`
`Facts,
`
`an Affidavit
`
`in Support
`
`of Motion
`
`by
`
`Joseph
`
`M. Guerra,
`
`III,
`
`Esq. with
`
`accompanying
`
`Exhibits
`
`A through
`
`M,
`
`an Affidavit
`
`in Support
`
`of Motion
`
`by
`
`Lynette
`
`Cracchiola
`
`with
`
`accompanying
`
`Exhibits
`
`A through
`
`P, and
`
`a Memorandum
`
`of Law in Support
`
`of Motion
`
`with
`
`accompanying
`
`Exhibits
`
`1 and
`
`2; and
`
`Plaintiff
`
`having
`
`filed
`
`on February
`
`8, 2023,
`
`an Affirmation
`
`of Andrew
`
`Silvershein,
`
`Esq.
`
`in
`
`Opposition
`
`to Defendant's
`
`Motion
`
`with
`
`accompanying
`
`Exhibits
`
`A through
`
`G, and
`
`a Statement
`
`of
`
`Material
`
`Facts
`
`with
`
`accompanying
`
`Exhibits
`
`A through
`
`U;
`
`and
`
`1
`
`1 of 9
`
`

`

`
`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 05/01/2023 01:58 PMFILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 808449/2020INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2023RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`
`Defendant
`
`having
`
`filed
`
`on March
`
`20,
`
`2023,
`
`a Response
`
`to Statement
`
`of Material
`
`Facts,
`
`a
`
`Reply
`
`Affidavit
`
`of
`
`Joseph
`
`M. Guerra,
`
`III,
`
`Esq.
`
`in Support
`
`of Motion
`
`with
`
`accompanying
`
`Exhibits
`
`A through
`
`C, and
`
`a Reply
`
`Memorandum
`
`of Law with
`
`accompanying
`
`Exhibits
`
`1 and
`
`2; and
`
`The
`
`parties,
`
`through
`
`counsel,
`
`Jonathan
`
`Cantarero,
`
`Esq.
`
`on behalf
`
`of
`
`the Plaintiff,
`
`and Brian
`
`behalf
`
`of
`
`appeared
`
`for
`
`and
`
`M. Melber,
`
`Esq.
`
`and
`
`Joseph
`
`M. Guerra,
`
`III,
`
`Esq.
`
`on
`
`the Defendant,
`
`participated
`
`in oral
`
`argument
`
`on the motion
`
`on March
`
`27,
`
`2023;
`
`and
`
`Due
`
`deliberation
`
`having
`
`been
`
`given
`
`by
`
`the Court
`
`to the respective
`
`positions
`
`of
`
`the parties,
`
`the
`
`filed
`
`pleadings,
`
`oral
`
`argument,
`
`and
`
`the
`
`law,
`
`and
`
`after
`
`such
`
`due
`
`deliberation,
`
`the Court
`
`having
`
`issued
`
`a written
`
`dated
`
`March
`
`and
`
`filed
`
`March
`
`attached
`
`hereto
`
`as
`
`Decision,
`
`29,
`
`2023,
`
`31,
`
`2023,
`
`Exhibit
`
`A,
`
`it
`
`is hereby
`
`ORDERED
`
`that
`
`Defendant's
`
`motion
`
`for
`
`summary
`
`judgment
`
`seeking
`
`dismissal
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`Complaint
`
`on
`
`the
`
`ground
`
`that
`
`the Child
`
`Victims
`
`Act
`
`is unconstitutional
`
`as applied
`
`of
`
`is
`
`DENIED;
`
`and
`
`it
`
`is further
`
`ORDERED
`
`that
`
`Defendant's
`
`motion
`
`for
`
`summary
`
`judgment
`
`seeking
`
`dismissal
`
`of
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`of
`
`action
`
`in
`
`negligent
`
`and
`
`it
`
`is
`
`cause
`
`sounding
`
`hiring
`
`is GRANTED,
`
`as unopposed;
`
`further
`
`ORDERED
`
`that
`
`Defendant's
`
`motion
`
`for
`
`summary
`
`judgment
`
`seeking
`
`dismissal
`
`of
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`claims
`
`against
`
`the Holland
`
`Middle
`
`School
`
`is GRANTED,
`
`as unopposed
`
`and Holland
`
`Middle
`
`School
`
`is dismissed
`
`as a defendant;
`
`and
`
`it
`
`is further
`
`ORDERED
`
`that Defendant's
`
`motion
`
`for
`
`summary
`
`judgment
`
`seeking
`
`dismissal
`
`of Plaintiff's
`
`claims
`
`for
`
`punitive
`
`damages
`
`is GRANTED,
`
`as unopposed;
`
`and
`
`it
`
`is further
`
`.
`
`2
`
`2 of 9
`
`

`

`
`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 05/01/2023 01:58 PMFILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 808449/2020INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2023RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`
`ORDERED
`
`that
`
`Defendant's
`
`motion
`
`for
`
`summary
`
`judgment
`
`seeking
`
`dismissal
`
`of
`
`Plaintiff
`
`s Complaint
`
`against
`
`the
`
`Holland
`
`Central
`
`School
`
`District
`
`is GRANTED,
`
`and
`
`the
`
`Complaint
`
`is dismissed
`
`as against
`
`the Holland
`
`Central
`
`School
`
`District
`
`in its entirety.
`
`Dated:
`
`April
`
`Buffalo,
`
`, 2023
`New York
`
`Hon.
`
`Deborah
`
`A. Chimes,
`
`J.S.C.
`
`3
`
`3 of 9
`
`XXXXXXXXXX
`
`May 1, 2023
`
`

`

`
`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 05/01/2023 01:58 PMFILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 808449/2020INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2023RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`
`Ex=I2IT
`
`A
`
`4 of 9
`
`

`

`
`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 05/01/2023 01:58 PMFILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138
`. FILED
`ERIE
`COUNTY
`CLERK
`:
`5
`2
`:
`NYSCEF
`DOC. NO.
`141
`
`INDEX NO. 808449/2020INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`808449/2020
`NO.
`INDEX
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2023RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`03/31/2023
`RECEIVED
`NYSCEF:
`
`OF NEW YORK
`STATE
`SUPREME
`COURT
`: COUNTY
`
`OF ERIE
`
`T.S.,
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`DECISION
`Index
`No.
`
`808449/2020
`
`HOLLAND
`SCHOOL
`CENTRAL
`DISTRICT,
`BOYS AND GIRLS
`CLUB
`OF HOLLAND,
`BOYS & GIRLS
`CLUB
`OF AMERICA,
`f/k/a BOYS CLUB OF AMERICA,
`
`INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Defendants,
`
`Holland
`
`Central
`
`School
`
`District
`
`and Holland
`
`Middle
`
`School,
`
`(hereafter
`
`collectively,
`
`the District)
`
`moved
`
`to dismiss
`
`the Complaint
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR 3212
`
`(NYSCEF
`
`motion
`
`005).
`
`Plaintiff
`
`opposed
`
`the motion.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`filed
`
`this
`
`action
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR 214-g
`
`known
`
`as the Child
`
`Victims
`
`Act
`
`(CVA).
`
`Plaintiff
`
`claims
`
`he was
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`by Carl
`
`Penziul
`
`during
`
`the winter
`
`of
`
`the
`
`1980-
`
`81 school
`
`year, when
`
`plaintiff
`
`was an eighth-grade
`
`student
`
`of
`
`the District.
`
`Penziul
`
`was
`
`a math
`
`teacher
`
`employed
`
`the District
`
`Penziul
`
`was
`
`also
`
`involved
`
`with
`
`the Boys
`
`by
`
`from 1975
`
`to 1981.
`
`Club
`
`of Holland
`
`from
`
`1979
`
`to 1981. While
`
`at school,
`
`Penziul
`
`invited
`
`plaintiff
`
`to play
`
`floor
`
`hockey
`
`at
`
`the Boys
`
`Club
`
`on a Friday
`
`or Saturday
`
`night.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`walked
`
`to the Boys
`
`Club
`
`in the
`
`evening
`
`Club,
`
`and played
`
`floor
`
`hockey.
`
`When
`
`floor
`
`hockey
`
`was
`
`over
`
`and the other
`
`boys
`
`left
`
`the Boys
`
`Penziul
`
`asked
`
`plaintiff
`
`to participate
`
`in a "pain
`
`test",
`
`which
`
`was Penziul's
`
`subterfuge
`
`for
`
`the sexual
`
`abuse.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`claims
`
`he was
`
`abused
`
`by Penziul
`
`at
`
`the Boys
`
`Club
`
`of Holland
`
`on one
`
`occasion.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`told
`
`the District's
`
`Superintendent/Principal,
`
`Herbert
`
`Arnold
`
`of
`
`the abuse
`
`close
`
`to Christmas
`
`1981.
`
`5 of 9
`
`

`

`
`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 05/01/2023 01:58 PMFILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138
`FILED
`: ERIE
`CLERK
`03/31/2023
`COUNTY
`01:05
`NYSCEF
`DOC. NO.
`141
`
`PN|
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 808449/2020INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2023RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`808449/2020
`INDEX
`NO.
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/31/2023
`
`The Complaint
`
`contains
`
`one cause
`
`of action
`
`against
`
`the District
`
`and one cause
`
`of action
`
`against
`
`Holland
`
`Middle
`
`School.
`
`Both
`
`causes
`
`of action
`
`are identical
`
`and allege
`
`that
`
`the
`
`defendants'
`
`"acts
`
`and conduct
`
`show
`
`a negligent,
`
`grossly
`
`negligent,
`
`reckless
`
`or willful
`
`disregard
`
`for
`
`the health,
`
`safety
`
`and welfare
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`and other
`
`children."
`
`Specifically,
`
`plaintiff
`
`claims
`
`the defendants
`
`failed
`
`to protect
`
`the plaintiff,
`
`negligently
`
`hired
`
`and retained
`
`Penziul,
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`supervise
`
`Penziul
`
`and failed
`
`to supervise
`
`the students.
`
`With
`
`respect
`
`to a motion
`
`based
`
`on CPLR 3212,
`
`"it
`
`is necessary
`
`that
`
`the movant
`
`establish
`
`his cause
`
`of action
`
`or defense
`
`'sufficiently
`
`to warrant
`
`the court
`
`as a matter
`
`of
`
`law in directing
`
`judgment'
`
`in his
`
`favor,
`
`and he must
`
`do so by tender
`
`of evidentiary
`
`proof
`
`in admissible
`
`form.
`
`On
`
`the other
`
`hand,
`
`to defeat
`
`a motion
`
`for
`
`summary
`
`judgment
`
`the opposing
`
`party must
`
`'show
`
`facts
`
`sufficient
`
`to require
`
`a trial
`
`issue
`
`of
`
`fact"
`
`(Zuckerman
`
`v New
`
`49 N.Y.2d
`
`557,
`
`562
`
`of any
`
`York,
`
`[1980]
`
`citing
`
`party"
`
`moving
`
`to CPLR
`
`3212(b).
`
`"[F]acts
`
`must
`
`be viewed
`
`in the light most
`
`favorable
`
`to the non-
`
`( Vega
`
`v Restani
`
`Constr.
`
`Corp.,
`
`18 N.Y.3d
`
`499,
`
`503
`
`[2012]
`
`citations
`
`omitted).
`
`It
`
`is initially
`
`noted
`
`that plaintiff
`
`does
`
`not
`
`oppose
`
`dismissal
`
`of
`
`the negligent
`
`hiring
`
`claim;
`
`dismissal
`
`of all
`
`claims
`
`against
`
`Holland
`
`Middle
`
`School;
`
`and the claim for punitive
`
`damages.
`
`Those
`
`portions
`
`of
`
`the District's
`
`motion
`
`are granted.
`
`The District
`
`first
`
`argues
`
`that
`
`Act
`
`the due
`
`as applied,
`
`the Child
`
`Victims
`
`deprives
`
`it of
`
`process
`
`right
`
`to defend
`
`against
`
`plaintiffs
`
`claims.
`
`A defendant
`
`may
`
`challenge
`
`a statute
`
`as being
`
`unconstitutional
`
`on its face
`
`or as applied.
`
`(See, People
`
`v Stuart,
`
`100 N.Y.2d
`
`412,
`
`421-24
`
`[2003]).
`
`"An
`
`'as-applied
`
`challenge'
`
`requires
`
`an analysis
`
`of
`
`the facts
`
`of a particular
`
`case to determine
`
`whether
`
`the application
`
`of a statute,
`
`even
`
`one constitutional
`
`on its face,
`
`deprived
`
`the individual
`
`to
`
`whom
`
`it was
`
`applied
`
`of a protected
`
`right"
`
`( Field
`
`Day,
`
`LLC v County
`
`of Suffolk,
`
`463 F.3d
`
`167,
`
`2
`
`6 of 9
`
`

`

`
`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 05/01/2023 01:58 PMFILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`,FILED
`ERIE
`COUNTY
`CLERK
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138
`:
`0
`:
`3
`NYSCEF
`DOC. NO.
`141
`
`
`INDEX NO. 808449/2020INDEX NO. 20-46602
`808449/2020
`INDEX
`NO.
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2023RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`03/31/2023
`RECEIVED
`NYSCEF:
`
`174 [2d Cir
`
`2006]).
`
`"Factual
`
`context
`
`and defendant's
`
`circumstances
`
`are
`
`critical"
`
`(U.S.
`
`v Laurent,
`
`861 F. Supp
`
`2d 71, 93 [ED NY 2011]).
`
`Specifically,
`
`the District
`
`argues
`
`that
`
`due to the passage
`
`of
`
`time
`
`principal
`
`Arnold
`
`and
`
`Penziul,
`
`are now deceased
`
`thus
`
`depriving
`
`the District
`
`of
`
`its right
`
`to defend
`
`against
`
`the claim.
`
`The
`
`death
`
`of Arnold
`
`is not
`
`significant
`
`for
`
`the purpose
`
`of due process
`
`because
`
`according
`
`to
`
`no sexual
`
`also
`
`argues
`
`that
`
`the death
`
`of
`
`plaintiff,
`
`abuse
`
`occurred
`
`after
`
`the meeting.
`
`The District
`
`Penziul
`
`deprives
`
`the District
`
`of
`
`the opportunity
`
`to question
`
`him as to the lengths
`
`he undertook
`
`to
`
`shield
`
`his activities
`
`from detection.
`
`That
`
`point
`
`is balanced
`
`by
`
`the fact
`
`that
`
`several
`
`teachers
`
`working
`
`at
`
`the school
`
`at
`
`the time
`
`of
`
`the alleged
`
`abuse
`
`testified
`
`they
`
`had no knowledge
`
`that
`
`Penziul
`
`was
`
`abusing
`
`male
`
`students.
`
`the District's
`
`argument
`
`that
`
`the passage
`
`of
`
`time
`
`eroded
`
`of
`
`Regarding
`
`the possibility
`
`producing
`
`policies
`
`and procedures,
`
`the District
`
`was
`
`provided
`
`the opportunity
`
`to question
`
`teachers
`
`that were
`
`in its employ
`
`during
`
`the relevant
`
`time
`
`on the issue
`
`as well
`
`as on their
`
`training,
`
`observations,
`
`what
`
`they were
`
`aware
`
`of and what
`
`they would
`
`do if
`
`they
`
`suspected
`
`inappropriate
`
`behavior.
`
`Further,
`
`to assert
`
`that
`
`a witness's
`
`failure
`
`to recall
`
`is a basis
`
`for
`
`depriving
`
`due process
`
`is
`
`there
`
`brought
`
`within
`
`shorter
`
`time
`
`frames
`
`where
`
`witnesses
`
`do not
`
`unpersuasive,
`
`since
`
`are cases
`
`recall
`
`circumstances
`
`or
`
`facts.
`
`Therefore,
`
`after
`
`review
`
`of
`
`the circumstances
`
`particular
`
`to this
`
`case,
`
`the Court
`
`finds
`
`the
`
`CVA is not
`
`unconstitutional
`
`as applied.
`
`Actual
`
`notice
`
`is not
`
`at
`
`issue
`
`here.
`
`Though
`
`plaintiff
`
`testified
`
`that
`
`he informed
`
`Arnold
`
`of
`
`the abuse
`
`sometime
`
`close
`
`to Christmas
`
`of 1981,
`
`Penziul
`
`did
`
`not
`
`sexually
`
`abuse
`
`plaintiff
`
`after
`
`that
`
`time.
`
`3
`
`7 of 9
`
`

`

`
`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 05/01/2023 01:58 PMFILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138
`ERIE
`FILED:
`COUNTY
`CLERK
`:
`3
`5
`NYSCEF
`DOC. NO.
`141
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 808449/2020INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`808449/2020
`NO.
`INDEX
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2023RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`03/31/2023
`NYSCEF:
`
`RECEIVED
`
`The District
`
`argues
`
`that
`
`it
`
`lacked
`
`constructive
`
`notice
`
`based
`
`on the testimony
`
`of
`
`teachers,
`
`who
`
`testified
`
`they
`
`did
`
`not
`
`suspect
`
`Penziul
`
`was
`
`abusing
`
`students
`
`here.
`
`In opposition,
`
`plaintiff
`
`submitted
`
`the affidavit
`
`of Sherryll
`
`Kraizer,
`
`PhD,
`
`as an expert
`
`in
`
`the field
`
`of prevention,
`
`recognition,
`
`and reporting
`
`of child
`
`abuse,
`
`sexual
`
`harassment,
`
`and
`
`sexual
`
`assault,
`
`and in the standard
`
`of care for
`
`educational
`
`organizations.
`
`In her affidavit,
`
`Dr. Kraizer
`
`states
`
`that
`
`issued
`
`a
`
`"[i]n
`
`1978,
`
`the New York
`
`State Department
`
`of Education
`
`(NYSDOE)
`
`resource
`
`packet
`
`to every
`
`school
`
`district
`
`entitled,
`
`"School
`
`District
`
`Responsibilities
`
`in the Area
`
`of
`
`Child
`
`Abuse
`
`and Neglect."
`
`This
`
`document
`
`defined
`
`the forms
`
`of child
`
`abuse,
`
`listed
`
`the indicators
`
`for
`
`child
`
`abuse,
`
`referenced
`
`resources
`
`for
`
`further
`
`staff
`
`education,
`
`and provided
`
`supplementary
`
`articles."
`
`However,
`
`the resource
`
`packet
`
`was not
`
`attached
`
`as an exhibit
`
`to the motion
`
`and there
`
`is
`
`no evidence
`
`that
`
`the resource
`
`packet
`
`received
`
`Nor was
`
`the information
`
`in the
`
`was
`
`by the District.
`
`resource
`
`packet
`
`quoted
`
`or applied
`
`to the facts
`
`of
`
`the case before
`
`the Court.
`
`Dr. Kraizer
`
`also
`
`states
`
`that
`
`in her opinion
`
`the District
`
`deviated
`
`from the standard
`
`of care by
`
`failing
`
`to have written
`
`policies
`
`and procedures
`
`and training
`
`in place
`
`to protect
`
`students
`
`from sexual
`
`abuse,
`
`among
`
`other
`
`deviations.
`
`However,
`
`the statements
`
`of Dr. Kraizer
`
`are unsupported
`
`by documents,
`
`research
`
`or
`
`data and therefore
`
`are conclusory
`
`and speculative.
`
`As
`
`such,
`
`the expert
`
`affidavit
`
`is insufficient
`
`to
`
`.
`
`raise
`
`a question
`
`of
`
`fact
`
`on the issue
`
`of
`
`the District's
`
`negligence
`
`(see, Westermeyer
`
`v. Whelan,
`
`2023 NY Slip Op 01375,
`
`*2 [4th Dept
`
`2023]).
`
`It
`
`is further
`
`noted
`
`that
`
`the
`
`1973 Child
`
`Protective
`
`Services
`
`Act
`
`referenced
`
`by Dr. Kraizer,
`
`though
`
`not
`
`submitted
`
`by her, was
`
`submitted
`
`by
`
`the
`
`District.
`
`Upon
`
`review,
`
`the standard
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`in the Act
`
`applied
`
`to abuse
`
`by a parent
`
`or person
`
`legally
`
`responsible
`
`for
`
`the child.
`
`Abuse
`
`by a parent
`
`or
`
`legal
`
`guardian
`
`is not
`
`the issue.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`failed
`
`to raise
`
`a triable
`
`issue
`
`of
`
`fact
`
`on the issue
`
`of constructive
`
`notice.
`
`4
`
`8 of 9
`
`

`

`
`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 05/01/2023 01:58 PMFILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143NYSCEF DOC. NO. 138
`ERIE
`. FILED:
`COUNTY
`CLERK
`:
`3
`0
`5
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`NO.
`141
`
`INDEX NO. 808449/2020INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`808449/2020
`NO.
`INDEX
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2023RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`03/31/2023
`NYSCEF:
`RECEIVED
`
`The District
`
`also
`
`argues
`
`the abuse
`
`occurred
`
`off
`
`school
`
`grounds
`
`at a time when
`
`plaintiff
`
`was
`
`not
`
`in the custody
`
`of
`
`the District.
`
`(See, Pratt
`
`v. Robinson,
`
`39 N.Y.2d
`
`554,
`
`560
`
`[1976]).
`
`There
`
`is no evidence
`
`here
`
`that
`
`any
`
`"inappropriate
`
`behavior"
`
`occurred
`
`on school
`
`grounds
`
`during
`
`the school
`
`day.
`
`(Johansmeyer
`
`v. New
`
`York City Department
`
`of Education.,
`
`165 A.D.3d
`
`634,
`
`636
`
`[2nd Dept
`
`2018]).
`
`The District
`
`met
`
`its initial
`
`burden
`
`in establishing
`
`the plaintiff
`
`was
`
`not
`
`in its
`
`or control
`
`at
`
`did
`
`not
`
`breach
`
`owed
`
`to the
`
`custody
`
`the time
`
`of
`
`the abuse
`
`and therefore
`
`a duty
`
`plaintiff.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`failed
`
`to raise
`
`a triable
`
`issue
`
`of
`
`fact.
`
`For
`
`the reasons
`
`stated,
`
`the Districts
`
`motion
`
`for
`
`summary
`
`judgement
`
`is granted
`
`and the
`
`Complaint
`
`dismissed.
`
`Counsel
`
`for
`
`the District
`
`is to prepare
`
`an Order
`
`and
`
`submit
`
`it
`
`to the Court
`
`upon
`
`approval
`
`of
`
`counsel
`
`for plaintiff.
`
`The Order
`
`shall
`
`be submitted
`
`within
`
`30 days
`
`and shall
`
`reference
`
`and attach
`
`the Courts
`
`Decision
`
`to the Order.
`
`DATED:
`
`March
`
`Buffalo,
`
`29, 2023
`New York
`
`Hon.
`
`Deborah
`
`A. Chimes,
`
`J.S.C.
`
`5
`
`9 of 9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket