throbber
FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 140
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 140
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT C
`EXHIBIT C
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 140
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`
`The problem of abused children has recently been recognized as a significant
`health concern. Nevertheless, many incidents in older children probably
`go unnoticed. In Syracuse, N. Y., a program was started on the premise
`that the school system would be valuable in detecting cases. The
`program and the results of the first four years of operation
`are presented.
`
`THE ABUSED CHILD AND THE SCHOOL SYSTEM
`
`C. George Murdock, M.D.
`
`chil-
`SINCE the dawn of civilization,
`dren have been abused or maltreated
`by adults. Many cultures for centuries
`used infanticide to appease their deities,
`eliminate defective offspring, and control
`early form of
`(an
`population
`their
`planned parenthood). Examples have
`been provided for us through the writ-
`other
`Dickens and
`Charles
`of
`ings
`authors. Who can ever forget the trials
`and sufferings of Oliver Twist told in
`such lurid detail by Dickens? The cruel
`indifference to the employment of chil-
`dren in the mines of Great Britain dur-
`ing this period was vividly described by
`the Earl of Shaftesbury in his speech to
`the House of Commons in 1842.1
`"In Oldham the mountain seams are wrought
`in a very rude manner. The ways are so low
`that only little boys can work in them, which
`they do naked, and often in mud and water,
`dragging sledge-tubs by girdle and chain. The
`child is obliged to pass on all fours-through
`avenues not so good as the common sewer,
`quite as wet, and often times more contracted.
`This kind of labour they have to continue
`several hours in a temperature described as
`perfectly intolerable."
`More recently, many of us can recail
`the horrible tales and vivid pictures of
`child labor in this country around the
`
`turn of the century in factories, sweat
`shops, and coal mines. These conditions
`were corrected by the Child Labor Laws
`and the general enlightenment of the
`public.
`However, despite the efforts of many
`governmental and private agencies, cases
`of child beating and maltreatment con-
`tinued to occur. The American Humane
`Association estimates that there are at
`least 10,000 cases of child abuse an-
`nually in the United States.2 Obviously
`only a small fraction of these cases are
`currently being reported.
`It is sometimes difficult to sharply de-
`marcate the difference between abuse
`and discipline. The attention of the med-
`ical profession was again drawn to this
`problem in 1946 by Caffey's report8
`which described the relationship between
`multiple fractures of the long bones in
`subdural hema-
`infants and chronic
`tomas. Other reports in the medical lit-
`children
`describing
`followed,
`erature
`with multiple injuries indicating new or
`recent trauma superimposed on old inju-
`ries. Increased public attention was ex-
`pressed by many magazine and news-
`paper articles as well as radio and tele-
`vision programs. A variety of profes-
`
`JANUARY, 19970
`
`-105
`
`

`

`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 140
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`
`sional disciplines-medical, governmen-
`tal,
`social, and welfare-joined in at-
`tempting to meet the problem.
`
`Guidelines for Legislation
`In 1962, the Children's Bureau as-
`sembled a group of experts in this field.
`They agreed that these children must
`first be found and identified before the
`community could protect them, and rec-
`ommended the passage of state laws which
`would require physicians to report these
`cases with immunity from legal counter-
`suit. As a result, in 1963, the Children's
`Bureau published "The Abused Child-
`Principles and Suggested Language for
`Legislation on Reporting of the Phys-
`ically Abused Child," to serve as guide-
`lines.4
`State legislatures started to pass child
`abuse reporting laws in 1963 and, by
`1968, all 50 states had statutes. Since
`each state enacted legislation to meet its
`own circumstances, there was consider-
`able variation in the laws. Some states
`have already amended their
`original
`statute, while others are likely to do so
`in the future. A comprehensive review
`of the current state laws was published
`by the Children's Bureau in 1966: "The
`Child Abuse Reporting Laws-A Tabu-
`lar View."5 The variations
`in
`these
`statutes are too numerous to report in
`detail in this presentation.
`The New York State Law, which be-
`came effective July 1, 1964, makes the
`reporting of any suspected case of child
`abuse mandatory for physicians, den-
`tists, osteopaths or the superintendent,
`manager, or person in charge of any
`hospital, sanitarium, or other institution
`where such a child is being treated.
`Legal immunity is granted for such re-
`porting.
`Upon a personal request, the phrase
`"other institution" was interpreted by
`local and state legal counsel to include
`schools, since these children were com-
`ing to the Health Service rooms for ad-
`
`vice and treatment. Because of this legal
`decision, the school authorities in Syra-
`cuse were apprised by the health direc-
`tor of the new law, and its mandatory
`regulation for reporting suspected cases
`of child abuse, in September, 1964. The
`Syracuse School District was the first in
`New York State and one of the first in
`the nation to participate in this pro-
`gram. Subsequently, many other school
`districts in the state and throughout the
`country have adopted similar
`proce-
`dures.
`
`School Program in Syracuse
`Since its inception, the school pro-
`gram has been the greatest single source
`of uncovering these problems in Syra-
`cuse. This may be due to inadequate re-
`porting of these cases by physicians and
`hospitals in this community, since it has
`been found in other surveys that school-
`age children account for only 20-30 per
`cent of the total cases. On the other
`hand, these other surveys may not have
`used the schools as an identifying agent
`for older children. The program has
`been invaluable in the identification of
`abused children of school age because,
`in most cases, the injuries are not of
`sufficient severity to necessitate care by
`a physician.
`A simple reporting form (Figure 1)
`was prepared and copies were issued to
`all schools in the district. These were
`completed and returned to the office of
`the director of Health Service, where
`duplicate copies were made for filing,
`and the original report was then for-
`warded to the Children's Division of
`the County Department of Social Wel-
`fare. Two full-time social workers from
`that office were assigned to investigate
`suspected cases of child abuse, and they
`subsequently referred them to the local
`Family Court if any punitive action was
`deemed necessary.
`A central registry was established by
`the Children's Division which provided
`
`106
`
`VOL. 60. NO. 1. A.J.P.H.
`
`

`

`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 140
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`THE ABUSED CHILD
`
`for other reports from different sources
`such as physicians and hospitals. This
`accumulative file often revealed repeated
`abuse of the same child, or other sib-
`lings in the same family, and strength-
`ened the position of the division when
`action was deemed necessary.
`court
`of
`extreme mobility
`the
`Because of
`many of the families invelh ed, many
`authorities working on this problem have
`stressed the importance of central regis-
`at the local
`for these children,
`ters6
`level and, hopefully in the future, at
`state and national levels. Several states
`have already or are in the process of
`establishing such registers.
`
`Results
`The Syracuse school system has just
`completed its fourth year of reporting
`suspected cases of child abuse. In the
`school year of 1964-1965, 18 cases were
`in
`reported; in 1965-1966, 20 cases;
`1966-1967, 24 cases; and in 1967-1968,
`18 cases.
`An early reluctance on the part of
`school personnel to report these cases
`was overcome after they were informed
`that they would be given legal immunity
`
`and that reporting was mandatory. The
`total registration for the school district
`at about 30,000,
`has remained static
`and the general socioeconomic status of
`the community has remained relatively
`unchanged during the past four years.
`The ages of the children involved
`varied from 5 to 14 years, but were pre-
`dominantly in the younger age groups
`(Table 1). This is probably accounted
`for by the predilection of younger chil-
`dren to become involved in provoca-
`tive situations.
`The types of injuries sustained con-
`sisted mainly of ecchymosis and welts
`with
`sticks,
`whippings
`incurred
`by
`broom handles, ropes, belts, and elec-
`tric cords-with a scattering of lacera-
`tions caused by knives or other sharp
`objects. Upon investigation, the perpe-
`trators of the abuse were frequently
`found to be emotionally disturbed, men-
`tally handicapped or chronic alcoholics.
`When stepparents were involved, their
`relationship was often by common law
`only and impermanent. Almost all of
`our cases came from the lower socioeco-
`nomic group, which is contrary to the
`findings of other investigators.
`Case reporting was usually done by
`
`Figure I-City School District, Syracuse, N. Y., Report form for abused child (please
`type or print)
`
`Name
`Address
`
`_
`Birth Date
`Mother_
`_
`
`_
`
`Father_
`
`Description of injuries (location, degree, and extent) -
`
`Statement from child regarding injuries.
`
`Statement from witnesses, if any, or other pertinent information.
`
`uate
`
`JlSlnigatur
`Title
`
`Return to: Director, Health Service, 409 West Genesee Street, Syracuse, N. Y. 13202
`
`JANUARY. 1970
`
`107
`
`

`

`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 140
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`
`Table 1-Case reports by year and age
`
`Age
`
`1964-
`1965
`
`1965-
`1966
`
`1966-
`1967
`
`1967-
`1968
`
`Total
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`
`3
`5
`2
`2
`0
`0
`0
`0
`2
`4
`
`1
`1
`8
`2
`4
`1
`3
`0
`0
`0
`
`3
`4
`4
`2
`4
`3
`1
`2
`2
`0
`
`1
`2
`4
`2
`2
`2
`1
`2
`0
`2
`
`Total
`
`18
`
`20
`
`25
`
`18
`
`8
`12
`18
`8
`10
`6
`5
`4
`4
`6
`
`81
`
`the school nurse-teacher after referral
`to her office, but other school person-
`nel were also involved (Table 2). Prior
`to the submission of the report, the
`school
`physician examined any sus-
`pected cases whenever he was available.
`Reports
`periodically
`obtained
`are
`from the Children's Division concerning
`the findings of their investigation and
`the disposition of each case. Two social
`workers have been relieved
`of other
`duties by the division so that they might
`devote their full attention to the solu-
`tion of these problems. The disposition
`of cases is shown in Table 3. A copy of
`each report from the division is returned
`to the individual who made the initial
`referral. This maintains their interest in
`the program and gives them a sense of
`accomplishment.
`
`Difficulties and Recommendations
`The following difficulties encountered
`in initiating our program might serve
`as guidelines for other school systems
`contemplating similar projects.
`i. The reluctance of school personnel to re-
`port suspected cases, for fear of legal involve-
`ment and court appearances, can be overcome
`proper presentation
`by a
`the" problem,
`of
`
`especially in those states where reporting is
`mandatory.
`2. Maximum cooperation between the school
`system and the investigating agency is of ex-
`treme importance. A frequent exchange of in-
`formation between the two organizations should
`be encouraged, not only in the initial reporting
`but also in the continued observation of these
`cases.
`The following recommendations of
`the Committee on Infant and Pre-School
`Child
`of the American Academy of
`Pediatrics regarding child abuse are ex-
`cellent.6 It is suggested that school per-
`sonnel and school systems be added to
`physicians and hospitals in these state-
`ments.
`1. Physicians should be required to report
`suspected cases of child abuse immediately to
`the agency legally charged with the respon-
`sibility of investigating child abuse-preferably
`the county or state department of welfare or
`health or their local representatives, or to the
`nearest law enforcement agency.
`
`Table 2-Reporters
`
`1964-
`1965
`
`1965-
`1966
`
`1966-
`1967
`
`1967-
`1968
`
`Total
`
`Nurse-
`teacher
`Principal
`Visiting
`teacher
`Teacher
`Guidance
`counselor
`School
`physician
`
`6
`6
`
`1
`3
`
`1
`
`1
`
`8
`6
`
`0-
`3
`
`0
`
`3
`
`16
`4
`
`4
`1
`
`0
`
`0
`
`11
`0
`
`2
`1
`
`1
`
`4
`
`41
`16
`
`7
`8
`
`2
`
`8
`
`Table 3-Disposition
`
`Year
`
`Closed
`
`Open
`
`1964-1965
`1965-1966
`1966-1967
`1967-1968
`
`Total
`
`10
`15
`8
`3
`
`36
`
`0
`1
`10
`11
`
`22
`
`Place-
`Un-
`ment known
`2
`2
`1
`3
`2
`2
`3
`1
`
`8
`
`8
`
`X08
`
`VOL. 60. NO. 1
`
`A.J.P.H.
`
`

`

`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2023 02:56 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 140
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2023
`THE ABUSED CHILD
`
`2. The agency should have ample personnel
`and resources to take action immediately upon
`receipt of the report.
`3. Reported cases should be investigated
`promptly and appropriate service provided for
`the child and family.
`4. The child should be protected by the
`agency either by continued
`hospitalization,
`supervision at home, or removal from home
`through family or juvenile court action when
`indicated.
`5. The agency should keep a central register
`of all such cases. Provision should be made for
`the removal of case records from the register
`when it is found that abuse did not, in fact,
`occur.
`6. The reporting physician or hospital should
`be granted immunity from suit.
`A program following these principles
`should
`be
`successful
`in
`identifying
`abused children and in protecting them
`from further abuse, in restoring those
`families that are capable of rehabilita-
`tion, in allowing the physician to per-
`form responsibly within the bounds of
`medical knowledge and ethics, and in al-
`lowing the community to meet its ob-
`ligations to its children.
`
`Summary
`The problem of abused children has
`recently been brought into sharper focus
`by the enactment of laws by state legis-
`latures for the protection of these indi-
`viduals.
`Although physicians and hos-
`
`pitals are the primary sources for iden-
`tifying these cases, especially in infants
`and preschool children, it was felt that
`many incidents in older children went
`unnoticed.
`With the supposition that a school
`system might be valuable in revealing
`suspected cases in older children, a pro-
`gram was initiated
`the Syracuse
`in
`(N.Y.)
`School District. This program
`is described in detail and the results
`of the four years since its inception are
`outlined.
`
`3.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Pediatrics 41,4:749 (Apr.), 1968.
`2. De Francis, V. Child Abuse-Preview of a
`Nationwide Survey. Denver, Colo.:
`Chil-
`dren's Division, American Humane Asso-
`ciation, 1963.
`Caffey, J. Multiple Fractures in the Long
`Bones of Infants Suffering from Chronic
`Subdural Hematoma. Am. J. Roentgenol.
`56:163, 1946.
`4. Children's Bureau, United States Depart-
`ment of Health, Education, and Welfare. The
`Abused Child-Principles and Suggested
`Language for Legislation on Reporting of
`the Physically Abused Child. Washington,
`D. C.: Gov. Ptg. Office, 1963.
`. The Child Abuse Reporting
`Laws-A Tabular View. Washington, D. C.:
`Gov. Ptg. Office, 1966.
`6. Report of Committee on Infant and Pre-
`School Child: Maltreatment of Children.
`Pediatrics 37,2:377 (Feb.), 1966.
`
`5.
`
`-
`
`Doctor Murdock is Director, Health Services, Syracuse City School District
`(409 West Genesee Street), Syracuse, N. Y. 13202, and Clinical Professor,
`Emeritus, of the Department of Pediatrics, New York State University Upstate
`Medical College, Syracuse.
`This paper was presented before a Joint Session of the American School Health
`Association and the School Health Section of the American Public Health
`Association at the Ninety-Sixth Annual Meeting in Detroit, Mich., November
`12, 1968.
`
`JANUARY. 1970
`
`1109
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket