throbber
FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`OF NEW YORK
`STATE
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`COURT:
`
`OF ORLEANS
`
`AB 511 DOE,
`
`v.
`
`LYNDONVILLE
`
`DISTRICT;
`SCHOOL,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`CENTRAL
`LYNDONVILLE
`
`SCHOOL
`ELEMENTARY
`
`Defendant(s).
`
`Index
`
`No.
`
`O
`
`SUMMONS
`
`TO THE ABOVE-NAMED
`
`DEFENDANTS:
`
`PLEASE
`
`TAKE
`
`NOTICE
`
`THAT
`
`YOU ARE HEREBY
`
`SUMMONED
`
`to
`
`answer
`
`the
`
`Complaint,
`
`a copy
`
`of which
`
`is hereby
`
`served
`
`upon
`
`you,
`
`and
`
`to serve
`
`a copy
`
`of
`
`your
`
`Answer
`
`to the
`
`Complaint
`
`upon
`
`the
`
`undersigned
`
`attorneys
`
`listed
`
`below
`
`within
`
`twenty
`
`(20)
`
`days
`
`after
`
`the
`
`service
`
`of
`
`service
`
`(or within
`
`days
`
`after
`
`the
`
`service
`
`is
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Summons,
`
`exclusive
`
`of
`
`the
`
`day
`
`thirty
`
`(30)
`
`complete
`
`if
`
`this
`
`Summons
`
`is not
`
`personally
`
`delivered
`
`to you
`
`within
`
`the
`
`State
`
`of New
`
`York);
`
`and
`
`in the
`
`case
`
`of
`
`your
`
`failure
`
`to
`
`appear
`
`or answer,
`
`judgment
`
`by
`
`default
`
`will
`
`be taken
`
`against
`
`you
`
`for
`
`the
`
`relief
`
`demanded
`
`herein.
`
`Venue
`
`is proper
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR
`
`§504
`
`in t
`
`t Defendants
`
`are
`
`situated
`
`in Orleans
`
`County.
`
`Dated:
`
`June
`
`2, 2020
`
`Leah
`STEVE
`40 North
`
`Co tahz(S,
`BOYD,
`Forest
`
`Èsq
`PC
`Road
`NY 14221
`400-0000
`
`Williamsville,
`Telephone:
`
`(716)
`Icostanzo@steveboyd.com
`
`1 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`P.A.
`
`R. Anderson
`Jeffrey
`Reck
`J. Michael
`ANDERSON
`JEFF
`7th
`52 Duane
`Street,
`NY 10007
`New York,
`759-2551
`Telephone:
`(646)
`jeff@andersonadvocates.com
`mreck@andersonadvocates.com
`
`& ASSOCIATES,
`Floor
`
`Counsel
`
`for
`
`Plaintiff
`
`2
`
`2 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`OF NEW YORK
`STATE
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`COURT:
`
`OF ORLEANS
`
`AB 511 DOE,
`
`v.
`
`LYNDONVILLE
`
`DISTRICT;
`SCHOOL,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Index
`
`No.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`CENTRAL
`LYNDONVILLE
`
`SCHOOL
`ELEMENTARY
`
`DEMAND
`
`FOR JURY
`
`TRIAL1
`
`Defendants.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`by
`
`and
`
`through
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`attorneys,
`
`states
`
`and
`
`alleges
`
`as follows:
`
`PSEUDONYM
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is authorized
`
`to file
`
`the
`
`instãñt
`
`action
`
`under
`
`a pseudonym
`
`and
`
`defendants
`
`are
`
`barred
`
`from
`
`disclosing
`
`Petitioner's
`
`true
`
`identity
`
`to the
`
`general
`
`public
`
`pursuant
`
`to an Amended
`
`Order
`
`of
`
`the Honorable
`
`Deborah
`
`A. Chimes.
`
`J.S.C.
`
`dated
`
`August
`
`13, 2018
`
`which
`
`is attached
`
`hereto.
`
`2.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`material
`
`to this
`
`Plaintiff
`
`resided
`
`in the
`
`State
`
`of New York.
`
`PARTIES
`
`times
`
`Complaint,
`
`3.
`
`Whenever
`
`reference
`
`is made
`
`to any Defendant
`
`entity,
`
`such
`
`reference
`
`includes
`
`that
`
`entity,
`
`affiliates,
`
`predecessors,
`
`and
`
`successors.
`
`In addition,
`
`whenever
`
`reference
`
`is made
`
`to any
`
`act,
`
`deed,
`
`or
`
`transaction
`
`of
`
`any
`
`entity,
`
`the
`
`allegation
`
`means
`
`that
`
`the
`
`entity
`
`engaged
`
`in the
`
`act,
`
`deed,
`
`or
`
`transaction
`
`by
`
`or
`
`through
`
`its
`
`officers,
`
`directors,
`
`agents,
`
`employees,
`
`or
`
`representatives
`
`while
`
`they
`
`were
`
`actively
`
`engaged
`
`in the management,
`
`direction,
`
`control,
`
`or
`
`transaction
`
`of
`
`the
`
`entity's
`
`business
`
`or affairs.
`
`I Pursuant
`
`to §4 of
`
`the New York Child
`
`Victims
`
`Act, Plaintiff
`
`is entitled
`
`to a trial
`
`preference.
`
`3 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`4.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Central
`
`School
`
`District
`
`("Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.")
`
`was
`
`and
`
`continues
`
`to
`
`be
`
`a public-school
`
`district
`
`located
`
`in
`
`the
`
`County
`
`of Orleans
`
`and
`
`State
`
`of New York.
`
`5.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Elementary
`
`School
`
`was
`
`and
`
`continues
`
`to
`
`be
`
`a
`
`public
`
`school
`
`owned,
`
`controlled,
`
`supervised,
`
`operated
`
`and
`
`managed
`
`by
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`6.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Terry
`
`E.
`
`Houseman
`
`was
`
`an
`
`employee
`
`of
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`7.
`
`This
`
`Court
`
`has
`
`jurisdiction
`
`pursuant
`
`to C.P.L.R.
`
`§ 301
`
`as Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`is a quasi-municipal
`
`corporation
`
`created
`
`and
`
`organized
`
`by
`
`state
`
`legislatures
`
`and
`
`charged
`
`in
`
`the
`
`State
`
`of New
`
`Defendant
`
`with
`
`the
`
`administration
`
`of
`
`public
`
`schools
`
`York,
`
`including
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Elersentary
`
`School,
`
`and
`
`because
`
`the
`
`unlawful
`
`conduct
`
`complained
`
`of herein
`
`occurred
`
`in New York.
`
`8.
`
`Venue
`
`is proper
`
`pursuant
`
`to C.P.L.R.
`
`§504
`
`in that
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`is
`
`situated
`
`in Orleans
`
`County.
`
`9.
`
`This
`
`complaint
`
`is brought
`
`under
`
`the Child
`
`Victims
`
`Act
`
`and,
`
`as such,
`
`the
`
`filing
`
`of
`
`a
`
`Notice
`
`of Claim
`
`is not
`
`required.
`
`FACTS
`
`10.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Houseman
`
`was
`
`employed
`
`by Defeñdañt
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and
`
`remained
`
`under
`
`the
`
`direct
`
`supervision,
`
`employ,
`
`and
`
`control
`
`of Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`11.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`placed
`
`Houseman
`
`in positions
`
`where
`
`he had
`
`access
`
`to and worked
`
`with
`
`children
`
`as an integral
`
`part
`
`of
`
`his work.
`
`Specifically,
`
`Defeñdant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`2
`
`4 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`C.S.D.
`
`placed
`
`and
`
`retained
`
`Houseman
`
`at Lyndonville
`
`Elemeñtary
`
`School
`
`as an elemeñtary
`
`school
`
`teacher.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`a student
`
`at Lyndonville
`
`Elemeñtary
`
`School.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`as a minor
`
`and
`
`vulnerable
`
`child,
`
`was
`
`dependent
`
`on Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and Houseman.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and Houseman
`
`had
`
`custody
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`were
`
`entrusted
`
`with
`
`the
`
`safety
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`and,
`
`therefore,
`
`had
`
`responsibility
`
`for
`
`and
`
`authority
`
`over
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`From
`
`when
`
`14.
`
`approximately
`
`1986
`
`to
`
`1987,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`approximately
`
`11 to
`
`12 years
`
`old,
`
`Housemañ
`
`engaged
`
`in unpermitted
`
`sexual
`
`contact
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`15.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`Houseman
`
`was
`
`a
`
`danger
`
`to children
`
`before
`
`Houseman
`
`sexually
`
`assaulted
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`16.
`
`Prior
`
`to
`
`the
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`of Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`learned
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`leamed
`
`that
`
`Houseman
`
`not
`
`fit
`
`with
`
`children.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`was
`
`to work
`
`C.S.D.,
`
`by
`
`and
`
`through
`
`their
`
`agents,
`
`servants
`
`and/or
`
`employees,
`
`became
`
`aware,
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`become
`
`aware
`
`of Houseman's
`
`propensity
`
`to
`
`commit
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`of
`
`the
`
`risk
`
`to Plaintiff's
`
`safety.
`
`At
`
`the
`
`very
`
`least,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`they
`
`did
`
`not
`
`have
`
`sufficient
`
`information
`
`about
`
`whether
`
`or not
`
`its
`
`employees,
`
`more
`
`specifically,
`
`Houseman,
`
`were
`
`fit
`
`to work
`
`with
`
`children.
`
`17.
`
`Defendañt
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`there
`
`was
`
`a risk
`
`of
`
`the
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`of
`
`children
`
`attending
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Elemeñtary
`
`School.
`
`At
`
`the
`
`very
`
`least,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`they
`
`did
`
`not
`
`have
`
`sufficient
`
`information
`
`about
`
`whether
`
`or
`
`not
`
`there
`
`was
`
`a risk
`
`of
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`abuse
`
`for
`
`children
`
`attending
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Elementary
`
`School.
`
`3
`
`5 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`18.
`
`Instead,
`
`Defendants
`
`negligently
`
`deemed
`
`that
`
`Houseman
`
`was
`
`fit
`
`to work
`
`with
`
`children
`
`and/or
`
`that
`
`any
`
`previous
`
`misconduct
`
`was
`
`fixed
`
`or
`
`cured
`
`and/or
`
`that
`
`Houseman
`
`would
`
`not
`
`sexually
`
`assault
`
`children
`
`and/or
`
`that
`
`Houseman
`
`would
`
`not
`
`injure
`
`children.
`
`19.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`of
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`because
`
`they
`
`had
`
`superior
`
`knowledge
`
`about
`
`the
`
`risk
`
`that
`
`Houseman
`
`posed
`
`to Plaintiff,
`
`the
`
`risk
`
`of
`
`abuse
`
`in
`
`general
`
`in its
`
`schools
`
`and/or
`
`the
`
`risks
`
`that
`
`its
`
`facilities
`
`posed
`
`to minor
`
`children.
`
`20.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`owed
`
`a duty
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`to
`
`protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`harm
`
`because
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`actions
`
`created
`
`a foreseeable
`
`risk
`
`of
`
`harm
`
`to
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`As
`
`a
`
`vulnerable
`
`child
`
`attending
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Elementary
`
`School,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`a
`
`foreseeable
`
`victim.
`
`As
`
`a vulnerable
`
`child
`
`who
`
`Houseman
`
`had
`
`access
`
`to through
`
`his
`
`employment
`
`with
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`a foreseeable
`
`victim.
`
`21.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`also
`
`to
`
`maintaining
`
`and
`
`employing
`
`Houseman
`
`in
`
`a position
`
`of
`
`power
`
`and
`
`authority
`
`through
`
`which
`
`Houseman
`
`had
`
`access
`
`to
`
`children,
`
`including
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`and
`
`power
`
`and
`
`control
`
`over
`
`children,
`
`breached
`
`its
`
`duty
`
`Plaintiff
`
`by
`
`actively
`
`including
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`22.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`breached
`
`its
`
`duties
`
`to
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`failed
`
`to use
`
`ordinary
`
`care
`
`in determining
`
`whether
`
`its
`
`facilities
`
`were
`
`safe
`
`and/or
`
`determining
`
`whether
`
`it
`
`had
`
`sufficient
`
`information
`
`to
`
`represent
`
`its
`
`facilities
`
`as
`
`safe.
`
`Defendant
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`breach
`
`of
`
`its
`
`duties
`
`include,
`
`but
`
`are
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to:
`
`failure
`
`to protect
`
`from
`
`a known
`
`danger,
`
`or
`
`reasonably
`
`foreseeable
`
`failure
`
`to have
`
`sufficient
`
`policies
`
`and
`
`procedures
`
`to prevent
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to properly
`
`implement
`
`policies
`
`and
`
`procedures
`
`to prevent
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to take
`
`reasonable
`
`measures
`
`to make
`
`sure
`
`that
`
`policies
`
`and
`
`procedures
`
`to prevent
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`abuse
`
`were
`
`working,
`
`failure
`
`to
`
`adequately
`
`inform
`
`families
`
`and
`
`children
`
`of
`
`the
`
`risks
`
`of
`
`4
`
`6 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to
`
`investigate
`
`risks
`
`of
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to have
`
`any
`
`outside
`
`agency
`
`test
`
`its
`
`safety
`
`procedures,
`
`failure
`
`to
`
`protect
`
`the
`
`children
`
`attending
`
`its
`
`programs
`
`from
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to adhere
`
`to the
`
`applicable
`
`standard
`
`of
`
`care
`
`for
`
`child
`
`safety,
`
`failure
`
`to investigate
`
`the
`
`amount
`
`and
`
`type
`
`of
`
`information
`
`necessary
`
`to represent
`
`the
`
`school
`
`and
`
`its employees
`
`as safe,
`
`failure
`
`to train
`
`its
`
`signs
`
`of
`
`sexual
`
`fellow
`
`employees
`
`properly
`
`to
`
`identify
`
`child
`
`abuse
`
`by
`
`employees,
`
`and
`
`failure
`
`to engage
`
`or
`
`timely
`
`engage
`
`certified
`
`mental
`
`health
`
`professionals.
`
`23.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`also
`
`breached
`
`its duty
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to warn
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`family
`
`of
`
`the
`
`risk
`
`that
`
`Houseman
`
`posed.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`further
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`warn
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`family
`
`of
`
`Defeñdañt
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`knowledge
`
`of
`
`the
`
`occurrence
`
`of
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`abuse.
`
`Defendant
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and/or
`
`violated
`
`legal
`
`24.
`
`Lyndonville
`
`its
`
`other
`
`agents
`
`their
`
`duty
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to report
`
`known
`
`and/or
`
`suspected
`
`abuse
`
`of
`
`children
`
`by Houseman
`
`to law
`
`enforcement.
`
`25.
`
`As
`
`a
`
`direct
`
`result
`
`of
`
`Defendants'
`
`negligence,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has
`
`suffered,
`
`and
`
`will
`
`continue
`
`to suffer,
`
`great
`
`pain
`
`of mind
`
`and
`
`body,
`
`severe
`
`and
`
`permañeñt
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`physical
`
`manifestations
`
`of
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`embarrassment,
`
`loss
`
`of
`
`self-esteem,
`
`humiliation
`
`and/or
`
`personal
`
`and
`
`psychological
`
`injuries.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`prevented,
`
`and
`
`will
`
`continue
`
`to
`
`be
`
`physical,
`
`prevented,
`
`from
`
`performing
`
`normal
`
`daily
`
`activities
`
`and
`
`obtaining
`
`the
`
`full
`
`enjoyment
`
`of
`
`life;
`
`and/or
`
`has
`
`incurred
`
`and
`
`will
`
`continue
`
`to
`
`incur
`
`expenses
`
`for
`
`psychological
`
`treatment,
`
`therapy,
`
`and
`
`counseling,
`
`and,
`
`on
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief
`
`has
`
`and/or
`
`will
`
`incur
`
`loss
`
`of
`
`income
`
`and/or
`
`loss
`
`of
`
`earning
`
`capacity.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST
`CAUSE
`NEGLIGENCE
`
`OF ACTION:
`
`26.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`incorporates
`
`all
`
`consistent
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`under
`
`this
`
`count.
`
`5
`
`7 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`27.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`of
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`to
`
`protect
`
`the Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`injury.
`
`28.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`of
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`because
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`a special
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`29.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`also
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`arising
`
`from
`
`its
`
`special
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`parents,
`
`and
`
`other
`
`parents
`
`of
`
`young,
`
`vulnerable
`
`children,
`
`to properly
`
`train
`
`employees.
`
`and
`
`supervise
`
`its
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`to
`
`establish
`
`measures
`
`of
`
`protection
`
`not
`
`necessary
`
`for
`
`persons
`
`who
`
`are
`
`older
`
`or better
`
`able
`
`to safeguard
`
`themselves.
`
`30.
`
`By
`
`representing
`
`Houseman
`
`as safe
`
`to work
`
`with
`
`children,
`
`and
`
`by
`
`undertaking
`
`the
`
`custody
`
`and
`
`supervision
`
`of
`
`the minor
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`a fiduciary
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`the minor
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`being
`
`a minor,
`
`and
`
`by Defendant
`
`of
`
`then
`
`vulnerable
`
`minor
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`undertaking
`
`of
`
`the
`
`care
`
`and
`
`guidance
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`held
`
`a position
`
`of empowerment
`
`over
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`31.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`an
`
`in
`
`loco
`
`parentis
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`to protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`injury.
`
`32.
`
`By
`
`establishing,
`
`operating
`
`and/or
`
`administrating
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Elementary
`
`School,
`
`accepting
`
`the minor
`
`Plaintiff
`
`as a participant
`
`in
`
`its
`
`programs,
`
`holding
`
`its
`
`facilities
`
`and
`
`programs
`
`environment
`
`of
`
`the minor
`
`Plaintiff
`
`in loco
`
`out
`
`to be a safe
`
`for Plaintiff,
`
`accepting
`
`custody
`
`parentis,
`
`and
`
`by
`
`virtue
`
`of
`
`its
`
`fiduciary
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`entered
`
`into
`
`an express
`
`and/or
`
`implied
`
`duty
`
`to properly
`
`supervise
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`provide
`
`a reasonably
`
`safe
`
`environment
`
`for
`
`children
`
`attending
`
`its
`
`schools.
`
`33.
`
`By establishing
`
`and
`
`operating
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Elemeñtas,f
`
`School
`
`and
`
`by
`
`accepting
`
`the
`
`enrollment
`
`and
`
`participation
`
`of
`
`the
`
`minor
`
`Plaintiff
`
`in
`
`its
`
`educational
`
`programs,
`
`Defendant
`
`6
`
`8 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`to
`
`properly
`
`supervise
`
`Plaintiff
`
`to
`
`prevent
`
`harm
`
`from
`
`generally
`
`foreseeable
`
`dangers.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`the
`
`duty
`
`to
`
`exercise
`
`the
`
`same
`
`degree
`
`of
`
`care
`
`over
`
`minor
`
`students
`
`under
`
`its
`
`control
`
`as a reasonably
`
`prudent
`
`parent
`
`would
`
`have
`
`exercised
`
`under
`
`similar
`
`circumstances.
`
`34.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`to protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`harm
`
`and
`
`aware
`
`because
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`was
`
`aware
`
`of Plaintiff's
`
`presence
`
`on its property
`
`that
`
`Houseman
`
`posed
`
`a danger
`
`on Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`property.
`
`35.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`breached
`
`its
`
`duties
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to
`
`use
`
`reasonable
`
`care.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`failures
`
`include,
`
`but
`
`are
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to,
`
`failing
`
`to
`
`properly
`
`supervise
`
`Houseman,
`
`failing
`
`to properly
`
`supervise
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`failing
`
`to protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`a known
`
`danger.
`
`sustained
`
`and
`
`36.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`physical,
`
`emotional,
`
`psychological
`
`injuries,
`
`along
`
`with
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering.
`
`AS AND FOR A SE_COND
`NEGLIGENT
`
`CAUSE
`HIRING
`
`OF ACTION:
`
`37.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`incorporates
`
`all
`
`consistent
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`under
`
`this
`
`count.
`
`38.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Houseman
`
`was
`
`employed
`
`by Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and
`
`was
`
`under
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`direct
`
`supervision,
`
`employ
`
`and
`
`control
`
`when
`
`he/she
`
`committed
`
`the wrongful
`
`acts
`
`alleged
`
`herein.
`
`Houseman
`
`engaged
`
`in the
`
`illegal
`
`conduct
`
`while
`
`acting
`
`in
`
`the
`
`course
`
`and
`
`scope
`
`of
`
`his
`
`employment
`
`with
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and/or
`
`accomplished
`
`the
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`by
`
`virtue
`
`of his/her
`
`job-created
`
`authority.
`
`39.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`negligently
`
`hired
`
`and/or
`
`negligently
`
`placed
`
`Houseman
`
`in a position
`
`to cause
`
`foreseeable
`
`harm
`
`which
`
`Plaintiff
`
`would
`
`not
`
`have
`
`been
`
`subject
`
`to
`
`7
`
`9 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`had
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`taken
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`in
`
`its
`
`pre-hiring
`
`investigation
`
`of
`
`Houseman.
`
`40.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`of
`
`Houseman's
`
`propensity
`
`for
`
`the
`
`type
`
`of behavior
`
`which
`
`resulted
`
`in Plaintiff's
`
`injuries.
`
`41.
`
`As
`
`a
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`sustained
`
`physical,
`
`emotional
`
`and
`
`psychological
`
`with
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering.
`
`injuries,
`
`along
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD
`NEGLIGENT
`TRAINING
`
`OF ACTION:
`CAUSE
`AND SUPERVISION
`
`42.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`incorporates
`
`all
`
`consistent
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`under
`
`this
`
`count.
`
`43.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Houseman
`
`was
`
`employed
`
`by Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and was
`
`under
`
`each
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`direct
`
`supervision,
`
`employ,
`
`and
`
`control
`
`when
`
`he committed
`
`the wrongful
`
`acts
`
`alleged
`
`herein.
`
`Houseman
`
`engaged
`
`in the wrongful
`
`conduct
`
`while
`
`acting
`
`in
`
`the
`
`course
`
`and
`
`scope
`
`of
`
`his
`
`employment
`
`with
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and/or
`
`accomplished
`
`the
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`by
`
`virtue
`
`of his
`
`job-created
`
`authority.
`
`44.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`a
`
`duty,
`
`arising
`
`from
`
`its
`
`employment
`
`of
`
`Houseman,
`
`to ensure
`
`that
`
`Houseman
`
`did
`
`not
`
`sexually
`
`abuse
`
`children.
`
`45.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`to train
`
`and
`
`educate
`
`employees
`
`Further,
`
`a duty
`
`and
`
`administrators
`
`and
`
`establish
`
`adequate
`
`and
`
`effective
`
`policies
`
`and
`
`procedures
`
`calculated
`
`to
`
`detect,
`
`prevent,
`
`and
`
`address
`
`inappropriate
`
`behavior
`
`and
`
`conduct
`
`between
`
`its
`
`employees
`
`and
`
`children.
`
`46.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`was
`
`negligent
`
`in
`
`the
`
`training,
`
`supervision,
`
`and
`
`instruction
`
`of
`
`its
`
`employees.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`failed
`
`to timely
`
`and
`
`properly
`
`educate,
`
`8
`
`10 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`train,
`
`supervise,
`
`and/or
`
`monitor
`
`its agents
`
`or employees
`
`with
`
`regard
`
`to policies
`
`and
`
`procedures
`
`that
`
`should
`
`be followed
`
`when
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`of
`
`a child
`
`is suspected
`
`or observed.
`
`47.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`was
`
`additionally
`
`negligent
`
`in
`
`failing
`
`to
`
`supervise,
`
`monitor,
`
`chaperone,
`
`and/or
`
`investigate
`
`Houseman
`
`and/or
`
`in
`
`failing
`
`to
`
`create,
`
`institute,
`
`and/or
`
`enforce
`
`regulations
`
`to
`
`prevent
`
`Houseman's
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`of
`
`rules,
`
`policies,
`
`procedures,
`
`and/or
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`48.
`
`Defeñdañt
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`further
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`establish
`
`policies,
`
`procedures,
`
`training,
`
`manuals
`
`and
`
`other
`
`instructive
`
`materials
`
`and
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`publish
`
`such
`
`materials
`
`to
`
`all
`
`employees
`
`and
`
`administrators.
`
`49.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`sustained
`
`physical,
`
`emotional,
`
`and
`
`psychological
`
`injuries,
`
`along
`
`with
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH
`NEGLIGENT
`
`CAUSE
`RETENTION
`
`OF ACTION:
`
`forth
`
`50.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`incorporates
`
`all
`
`consistent
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`under
`
`this
`
`count.
`
`51.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`became
`
`aware
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`become
`
`aware
`
`of
`
`Houseman's
`
`propensity
`
`for
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`failed
`
`to take
`
`any
`
`further
`
`action
`
`to remedy
`
`the
`
`problem
`
`and
`
`failed
`
`to investigate
`
`or
`
`remove
`
`Houseman
`
`from
`
`working
`
`with
`
`children.
`
`and/or
`
`retained
`
`Houseman
`
`52.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`negligently
`
`recklessly
`
`with
`
`knowledge
`
`of Houseman's
`
`propensity
`
`for
`
`the
`
`type
`
`of
`
`behavior
`
`which
`
`resulted
`
`in Plaintiff's
`
`injuries
`
`in this
`
`action.
`
`53.
`
`Defendants
`
`negligently
`
`and/or
`
`recklessly
`
`retained
`
`Houseman
`
`in
`
`a position
`
`where
`
`he had
`
`access
`
`to
`
`children
`
`and
`
`could
`
`foreseeably
`
`cause
`
`harm
`
`which
`
`Plaintiff
`
`would
`
`not
`
`have
`
`been
`
`subjected
`
`to had Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`acted
`
`reasonably.
`
`9
`
`11 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`54.
`
`In failing
`
`to timely
`
`remove
`
`Houseman
`
`from
`
`working
`
`with
`
`children
`
`or
`
`terminate
`
`the
`
`employment
`
`of Houseman,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`negligently
`
`and/or
`
`recklessly
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`exercise
`
`the
`
`degree
`
`of
`
`care
`
`that
`
`a reasonably
`
`prudent
`
`parent
`
`would
`
`have
`
`exercised
`
`under
`
`similar
`
`circumstances,
`
`and
`
`created
`
`an increased
`
`risk
`
`of
`
`future
`
`harm.
`
`55.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`sustained
`
`and
`
`psychological
`
`injuries,
`
`along
`
`with
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH
`BREACH
`OF STATUTORY
`
`CAUSE
`DUTY
`
`OF ACTION:
`TO REPORT
`
`physical,
`
`emotional,
`
`56.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`incorporates
`
`all
`
`consistent
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this Complaint
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`under
`
`this
`
`count.
`
`57.
`
`Defendants
`
`became
`
`aware
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`become
`
`aware
`
`of
`
`suspected
`
`incidents
`
`child
`
`abuse
`
`and/or
`
`maltreatment
`
`by Houseman,
`
`and
`
`failed
`
`to take
`
`any
`
`action
`
`to report,
`
`remedy
`
`of
`
`or
`
`child
`
`and/or
`
`Houseman
`
`otherwise
`
`investigate
`
`the
`
`abuse
`
`maltreatment
`
`and
`
`remove
`
`from
`
`working
`
`near
`
`or with
`
`access
`
`to children.
`
`58.
`
`Pursuant
`
`to New
`
`York
`
`Social
`
`Services
`
`Law
`
`§ 413,
`
`Defendants
`
`had
`
`a mandatory
`
`duty
`
`to report
`
`suspected
`
`abuse
`
`or maltreatment
`
`of Plaintiff.
`
`59.
`
`Defendants
`
`and/or
`
`its
`
`agents
`
`violated
`
`this
`
`statutory
`
`duty
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to report
`
`known
`
`and/or
`
`suspected
`
`abuse
`
`of
`
`children,
`
`including
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`by Ciccarelli
`
`to law
`
`enforcemeñt.
`
`was
`
`prevented
`
`from
`
`the
`
`60.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`receiving
`
`benefit
`
`of
`
`a thorough
`
`investigation
`
`and
`
`prompt
`
`medical
`
`attention,
`
`and
`
`has
`
`sustained,
`
`and
`
`will
`
`continue
`
`to sustain
`
`physical,
`
`emotional
`
`and
`
`psychological
`
`injuries,
`
`along
`
`with
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering.
`
`61.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`damages
`
`are the
`
`direct
`
`result
`
`of Defendants
`
`failure
`
`to report
`
`and
`
`are
`
`fully
`
`recoverable
`
`pursuant
`
`to New York
`
`Social
`
`Services
`
`Law § 420.
`
`P_RAYER
`
`FOR RELIEF
`
`10
`
`12 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`WHEREFORE,
`
`based
`
`on
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`causes
`
`of
`
`action,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`prays
`
`for
`
`judgment
`
`against
`
`Defendant(s)
`
`in
`
`an
`
`amount
`
`that
`
`will
`
`fully
`
`and
`
`fairly
`
`compensate
`
`Plaintiff
`
`for
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`injuries
`
`and
`
`damages,
`
`and
`
`for
`
`any
`
`other
`
`relief
`
`the Court
`
`deems
`
`appropriate.
`
`The
`
`amount
`
`of damages
`
`sought
`
`in
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`exceeds
`
`the
`
`jurisdictional
`
`limits
`
`of
`
`all
`
`lower
`
`courts
`
`which
`
`would
`
`otherwise
`
`have
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`DATED:
`
`June
`
`2, 2020
`
`Leah
`STEVE
`40 North
`
`Costanzh,
`BOYD,
`Forest
`
`Ésq
`PC
`Road
`NY 14221
`400-0000
`
`Williamsville,
`Telephone:
`(716)
`Icostanzo@steveboyd.com
`
`& ASSOCIATES,
`Floor
`
`R. Anderson
`Jeffrey
`Reck
`J. Michael
`ANDERSON
`JEFF
`7th
`52 Duane
`Street,
`NY 10007
`New York,
`759-2551
`Telephone:
`(646)
`jeff@andersonadvocates.com
`mreck@andersonadvocates.com
`Counsel
`for
`
`Plaintiff
`
`P.A.
`
`11
`
`13 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`NYSCBF DOC. 20.
`
`7
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`809838/2019
`
`INDBK N0,
`
`RECBIVBD
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`08/13/2019
`
`the SupremeCourt
`Tenn
`At a Special
`of
`the
`in and for
`lisid
`York
`State ofNew
`50
`the Erie County
`of Erie at
`Courthouse,
`County
`NY 14202, on
`Delaware
`Buffalo,
`Part33,
`Avenue,
`the 95
`2019.
`day of August,
`
`of
`
`the
`
`PRESENT:
`
`Hon, Deborah
`Supreme
`Court
`
`A. Chimes,
`Justice
`
`J, S.C.
`
`AB 1 Doe
`
`ORDER
`
`Petitioner,
`
`Index No.:
`
`809838/2019
`
`vs.
`
`John Dae(s)
`
`1 - 5
`
`Respondent.
`
`Petitioner
`
`AB 1 Doe having moved
`
`ex parte for an Order
`
`granting
`
`Petitio::er
`
`the right
`
`tó
`
`file a claim in the Eighth
`
`Judicial
`
`District
`
`under
`
`the Child Victims
`
`Act using
`
`the pse-de:r;m
`
`AB
`
`1 Doe, directing
`
`the parties
`
`knfi-g
`
`such claim not
`
`to disclose
`
`Petitioner's
`
`identity
`
`to the
`
`general
`
`public,
`
`all other Plaintiffs
`
`claims
`
`under
`
`the Child
`
`Victims
`
`Act.the
`
`and granting
`
`filing
`
`same Telief With Tespe.Ct
`
`to proceeding
`
`nader
`
`a pseudCnym,
`
`sad
`
`Petitioner
`
`AB 1 Doe, by Petitioner's
`
`attorney,
`
`Stephen
`
`Boyd,
`
`Esq., of counsel
`
`to Steve
`
`Boyd, PC, havingmoved
`
`for an Order
`
`grandag
`
`Petitioner
`
`the right
`
`to file a clahn
`
`in the Eighth
`
`Judicial
`
`District
`
`under
`
`the Child
`
`Victims
`
`Act using the pseudonym
`
`AB 1 Doe,
`
`directiñg
`
`the.
`
`parties.'=d":g
`
`such claim not
`
`to disclose
`
`Petitioner's
`
`identity
`
`to the general
`
`public,
`
`and
`
`granting
`
`all other Plaintiffa
`
`filing
`
`claims
`
`under
`
`the Child
`
`Victims
`
`Act
`
`the same relief with
`
`respect
`
`to proceeding
`
`unders
`
`pseudonym,
`
`and
`
`1 of
`
`3
`
`14 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`NYSCEF DOC. 50.
`
`7
`
`..
`
`INDBE N0.
`
`809838/2019
`
`'
`
`RECE1TED NYSCEF:
`
`08/13/2019
`
`UPON=dingtheNoticeofExParteParitionandthePetitlanafStephenBoyd,Esq.,
`
`swomtotheedayofAugust,2019,insapportofPetitiometsrequest,and
`
`UPON=adingthe
`
`andeus
`
`carlseafit--a-afaefnmayChridnpberJ.O'Brien,Esq.,of
`
`counselto
`
`O'BrianandFord,PC,sworntothe8*dayofAugust,2019,andtheaccompanying
`
`affidavitafpsychothesspistDavide.TTafHar
`
`PhD,IAdHC,sworntothe8
`
`dayaEAugust,
`
`2019,inaupportofPetitions'srequest,and
`
`s
`
`UPON1weringaralaqpunentbySteveBoyd,PC,SteveBoyd,Esq.,ofcounsel,fn
`
`supportafPetitione#srequest,and
`
`UPONdnedeliberationthereon,itishereby,
`
`ORDERED:
`
`ThatPetifianerisparmittedtonseofthepseudonym°AB1Doe"andfbecaption"ABI
`
`Doevs.
`
`JohnDoe(s)1-5"inaalaimtobah---g:tnndartbenhildVictimsAct;anditisfinther
`
`.
`
`ORDERED:
`
`ThatPetitionerisyrmitfadfofileanaction-imdertheChildVictimsActualngthe
`
`pseudonymªAB1Doe''anditisferfber
`
`ORDERED:
`
`.
`
`ThatthepartiestosucholaimixonghtundertheChildYactimsActaretorefrainfrom
`
`discloslagPetitionetstrueidentitr1nthesenml
`
`ynhanddfrectaUindivirInd=arentitiesto
`
`whomdiackmoreisnecessary
`
`dmingthecourseaffbelitigatinathattheyarebarredunderthis
`
`OrderfromdisclosingPetinonetstreeidentitytothegemealpublic;anditisfsther
`
`2
`
`.
`
`2 of
`
`3
`
`_
`
`.
`
`15 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 11:07 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 20-46602
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
`
`NYSCBF DOC. No.
`
`7
`
`ORDERED:
`
`INDEX NO.
`
`809838/2019
`
`RECEIVBD
`
`NYSCEF e 08/13/2019
`
`That all papers
`
`fded
`
`in the Child Victims
`
`Act action,
`
`and alijudgments,
`
`orders,
`
`decisions,
`
`notices
`
`to the Court
`
`and any other documents
`
`relating
`
`to the acdon
`
`refer
`
`to the Pedtioner
`
`as "AB
`
`1 Doe,"
`
`and it
`
`is further
`
`ORDERED:
`
`.
`
`That all other Anderson/Boyd
`
`P'egifE;fliing
`
`claims
`
`underthe
`
`Child
`
`Victims
`
`Act
`
`in the
`
`Eghth
`
`Judicial
`
`District
`
`are granted
`
`the same relief
`
`granted
`
`to Petitioner
`
`as set
`
`forth
`
`above, with
`
`each Plaintiff
`
`s pscadct.ym
`
`to consist
`
`"AB"
`
`and a numeric
`
`designation.
`
`ENTERED:
`
`GRANTED:
`
`Deborah
`
`A.
`
`J.S.C.
`
`3
`
`3 of
`
`3
`
`16 of 16
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket