throbber
FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT E
`EXHIBIT E
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`D O NOT DETACH
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`FULL
`
`TITLE OF ACTION
`
`OR PROCEEDING
`
`Supreme
`
`Court,
`
`Orleans
`
`County
`
`AB 524 Doe
`
`vs.
`
`Lyndonville
`Lyndonville
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Central
`
`Elementary
`
`School
`District;
`School
`Defendants
`
`Index Number
`
`ORLERNS
`2021
`
`CO CLERK
`11989:31
`JUN
`
`N'
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`Index
`
`No.
`
`c9\
`
`SU1WMONS
`
`STATE
`SUPREME
`
`OF NEW ŽORK
`COUNTY
`COURT:
`
`OF ORLEANS
`
`AB 524 DOE,
`
`v.
`
`LYNDONVILLE
`
`DISTRICT;
`SCHOOL,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`CENTRAL
`LYNDONVILLE
`
`SCHOOL
`ELEMENTARY
`
`Defendants.
`
`TO THE
`
`ABOVE-NAMEI)
`
`DEFENDANTS:
`
`P
`
`PLEASE
`
`TAKE
`
`NOTICE
`
`THAT
`
`YOU ARE HEREBY
`
`SUMMONED
`
`to answer
`
`the
`
`.
`
`Complaint,
`
`a copy
`
`of which
`
`is hereby
`
`served
`
`upon
`
`you,
`
`and to serve
`
`a copy
`
`of your
`
`Answer
`
`to the
`
`Complaint
`
`upon
`
`the
`
`undersigned
`
`attorneys
`
`listed
`
`below
`
`within
`
`twenty
`
`(20)
`
`days
`
`aher
`
`the
`
`service
`
`the
`
`the
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Summons,
`
`exclusive
`
`of
`
`day
`
`of
`
`service
`
`(or withirt
`
`thirty
`
`(30)
`
`days
`
`after
`
`service
`
`is
`
`complete
`
`if
`
`this
`
`Summons
`
`is not
`
`personally
`
`delivered
`
`to you within
`
`the State
`
`of New York);
`
`and
`
`in the case
`
`of your
`
`failure
`
`to appear
`
`or answer,
`
`judgment
`
`by default
`
`will
`
`be taken
`
`against
`
`you
`
`for
`
`the relief
`
`demanded
`
`herein.
`
`Venue
`
`is proper
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR §504
`
`inthat
`
`endants
`
`are situated.in
`
`Orleans
`
`County.
`
`Dated-
`
`June
`
`9, 2021
`
`Leah
`STEVE
`40 North
`
`Costanzo,
`BOYD,
`Forest
`
`Esq.
`PC
`Road
`NY 14221
`Williamsville,
`400-0000
`Telephone:
`(716)
`Icostanzo@steveboyd.com
`
`CLERNS
`2021
`
`CD C
`JUN
`11
`
`33 2
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`P.A.
`
`R. Anderson
`Jeffrey
`J. Michael
`Reck
`& ASSOCIATES,
`JEFF ANDERSON
`52 Duane
`7th Floor
`Street,
`New York, NY 10007
`Telephone:
`759-2551
`(646)
`jeff@andersonadvocates.com
`mreck@andersonadvocates.com
`
`Counsel
`
`for
`
`Plaintiff
`
`2
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`STATE
`SUPREME
`
`OF lsEW YORK
`COUNTY
`COURT:
`
`OF ORLEANS
`
`AB 524 DOE,
`
`v.
`
`LYNDONVILLE
`
`DISTRICT;
`SCHOOL,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`CENTRAL
`LYNDONVILLE
`
`SCHOOL
`ELEMENTARY
`
`Defendants.
`
`No. S b ©3
`
`Index
`
`P
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`DEMAND
`
`FOR JURY
`
`TRIAI/
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`by and through
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`attomeys,
`
`states
`
`and alleges
`
`as follows:
`
`PSEUDONVM
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is authorized
`
`to file
`
`the
`
`instant
`
`action
`
`under
`
`a pseudonym
`
`and
`
`defendants
`
`are barred
`
`from
`
`disclosing
`
`Petitioner's
`
`true
`
`identity
`
`to the
`
`general
`
`public
`
`pursuant
`
`to an Amended.
`
`Order
`
`of
`
`theHonorable'Deborah
`
`A. Chimes.
`
`J.S.C.
`
`dated
`
`August
`
`13,2018
`
`whichis
`
`attached
`
`hereto.
`
`PARTIES
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material
`
`Plaintiff
`
`resided
`
`in the State
`
`York.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`At
`
`to this Complaint,
`
`ofNew
`
`Whenever
`
`reference
`
`is made
`
`to any Defendant
`
`entity,
`
`such
`
`reference
`
`includes
`
`that
`
`entity,
`
`affiliates,
`
`predecessors,
`
`and successors.
`
`In addition,
`
`whenever
`
`reference
`
`is made
`
`to any
`
`act,
`
`deed,
`
`or
`
`transaction
`
`of any
`
`entity,
`
`the
`
`allegation
`
`means
`
`that
`
`the entity
`
`engaged
`
`in the
`
`act, deed,
`
`or
`
`transaction
`
`by or
`
`through
`
`its
`
`officers,
`
`directors,
`
`agents,
`
`employees,
`
`or
`
`representatives
`
`while
`
`they
`
`were
`
`actively
`
`engaged
`
`in the management,
`
`direction,
`
`control,
`
`or
`
`transaction
`
`of
`
`the entity's
`
`business
`
`or affairs.
`
`I Pursuant
`
`to §4 of
`
`the New York Child Victims
`
`Act, Plaintiff
`
`is entitled
`
`to a trial preference.
`
`BRLE ANS CO CL ER'C M
`11 AM9:32
`JUN
`2021
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`4.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times material,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Central
`
`School
`
`District
`
`("Lyndonville
`
`C.SD.")
`
`was
`
`and
`
`continues
`
`to be a public-school
`
`district
`
`located
`
`in the County
`
`of Orleans
`
`and
`
`State
`
`of New York.
`
`5.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times material,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Elementary
`
`School
`
`was
`
`and continues
`
`to
`
`be
`
`a public
`
`school
`
`owned,
`
`controlled,
`
`supervised,
`
`operated
`
`and managed
`
`by
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`6.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Terry
`
`.E. Houseman
`
`was
`
`an
`
`employee
`
`of
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`7.
`
`This
`
`Court
`
`has jurisdiction
`
`pursuant
`
`to C.P.L.R.
`
`§ 301
`
`as Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`is a quasi-municipal
`
`corporation
`
`created
`
`and
`
`organized
`
`by
`
`state
`
`legislatures
`
`and
`
`charged
`
`the
`
`public
`
`schools
`
`in
`
`the
`
`State
`
`with
`
`administration
`
`of
`
`of New
`
`York,
`
`including
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Elementary
`
`School,
`
`and because
`
`the unlawful
`
`conduct
`
`complained
`
`of herein
`
`oceurred
`
`in New York.
`
`8.
`
`Venue
`
`is proper
`
`pursuatit
`
`to C.P1.R.
`
`§504
`
`in that Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`is
`
`situated
`
`in Orleans
`
`County.
`
`9.
`
`This
`
`complaint
`
`is brought
`
`under
`
`the Child
`
`Victims
`
`Act
`
`and,
`
`as such,
`
`the
`
`filing
`
`of a
`
`Notice
`
`of Claim
`
`is not
`
`required.
`
`FACTS
`
`10.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Houseman
`
`was
`
`employed
`
`by Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and remained
`
`under
`
`the direct
`
`supervision,
`
`employ,
`
`and
`
`control
`
`of Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`11.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`placed
`
`Houseman
`
`in positions
`
`where
`
`he had
`
`access
`
`to and worked
`
`with
`
`children
`
`as an integral
`
`partof
`
`his work.
`
`Specifically,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`2
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`C.S.D.
`
`placed
`
`and retained
`
`Houseman
`
`atlyndonville
`
`Elementary
`
`School
`
`as an elementary
`
`school
`
`teacher.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`a student
`
`at Lyndonville
`
`Elementary
`
`School.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`as a minor
`
`and vulnerable
`
`child,
`
`was
`
`dependent
`
`on Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`andHouseman.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and Houseman
`
`had
`
`custody
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`were
`
`entrusted
`
`with
`
`the safety
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`and,
`
`therefore,
`
`had responsibility
`
`for
`
`and
`
`authority
`
`over
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`14.
`
`1982
`
`From approximately
`
`to 1983, when
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`approximately
`
`10 to 11 years
`
`old, Houseman
`
`engaged
`
`in unpermitted
`
`sexual
`
`contact
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`15.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that Houseman
`
`was
`
`a
`
`danger
`
`to children
`
`before
`
`Houseman
`
`sexually
`
`assaulted
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`16.
`
`Prior
`
`to
`
`the
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`of Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S,D.
`
`learned
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`learned
`
`that
`
`Houseman
`
`was
`
`not
`
`fit
`
`to work
`
`with
`
`children.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.,
`
`by
`
`and
`
`through
`
`their
`
`agents,
`
`servants
`
`and/or
`
`employees,
`
`became
`
`aware,
`
`or should
`
`have
`
`become
`
`aware
`
`of Housenian's
`
`propensity
`
`to commit
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`of
`
`the
`
`risk
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`s
`
`safety.
`
`At
`
`the very
`
`least,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`knew
`
`or should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`they
`
`did
`
`not havesufficient
`
`information
`
`about
`
`whether
`
`or not
`
`its employees,
`
`more
`
`specifically,
`
`Houseman,
`
`were
`
`fit
`
`to work
`
`with
`
`children.
`
`have
`
`known
`
`was
`
`17.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`knew
`
`or should
`
`that
`
`there
`
`a risk
`
`of
`
`the
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`of
`
`children
`
`attending
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Elementary
`
`School.
`
`At
`
`the
`
`very
`
`least,
`
`.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`snould
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`they
`
`did
`
`not
`
`have
`
`sufficient
`
`information
`
`about
`
`whether
`
`or
`
`not
`
`there
`
`was
`
`a risk
`
`of
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`abuse
`
`for
`
`children
`
`attending
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Elemelitary
`
`School.
`
`3
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`18.
`
`Instead,
`
`Defendants
`
`negligently
`
`deemed
`
`that
`
`Houseman
`
`was
`
`fit
`
`to work
`
`with
`
`children
`
`and/or
`
`that
`
`any
`
`previous
`
`misconduct
`
`was
`
`fixed
`
`or cured
`
`and/or
`
`that Houseman
`
`would
`
`not
`
`sexually
`
`assault
`
`children
`
`and/or
`
`that ‰ouseman
`
`would
`
`not
`
`injure
`
`children.
`
`19.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`of
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`because
`
`they
`
`had superior
`
`knowledge
`
`about
`
`the risk
`
`that Houseman
`
`posed
`
`to Plaintiff,
`
`the risk
`
`of abuse
`
`in
`
`and/or
`
`that
`
`its facilities
`
`posed
`
`to minor
`
`general
`
`in its schools
`
`the risks
`
`children.
`
`20.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`owed
`
`a duty
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`to protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`.
`
`harm
`
`because
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`actions
`
`created
`
`a foreseeable
`
`risk
`
`of
`
`harm
`
`to
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`As
`
`a vulnerable
`
`child
`
`attending
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Elementary
`
`School,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`a
`
`foreseeable
`
`victim.
`
`As
`
`a vulnerable
`
`child
`
`who
`
`Houseman
`
`had
`
`access
`
`to through
`
`his
`
`employment
`
`with
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`a foreseeable
`
`victim.
`
`21.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`its
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`C.S.D.
`
`also
`
`breached
`
`duty
`
`by
`
`actively
`
`maintaining
`
`and
`
`etnploying
`
`Houseman
`
`in
`
`a position
`
`of
`
`power
`
`and
`
`authority
`
`through
`
`which
`
`Houseman
`
`had
`
`access
`
`to
`
`children,
`
`including
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`and
`
`power
`
`and
`
`control
`
`over
`
`children,
`
`.
`
`including
`
`PlaintifE
`
`22.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`breached
`
`its
`
`duties
`
`to
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`failed
`
`to use ordinary
`
`care
`
`in determining
`
`whetherits
`
`facilities
`
`were
`
`safe and/or
`
`whether
`
`it had
`
`sufficient
`
`information
`
`to
`
`facilities
`
`as
`
`safe.
`
`Defendant
`
`deterrnining
`
`represent
`
`its
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`breach
`
`of
`
`its duties
`
`include,
`
`but
`
`are not
`
`limited
`
`to:
`
`failure
`
`to protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`a known
`
`danger,
`
`or
`
`reasonably
`
`foreseeable
`
`failure
`
`to have
`
`sufficient
`
`policies
`
`and procedures
`
`to prevent
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to properly
`
`implement
`
`policies
`
`and procedures
`
`to prevent
`
`child
`
`sex abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to take
`
`reasonable
`
`measures
`
`to make
`
`sure that
`
`policies
`
`and procedures
`
`to prevent
`
`child
`
`sex abuse
`
`were
`
`working,
`
`failure
`
`to adequately
`
`inform
`
`families
`
`and
`
`children
`
`of
`
`the
`
`risks
`
`of
`
`4
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`..
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`child
`
`sex abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to investigate
`
`risks
`
`of
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to have
`
`any
`
`outside
`
`agency
`
`test
`
`its
`
`safety
`
`procedures,
`
`failure
`
`to protect
`
`the
`
`children
`
`attending
`
`its
`
`programs
`
`from
`
`child
`
`sex
`
`abuse,
`
`failure
`
`to adhere
`
`to the applicable
`
`standard
`
`of care
`
`for
`
`child
`
`safety,
`
`failure
`
`fo investigate
`
`the
`
`amount
`
`and type
`
`of
`
`information
`
`necessary
`
`to represent
`
`the school
`
`and its employees
`
`as safe,
`
`failure.
`
`signs
`
`of
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`fellow
`
`and
`
`to train
`
`its employees
`
`properly
`
`to identify
`
`by
`
`employees,
`
`failure
`
`to engage
`
`or
`
`timely
`
`engage
`
`certified
`
`mental
`
`health
`
`professionals.
`
`23.
`
`Defendantlyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`also
`
`breached
`
`its duty
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`by failing
`
`to warn
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and Plaintiff's
`
`family
`
`of
`
`the
`
`risk
`
`that Houseman
`
`posed.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`further
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`warn
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`family
`
`of
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`knowledge
`
`of
`
`the occurrence
`
`of
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`abuse.
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`agents
`
`violated
`
`legal
`
`24.
`
`Defendant
`
`and/or
`
`its other
`
`their
`
`duty
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to report
`
`known
`
`and/or
`
`suspected
`
`abuse
`
`of
`
`children
`
`by Houseman
`
`to law enforcement.
`
`25.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`result
`
`of
`
`Defendants'
`
`negligence,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has
`
`suffered,
`
`and
`
`will
`
`continue
`
`to suffer,
`
`great
`
`pain
`
`of mind
`
`and body,
`
`severe
`
`and permanent
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`physical
`
`manifestations
`
`of
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`embarrassment,
`
`loss
`
`,of
`
`self-esteem,
`
`humiliation
`
`and/or
`
`personal
`
`and
`
`psychological
`
`injuries.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`prevented,
`
`and will
`
`continue
`
`to be
`
`physical,
`
`prevented,
`
`from performing
`
`normal
`
`daily
`
`activities
`
`and obtaining
`
`the full
`
`enjoyment
`
`oflife;
`
`and/or
`
`has
`
`incurred
`
`and
`
`will
`
`ebntinue
`
`to
`
`incur
`
`expenses
`
`for
`
`psychological
`
`treatment,
`
`therapy,
`
`and
`
`counseling,
`
`and,
`
`on
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief
`
`has
`
`and/or
`
`will
`
`incur
`
`loss
`
`of
`
`income
`
`and/or
`
`loss
`
`of
`
`earning
`
`capacity.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST
`CAUSE
`NEGLIGENCE
`
`OF ACTION:
`
`26.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`incorporates
`
`all consistent
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this Complaint
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`under
`
`this
`
`count.
`
`5
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`27.
`
`DefendaDt
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`of
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`to protect
`
`the Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`injury.
`
`28.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`of
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`because
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`a special
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff
`
`29.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`also
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`arising
`
`from
`
`its
`
`special
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`pa ents,
`
`and other
`
`parents
`
`of young,
`
`vulnerable
`
`children,
`
`to properly
`
`train
`
`and
`
`supervise
`
`its
`
`employees.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`to establish
`
`measures
`
`of
`
`protection
`
`not
`
`necessary
`
`for
`
`persons
`
`who
`
`are older
`
`or better
`
`able
`
`to safeguard
`
`themselves.
`
`30.
`
`By
`
`representing
`
`Houseman
`
`as safe
`
`to work
`
`with
`
`children,
`
`and
`
`by undertaking
`
`the
`
`custody
`
`and
`
`supervision
`
`of
`
`the minor
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`a special
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`the minor
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`of Plaintiff
`
`being
`
`a minor,
`
`and
`
`by Defendant
`
`care
`
`guidance
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`undertaking
`
`of
`
`the
`
`and
`
`of
`
`then
`
`vulnerable
`
`minor
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`held
`
`a position
`
`of empowerment
`
`over
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`31.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`an in loco
`
`arentis
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`to protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from
`
`injury.
`
`32.
`
`By
`
`establishing,
`
`operating
`
`and/or
`
`administrating
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Èlementary
`
`School,
`
`accepting
`
`the minor
`
`Plaintiff
`
`as a participant
`
`in its programs,
`
`holding
`
`its
`
`facilities
`
`and
`
`programs
`
`of
`
`the minor
`
`Plaintiff
`
`in·loco
`
`out
`
`to be a safe environinent
`
`for.Plaintiff,
`
`accepting
`
`custody
`
`parentis,
`
`and by
`
`virtue
`
`of
`
`its
`
`special
`
`relationship
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`entered
`
`into
`
`an
`
`express
`
`and/or
`
`implied
`
`duty
`
`to
`
`properly
`
`supervise
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`provide
`
`a reasonably
`
`safe
`
`environment
`
`for
`
`children
`
`attending
`
`its
`
`schools.
`
`33.
`
`By establishing
`
`and operating
`
`Lyndonville
`
`Blementary
`
`School
`
`and by accepting
`
`the
`
`enrolhnent
`
`and
`
`participation
`
`of
`
`the minor
`
`Plaintiff
`
`in
`
`its
`
`educational
`
`programs,
`
`Defendant
`
`6
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`to properly
`
`supervise
`
`Plaintiff
`
`to prevent
`
`harm
`
`from
`
`generally
`
`foreseeable
`
`dangers.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`the
`
`duty
`
`to exercise
`
`the
`
`same
`
`degree
`
`of
`
`care
`
`over minor
`
`students
`
`under
`
`its
`
`control
`
`as a reasonably
`
`prudent
`
`parent
`
`would
`
`have
`
`exercised
`
`under
`
`similar
`
`circumstances.
`
`34.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`owed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`a duty
`
`to protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from harm
`
`C.S.D.
`
`aware
`
`presence
`
`because
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`was
`
`of Plaintiff's
`
`on its property
`
`and aware
`
`that Houseman
`
`posed
`
`a danger
`
`on Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`property.
`
`35.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`breached
`
`its
`
`duties
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to
`
`use
`
`reasonable
`
`care. Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`failures
`
`include,
`
`but
`
`are not
`
`limited
`
`to,
`
`failing
`
`to
`
`properly
`
`supervise
`
`Houseman,
`
`failing
`
`to properly
`
`supervise
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and
`
`failing
`
`to protect
`
`Plaintiff
`
`from a known
`
`danger.
`
`result
`
`of
`
`Plaintiff
`
`sustained
`
`36.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`physical,
`
`emotional,
`
`and
`
`psychological
`
`injuries,
`
`along
`
`with
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND
`NEGLIGENT
`
`CAUSE
`HIRING
`
`OF ACTION:
`
`37.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`incorporates
`
`all
`
`consistent
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this Complaint
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`under
`
`this
`
`count.
`
`38.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Houseman
`
`was
`
`employed
`
`by Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and was
`
`under
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`direct
`
`supervision,
`
`employ
`
`and
`
`control
`
`when
`
`he/she
`
`committed
`
`the wrongful
`
`acts
`
`alleged
`
`herein.
`
`Houseman
`
`engaged
`
`in the illegal
`
`conduct
`
`while
`
`acting
`
`in
`
`the
`
`course
`
`and
`
`scope
`
`of
`
`his
`
`employment
`
`with
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and/or
`
`accomplished
`
`the sexual
`
`abuse
`
`by
`
`virtue
`
`of his/her
`
`job-created
`
`authority.
`
`3.9.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`negligently
`
`hired
`
`and/or
`
`negligently
`
`placed
`
`Houseman
`
`in a position
`
`to cause
`
`foreseeable
`
`harm which
`
`Plaintiff
`
`would
`
`not
`
`have
`
`been
`
`subject
`
`to
`
`7
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`had
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`taken
`
`reasonable
`
`care
`
`in
`
`its
`
`pre-hiring
`
`investigation
`
`of
`
`Houseman.
`
`40.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`of
`
`Houseman's
`
`propensity
`
`for
`
`the type
`
`of behavior
`
`which
`
`resulted
`
`in Plaintiff's
`
`injuries.
`
`41.
`
`As
`
`a
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`sustained
`
`physical,
`
`emotional
`
`and
`
`with
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering.
`
`psychological
`
`injuries,
`
`along
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD
`NEGLIGENT
`TRAINING
`
`OF ACTION:
`CAUSE
`AND SUPERVISION
`
`42.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`incorporates
`
`all
`
`consistent
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this Complaint
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`under
`
`this
`
`count.
`
`43.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`material,
`
`Houseman
`
`was
`
`employed
`
`by Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and was under
`
`each Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.'s
`
`direct
`
`supervision,
`
`employ,
`
`and control
`
`when
`
`he committed
`
`the wrongful
`
`acts
`
`alleged
`
`herein.
`
`Houseman
`
`engaged
`
`in the wrongful
`
`conduct
`
`while
`
`acting
`
`in
`
`the
`
`course
`
`and
`
`scope
`
`of
`
`his
`
`employment
`
`with
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`and/or
`
`accomplished
`
`the
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`by
`
`virtue
`
`of his job-created
`
`authority.
`
`44.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`a
`
`duty,
`
`arising
`
`from
`
`its
`
`employment
`
`of
`
`Houseman,
`
`to ensure
`
`that Houseman
`
`did
`
`not
`
`sexually
`
`abuse
`
`children.
`
`45.
`
`Further
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`to train
`
`and
`
`educate
`
`employees
`
`and
`
`administrators
`
`and
`
`establish
`
`adequate
`
`and
`
`effective
`
`policies
`
`and
`
`procedures
`
`calculated
`
`to
`
`detect,
`
`prevent,
`
`and
`
`address
`
`inappropriate
`
`behavior
`
`and
`
`conduct
`
`between
`
`its
`
`employees
`
`and
`
`children.
`
`46.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`was
`
`negligent
`
`in
`
`the
`
`training,
`
`supervision,
`
`and
`
`instruction
`
`of
`
`its employees.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`failed
`
`to timely
`
`and properly
`
`educate,
`
`8
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`train,
`
`supervise,
`
`and/or
`
`monitor
`
`its agents
`
`or employees
`
`with
`
`regard
`
`to policies
`
`and procedures
`
`that
`
`should
`
`be followed
`
`when
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`of a child
`
`is suspected
`
`or observed.
`
`47.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`was
`
`additionally
`
`negligent
`
`in failing
`
`to supervise,
`
`monitor,
`
`chaperone,
`
`and/or
`
`investigate
`
`Houseman
`
`and/or
`
`in
`
`failing
`
`to
`
`create,
`
`institute,
`
`and/or
`
`enforce
`
`procedures,
`
`and/or
`
`regulations
`
`to prevent
`
`Houseman's
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`of
`
`rules,
`
`policies,
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`48.
`
`Defendalit
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`further
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`establish
`
`policies,
`
`procedúres,
`
`training,
`
`manuals
`
`and
`
`other
`
`instructive
`
`materials
`
`and
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`publish
`
`such
`
`materials
`
`to
`
`all
`
`employees
`
`and administrators.
`
`49.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`sustained
`
`physical,
`
`emotional,
`
`and
`
`psychological
`
`injuries,
`
`along
`
`with
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH
`NEGLIGENT
`
`CAUSE
`RETENTION
`
`OR ACTION:
`
`50.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`incorporates
`
`all
`
`consistent
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this Complaint
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`under
`
`this
`
`count.
`
`51.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`became
`
`aware
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`become
`
`aware
`
`of
`
`Houseman's
`
`propensity
`
`for
`
`child
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`failed
`
`to take
`
`any
`
`further
`
`action
`
`to remedy
`
`the
`
`problem
`
`and failed
`
`to investigate
`
`or
`
`remove
`
`Houseman
`
`from working
`
`with
`
`children.
`
`aud/or
`
`retained
`
`52.
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`negligently
`
`recklessly
`
`Houseman
`
`with
`
`knowledge
`
`of Houseman's
`
`propensity
`
`for
`
`the
`
`type
`
`of behavior
`
`which
`
`resulted
`
`in Plaintiffs
`
`injuries
`
`in this
`
`action.
`
`53.
`
`Defendants
`
`negligently
`
`and/or
`
`recklessly
`
`retained
`
`Houseman
`
`in a position
`
`where
`
`he had
`
`access
`
`to children
`
`and
`
`could
`
`foreseeably
`
`cause
`
`hann
`
`which
`
`Plaintiff
`
`would
`
`not
`
`have
`
`been
`
`subjected
`
`to had Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`acted
`
`reasonably.
`
`9
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`54.
`
`In failing
`
`to timely
`
`remove
`
`Houseman
`
`from working
`
`with
`
`children
`
`or
`
`terminate
`
`the
`
`employment
`
`of Houseman,
`
`Defendant
`
`Lyndonville
`
`C.S.D.
`
`negligently
`
`and/or
`
`recklessly
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`exercise
`
`the
`
`degree
`
`of
`
`care
`
`that
`
`a reasonably
`
`prudent
`
`parent
`
`would
`
`have
`
`exercised
`
`under
`
`similar
`
`circumstances,
`
`and
`
`created
`
`an increased
`
`risk
`
`of
`
`future
`
`harm.
`
`a direct
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Plaintiff
`
`sustained
`
`and
`
`55.
`
`As
`
`foregoing,
`
`physical,
`
`emotional,
`
`psychological
`
`injuries,
`
`along
`
`with
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH
`BREACH
`OF STATUTORY
`
`OF ACTION:
`CAUSE
`DUTY TO REPORT
`
`56.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`incorporates
`
`all
`
`consistent
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this Complaint
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`under
`
`this
`
`count.
`
`57.
`
`Defendants
`
`became
`
`aware
`
`or should
`
`have
`
`become
`
`aware
`
`of
`
`suspected
`
`incidents
`
`child
`
`abuse
`
`and/or
`
`maltreatment
`
`and
`
`failed
`
`to take
`
`action
`
`to report,
`
`remedy
`
`of
`
`or
`
`by Houseman,
`
`any
`
`otherwise
`
`investigate
`
`the
`
`child
`
`abuse
`
`and/or
`
`maltreatment
`
`and
`
`remove
`
`Houseman
`
`from
`
`working
`
`near
`
`or with
`
`access
`
`to children.
`
`58.
`
`Pursuant
`
`to New York
`
`Social
`
`Services
`
`Law § 413,
`
`Defendants
`
`had
`
`a mandatory
`
`duty
`
`to report
`
`suspected
`
`abuse
`
`or maltreatment
`
`of Plaintiff.
`
`59.
`
`Defendants
`
`and/or
`
`its agents
`
`violated
`
`this
`
`statutory
`
`duty
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to report
`
`known
`
`and/or
`
`suspected
`
`abuse
`
`of children,
`
`including
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`by Ciccarelli
`
`to law enforcement
`
`60.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`prevented
`
`from
`
`receiving
`
`the
`
`benefit
`
`of
`
`a thorough
`
`.investigation
`
`and
`
`prompt
`
`medical
`
`attention,
`
`and
`
`has
`
`sustained,
`
`and will
`
`continue
`
`to sustain
`
`physical,
`
`emotional
`
`and psychological
`
`injuries,
`
`along
`
`with
`
`pain
`
`and suffering.
`
`61.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`damages
`
`are the
`
`direct
`
`result
`
`of Defendants
`
`failure
`
`to report
`
`and are fully
`
`recoverable
`
`pursuant
`
`to New York
`
`Social
`
`Services
`
`Law § 420.
`
`10
`
`

`

`FILED: ORLEANS COUNTY CLERK 11/01/2023 02:49 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11
`
`INDEX NO. E23-01101
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/01/2023
`
`PRAYER
`
`FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE,
`
`based
`
`on
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`causes
`
`of
`
`action,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`prays
`
`for
`
`judgment
`
`against
`
`Defendant(s)
`
`in
`
`an amount
`
`that will
`
`fully
`
`and
`
`fairly
`
`compensate
`
`Plaintiff
`
`for PlaintifPs
`
`igjuries
`
`and damages,
`
`and for any other
`
`relief
`
`the Court
`
`deems
`
`appropriate.
`
`The
`
`amountof
`
`damages
`
`sought
`
`in
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`exceeds
`
`the
`
`juris
`
`dictional
`
`limits
`
`of
`
`all
`
`lower
`
`courts
`
`which
`
`would
`
`otherwise
`
`have
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`DATED:
`
`June
`
`9, 2021
`
`Leah
`STEVE
`40 North
`
`Costanzo,
`BOYD,
`Forest
`
`Esq.
`PC
`Road
`NY 14221
`Williamsville,
`400-0000
`Telephone:
`(716)
`loostanzo@steveboyd.com
`
`R. Anderson
`Jeffrey
`Reck
`J. Michael
`& ASSOCIATES,
`JEFF
`ANDERSON
`52 Duane
`7th Floor
`Street,
`New York, NY 10007
`Telephone:
`759-2551
`(646)
`jeff@andersonadvocates.com
`mreck@andersonadvocates.com
`Counsel
`for
`Plainti
`f
`
`P.A.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket