FILED: OUEENS COUNTY CLERK 08m2013
`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 08/30/2013
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19
`
`WVVINDEX N0."7'00905/2013
`INDEX NO. 700905/2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RaCaIVaD VYSCEF: 08/30/2013
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2013
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF QUEENS
`___________________________________________________________X
`
`JEROME DAVIS,
`
`'
`
`Index No.: 700905/2013
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`AFFIRMAIION
`IN OPPOSITION
`
`~against—
`
`U—HAUL CO. OF ARIZONA, TIESHA SINCLAIR,
`JASON BRUCE, and KEMAR PATRICK,
`
`___..____,..______------------------------t———————————————————X
`
`7 Defendants.
`
`.
`
`-
`
`JOHN R. DANZI, an attorney duly licensed to practice law in the Courts of the State
`
`of New York, under penalty of perjury, affirms the following:
`
`1.
`
`I am an associate of the law firm of Picciano 8: Scahili, PC, attorneys for the
`
`defendants, JASON BRUCE and KEMAR PATRICK herein, and as such,I am fully familiar
`
`with the facts, circumstances and pleadings in the above action.
`
`2.
`
`I make this affirmation in opposition to the application by Defendant, U—HAUL
`
`CO. OF ARIZONA (hereinafter “UHAUL”) for an Order pursuant to CPLR 2201, granting a
`
`stay of the within iitigation pending the resolution of the dectaratory judgment action
`
`entitled, Repwest Insurance Company, formeriy known as Repubiican Western Insurance
`
`Company, U—Haul Co. of Arizona and U-l—iaul Co. of New York and Vermont, Inc. M.
`
` Rolanda Alston et ai., venued in the Supreme Court, Kings County, hearing Index No:
`
`11234/2013.
`
`'
`
`,3
`a.
`
`This action seeks to recover 'Jersonai
`
`I
`r
`.
`iniuries alle edi‘r sustained try the
`
`plaintiff, JEROME DAVIS, following a motor vehicle aetio‘ent which occurred on July 7"?
`
`

`

`2010 at approximately 7:50 pm. on 232'1d Street at its intersection with Francis Lewis
`
`Boulevard, Queens County, New York. A copy of the police report of this incident is
`
`annexed as Exhibit A.
`
`Copies of the plaintiff’s. summons and complaint and the
`
`pleadings thereto are annexed hereto as Exhibit B.
`
`4.
`
`This accident occurred, when the U-i—laui truck that was operated by the t2o=
`
`defendant, TTESi-EA SINCLAIR,
`
`rear—ended the motor vehicle that was owned by the
`
`defendant, JASON BRUCE, and operated by the defendant, KEMAR PATRICK. At the time
`
`of the subject accident, the plaintiff was a passenger in the motor vehicle operated by the
`
`defendant,
`
`KEMAR PATRICK. The
`
`rear—ending
`
`incident
`
`occurred while
`
`the
`
`BRUCE/PATRICK vehicle was at a full and complete stop at a stop sign on 232nd Street,
`
`and waiting for traffic on Francis Lewis Bouievard to clear before entering the roadway.
`
`S.
`
`The defendants in this matter,
`
`JASON BRUCE and KEMAR PATRICK,
`
`previously moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability in the corresponding
`
`action arising out of the same accident. The Honorable Dennis J. Butler of Supreme Court,
`
`Queens County,
`
`issued an Order, dated February 13,. 2013, which granted the
`
`defendants, JASON BRUCE and KEMAR PATRICK, summary judgment on the issue of
`
`iiability in the corresponding action of-Kenny Sinclair v. Jason Brace, et at, Supreme
`
`Court, Queens County, Index Number 700051/2011. A copy of that entered order is
`
`annexed hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit C
`
`6.
`
`in the instant action your affirmant, on behalf of defendants, BRUCE and
`
`PATRECK, again moved motion for summary judgment on the issue of iiabiiity on the
`
`same grounds. Said motion was originally returnable in the Staten Court, mean
`
`[\3
`
`

`

`County, before Justice Valerie Brathwaite Neison, on June 25, 2013.
`
`7.
`
`On June 26, 2013, one day after the original return date on your affirman‘t’s
`
`motion for summary judgment, the Summons and Complaint in the deciaratenr judgment
`
`action was filed in the Supreme Court, Kings County. Now, fer the first time, ceunsei fer
`
`UHAUL is seeking to stay the instant action so that a separate newiy camrnenceci action
`
`may be pursued, A copy of the elaw printout for the deciaratory action is annexed hereto
`
`as Exhibit D.
`
`8.
`In support of their argument, UHAUL, proffered aiieged confessions 0f Aiicia
`Burton, Sean Norman, and Tyrell Feider, which are not in admissible form, as they are not
`
`‘
`
`signed, notarized or given under oath with the penalty of perjury, As such, the only
`
`portion of UHAUL’s moving papers citing to the staged loss is embodied in the attached
`
`Summons and Complaint. An attorney affidavit without supporting proof in admissible
`
`form affords no probative value. See Zuckerman v. City of New York, 4-9 N.Y.2cl557, 553,
`
`427 N.Y.S.2d 595 (1980).
`
`9.
`
`The issuance of a stay is discretionary with the Court, and shall be exercised
`
`sparingly and “only when other remedies are inadequate and the equities involved are
`
`apparent and strong." In re Weinbaum's Estate, 51 Misc.2d'538, 273 hi.‘r’.S.2d 4-61, 463
`
`(MY. 1966).. As such, UHAUL’S Cross—Motion for a stay may be denied as the Ceurt deems
`
`appropriate.
`
`iii.
`
`Further, counsei- for Ui—lAtii. seeks to stay the instant action so it may
`
`pursue an action against dozens of defendants,
`
`including owners and eperatars ef
`
`vehicies, and medical service providers. it is ciear from the size and scope ef the tiaajie
`
`U)
`
`

`

`of defendants in this newly commenced action, it will not be resolved for years to come.
`
`Such a delay is inappropriate to a party that has already filed a motion tot summary
`
`judgment on the basis of a prior Order issued regarding the same accident“
`
`11.,
`
`It shouid be noted,
`
`in opposition to your affirmant’s motion for sumn‘iaty
`
`judgment on the issue of liability in the action of Sinclair v“ Bruce, et at; index hid:
`
`' 700051/11, counsel for Ui-iAUL proffered the verysarne argument that the subject
`
`accident was “staged’_’, which the Court found unavaiiingt
`12.
`Should the Court grant your atfirmant’s motion for summary judgment on
`
`the issue of iiabiiity, UHAUL would not be disclosed from pursuing a declaratory'judgment
`
`action against any and all parties to this action.
`
`13. Moreover,
`
`it
`
`is deer that defendant UHAUL has no defense to the
`
`negligence claim of the subject
`
`rear~end motor—vehicle accident: As such they are
`
`pursuing an action against dozens of individuals and medical service providers.
`
`in their
`
`own motion they cite that all actions deemed “staged” are rear—end accidents, “for which a
`
`liability defense is unavailable. '
`
`14.
`
`in this matter, the doctrine of collaterai estoppel should appiy since the
`
`identical
`
`issue of liability was previously determined by Judge Butler based upon the
`
`testimony Of the two defendant driversr PATRICK KEMAR and TEESHA T, SINGER“ “in
`
`order to invoke the doctrine! the identical issue must necessarily have been decided in
`
`the prior action or proceeding and be decisive of the present action or proceeding and
`
`the party to be preciuded trern relitigating the issue must have had a tuii and fair
`
`I U
`
`epportunity to contest the prior determination {see Buechel v Bainy is“ Petite at Ci
`
`

`

`304; Parker V Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 NY2d at 349; D‘Arata v NewYork Cent.
`
`Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 76 NYch 659, 664, 564 NE2d 634, S63 NYSZd 24 [1990]).” See
`
`Comprehensive Med. Care of N.Y., PC. v. l-lausknecht, 55 AD 3d 3’77 (2d Dept. 2668);.
`
`It is respectfully asserted that the burdeh has been met, as Judge Eautler has aiready
`
`made a determination, as a matter of law, that the defendants, LEASON BRUCE ahtt
`
`PATRICK KEMAR, were not negligent for the happening of the rear-weed accident which
`is the subject of this action. _
`_
`I
`I
`
`WHEREFORE,
`
`it
`
`is respectfullyrequested that UHAUL’S motion be denied ll’l all
`
`respects and for such other and further relief as to this Court may be deemed just and
`
`proper.
`
`Dated: Westbury, New York
`August 19, 2013
`
`.3.x/'\.
`
`.._,
`.
`are/z
`
`.
`w”
`,fiiH R. DANZI
`{7/
`
`..
`
`.,
`
`{.-
`,fx
`w
`
`

`

`
`
`

`

`..
`.
`.
`MI;- m ww IIIU‘JHIYI
`Gaflofzoin TUE 3.2:33
`
`am:
`
`..
`
`..
`
`.
`
`m
`
`_.
`
`.
`
`_.
`‘0‘
`H UN;
`
`F.
`
`_
`1
`
`mazmoa
`.
`347-159-8754
`Jul as 10 Hanna
`”W “MW hmmi: '
`magma-1;:
`'.
`I,
`,
`1‘
`
`
`:
`' Fig-
`7
`fig? yfigfiiiqfii’b}
`
`
`._
`'
`..
`_‘.
`'
`934 . n '1'“ -I. 11-.
`,.
`' firm _'
`
`II. “1-. '
`
`.
`
`»
`
`t
`
`I
`
`.
`
`.
`
`'
`
`.
`
`w
`
`‘
`
`,'“
`‘
`'—
`
`
`
`a;_
`‘fi
`.Il‘n‘# -'
`[L mahfigfln ..
`7?:
`gfl'u‘é-bf
`E
`"lgfifwfiwfi
`
`I,
`
`ma. maugmmm mam ._
`_
`5.15! E'ErfifamgwérarQEa g: .-
`
`~~ 3w- 19.5th
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` ' {3 F" ,i
`
`wars Ma;
`1 axiflh
`
`
`E
`
`
`
`
`

`

`.fi,.,. 11. M U) H. [M11
`DB/lUJ’EfiiD I'UE 32:35 FM
`
`Jufii ea 11:: 03:9?p
`WEEQNSMLLEHQHL
`
`347— 7;:«r: 5754]
`
`'
`
`pug
`
`Elana/one.
`
`mmrqgg‘afifiw,
`- Manly-H =11 7‘.
`=
`
`
`
`
`v'"riflt'g':駧si¥afién agg;
`u...
`
`niafi’aé’n')
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.m" "-
` am; gt}.mama; mm
`Ej’ We: T331151.
`1‘3 ffiapt offiédfarfiahides
`Hfiwfiamm:‘13- fiwfipfi‘frRama» :~‘
`E3 Mofizrmnspfiflfiifdrsian ‘
`1RD. vghffilé imagivéfi}
`"3Wanyana {aIklléedfinhrafijx _
`{if a Ugangadzt’aflElf {Wanam-
`(Sgaamr
`ifi32_fi{\£a§)‘..
`
`'fi-Highway Unf'
`fl .fiffiéa12f figmptrofiar
`E Paraannalagfatwnrt
`, ‘:\,
`:
`;
`€7er
`1
`fifa RD. wafiidelnwimé}
`" ..-3,.
`film: m- mgma'm
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"r
`-
`.
`-
`\
`
`..‘ #3551733.arm ..
`
`
`Jane-i, .
`
`’J‘Wékmgfij
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Eng. 1!. 2m nmam
`
`oaxlpzzaia EUE 12.35 rm;
`
`3
`
`'
`
`jaws/ow
`
`
`
`Jul 28 1.13 05:07}: F41. S4?—'3/13.q~3‘?54
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"1'3...“ 5;.
`”4;?qu
`
`..nyms‘igafimfiun HE!E“:
`
`
`
`!3fifi’fi‘éififi “Fifi!Egg-a:Ifnwfifififirfl
` ‘1
`.
`.
`‘
`
`
`
`‘
`
`"13:131.am; am: magma ma:
`as“?Pap“: 3f $3.3!er Vahimfiii
`. E Mm: Trafifipfifl, fih‘héfiifi
`'Q: N723TfififlaxfiHm'1?meflfli‘f‘m‘,WE!“GWRFGEYA931"!
`
`.f’fif Emma‘s {Skidfidfinfifii‘Sfi-M
`{REL Vahfwe iavgivsfi}
`{if a ”qfiffidmQ?glflnomfiae
`'1333353H'
`'-
`'\
`.
`-
`_ m¥9!vfi 1'
`'
`'
`:5
`A
`
`C!Wmof Samfitmfiar
`~
`I
`‘
`' E Earagqna! 3§§5114 “I!!!
`uE9'i‘J'QE'W’ay 831E33ww' 7
`
`
`{7?3 PD931-3313 EWGWEE)Ig —’— , . ‘ ' :LLA?!“ E C3diva?!mainmfid} 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“ 5rT31€3\’&p5,! .373Efijdgdgamgn}15;;3gfig§3¥iflm!3 .
`_
`
`'
`-1.
`.
`1
`1
`"W '3"!
`‘-"-"
`HE
`
`
` “WERE?fiééfififigjflifiifisffilflflWWW}: W ”W
`.
`_ ‘,ER GE Faflfififiigfinda cw Egfinsy.whahé PERM?!
`
`
`
`!
`‘-. “ A
`_ :i:_
`‘
`___. 73:73'1! ‘x‘ ‘M
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘2J
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sfiygfiéfiagfiifi wmmmw Mg .
`
`Pi NEW! kafigmil mm! "' gamma
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`"
`
`A
`
`‘
`A?
`
`I
`
`'
`
`.
`
`SU?REM:E COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY OF QUEENS
`_____--_...._-..---.._-,_m________-.,-,_________-_________l-_______X
`
`JEROME DAVIS
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`'
`
`against
`
`Index No. 7%???57%;
`see/moms
`[121/:5
`
`, Plaintiff designates QU ENS
`County as the place of trial.
`
`,
`
`The basis ofvenue is:
`Plaintiff“ s residence
`
`UHAUL co OF ARIZONA TIESHA SWCLAI&
`JASON BRUQE and KEMAR PATRICK
`“WWWwry—reev-
`
`Defendants-
`"qflpm-Dfi‘wnfinwugd—I—hfi_bc——hhfll——Ifln—I—h‘—Hll-—n|—|—————‘—a—-I--—-I—-——_—_¢—__-—‘r-flu x
`
`To The above named Defendants
`
`You are hereby summoned to answer the complaint in this action and to
`serve a copy ofyour answer on the Plaintiff‘s attorney within 20 days after The service of
`WWWeWWWWMM_
`service is complete if this summons and complaint are net personally delivered to you
`within the State of New York); and in caee'ef your failure to appear or answer, judgment
`will be taken against yet: by default for the relief demanded in the complaint.
`
`Dated: Broeklyn, New Yer}:
`March 7, 2013
`
`Defendant U-HAUL CO. OF ARIZONA’S address;
`
`2390 Best Cemelbaek Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85016
`
`Defendant TIESHA SINCLAIR’S address;
`669New Jersey Avenue, Apmmem 2?, Brooklyn NY 1120?
`
`Defendant JASON BRUCEls address;
`21E:3:3129thAvenueCarqlgnifielghlsENE}1 4l L
`
`Defendanl KER/{AR PATRECK’S address:
`
`l97~20 120th Avenue; St, Albens; NY 11412
`
` Steven l‘viirrLralfiy LSD
`
`Gleelis Lew Offices
`
`Aléemey for Plaintiff
`2004 Come}! Islzmd Avenue:
`Brooklyn "New 'E’Ol‘l: 1'1223
`' (3-.J7‘24”L101"”;ng
`'
`
`

`

`
`
`SUPREMECOURTOF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF QUEENS
`,~__-_-___.__e---..-"m.--F________-_-___-_--____-_-----__......_X
`
`JEROME DAVIS
`
`.
`
`Index No.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`uagainst-
`
`.
`
`COWLAINT
`
`U—HAUL (:0w OF ARLZONA, TiESHA SINCLAIR,
`JASON BRUCE, and KEMAR PATRICK
`
`‘
`Defendants.
`_________________________________________________________________X
`
`Fiainfiff by his attorney STEVEN MIZLRAH}, ESQ, an attorney from the
`,
`GITELIS LAW OFFICES, alleges upon information and belief and at 23112 times
`, mentioned as foiiows:
`
`That at at] times herein mentioned, the Plaintiff is and continues to be a,
`1-
`
`
`resident of the County of Queens and the State ofNew York,
`
`2.
`
`That at all] times herein mentioned, the Defendant U-I iAUI. CO. OF
`
`ARlZONA was and continues to be a incorporated in the State offirizona
`
`with its principal place of business at 2390 East Cnmeibnek Road, Phoenix,
`
`AZ 85016.
`That at ail times herein mentioned, the Defendent TIESHA SINCLAIR Was
`
`3,
`
`and continues to be a resident of 6-69 New Jersey Avenue, Apartment 25,
`
`’ Brooki'yn, NY 11207.
`
`4.
`
`That at at} times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant U~HAUL CO. OF
`
`ARIZONA was the owner of a certain 2004 GMC automobile bearing New
`
`Yetk Lieense plete number A136 14-55.
`
`-
`
`5..
`
`"that at all times hereinafter mentiened, Defendant TIESHA SWCLMR was
`
`the operate-1‘ 01‘ said automobile,
`
`

`

`
`
`it
`
`That at all times herein mentioned the Defendant, JASON BRUCE was and
`
`continues to be a resident of 2 1 8~19 120th Avenue: Carnot-let Heights, NY
`
`11411.7
`
`That at alt times herein mentioned the Defendant KEMAR PATRICK was and
`
`continues to be a resident of 197—20 120th Avenue, St. Alberta, NY 1 1412.
`
`That at all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant EASON BRUCE was the
`
`owner of_a certain 1999 Toyota automobile bearing New York license plate
`
`number EXI‘J6188.
`
`That at ali times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant KEMAR PATRICK was
`
`the operator of said automobile.
`
`That at all times hereinafter mentioned, Pleintiffi JEROME DAVIS was a
`
`10.
`
`passenger in the automobile owned by JAS ON BRUCE and operated by
`
`KEMAR PA'i'RECK.
`
`ll.
`
`That on or about July 22, 2010 at or abbot 7:50 p.m._. Defendant TIESHA
`
`SINCLAIR was operating the 2004 GMC vehicle on Francis Lewis Boulevard
`
`near the intersection of 232nd Street in the county of Queens, State ot'New
`
`York.
`
`12.
`
`That on or about said time and place: said Defendant U—HAUL CO. OF
`
`ARiZONA’s vehicle was so carelessly and negligently operated, managed,
`
`and controlled by Defendant THESE-IA SINCLAlRes to cause and permit said
`
`automobile to enme into contact with the Defendant JASON BRUCE’S
`
`automobile.
`
`That the Defendant DESI-EA SENCLAIR was negligent in that she operated
`
`said motor vehicle in a negligent. tetfltltess5 and careless mmnet in violation ot’
`. J!
`.——— w. zine“ a twine“...
`,J
`-
`.M.
`.40.. 7“. We; wake
`,, -". :m
`"‘.'L » emitting Enlfl ut!._.;-Llai1t:aflbs 551$ Walt. ELLE; vt-‘lSu Hcgllgutl,
`
`a
`v—-
`lill;
`
`

`

`Defendant U—HAUL CO- OF ARIZONA was negligent in that it allowed its
`
`vehicle to be operated in a negligent, reckless, and careless manner in
`
`violation of the law. This action falls within one or more of the exceptions set
`
`forth in CPLR 1601.
`
`l4.
`
`That on or about July 22, 2010 at or about 7:50 p.m., Defendant KEMAR
`
`PATRICK. Was operating the 1999 Toyota automobile on Francis Lewis
`
`Boulevard near the intersection of 232nd Street in the county of Queens, State
`
`_
`of New York.
`That on or about said time and place, said Defendant JASON BRUCE’S
`
`l5.
`
`vehicle was so carelessly and negligently operated, managed, and ccintrollecl
`
`
`by Defendant KEMAR PATRICK as to cause and “permit said automobile to
`
`16.
`
`l7.
`
`1‘9.
`
`come into contact with Defendant U—HAUL co. os ARIZONA’S vehicle
`
`That at all times hereinafter mentioned, Francis Lewis BouleVard and 232ml
`
`'
`
`Street are public roads of the State ofNew York and the County of Queens.
`
`The accident and the injuries to the Plaintiff were caused by the negligence of
`
`the Defendants.
`
`That the Defendant KEMAR PATRICK was negligent in that'he Operated said '
`
`motor vehicle in a negligent, reckless, and careless manner in Violation of the
`
`law, statutes? and ordinaneea and were otherwise negligent. Defendant
`
`JASON BRUCE was negligent in that lie-allowed his vettieie to be operated in
`
`a negligent recklessS and careless manner in vioiation of the law“ This actiOn
`
`falls within one or i‘nore of the exceptions set forth in CPLR lfiOl‘
`
`~¢tui
`sustained serious andsevere peisonal injuries teqniting manipulation and“
`
`i
`' in. ”A, ,..,
`.—.'A
`E M.
`(2' 1’sifln 1-
`‘-‘-,~ ‘
`LU lfjjblluo LO flib streamers L‘d'uib; :‘lfl
`
`
`

`

`
`
`neck, still suffers and will continue to suffer for some time, great physical
`
`pain and mental anguish, became sick, sore, lame, and disabled and so
`
`remained. As a result of the aforementioned injuries, the Plaintiff quality of
`
`life has suffered and will continue to suffer iIteparahle harm.
`
`20.
`
`As a result of the foregoing, the Plaintiff JEROME DAVIS has sustained a
`
`“serious injury" as defined by Section 5102(d) of the immense Law of the
`
`State of New Yorks and / or economic: loss greater than the basic economic
`
`loss as defined in Section 5102(a) of the insurance Law of the State of New
`
`Yorlt.
`
`AS a result of the foregoing, the Plaintiff JEROME DAVIS has been damaged
`21;
`
`in the meme whitfh exoeedsfiteffitrisdictionfil limits mmWr—w—
`
`would havejurisdietion, together with the courts and disbursements of this
`
`action.
`
`WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff demands judgment in his favor in an amount which
`
`exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all lower courts, which would otherwise have
`
`jurisdiction, together with the costs and disbursements ofthis action.
`
`Dated: Emokiyn, New York
`March 7, 2013
`
`Yoursa etc”
`
`gig/”tii
`
`Steven Miztahi, Esq
`Gitelis Law Offices
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`2004 Cone}! island Avenue
`Brooklyn: New York 11223
`{347‘} 462A 83
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`magaimstu
`
`UwHAUL (39, OF WGNA, TIESHA SENCLAIR
`JASQN BRUCE, find; KEMAR PATRICK
`
`Defendmfis.
`
`
`
`7h
`-
`‘
`' SW Mommy: ‘
`7
`7 W
`' Giftlié' Law 6mm
`[Niamey At Law
`Aflomey fmr Plafimfiffl
`2W Emmy Mam Awme -
`
`_
`W
`Emmkflfim? NY 11111223 WW W
`,
`, W
`AWEBRNEY CERTEFECAHQN
`Tba mqéssflgaafi an flimsy admifibd Kuwait-Ens in {he cums ofNew Yank 322326, mane that, m mfmailun, beliefand mana‘alr; ingm, a]: mmmieas
`mimdm we alww mm [format {5-) Exam! frivolous,
`9m 35:91;sz m
`@EEEWWWW
`
`March’frlflfi
`_'
`E 3 WWWWW.W,,W
`H.
`.
`m m
`WWWW W
`7‘ W
`W}? m1 55%
`W ,
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE
`”ML” "
`A"
`'
`, __
`"
`‘W
`"W'U‘m
`4
`Thai $27.6
`‘
`7N- ‘ a J
`LZMLEEJL;
`
`r
`
`j
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`

`

`.U-EENS COURT? CLERK 02-11%201 gigs;
`FILED:
`NYSCEF Doc, ND- 84
`,,
`
`70005..
`'
`HQ? "Z NO
`”2°”
`egg—Teri
`95> mail/3
`RsCEIVEp NYSCEF: 02/1472013
`
`Short Form Order
`
`NEW YORK enemas COURT — Queens COUNTY
`
`Present: Honoxable DENIS J. BUTLER
`Justice
`___________________________ ~__-__-i-i----x
`
`IRS PART ;;
`
`KENNY SINCLAIR,
`
`
`
` -.\§m.‘mmryllu;azlm~.r'
`
`g
`
`Plaintiff,
`5
`
`Index 1219.: 713005le1
`
`Motion Date:
`
`~against— .
`
`-
`
`January'l7, 2013
`
`JASOH BRUCE, FfiTRICX KEMAR,
`U—HAUL CO. OF ARIZOEA and
`TIESHA.SINCLRIR,
`
`Cal. NO.: 143
`Seq. No.1 8
`
`7
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`——————————————————————————————————————— K
`
`
`
`The following'papers Hmnbered l to 17 read on this motion by
`defendants, Jason Bruce (“Bruce”) and Patrick Kemar {while said
`' defendant states his name is “Kemar Patrick”,
`the caption has not
`been amended to reflect defendantfs proper name, so he shall
`hereafter be referred to as “Kemar”)J seeking summary judgment on
`
`liability, pursuant to CPLR §3212.
`a
`
`i
`E
`tapers
`um
`NumberedggCU .w
`
`1
`Or*er ....................................‘i..
`Netice.of Motionr Affirmation» Exhibits ........ 2e8
`Plaintiff’s Aifirmatien in Opposition,
`Exhibits ............. . ..... . ..... . ............. 9—12
`Defendant} Tiesha Sinclair’s Affirmatioi_
`in Opposition.
`..
`= ............... , .......... ..
`Defendant,'U—Eaul Ce. Of firizeia’s
`
`13
`
`if F"
`52
`FIN
`;3
`M
`011
`i'
`ifl’:
`,:
`
`Affirmatiefi in Opposition, Exhibits.‘, ......... 14-16
`
`Reply Afiirmatien.‘.un.unw.~,L,.v(v.u...k,s_.
`
`.
`
`17
`
`

`

`
`
`
`

`

`Pursuant to an Order of this Court, dated January 23, 2013,
`this motion, originally Submitted before Centralized Motion Part
`on.January 17, 2013 was set down.for and oral argument was
`conducted oanebruary 5, 2013,
`
`in this action to-recover for personal injuries allegedly
`sustained in a motor vehicle accident on July 22, 2010,
`defendants Bruce and Kemar move for summary judgment Solely on
`
`
`
`the issue of liability. Defendant operator, Kemar, alleged in his
`deposition testimony,
`taken on August 2, 2012 (Ex. E)
`that he was
`.Stopped at a stop sign for “almost a minute and a half” when his
`vehicle was struck in the rear by the truck owned by COv
`'
`defendant,
`fl-Haul Co. Of Arizona (“UFHaul"}, and operated by co—
`defendant, Tiesha Sinclair (“Sinclair”}{p, 11,
`i2). As such,
`defendants Bruce and Kemar have established a prima facie case of
`negligence against co—defendants, Uuflaul and Sinclair, a lack oi
`negligence against moving defendants, and entitlement to summary
`
`judgment {eee, Castle v. Bawuah, 101 AJD.3d 922 [2 Dept. 2012};
`
`Penasa
`lieae, 101 A.D.3d—¥QE [2 Depeeu99&%J,-Eranoc v.
`Breoeus,
`7O A.D.3d 767 {2 Dept. 2010]; Staten v. Ilia, 59 A,D.3d
`606 [2 Dept. 28101). It is now incumbent upon plaintiffi, or co~
`defendants, U—Heul and Sinclair,
`to provide a non—negligent
`explanation.to rebut the inference of negligence on defendants,
`U—Eaul and Sinclair, and lack of negligence on defendants, Bruce
`and Kemar
`(see, Tutrani v- County of Suffolk, 10 N.Y.3d 906
`‘[2D08]; Dicturel v. Dukureh, 71 A.D.3d 558 [1 Dept. 2310]).
`
`
`
`1.:.‘i“T
`
`
`
`Plaintiff’s counsel opposes the motion contending that the
`cause of the accident “has not been determined” and that
`
`defendant Kemar s testimony “suggests‘that he was a negligent
`W
`driver and railed to cheek he; s rearview mirror tor cars follosi
`nil” (Affirmation in Opposition,
`€13). Defendant, Tiesha Sincla::r
`testii‘ied at her deposition, dated October $6, 2012 (Opposition
`of U Haul Ex. A}, that the Kemar and Bruce vehicl e “stopped
`short and E tried to stop” (p. Bl).
`'
`
`The failure of defendant to obey We tii ole and Trat_ic Law
`§1129(a}, wnicn states that a driver of a motor vehicle shall not
`follow anoother motor JEhiClE “more closely than is reasonable and
`
`prudent” under the existing conditions, Constitutes negligence on
`the tart of defendants, The allegatition that the leadgeh.ic le made
`a sudden stop, on its own,
`is nsufii ient to raise a guestiOr of
`fact to defeat summary judgment
`(see, CKaetritsios v. Marcello, as
`E 333d 1174 {2 Dent _ EOlZE),
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`_
`
`.
`
`-
`
`._
`
`_.
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`M
`
`.
`
`_'
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`-
`
`_
`
`g
`
`A
`
`..
`
`._
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`..
`
`-
`
`.
`
`.
`
`_
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`_
`
`‘
`
`_
`
`. _'
`
`a
`
`.
`
`s
`
`.
`
`-
`
`.
`
`,
`
`_
`
`,
`
`'
`
`a
`
`.
`
`r
`
`.-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-
`
`_
`
`k
`
`'
`
`'
`
`-
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`l
`
`r
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`_
`.
`
`_
`
`A
`
`_
`
`4
`
`v
`
`1
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`—
`
`K
`
`_
`
`-
`
`'
`
`a
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`‘.
`
`
`
`_
`
`a
`
`,
`
`'
`
`~
`
`.
`
`.‘_
`
`.
`I."
`
`.
`
`'
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`-
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`a
`
`_
`
`.
`
`.
`
`-
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`|
`'
`'
`-"
`.
`‘.
`2
`_’
`_
`'
`‘
`‘
`'
`x.
`.
`-
`
`
`_
`
`'
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`‘I
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`_
`
`.
`
`.
`
`k
`.
`;
`
`.
`
`r
`
`x
`
`-
`.
`
`r
`
`-
`
`.
`
`|
`
`A
`
`'
`
`-
`
`-
`
`.-
`..
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`'
`
`\
`
`V
`
`,
`
`-
`
`,
`
`,
`
`.
`
`_
`
`'
`
`_
`
`Q
`
`-
`
`m
`
`r
`
`.
`
`t
`
`~
`
`‘
`
`
`
`,
`
`- i
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`y
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`,
`
`2
`
`.
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`-.
`
`_
`
`‘~.
`“\-
`
`\_ \
`
`
`.
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`.
`
`-A
`
`.
`
`4-
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`u
`
`1
`
`'
`
`:
`
`\
`
`_
`
`1
`
`-
`
`.
`
`r
`
`
`
`_
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`'
`
`-
`
`.
`
`e
`
`_
`
`~
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`'-
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`
`
`‘
`
`
`
`,
`
`‘,
`
`s
`
`.
`
`k
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Ei
`
`E
`
`
`
`Defendant UvHaul’s opposition contends that a question of
`fact exists as to whether this was a “staged ‘accident’”
`(apposition, $15), but does not contest the allegaties that the
`Kemar and Bruce vehicle was hit in the rear by the U-Haul
`‘vehicle. As such, plaintiff‘s and co~defendants' opposition
`papers have failed to-present any non—negligent excuse fer the
`accident
`(see, Plummer v. Nourddine, 83 A.D.3d 1069 {2 Dept.
`2011}; Volpe v. Limoneelli, 74 A.D.3§.795 {2 Dept- 2010]; Paul v.
`Reilly. 29 A-D.3d 626 [2 Dept. 20061; Vlachos v. Saueracker, 19
`sense 683 [2 Dept. 2004]), and have failed to raise a triable
`
`issue of feet to defeat summary judgment (see. Zdenek v- Safetv
`Consultants. Inc., 63 A.D.3d 918 [2 Dept. 2009]).
`
`Accordingly, it is Ordered and Adjudged that defenfiant.
`Kemar aud Bruce’s metion for summary judgment on liability is
`hereby granted? and plaintiif‘s'eomplaint, as against defendants
`Kemar and Bruce, is hereby dismissed.
`
`
`Eeis GeeseieHEeeeteeeDeeieeee—eee—eeeefmef the Court.
`
`Dated: February [3.72013
`
`I
`
`h
`
`.d
`
`‘111!
`
`F
`
`

`

`
`

`

`Case Detail
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
` Prettrifea with fiergfirfeaee
`
`SUPREME COURT
`REPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY ETC KINGS County
`V
`'
`Index Number: 11234/2013
`ALSTON’ ROLANDA ETAL
`Case Status: ACTIVE
`
`According to the records of the KINGS County Clerk's Office, the Index Number for this case was
`assigned on JUNE 19, 2013.
`
`The parties of record for this case are listed as follows:
`
`Planitiffls) :
`
`REPWEST WSURANCE COMPANY ETC. ETANO,
`
`Defendant(s) : ALSTON, ROLANDA ETAL,
`
`The foflowing entries appear on the County Clerk’s Minute book for this case. To obtain a copy of any of the listed
`documents, click on the Order eCopy link next to the document:
`
`Received
`Date
`
`_
`Filed Date
`W/A)
`
`'
`Document/Entry
`.
`COMPLETE FILE
`
`08/07/2013.
`
`(N/A)
`
`Amended summ- & comply
`
`06/19/2013
`
`06/26/2013
`
`SHEER. & 00mph
`
`(N/A).
`
`OTHER? (additional information will be requesreofl
`
`

`

`STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NASSAU
`
`I am not a party to the action,
`I, LISA CALABRO, being sworn, depose and say:
`am over 18 years of age and reside at Lake Ronkonkoma, New York. On the 27th day of
`August, 2013, I served the within: AFFERMATIQN IN @PPQSITIQN and EXHIBITS
`
`TO:
`
`GITELIS LAW OFFICES
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`JEROME DAVIS
`
`2004- Coney Island Avenue
`Brooklyn, New York 11223
`(347) 46271388
`
`NICOLETI‘I‘GONSON SPINNER & OWEN, LLP
`Attorneys for Defendant
`U-HAUL CO. OF ARIZONA
`555 Fifth Avenue, 8th Floor
`New York, New York 10017
`(212) 730-7750
`
`‘ McANDREW CONBOY & PRISCO, LLP
`Attorneys for Defendant
`TIESHA SINCLAIR
`-
`1860 Walt Whitman Road, Suite 800
`Melville, New York 11747
`(516) 921-8600
`
`by depositing a true copy thereof enclosed in a post~paid wrapper, in an official depository
`under the exclusive care and custody of the US. Postal Service within New York State,
`addressed to each of the above at the last known addr
`as set forth after each name.
`
`fl
`1
`,'
`
`Mallow
`
`Sworn to before me on the
`27‘Eh day of August, 2013
`17
`.I"“-\
`x»
`i
`,
`"*1“...
`J/‘iLMfQ/f/Fh-bfiaflAIL-“if”7WD
`’ Notary Pupil-5c
`
`SUSAN JACDBS
`Notary Public, State of New York
`No. 4796933
`Qualified in Nassau County
`Commission Expires Not-t 30, 20,;
`
`._
`
`C)‘‘1
`
`

`

`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF QUEENS
`.. _.
`, ,.
`In‘31‘3><i‘1070090/
`
`
`JEROME DAVIS,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Pagainsb
`
`.
`
`U~HAUL co. or: APJZONA; ”fiESHA SINCLAIR, JASON BRUCE, and KEMAR PATRICK,
`
`Defendants,
`
`
`
`PICCIANO 8: SCAHILL, PC.
`Attorneys for Defendants
`JASGN BRUCE and PATRICK KEMAR
`900 Merchants ConcourseéSuite 310
`Westbury, NéW Yerk 11590
`(516) 2945200
`
`
`
`Notice of entfl
`that the within'[S a (certifies? true copy of a
`named court on
`
`duly entered in the office of the Cierk of the within
`
`ElNetice of Settlement
`that an order A of which the within is a true copy wiii be presented for msettiement t0 the HON“
`one of the judges of the within named court, at
`.
`on
`
`Dated: Westbum New York
`August 27, 2013
`
`Yours, etC
`
`PZCCEANG Ra SCANELL REC:
`Atterneys for Defendants
`JASON BRUCE and PATRICK KEMAR
`900 MerChants Conceurse Suite 310
`Westbury New York {1590
`(516} 294—5200
`
`QL‘ESECQ P1115?:nt tC Rt1E6; 1;0 F9
`
`
`
`