`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 702254/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2024
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF QUEENS
`TABIJO REALTY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`CORNELL REALTY MANAGEMENT LLC and
`SHIFRA HAGER,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Index No.: 702254/2024
`
`VERIFIED ANSWER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`Defendants Cornell Realty Management LLC and Shifra Hager (collectively “Defendant”),
`
`by and through their attorneys Koffsky Schwalb LLC, as and for their Verified Answer to the
`
`Verified Complaint, respectfully state and allege:
`
`1.
`
`Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in the paragraph of the Complaint numbered 1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Deny the paragraphs of the Complaint numbered 2 and 3.
`
`Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in the paragraph of the Complaint numbered 4.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`Deny the paragraphs of the Complaint numbered 5, 6, and 7.
`
` Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in the paragraphs of the Complaint numbered 8, 9, 10, and 11.
`
`6.
`
`Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in the paragraphs of the Complaint numbered 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, and respectfully
`
`refer this Honorable Court to such agreement(s) for the terms thereof.
`
`7.
`
`Deny the paragraphs of the Complaint numbered 17, 18, and 19.
`
`1 of 7
`
`
`
`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2024 10:20 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 702254/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2024
`
`8.
`
` Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in the paragraphs of the Complaint numbered 20, 21, and 22, and respectfully refer
`
`this Honorable Court to such agreement(s) for the terms thereof.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`Deny the paragraph of the Complaint numbered 23.
`
`Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in the paragraph of the Complaint numbered 24, and respectfully refer all questions of
`
`law to this Honorable Court.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`Deny the paragraph of the Complaint numbered 25.
`
`AS AND FOR A RESPONSE TO THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`Defendants repeat and reallege each and every response to the allegations
`
`contained in each of the prior paragraphs as if more fully set forth herein.
`
`13.
`
`Deny the paragraphs of the Complaint numbered 27, 28, 29, and 30.
`
`AS AND FOR A RESPONSE TO THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`14.
`
`Defendants repeat and reallege each and every response to the allegations
`
`contained in each of the prior paragraphs as if more fully set forth herein.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`Deny the paragraphs of the Complaint numbered 32, 33, and 34.
`
`AS AND FOR A RESPONSE TO THE THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`Defendants repeat and reallege each and every response to the allegations
`
`contained in each of the prior paragraphs as if more fully set forth herein.
`
`17.
`
`Deny the paragraphs of the Complaint numbered 36, 37, 38, and 39.
`
`AS AND FOR A RESPONSE TO THE FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`18.
`
`Defendants repeat and reallege each and every response to the allegations
`
`contained in each of the prior paragraphs as if more fully set forth herein.
`
`2 of 7
`
`
`
`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2024 10:20 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 702254/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2024
`
`19.
`
`Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in the paragraphs of the Complaint numbered 41 and 42.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`Deny the paragraphs of the Complaint numbered 43, 44, and 45.
`
`AS AND FOR A RESPONSE TO THE FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
` Defendants repeat and reallege each and every response to the allegations
`
`contained in each of the prior paragraphs as if more fully set forth herein.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`Deny the paragraphs of the Complaint numbered 47, 48, and 49
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`The Complaint herein fails to state a cause of action upon which relief may be
`
`granted, and is thus fatally defective.
`
`party.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`This action cannot proceed not proceed in the absence of a person who should be a
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`That in the event of any judgment or verdict on behalf of the Plaintiff, the Defendant
`
`is entitled to a set-off or verdict with respect to the amounts of any payments made to the Plaintiff.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`26.
`
`Plaintiff failed to mitigate, obviate, diminish or otherwise act to lessen or reduce
`
`the injuries, damages and disabilities alleged in the complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`27.
`
`defendants.
`
`Plaintiff is not party to any agreement or contract with one or more of the
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`3 of 7
`
`
`
`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2024 10:20 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 702254/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2024
`
`28.
`
`Plaintiff failed to comply with a condition precedent to bringing this action
`
`including, but not limited to, providing a required notice.
`
`AS AND FOR A SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`29.
`
`Plaintiff and Defendant are not parties to an agreement, the terms of which mirror
`
`the allegations contained in the Complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR AN EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff lacks standing and/or capacity to bring the instant lawsuit.
`
`AS AND FOR A NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff’s action must be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s own unclean hands.
`
`AS AND FOR A TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are barred by release, waiver, laches, and/or estoppel.
`
`AS AND FOR AN ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are barred by accord and satisfaction.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`The alleged guaranty was discharged, cancelled, terminated, and/or lapsed.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are barred by its own culpable conduct and/or the culpable
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`conduct of its agents including, but not limited to, Plaintiff’s agent’s disconnecting of electricity
`
`to the subject premises.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are barred by a failure to perform in accordance with its alleged
`
`36.
`
`agreement.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`4 of 7
`
`
`
`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2024 10:20 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 702254/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2024
`
`37.
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are barred as it performed its alleged work, duties, and
`
`responsibilities negligently.
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing by, among other
`
`38.
`
`things:
`
`a. attempting to avoid receipt of payment(s);
`
`b. withholding consents in violation of the lease agreement;
`
`c. improperly charging fees that it was not entitled to charge under the law.
`
`AS AND FOR A SEVENTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`39.
`
`Plaintiff unlawfully seeks late fees for periods in which it may not, such as during
`
`the state of emergency due to COVID-19.
`
`AS AND FOR AN EIGHTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`40.
`
`Plaintiff breached the warranty of habitability and therefore no rent is due for some
`
`or all of the periods in question.
`
`AS AND FOR A NINETEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`41.
`
`Venue is improper in Queens County because the property in question is located in
`
`Kings County, and it is demanded that venue be moved to Kings County.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`42.
`
`Defendant(s) was not properly served with the Summons in this case and therefore
`
`this Court lacks jurisdiction and this case must be dismissed.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`43.
`
`Defendant is with insufficient knowledge or information upon which it may form a
`
`belief as to whether it may have additional and/or unstated affirmative defenses and reserves its
`
`5 of 7
`
`
`
`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2024 10:20 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 702254/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2024
`
`right to assert additional affirmative defenses in the event discovery or clarification of the claims
`
`asserted indicate that such assertion is appropriate.
`
`WHEREFORE, Defendant demands judgment dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint, together
`
`with the attorneys’ fees, costs and disbursements of this action.
`
`KOFFSKY SCHWALB LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Steven A. Weg
`By: Steven A. Weg
`Attorneys for Defendants
`500 Seventh Avenue, 8th Floor
`New York, New York 10018
`(646) 553-1590
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`March 27, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6 of 7
`
`
`
`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2024 10:20 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 702254/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2024
`
`ATTORNEY VERIFICATION
`
`
`
`
`
`The undersigned, an attorney licensed to practice as such in the State of New York, affirms under
`the penalty of perjury as follows:
`
`This verification is made by the undersigned and not by the Defendants because the Defendants
`are currently in a county within New York State other than where the undersigned has his office.
`
`The foregoing Answer is true to my knowledge and based on facts and information relayed to me
`by my client(s).
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`March 27, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/S/ Steven A. Weg
`Steven A. Weg
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7 of 7
`
`