throbber
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/08/2024 11:31 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7
`
`INDEX NO. 722834/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2024
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF QUEENS
`--------------------------------------------------------------------X
`AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`ADVANCED ORTHOPAEDICS, P.L.L.C., ET AL.,
`
`
` Defendants.
`--------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. 722834/23
`
`
`ANSWER
`
`
`
`FILE # 69,468
`
`Defendants BRIYUT MEDICAL, P.C., FORCE OF NATURE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C.
`
`PROGRESSIVE HEALTHCARE MEDICINE, P.C. and RESTART PSYCHOLOGICAL
`
`SERVICES, P.C. (hereinafter “Answering Defendants”) by their attorneys, KOPELEVICH &
`
`FELDSHEROVA, P.C., as and for their answer respectfully allege upon information and belief as
`
`follows:
`
`1. Deny any knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation
`
`contained in the paragraphs of the complaint therein designated as 1-3, 5-7, 9-12, 15-24, 27-
`
`34, 37-38, 40 and refer all questions of law to this Honorable Court.
`
`2. Deny any knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation
`
`contained in the paragraph of the complaint therein designated as 25 EXCEPT admit that
`
`DARKINE MOISE sought no-fault services from Answering Defendants.
`
`3. Deny any knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation
`
`contained in the paragraph of the complaint therein designated as 26 EXCEPT admit that
`
`DARKINE MOISE assigned rights to collect no-fault benefits to Answering Defendants.
`
`4. Deny any knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation
`
`contained in the paragraph of the complaint therein designated as 35 EXCEPT admit that
`
`Answering Defendants have submitted claims to Plaintiff as assignee of DARKINE MOISE.
`
`5. Deny any knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation
`
`contained in the paragraph of the complaint therein designated as 36 EXCEPT admit that
`
`Answering Defendants have commenced or have the right to commence actions or arbitrations
`
`against the Plaintiff.
`
`
`
`1
`
`1 of 7
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/08/2024 11:31 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7
`
`INDEX NO. 722834/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2024
`
`6. To the extent that Plaintiff repeats and reallges prior allegations of the complaint as set forth
`
`in paragraph 39, Answering Defendants repeat and reallge each and every admission, denial
`
`and allegation set forth above with the same force and effect as if stated here in full.
`
`AS FOR THE FIRST, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a proper and valid cause of action in each and every cause
`
`of action upon which relief may be granted, and is thus fatally defective.
`
`AS FOR THE SECOND, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE;
`
`Venue is improper.
`
`AS FOR THE THIRD, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE;
`
`Forum non conveniens.
`
`AS FOR THE FOURTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Plaintiff has failed to properly commence the instant action.
`
`AS FOR THE FIFTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Statutes of limitations have expired on the Plaintiff’s action.
`
`AS FOR THE SIXTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Plaintiff lacks legal capacity to sue.
`
`AS FOR THE SEVENTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Plaintiff lacks standing to bring this cause of action against the Answering Defendants
`
`because the Answering Defendants owe no duty to Plaintiff.
`
`AS FOR THE EIGHTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Plaintiff is barred from disclaiming liability under the doctrine of laches and equitable
`
`estoppel.
`
`
`
`AS FOR THE NINTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`2
`
`2 of 7
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/08/2024 11:31 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7
`
`INDEX NO. 722834/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2024
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`There are other actions pending for the same causes of action, therefore, this case is barred.
`
`AS FOR THE TENTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Necessary parties have not been included as parties to this action.
`
`AS FOR THE ELEVENTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`The alleged causes of action are barred by any prior payment, release or settlement.
`
`AS FOR THE TWELFTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Plaintiff will be unjustly enriched.
`
`AS FOR THE THIRTEENTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`The Answering Defendants did not deceive or cause to deceive the Plaintiff.
`
`AS FOR THE FOURTEENTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Plaintiff’s damages if any are the result of its own fraudulent practices.
`
`AS FOR THE FIFTEENTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`That in the event any judgment or verdict is rendered in favor of Plaintiff, the Answering
`
`Defendants are entitled to have such judgment or verdict reduced by the amounts of any
`
`collateral payments.
`
`AS FOR THE SIXTEENTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Upon information and belief, Plaintiff is barred from making this claim because of the failure
`
`of Plaintiff to comply with all the insurance laws, rules and regulations.
`
`AS FOR THE SEVENTEENTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Plaintiff failed to issue timely denials of Answering Defendant’s claims.
`
`AS FOR THE EIGHTEENTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`
`
`3
`
`3 of 7
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/08/2024 11:31 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7
`
`INDEX NO. 722834/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2024
`
`All bills as submitted to Plaintiff by the Answering Defendant were not fraudulent.
`
`AS FOR THE NINETEENTH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`The Answering Defendant did not breach the provisions of the insurance policy issued by
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`AS FOR THE TWENTIETH, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`The Answering Defendant is properly incorporated and operate pursuant to the applicable
`
`laws and regulations of the State of New York.
`
`AS FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`All services provided by Answering Defendant were causally related to an insured incident.
`
`AS FOR THE TWENTY-SECOND, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Any denials issued by Plaintiff failed to preserve relevant defenses to coverage.
`
`AS FOR THE TWENTY-THIRD, SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Plaintiff failed to timely and properly deny Answering Defendant’s claims.
`
`AS FOR THE TWENTY-FOURTH SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel.
`
`AS FOR THE TWENTY-FIFTH SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Lack of jurisdiction.
`
`AS FOR THE TWENTY-SIXTH SEPARATE, AND DISTINCT
`
`AND COMPLETE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE:
`
`Improper service.
`
` WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that a judgment be granted:
`
`(1) Dismissing the complaint herein as against Answering Defendants by their attorneys,
`
`KOPELEVICH & FELDSHEROVA, P.C. with costs and disbursements of this action; and,
`
`
`
`4
`
`4 of 7
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/08/2024 11:31 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7
`
`INDEX NO. 722834/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2024
`
`(2) Granting such other, further, or different relief as this court may deem just and proper.
`
`
`
`Dated: March 7, 2024
` Brooklyn, NY
`
`
`
`
`
`KOPELEVICH & FELDSHEROVA, P.C.
`Attorneys for Defendants
`BRIYUT MEDICAL, P.C.
`FORCE OF NATURE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C.
`PROGRESSIVE HEALTHCARE MEDICINE, P.C.
`RESTART PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, P.C.
`241 37th Street, Suite B439
`Brooklyn, NY 11232
`718-332-0577
`
`By:___________________________________
`__ Mikhail KOPELEVICH __Galina FELDSHEROVA
`
`
`
`
`
`TO: LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL J. TUCKER
` Attorneys for Plaintiff
` One MetroTech Center, 7th Floor
` Brooklyn, NY 11201
`
`
`
`5
`
`5 of 7
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/08/2024 11:31 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7
`
`INDEX NO. 722834/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2024
`
`
`
`
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF QUEENS
`----------------------------------------------------------------------X
`AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY,
`
` Plaintiff,
`-against-
`
`ADVANCED ORTHOPAEDICS, P.L.L.C., ET AL.,
` Defendants.
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`The undersigned, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the Courts of the State of New York,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Index No. 722834/23
`
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`
`File No. 69,468
`
`affirms as follows under penalty of perjury:
`
`Affirmant is associated with the firm of Kopelevich & Feldsherova, P.C., the attorney of record
`
`for Defendants BRIYUT MEDICAL, P.C., FORCE OF NATURE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C.
`
`PROGRESSIVE HEALTHCARE MEDICINE, P.C. and RESTART PSYCHOLOGICAL
`
`SERVICES, P.C. Affirmant has read the annexed answer and knows the contents thereof, and the
`
`same are true to the best of affirmant’s knowledge, except as to those matters therein stated to be
`
`alleged upon information and belief; and as to those matters, affirmant believes to be true. The
`
`source of affirmant’s knowledge and the grounds of belief, as to those matters therein not stated
`
`upon knowledge, are bills, reports, conversations with Defendant’s employees, routine business
`
`practices, etc.
`
`Affirmant makes this verification on behalf of Defendants BRIYUT MEDICAL, P.C., FORCE OF
`
`NATURE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C. PROGRESSIVE HEALTHCARE MEDICINE, P.C. and
`
`RESTART PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, P.C. as affirmant is an attorney authorized to verify
`
`said Answer.
`
`Dated: March 7, 2024 Signed__________________________
`
` __Mikhail KOPELEVICH __ Galina FELDSHEROVA
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`6 of 7
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/08/2024 11:31 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7
`
`INDEX NO. 722834/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2024
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF QUEENS
`-------------------------------------------------------------------X
`AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY,
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Plaintiff,
` INDEX NO. 722834/23
` -against-
`
`
`
`ADVANCED ORTHOPAEDICS, P.L.L.C., ET AL.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`-------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`
`
`
`
`ANSWER
`
`
`
`KOPELEVICH & FELDSHEROVA, P.C.
`Attorneys for Defendants
`BRIYUT MEDICAL, P.C.
`FORCE OF NATURE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C.
`PROGRESSIVE HEALTHCARE MEDICINE, P.C.
`RESTART PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, P.C.
`241 37th Street, Suite B439
`Brooklyn, NY 11232
`718-332-0577
`File # 69,468
`
`Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, the undersigned, an attorney duly admitted to practice in the courts of New
`York State, certifies that, upon information and belief and reasonable inquiry, the contentions contained in
`the annexed documents are not frivolous.
`
`Dated: March 7, 2024
`
` Print Signer’s Name: __Mikhail KOPELEVICH __ Galina FELDSHEROVA
`
`
`
`
`............................................................
`
`Signature:
`
`TO: LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL J. TUCKER
` Attorneys for Plaintiff
` One MetroTech Center, 7th Floor
` Brooklyn, NY 11201
` (212) 857-8200
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`7 of 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket