throbber
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2025 09:32 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19
`
`INDEX NO. 723572/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2025
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INDEX No.: 723572/2024
`
`DEFENDANTS, DR. CARL NICOLEAU’S
`ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND
`COUNTERCLAIM
`
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF QUEENS
`_______________________________________________________X
`
`
`
`
`
`DR. NABIL SALIB,
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`
`DR. CARL NICOLEAU, CHRIS NICOLEAU,
`EAST ELMHURST PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE, PLLC.,
`FAR ROCKAWAY MEDICAL PC, and
`LAMD WALK-IN URGENT CARE MEDICAL GROUP,
`
`
`
`_______________________________________________X
`ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND COUNTERCLAIM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Defendant, DR. CARL NICOLEAU, hereby files his Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and
`
`Counterclaim to Plaintiff, DR. NABIL SALIB’s Verified Complaint filed on December 12,
`2024, and states as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THEIR ACTION
`
`1. Paragraph 1. Deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of the Complaint, except
`respectfully refers the Court to the “contract” referenced and attached therein for the true
`and correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof.
`
`PARTIES
`2. Paragraphs 2-4. Admit the allegations contained in Paragraph 2-4.
`3. Paragraph 5-6. Admit the allegations contained in paragraphs 5-6 of the complaint,
`other than the incorrect current address.
`4. Paragraph 7. Deny the allegations contained in Paragraph of the Complaint, except
`respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract” referenced and attached therein for
`the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`5. Paragraphs 8, and 9. Admit to the allegations contained in paragraphs 9 and 9 of the
`complaint.
`
`
`
`
`1 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2025 09:32 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19
`
`INDEX NO. 723572/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2025
`Dr. Nabil Salib v. Dr. Carl Nicoleau, et. al.
`Index #: 723572/2024
`Page 2 of 6
`
`FACTUAL COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6. Paragraph 10. Admit Dr. Salib’s proposal to purchase a 50% membership share, and
`a 51% membership in Dr. Nicoleau’s practice, but deny all other allegations
`contained in paragraph 10 of the complaint.
`7. Paragraph 11. Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 11 but admit to ceding
`majority control only within the specific mandates of the Agreement, except
`respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract” referenced therein for the true and
`correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof. Paragraph 12. Deny all the
`allegations contained in paragraph 12 but admit Dr. Salib’s offer of $250,000
`purchase agreement paid in installment payments, the 50% membership purchase,
`and 51% voting interest.
`8. Paragraphs 13, and 14. Deny all the allegations contained paragraph 13 and 14,
`except respectfully refers the Court to the language of the contract” referenced and
`attached therein for the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if any.
`9. Paragraph 15-18. Deny the allegations contained in paragraphs 15-18, except
`respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract” referenced and attached therein for
`the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof.
`10. Paragraph 19. Admit to the allegations contained in paragraph 19 that Dr. Nicoleau
`bought Dr. Salib’s interest in the Company.
`11. Paragraph 20. Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 20.
`12. Paragraph 21-38. Deny all the allegations contained in paragraphs 21-38.
`13. Paragraph 32. Deny all the accusations contained therein in paragraph 32.
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Breach of contract-Purchase Agreement against Dr. Nicoleau).
`14. Paragraph 39. In response to Paragraph 1-38 of the Complaint, Defendants repeats
`and re-alleges all the above answers as if fully set forth herein.
`
`15. Paragraph 40. Agree with the allegation contained in paragraph 40 except
`respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract)” referenced therein for the true and
`correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof
`
`16. Paragraphs 41-43. Deny the allegations contained in paragraphs 41-43, except
`respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract)” referenced therein for the true and
`correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof
`
`2 of 6
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2025 09:32 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19
`
`INDEX NO. 723572/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2025
`Dr. Nabil Salib v. Dr. Carl Nicoleau, et. al.
`Index #: 723572/2024
`Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Breach of Contract-Operating Agreement against Dr. Nicoleau and the Company).
`
`17. Paragraphs 44-48. Deny repeats and realleges each allegation contained in
`paragraphs 44-48, except respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract)” referenced
`therein for the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof
`
`THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Breach of Contract-Exit Agreement against Dr. Nicoleau).
`18. Paragraphs 49. Paragraphs 1-48. Deny and repeats and realleges each allegation
`contained in paragraphs 1-48, except respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract)”
`referenced therein for the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof.
`
`19. Paragraph 50. Deny and repeats and realleges each allegation contained in
`paragraphs 50, except respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract)” referenced
`therein for the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof.
`
`FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Breach of contract- Employment against Dr. Nicoleau)
`20. Paragraphs 54. Deny and repeats and realleges each allegation contained in
`paragraphs 1-53, except respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract)” referenced
`therein for the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof.
`FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Fraud of Dr. Nicoleau and Chris Nicoleau)
`21. Deny and repeats and realleges each allegation contained in paragraphs 1-58, except
`respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract)” referenced therein for the true and
`correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof.
`22. Paragraph 59. Deny and repeats and realleges each allegation contained in
`paragraphs 1-48, except respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract)” referenced
`therein for the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof.
`
`3 of 6
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2025 09:32 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19
`
`INDEX NO. 723572/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2025
`Dr. Nabil Salib v. Dr. Carl Nicoleau, et. al.
`Index #: 723572/2024
`Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Unjust enrichment against Dr. Nicoleau, Chris Nicoleau, Far Rockaway Medical PC, and
`LAMD Walk-In Urgent Care Medical Group).
`23. Paragraph 65. Deny, repeats and realleges all allegations made in paragraphs 1-64
`unless I responded specifically as I agree, deny, partially agree, or partially deny.
`Except as above, I respectfully refer the Court to the to the language of the contract”
`referenced and attached therein for the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if
`any.
`
`24. Paragraphs 66-70. Deny and repeats and realleges each allegation contained in
`paragraphs 66-70, except respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract)” referenced
`therein for the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof.
`
`SEVENTH CAUSEOF ACTION
`(Breach of Fiduciary Duty against Dr. Nicoleau).
`25. Paragraph 1-74. Deny and repeats and realleges each allegation contained in
`paragraphs 1-74, except respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract)” referenced
`therein for the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof.
`
`EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Permanent injunction against Dr. Nicoleau, Christ, and LAMD Walk-In Urgent care Medical
`Group).
`26. Paragraph 75. Deny and repeats and realleges each allegation contained in
`paragraphs 1-82, except respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract)” referenced
`therein for the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof.
`27. Paragraph 80. This decision is left at the Court’s discretion.
`NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Accounting against Dr. Nicoleau, Far Rockaway Medical PC, and LAMD Walk-in
`Urgent Center).
`28. Paragraph 83. Deny and repeats and realleges each allegation contained in
`paragraphs 1-87, except respectfully refers the Court to the “Contract)” referenced
`therein for the true and correct terms, and legal effects, if any, thereof.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4 of 6
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2025 09:32 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19
`
`INDEX NO. 723572/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2025
`Dr. Nabil Salib v. Dr. Carl Nicoleau, et. al.
`Index #: 723572/2024
`Page 5 of 6
`
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`
`
`1. Accord and Satisfaction
`
`There was a settlement agreement that the parties had entered into where both parties began to
`perform their obligations. Very early on into this agreement, Plaintiff breached the agreement
`by not paying Dr. Nicoleau the agreed amount.
`
`2. Breach of Contract
`
`Both parties entered into a settlement agreement where both parties began to perform their
`obligations and then Plaintiff breached that agreement.
`
`3. Anticipatory Repudiation
`
`The plaintiff anticipatorily repudiated the settlement agreement by indicating that he was no
`longer going to perform his obligation under the agreement, thus discharging defendant of his
`obligations to perform.
`
`4. Unclean Hands
`
`Plaintiff has unclean hands because he engaged in malfeasance by defaming, libeling, and/or
`slandering Defendant to Defendant’s patients, thus injuring Defendant’s business.
`
`
`COUNTERCLAIM
`
`Count I - Breach of Contract
`
`
`Plaintiff breached his settlement agreement with the Defendant.
`
`
`Count II - Breach of Fiduciary Duty
`
`
`Defendant and Plaintiffs shared a relationship where Defendant reposed trust and confidence
`in Plaintiff and Plaintiff undertook this duty of trust and agreed to protect Defendant. Plaintiff
`breached his duties to Defendant and Defendant suffered damages.
`
`
`Count III - Unjust Enrichment (alternatively)
`
`
`Plaintiff was unjustly enriched by intentionally poaching Defendant’s patients, and it is
`inequitable for him to keep the monies he made from these patients.
`
`
`
`
`5 of 6
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/12/2025 09:32 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19
`
`INDEX NO. 723572/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/12/2025
`Dr. Nabil Salib v. Dr. Carl Nicoleau, et. al.
`Index #: 723572/2024
`Page 6 of 6
`
`Count IV - Quantum Meruit (alternatively)
`
`
`Defendant provided his medical services to Plaintiff’s patients and these patients, and their
`insurance carrier paid Plaintiff and Plaintiff failed to pay Defendant.
`
`
`Count V - Tortious Interference with Advantageous Business Relationship
`
`
`Defendant had an advantageous business relationship with a number of patients; Plaintiff was
`aware that this business relationship existed; Plaintiff intentionally and unjustifiably interfered
`with Defendant relationships and he suffered damages
`
`
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`Wherefore, Defendant Dr. Nicoleau demands judgement against the plaintiff as follows:
`A-G.
`1. Order a full accounting of all money owed to Dr. Nicoleau including:
`a. Under payment of salaries,
`b. Late payments,
`c. 50% profit
`d. Calculate money owed from all billings performed on behalf of Dr.
`Nicolaus’s Patients,
`e. Open Dr. Salib’s, books, billing records including the AR from January 2024,
`Bank deposits
`
`f. Punitive damages to be determined by the Court
`g. Damages to pain and suffering and causing further loss of income,
`h. Damage to Dr. Nicoleau’s good name
`i. Defamation of character
`j. Pre and Post judgement penalties interests,
`k. Attorney’s fees and costs and interest,
`l. Such other and further relief as the Court deems justified and proper
`m. Final financial reward is to be determined by the Court, but not less than
`$750,000.
`
`March 12, 2025
`
`cat} A)N..olid-M
`Carl Nicoleau, MD., Ph.D.
`
`.
`
`6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket