throbber
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/16/2024 10:38 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26
`
`INDEX NO. 725731/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/16/2024
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF QUEENS
`
`SPECIAUZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ALFONSO REYES, et. al.
`
`Defendants.
`
`Index No. I 725731/2023~1
`
`VERIFIED PRO SE
`ANSWER TO
`FORECLOSURE^
`COMPLAINT E'AND
`COUNTERCLAIMS
`[Defendant: check this box if
`you checked any item in the
`“counterclaim” section
`below]
`
`Defendant- Alfonso Reyes
`follows:
`
`] Pro Se answers the complaint in this proceeding as
`
`I plead the following Defenses and Counterclaims:
`
`DEFENSES
`
`I generally deny each allegation of the Complaint, including anv allegation that Plaintiff
`FILED
`is the owner of the note and mortgage.
`APR 1 6 2024
`COUNTY CLERK ti
`QUEENS COUNTY
`Lack of Standing: Plaintiff, upon information and belief, was not the legal owner of the
`note and/or mortgage, and did not otherwise have the right to enforce the mortgage, at the
`time it commenced this foreclosure lawsuit and therefore lacks standing.
`
`/
`
`/
`
`□
`
`Foreclosure Cause of Action: Plaintiff has not pleaded that it owns the note and
`mortgage, which is an element of a foreclosure cause of action, and it therefore has failed
`to plead a foreclosure cause of action.
`
`Statute of Limitations (NY Civil Practice Law and Rules § 213(4)): Plaintiff may not
`sue on all or part of the mortgage debt because Plaintiff, upon information and belief,
`commenced this action more than six years after the debt became due, which defense also
`supports the separately pleaded counterclaim to cancel and discharge the mortgage under
`NY Real Property-Actions and Proceedings Law § 1501(4)..
`
`Service of Process (NY Civil Practice Law and Rules § 308): I was not properly served
`with process in this action for the following reason(s): 1 on[u ft it t) ~H/Y
`Summc/n*; i £&rnpUi>Mr-Pcm ^ (\tiMoof) uOW cWj (\o+ Ui/l i.Y> "Hats
`no ^*1 ^
`4W V\a^e.,j. (sr\b
`44^
`44^
`(\)0T
`o^b [ U»4L
`
`/
`
`hoose ,
`
`1 of 7
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/16/2024 10:38 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26
`
`INDEX NO. 725731/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/16/2024
`
`□
`
`□
`
`□
`
`□
`
`□
`
`□
`
`Prior Pending Action (NY Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law § 1301):
`Plaintiff impermissibly commenced this action because there is a prior pending action to
`recover all or part of the mortgage debt.
`
`No Default/Payment or Partial Payment: I have paid, in whole or in part, the amounts
`claimed by Plaintiff, or the amounts claimed by Plaintiff are not due, or the loan is
`otherwise not in default.
`
`Reverse Mortgages
`
`Reverse Mortgage—Notice Requirements: Plaintiff failed to comply with the notice
`requirements under New York and/or federal law or failed to comply with contractual
`requirements of the reverse mortgage, which are conditions precedent to this foreclosure
`action.
`
`Reverse Mortgage—Failure to Specify Alleged Default: The complaint is vague and
`does not specify the alleged default and/or the amount(s) plaintiff claims in this action.
`
`Reverse Mortgage—Foreclosure on a Reverse Mortgage for Property Charge
`Defaults is Against Public Policy: The purpose of reverse mortgage loans under the
`Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (“HECM”) program is to assist senior citizens to stay
`in their homes, and reverse mortgage lenders have other remedies in the event of alleged
`failure to pay property charges. Plaintiff, accordingly, as a matter of equity and public
`policy, should not be permitted to foreclose.
`
`Reverse Mortgage—NY Real Property Law § 280-b: Plaintiff and/or its predecessor-
`in interest, upon information and belief, violated the requirements of NY Real Property
`Law § 280-b, compliance with which is a condition precedent to commencing an action
`to foreclose on a reverse mortgage loan covered by that statute, mandating dismissal of
`this foreclosure action, which defense also supports the separately pleaded counterclaim
`for damages under NY Real Property Law § 280-b.
`
`Predicate Notices/Conditions Precedent
`
`/ Notice of Default: Plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements for the notice of
`default in my mortgage loan agreement, a condition precedent to this foreclosure action.
`
`/
`
`90-Day Notice Requirement (NY Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law § 1304):
`Plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of NY Real Property Actions and
`Proceedings Law § 1304, a condition precedent to this foreclosure action.
`
`Prepared with assistance from Queens Legal Services
`
`2
`
`2 of 7
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/16/2024 10:38 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26
`
`INDEX NO. 725731/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/16/2024
`
`/
`
`□
`
`/
`
`90-Day Notice Filing Requirement (NY Real Property and Proceedings Law § 1306):
`Plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of NY Real Property and Proceedings
`Law § 1306, a condition precedent to this foreclosure action.
`
`Help for Homeowners in Foreclosure Notice Requirement (NY Real Property Actions
`and Proceedings Law § 1303): Plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of NY
`Real Property and Proceedings Law § 1303, a condition precedent to this foreclosure
`action.
`
`Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
`
`Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Early Intervention Requirement (12 C.F.R.
`§ 1024.39): Upon information and belief, Plaintiff violated the early intervention
`requirements of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act because (check one or both if
`applicable):
`/
`
`Within 36 days of my delinquency, the loan servicer did not attempt to establish
`live contact with me to inform me about the availability of loss mitigation options.
`
`□
`
`Within 45 days of my delinquency, the loan servicer did not send me a written
`notice that included contact information for the servicer, a description of loss
`mitigation options available from the servicer, information about applying for loss
`mitigation, and a website listing housing counselors.
`
`□
`
`Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Pre-Foreclosure Review Requirement (12
`C.F.R. § 1024.41): Plaintiff impermissibly filed this foreclosure during the pre­
`foreclosure review period because (check one or both if applicable):
`
`□
`
`□
`
`Plaintiff commenced this action before my loan was more than 120 days
`delinquent.
`
`I submitted a complete loss mitigation application to my loan'servicer but Plaintiff
`commenced this action (1) before the loan servicer made a decision on that
`application, (2) before the time period to appeal the loan servicer’s decision
`lapsed, or (3) before the loan servicer made a decision on an appeal I submitted in
`connection with the loss mitigation application.
`
`Prepared with assistance from Queens Legal Services
`
`3
`
`3 of 7
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/16/2024 10:38 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26
`
`INDEX NO. 725731/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/16/2024
`
`FHA-Insured Loans
`
`□
`
`FHA Pre-Foreclosure Requirements: My loan is insured by the Federal Housing
`Administration. Upon information and belief, the loan servicer/mortgagee has not
`complied with regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development
`because the loan servicer/mortgagee did not do one or more of the following {check all
`that are applicable):
`
`□
`
`□
`
`□
`
`□
`
`Send me a notice of default before the end of the second month of my
`delinquency (24 C.F.R. § 203.602).
`
`Attempt to arrange a face-to-face interview with me before three full monthly
`installments due under the mortgage were unpaid (24 C.F.R. § 203.604).
`
`Evaluate me for loss mitigation before four full monthly installments due under
`the mortgage were unpaid (24 C.F.R. § 203.605).
`
`Wait until three full monthly installments due under the mortgage were unpaid
`before commencing this foreclosure action (24 C.F.R. § 203.606).
`
`:|c $ :|c $ $ sfc
`
`Certificate of Merit Requirement (NY Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3012-b): Upon
`information and belief, Plaintiff failed to comply with the Certificate of Merit
`requirements of NY Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3012-b.
`
`Request for Judicial Intervention (NY Codes, Rules and Regulations Title 22, §
`202.12-a(b)): Upon information and belief, Plaintiff did not file a Request for Judicial
`Intervention.
`
`Excessive Interest and Fees (NY Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3408(f)): In a prior
`foreclosure action, Plaintiff failed to negotiate in good faith pursuant to CPLR 3408(f).
`This failure to negotiate in good faith has caused excessive interest and fees to accrue
`which Plaintiff, as a matter of equity and by operation of the CPLR, is not entitled to
`recover.
`
`Excessive Interest (NY Civil Practice Law and Rules § 5001(a)): Plaintiff has
`unreasonably delayed filing this action, failed to file the Request for Judicial Intervention
`or engaged in other dilatory conduct causing excessive interest to accrue which the Court
`may reduce or toll, as a matter of equity and pursuant to NY Civil Practice Law and
`Rules § 5001(a).
`
`Action Commenced Against a Deceased Party: This action is a nullity because it was
`commenced against
`after that party was already deceased and before a
`personal representative was appointed and it should therefore be dismissed.
`
`□
`
`□
`
`□ J
`
`□
`
`Prepared with assistance from Queens Legal Services
`
`4
`
`4 of 7
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/16/2024 10:38 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26
`
`INDEX NO. 725731/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/16/2024
`
`o
`
`□
`
`Failure to Join Necessary Party: This action should be dismissed because of Plaintiff s
`failure to join a necessary party.
`
`Coronavirus Foreclosure Moratoriums/Forbearance and Loss Mitigation Programs:
`Plaintiff failed to comply with federal or New York State law requiring forbearance and
`loss mitigation programs for borrowers affected or impacted by the Coronavirus
`pandemic, or it commenced this action in violation of federal or New York State law
`imposing moratoriums on the commencement of residential foreclosure actions, or
`otherwise in violation of any applicable Executive Order promulgated by the Governor of
`the State of New York or Administrative Orders promulgated by the Chief
`Administrative Judge of the State of New York.
`
`Equitable Defenses
`
`□ Unclean Hands and/or Unconscionability: This action is barred by the doctrine of unclean
`hands and/or unconscionability for the following reason(s):
`
`□ Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing: Plaintiff or its predecessor-in-interest
`violated the covenant of good faith and fair dealing implied in all contracts and is barred from
`recovery in this action for the following reason(s):______________________ ________ •
`
`□
`
`Other Defenses or Counterclaims (attach additional pages if needed)-.
`
`Prepared with assistance from Queens Legal Services
`
`5
`
`5 of 7
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/16/2024 10:38 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26
`
`INDEX NO. 725731/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/16/2024
`
`COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`□
`
`□
`
`/
`
`Quiet Title/Cancel and Discharge the Mortgage: The statute of limitations for
`commencement of this foreclosure action on the subject mortgage has expired because
`Plaintiff, upon information and belief, commenced this action more than six years after it
`accelerated the mortgage debt. Plaintiff is not in possession of the mortgaged property
`and I am the owner of the property and therefore am entitled to a judgment cancelling and
`discharging the mortgage and adjudging the property free of any encumbrance by such
`mortgage pursuant to NY Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law § 1501(4).
`
`Violations of NY Real Property Law § 280-b: I have been injured by reason of
`Plaintiffs and/or its predecessor-in-interest’s violations of NY Real Property Law § 280-
`b or the rules and regulations of the federal Department of Housing and Urban
`Development relating to the home equity conversion mortgage program and I am
`therefore entitled to recover treble and actual damages, in addition to reasonable
`attorneys’ fees if I retain an attorney, in an amount to be proven at trial.
`
`Attorney’s Fees (NY Real Property Law § 282): If I retain counsel, I am entitled to
`recover my attorney’s fees in defending this action pursuant to New York Real Property
`Law § 282.
`
`Wherefore, Defendant requests that the Complaint be dismissed; that judgment in favor
`of Defendant be granted on Defendant’s counterclaims in their entirety; that Defendant be
`granted costs and attorneys’ fees if he or she retains counsel; and that Defendant be granted any
`other relief allowed by law or equity as this Court shall deem just and proper.
`
`Dated: Jamaica, New York
`^rtl Z
`
`, 20A4
`
`(Defendant’s Signature!
`(Defendant’s Name)
`(Defendant’s Address)___________________________________ ._ .
`(Defendant’s Address) e=7>'^t^ <y> / J”- *^7^ s0
`<c> /^O“V ^
`
`(Defendant’s Telephone Number) (Z
`
`A /
`
`0 Prepared with the assistance of counsel admitted in New York.
`
`Prepared with assistance from Queens Legal Services
`
`6
`
`6 of 7
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/16/2024 10:38 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26
`
`INDEX NO. 725731/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/16/2024
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`l^'i£-cfY)C) bj $ being duly sworn, state that the within Answer is true to the best of my
`
`I,
`knowledge, except as to those matters alleged upon information and belief, which I believe to be
`true
`
`Sworn to before me this
`^ day of APME,
`
`, 202./
`
`Notary Publi,
`
`DUSTIN T. PANGONIS
`NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF NEW YORK
`NO. 02PA6344660
`QUALIFIED IN kings coyNgr
`COMMISSION EXPIRES 7/05/j^
`
`Prepared with assistance from Queens Legal Services
`
`7
`
`7 of 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket