throbber
FILED: SCHENECTADY COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2023 09:54 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2023
`
`
`INDEX NO. 2023-83
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF SCHENECTADY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`NATASHA HANCE,
`
`
`
`
`– against –
`
`
`Index No.: 2023-83
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF
`PAUL S. GROSSWALD
`
`
`PEPSICO, INC., et al.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`I, PAUL S. GROSSWALD, of full age, hereby affirm the following to be true under the
`penalties of perjury pursuant to CPLR § 2106:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at law of the State of New York and counsel to Plaintiff Natasha Hance
`("Plaintiff") in this matter. As such, I am fully familiar with the facts contained herein. I
`submit this Certification in support of the accompanying proposed Order to Show Cause
`with a request for a Temporary Restraining Order.
`
`Employment Law Group, LLC is a plaintiff-side law firm that specializes in employment
`cases (the "Firm").
`
`The Firm generally takes plaintiffs' cases on contingency and earns money by collecting a
`percentage of any monies recovered by the plaintiff as a result of the Firm's legal work on
`the case.
`
`I am the Firm's New York Case Manager. It is my responsibility to oversee all of the
`Firm's employment cases in New York.
`
`On August 10, 2022, Plaintiff Natasha Hance ("Ms. Hance") signed the Firm's
`engagement agreement to have the Firm represent her in an employment case against
`Defendant PepsiCo, Inc. and related Defendants.
`
`Attached hereto is a true and accurate copy of that engagement agreement.
`
`In my role as the Firm's New York Case Manager, I assigned Ms. Hance's case to one of
`the Firm's New York attorneys, Jessica Sparacino.
`
`Ms. Sparacino successfully negotiated a settlement with Alexander Wood, counsel for
`Defendant PepsiCo, Inc.
`
`1 of 5
`
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`FILED: SCHENECTADY COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2023 09:54 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2023
`
`
`INDEX NO. 2023-83
`
`Due to a confidentiality provision in the settlement agreement, I cannot publicly disclose
`the terms or the amount of the settlement. If requested, I can make a copy of the
`settlement agreement available to the Court for in camera review.
`
`10. Ms. Hance executed the settlement agreement on May 15, 2023.
`
`On June 20 2023, Ms. Sparacino resigned from the Firm to pursue another opportunity.
`
`At the time that Ms. Sparacino resigned, the settlement check for Ms. Hance had not yet
`arrived.
`
`9.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`
`13.
`
`In the first week of July, I contacted Ms. Hance and Mr. Wood to let them know that Ms.
`Sparacino had left the Firm and that I would be taking over Ms. Hance's matter.
`
`On Thursday, July 27, 2023, I called Ms. Hance to tell her that the settlement check had
`arrived.
`
`I told her that the check was made out to "Natasha Hance".
`
`In order to ensure that the Firm got paid, I told Ms. Hance that the check needed to be
`deposited into the Firm's IOLA account.
`
`I explained that it would probably take up to ten days for the check to clear, after which,
`the Firm would write her a check for her share of the money.
`
`I told her that the Firm's IOLA account is held in TD Bank.
`
`However, because the check was made payable to her, and not to the Firm, I could not
`deposit it in the Firm's IOLA account unless she endorsed the check over to the Firm.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`
`20.
`
`22.
`
`24.
`
`I asked her to pick a TD Bank location near where she lives where we could meet.
`
`21. Ms. Hance selected the TD Bank located at 2301 Nott Street East, Niskayuna, New York
`12309.
`
`I told Ms. Hance to meet me at that bank on Friday, July 28, 2023, at 11:00 am. I
`explained that I would have her endorse the check at the bank, and she would watch me
`deposit the check into the Firm's IOLA account. I explained that the bank would provide
`both her and me with a receipt documenting the deposit.
`
`23. Ms. Hance agreed to these terms.
`
`The next day, I met Ms. Hance at the TD Bank in Niskayuna at 11:00 am, as agreed.
`
`25. While standing in front of the teller, I presented the settlement check to Ms. Hance.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`2 of 5
`
`

`

`FILED: SCHENECTADY COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2023 09:54 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2023
`
`
`INDEX NO. 2023-83
`
`26. Ms. Hance suddenly, and without warning, grabbed the check and stepped away from the
`teller, shouting "This is my money! You can't make me put it in your account! Don't try
`anything! The police have already been called!"
`
`27. Ms. Hance continued to rant about how the money belongs to her, because the check was
`in her name, and that she has so much debt, and so many bills to pay, and how she would
`not allow me to take her money, and the police are on their way.
`
`A few minutes later, a police officer arrived.
`
`After taking statements from both Ms. Hance and myself, the officer concluded that this
`was a civil dispute, not a criminal matter, and therefore police intervention was
`unwarranted.
`
`The officer escorted Ms. Hance to her car, and she drove away with the check.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`
`
`Based on Ms. Hance's conduct and statements, I believe there is a reasonable probability
`that Ms. Hance intends on using the full amount of the settlement check – including the
`Firm's portion – to pay her outstanding debts.
`
`New York Judiciary Law § 475 states:
`
`
`Attorney's lien in action, special or other proceeding.
`
`From the commencement of an action, special or other proceeding in any
`court or before any state, municipal or federal department, except a
`department of
`labor, or
`the service of an answer containing a
`counterclaim, or the initiation of any means of alternative dispute
`resolution including, but not limited to, mediation or arbitration, or
`the provision of services in a settlement negotiation at any stage of
`the dispute, the attorney who appears for a party has a lien upon his or
`her client's cause of action, claim or counterclaim, which attaches to a
`verdict, report, determination, decision, award, settlement, judgment or
`final order in his or her client's favor, and the proceeds thereof in
`whatever hands they may come; and the lien cannot be affected by any
`settlement between the parties before or after judgment, final order or
`determination. The court upon the petition of the client or attorney may
`determine and enforce the lien.
`
`
`Pursuant to § 475, the Firm has a charging lien on the settlement proceeds of this case.
`
`Therefore, the Firm is respectfully petitioning this Court to determine and enforce the lien,
`pursuant to § 475.
`
` Specifically, the Firm is requesting the following relief:
`
`
`3
`
`3 of 5
`
`

`

`FILED: SCHENECTADY COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2023 09:54 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2023
`
`
`INDEX NO. 2023-83
`
`1.
`
`Defendant Pepsico, Inc. shall, within thirty (30) days, remit payment of Plaintiff's
`
`settlement money in this case in a check for the full settlement amount made
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`payable to "Employment Law Group, LLC Attorney Trust Account";
`
`Such remittance is to be delivered to Paul S. Grosswald, Employment Law Group,
`
`LLC, 350 Main Street, West Orange, NJ 07052;
`
`Employment Law Group, LLC shall deposit said funds into its New York IOLA
`
`account; and
`
`Once such funds have cleared the bank, Employment Law Group, LLC shall
`
`promptly remit to Plaintiff her share of the funds, pursuant to the terms of the
`
`engagement agreement between Plaintiff and Employment Law Group, LLC,
`
`executed by Plaintiff on August 10, 2022.
`
`36.
`
`The Firm is further requesting a temporary restraining order to prevent Plaintiff from
`
`cashing the settlement check and absconding with the Firm's money.
`
`37.
`
`Specifically, the Firm is requesting that Defendant PepsiCo, Inc. be ordered to stop
`
`payment on the check that Ms. Hance took into her possession.
`
`38. Ms. Hance could have already deposited the check into her personal account on Friday,
`
`July 28, 2023. That necessarily means that this Court has only a few days before the
`
`check clears to order that the payment be stopped in order to prevent Ms. Hance from
`
`absconding with the funds.
`
`39.
`
`If the Court fails to issue such an Order in a timely manner, the Firm will lose access to
`
`the funds, and its charging lien will become worthless and unenforceable.
`
`40.
`
`Therefore, time is of the essence.
`
`
`
`4
`
`4 of 5
`
`

`

`FILED: SCHENECTADY COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2023 09:54 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2023
`
`
`INDEX NO. 2023-83
`
`41.
`
`Employment Law Group, LLC agrees to pay any bank fees incurred by Defendant
`
`PepsiCo, Inc. as a result of the stopped payment.
`
`Dated: July 30, 2023
`
`
`
`By:
`
`EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, LLC
`
`
`
`PAUL S. GROSSWALD
`350 Main Street
`West Orange, NJ 07052
`-and-
`774 Manor Road, Ste. 204
`Staten Island, NY 10314
`Phone: (917) 753-7007
`Email: pgrosswald@hotmail.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Natasha Hance
`
`
`
`5
`
`5 of 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket