throbber
202209030110
`
`FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 09/03/2022 02:20 PMFILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/2024 03:00 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 651NYSCEF DOC. NO. 216
`
`Index #: E2020003840
`
`INDEX NO. E2020003840INDEX NO. 612331/2023
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/03/2022RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2024
`
`Original article
`
`Using the geologic
`setting
`as an indicator
`of
`deposits
`amphibole asbestos
`content
`
`of
`
`talc
`
`Bradley S. Van Gosen · Heather A. Lowers · Stephen J. Sutley
`
`· Carol A. Gent
`
`This study examined commercial
`Abstract
`talc
`in the U.S. and their amphibole-asbestos
`deposits
`content. The study found that
`the talc-forming
`the amphibole and
`environment
`influenced
`directly
`amphibole-asbestos
`content of
`the talc deposit.
`in the U.S. have mined
`Large talc
`districts
`replaced dolostone.
`hydrothermal
`that
`tales
`Hydrothermal
`created by siliceous
`fluids
`talcs,
`heated by magmasat depth,
`lack
`consistently
`amphiboles
`In contrast,
`as accessory minerals.
`formed by contact or
`mineable talc
`deposits
`that
`regional metamorphism consistently
`contain
`as asbestiform varieties.
`amphiboles,
`locally
`Examples of contact metamorphic
`deposits
`Death Valley, California;
`these talc-tremolite
`contain accessory amphibole-asbestos. Talc
`deposits
`bodies formed by regional metamorphism always
`of
`contain amphiboles, which display
`a variety
`compositions
`and habits,
`asbestiform.
`including
`Someindustrial mineral deposits
`are under scrutiny
`sources of accessory asbestos minerals.
`as potential
`between the talc-
`relations
`Recognizing consistent
`and amphibole-asbestos
`forming environment
`content maybe used in prioritizing
`remediation or
`of abandoned and active talc mines.
`monitoring
`Keywords Talc · Amphibole-asbestos
`· Hydrothermal
`· Metamorphic
`setting
`
`· Geologic
`· USA
`
`occur in
`
`Introduction
`
`The presence of amphibole asbestos
`as minor accessory
`minerals in some talc
`and its potential
`health
`deposits,
`
`I Received: 26 September 2003 / Accepted: 24 November 2003

`
`r
`
`2004
`
`B. 5. Van Gosen (C 3) H. A. Lowers · 5. 1 Sutley C. A. Gent
`U.S. Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, M.S. 905,
`Box 25046, Denver, CO 80225, USA
`Email: bvangose@usgs.gov
`Tel.: +1-303-2361566
`Fax: +1-303-2361425
`
`impacts on the humanrespiratory
`system, have been the
`research and contentious debate for
`focus of considerable
`(Goodwin 1974; Occupational and Safety
`30 years
`at
`least
`and Health Administration
`issues
`1992). Talc-asbestos
`have drawn renewed attention,
`such as news reports
`in
`talc used to add strength
`2000 contending that
`the fibrous
`crayons contained
`brands of children's
`to the best-selling
`2001). To investi-
`(Beard and others
`amphibole asbestos
`of amphibole minerals in
`and character
`gate the extent
`the U.S. Geological
`Survey
`a group at
`deposits,
`talc
`between amphi-
`(USGS) is examining the relationships
`in U.S. deposits. This study,
`boles and talc
`field
`involving
`analyses, and an
`and sampling,
`examinations
`laboratory
`review, has revealed
`that a consistent
`extensive
`literature
`and small
`occurs within
`large (commercial)
`relationship
`U.S talc deposits-that
`the primary
`talc-forming
`is,
`amphibole
`environment
`the ultimate
`controlled
`directly
`content of
`deposit.
`the talc
`are the products of metasomatism caused by
`Talc deposits
`contact metamorphism,
`or
`regional metamorphism,
`or brines heated
`hydrothermal
`(meteoric
`processes
`fluids
`Twoof
`or buried intrusions).
`these talc-forming
`by distant
`mechanisms-contact metamorphism and hydrothermal
`processes-are
`represented
`well
`by large,
`historically
`mined deposits
`region of southern
`in the Death Valley
`studies on these
`Results of field and laboratory
`California.
`the con-
`described herein,
`Death Valley
`deposits,
`reflect
`talc deposits with
`of amphibole-rich
`associations
`sistent
`contact metamorphism versus amphibole-poor
`talc with
`hydrothermal
`processes.
`A number of U.S.
`(under
`of commercial
`talc deposits
`size
`were formed by
`past or present economic conditions)
`metasomatic processes
`driven by regional metamorphism;
`intergrown
`contain talc
`these large bodies consistently
`and (or) anthophyllite.
`with amphiboles, such as tremolite
`(major versus
`Debate over the asbestos mineral content
`trace amounts) within these talc-amphibole
`is the
`deposits
`of the predominant
`of differing
`habit
`interpretations
`result
`of the amphibole
`versus non-asbestiform)
`(asbestiform
`The complicating
`face analysts
`factors
`that
`particles.
`talc ore material
`are discussed.
`type of
`examining this
`
`ASheSt0S
`
`term with a long his-
`Asbestos is a commercial-industrial
`"Asbestos"
`tory, and is not a mineralogical
`definition.
`in the
`
`920
`
`Environmental Geology (2004) 45:920-939
`
`DOI 10.1007/s00254-003-0955-2
`
`

`

`202209030110
`
`FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 09/03/2022 02:20 PMFILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/2024 03:00 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 651NYSCEF DOC. NO. 216
`
`Index #: E2020003840
`
`INDEX NO. E2020003840INDEX NO. 612331/2023
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/03/2022RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2024
`
`Original artide
`
`its
`
`intergrown with the vermiculite
`half of the 20th century becamewidely used in regu- mineral
`deposits
`fibers
`latter
`near the town from 1923 to 1990 (U.S.
`mined and milled
`language to refer
`thin parti-
`to well developed,
`long,
`latory
`and Public Works
`Senate Committee on Environment
`and fiber bundles of specific mineral
`or fibrils)
`(fibers
`cles
`2000; Dearwent and others 2000). The California
`Division
`compositions, which have fulfilled
`industrial
`particular
`of Mines and Geology has mapped outcrops of ultramafic
`is most commonly
`In the U.S., asbestos
`applications.
`country rocks with the
`rocks in California
`to indicate
`defined as the asbestiform variety
`of 6 naturally
`occurring
`and actinolite-series
`asbestos
`to host chrysotile
`potential
`hydrated silicate
`the
`these include
`minerals;
`chrysotile,
`2000). Other examples of occupational
`asbestiform memberof the serpentine
`and Hill
`group, and five
`(Churchill
`exposures to asbestos are described in
`and environmental
`the asbestiform varieties
`minerals of the amphibole group:
`Nolan and others
`(2001).
`called crocidolite),
`riebeckite
`(commercially
`of
`(2)
`(1)
`The history
`and study of naturally
`occurring asbestos,
`cummingtonite-grunerite
`called amosite),
`(commercially
`complex
`and the multiple,
`health
`associated
`impacts,
`(anthophyllite
`(3) anthophyllite
`(4) actinolite
`asbestos),
`are discussed in
`revolve around asbestos
`and (5)
`issues that
`tremolite
`(tremolite
`(actinolite
`asbestos)
`asbestos),
`1992). The Campbell and others
`(1977), Ross (1981), Zoltai
`(1981),
`(Occupational Safety and Health Administration
`(1988), Mossman and
`Levadie (1984), Skinner and others
`that make it useful and desirable
`of asbestos
`for
`qualities
`(1990), Occupational Safety and Health Adminis-
`and
`commercial use are its high tensile
`others
`strength,
`flexibility,
`(1992), Guthrie and Mossman(1993), Nolan and
`and electricity.
`tration
`to heat, chemicals,
`resistance
`its
`(2001, 2002). Current
`that are dura-
`(2001), and Virta
`federal
`The inherent properties
`of asbestos-fibers
`others
`are provided in the Code of Federal Regula-
`long, and thin-appear
`regulations
`of
`to the toxicity
`to contribute
`ble,
`on occupational expo-
`the human
`these mineral particles when lodged inside
`regulations
`(CFR),
`tions
`including
`and ship-related
`sures to asbestos excepting construction
`1981; Wylie and
`system (Stanton and others
`respiratory
`1910.1001); CFRregulations
`work (CFR 29, part
`are
`1993). Occupational exposures to asbestos have
`others
`"pulmo-
`updated as needed on July 1.
`been linked to asbestosis
`of
`the lungs,
`(scarring
`lung cancer, and malignant
`nary interstitial
`fibrosis"),
`(tumor development within
`mesothelioma
`the pleural
`in the perito-
`membrane lining
`the chest cavity and (or)
`neumlining
`the abdominal and pelvic walls and their
`vis-
`1988; Mossman and others
`(Skinner and others
`1990;
`cera)
`Guthrie and Mossman1993; Nolan and others 2001). His-
`has accounted for more than 90%of the
`chrysotile
`torically,
`over 99%of
`composition of
`Talc is a hydrous silicate with an idealized
`and presently
`the
`asbestos production,
`world's
`2001, 2002). Mg3Si4Ow(OH)3but can contain major amounts of Fe,
`world production
`(Ross and Virta
`2001; Virta
`has been minor Al and F, and trace Mn, Ti, Cr, Ni, Ca, Na, and K
`Whereasmining, processing,
`and use of chrysotile
`(Evans and Guggenheim 1988; Greenwood 1998). Signifi-
`that amphi-
`muchmore common, several
`studies
`suggest
`in the Appalachians,
`occur in the U.S.
`bole asbestos, even when occurring as a minor accessory in
`talc deposits
`cant
`in the West in Montana,
`from Vermont to Alabama,
`deposits, maybe the primary cause of meso-
`chrysotile
`Idaho, and NewMexico
`Nevada, Washington,
`occupations (Ross 1981, 1984, California,
`thelioma in asbestos-related
`also occur
`2001; Mossmanand others
`1994). Large deposits
`1990; Browneand Wagner 2001;
`and others
`(Piniazkiewicz
`in Texas, and small soapstone mines once operated in
`Gibbs 2001; Langer 2001; Pooley 2001a, 2001b). As noted by
`are otherwise lacking
`Mossmanand others
`Arkansas, but economic deposits
`"The persistence
`of
`(1990, p. 296):
`amphiboles in humanlungs maybe attributed
`between the Appalachians and the Rocky Mountains.
`to their
`rock
`two general
`have replaced
`lack of
`Commercial
`talc deposits
`the peripheral
`to penetrate
`lung,
`increased
`ability
`types:(1) Dolostone (dolomite or dolomitic marble), which
`or durability". Wagner and others
`(1960)
`clearance,
`replaced by reactions with large volumes of
`were selectively
`described the high rates of malignant mesothelioma in
`in solution, mobilized by
`heated waters carrying
`of crocidolite
`workers and nearby residents
`(asbestiform
`silica
`magmatic or metamorphic mechanisms. The dolostone-
`riebeckite) mines in the Cape Province of South Africa.
`range from cm-thick pods to
`that study in 1960, mesothelioma
`hosted replacement deposits
`Following publication
`of
`the Treasure Chest mine near
`the 29-m-thick
`talc body at
`becameincreasingly
`recognized as an occupational
`risk in
`Dillon, Montana (Berg 1979). Today and in the past,
`the
`and handling of rocks that contain
`the mining, milling,
`in the U.S. exploited
`by-products.
`amphibole asbestos and their
`talc
`largest
`talc producing districts
`extent, mag-
`there has been a renewed focus upon the
`and to a lesser
`deposits
`dolostone,
`In recent
`replacing
`years,
`(2) The second commontalc hosts are ultramafic
`of amphibole asbestos;
`in
`hazards related
`to inhalation
`nesite.
`altered by metaso-
`and peridotites,
`exposures due to the mining and processing of
`rocks, mainly dunites
`particular,
`regional metamorphism. Mag-
`matism through contact
`some amphibole-bearing
`industrial mineral deposits,
`or
`as
`in these rocks reacted with SiOrsaturated
`nesium silicates
`exposures to amphibole-rich
`well as environmental
`during metamorphism to form nearly
`aqueous pore fluids
`that expose
`bedrock, such as road cuts and excavations
`rock (Browne and Wagner 2001). For
`to zoned
`bodies of talc adjacent
`monomineralogic
`asbestos-bearing
`sequences of
`example, unusually high incidences
`of asbestos-related
`amphibole-chlorite-,
`talc-carbonate-,
`calcic
`zones in addition
`and chlorite-dominant
`disease in the small
`and respiratory
`town of
`to complexly
`mortality
`by Sanford 1982). These deposits
`mixed zones (described
`to amphibole
`Libby, Montana, have been attributed
`
`Exploitable
`talc
`and amphiboles
`
`deposits
`
`Environmental Geology (2004) 45:920-939
`
`921
`
`

`

`202209030110
`
`FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 09/03/2022 02:20 PMFILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/2024 03:00 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 651NYSCEF DOC. NO. 216
`
`Index #: E2020003840
`
`INDEX NO. E2020003840INDEX NO. 612331/2023
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/03/2022RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2024
`
`Original
`
`artide
`
`......
`
`sample
`form rinds on the ultramatic
`selected talcose rock at each particular
`bodies or nearly
`replace them;
`randomly
`talc bodies that can spot. The samples are intended to represent
`the talcose
`or lenticular
`tabular
`they are typically
`and extend more than 300 min
`reach 100 min thickness
`material mined at each site,
`collected mainly from mines
`those samples
`type are mined in Vermont,
`and abandoned, excepting
`Large deposits
`of this
`that are inactive
`length.
`the Yellowstone mine,
`have been mined in other eastern
`from an active open pit of
`and smaller deposits
`collected
`and Texas. The ultramafic-hosted
`southwest Montana.
`states, California,
`sampling bag was
`the inside of the plastic
`sources of pure talc
`Dust coating
`important
`have been equally
`deposits
`examined using a JEOL5800-LV scanning electron
`the dark talcose bodies owing
`and darker
`(soapstone),
`talc
`microscope (SEM), equipped with an Oxford ISIS energy-
`and chlorite
`to amphibole,
`coloration
`their
`serpentine,
`window detector.
`and others
`system (EDS) with ultra-thin
`impurities
`dispersive
`(Piniazkiewicz
`1994).
`The EDSprovided semi-quantitative
`chemical data that
`The host
`and process of formation
`rock composition
`was reduced using the Oxford ISIS standardless
`software
`talc, which in turn
`of
`determines
`the
`the qualities
`affects
`with the ZAFcorrection
`Analyses were
`deposit. The grain
`procedure selected.
`of a particular
`industrial
`applications
`performed on single,
`not on fibers
`size and shape, color, and purity
`that
`of talc
`isolated
`its uses
`structures,
`influence
`The operating condi-
`lay across other mineral particles.
`(Piniazkiewicz
`and others
`the talc-
`In addition,
`1994).
`the instrument were 15 kV, 0.5-3 nA (cup), and
`forming mechanism-hydrothermal
`tions of
`contact
`processes,
`approximately 30%dead time. These conditions
`would
`metamorphism, or
`regional metamorphism-directly
`volume of ~2 µm.
`excite an analysis
`amphibole content of the talc ore
`influenced the ultimate
`used do not account
`The matrix corrections
`body, described below through examples. Within a single
`for particle
`(2000) demon-
`geometry. However, Small and Armstrong
`such as some talc
`ore bodies, amphibole
`mineral
`deposit,
`that at 10-15 kV (utilized
`study) geometry-
`crystals may range in habit
`from blocky to prismatic
`by this
`strated
`to
`can be relatively
`in the analyses of particles
`induced errors
`amphibole asbestos,
`In describing
`to asbestiform.
`acicular
`small. One of the amphibole-rich
`study samples was
`"Amphibole-asbestos
`Wylie (2000,
`p. 56) notes that:
`fibrils
`µm" and "individual
`analyzed by EDSand by electron
`with
`probe microanalysis
`range in width from about 1 to 0.01
`spectroscopy (WDS) to evaluate
`wavelength dispersive
`the
`fibrils mayattain
`lengths of
`and bundles of
`fibrils
`the EDS measurements. Table 1 shows the
`to thousands of
`hundreds
`accuracy of
`their widths".
`times
`by EDSand WDS.The
`comparison of analytical
`results
`amphibole nomenclature used in this study follows
`the
`of Leake and others
`recommendations
`(1997).
`Study methods
`(XRD) analyses were pul-
`Samples for
`diffraction
`x-ray
`split. The minerals identified
`and mechanically
`by
`verized
`at several mine XRDin the samples were categorized
`as major, minor, and
`Samples of talc ore material were collected
`"Major"
`the analyzed split.
`trace mineral constituents
`sites, which are described below. Each sample was
`of
`minerals are estimated to comprise >25 wt% of
`least 30 pieces of
`as a composite, containing at
`collected
`
`the
`
`Table 1
`in one tremolite-
`Comparison of
`particles
`tremolite
`the analyses of
`as measured by two
`rich specimen from the Death Valley
`region,
`(EDS) on polished
`x-ray analysis
`(1) energy dispersive
`techniques:
`L x W method
`(µm)
`203×106 WDS
`EDS
`362×226 WDS
`EDS
`620×228 WDS
`EDS
`241×28.8 WDS
`EDS
`140×14.3 WDS
`EDS
`225×170 EDS
`445×166 EDS
`EDS
`104×27.1
`EDS
`20.2×3.4
`EDS
`18.5×0.9
`EDS
`5.8×0.8
`EDS
`6.7×1.1
`EDS
`3.9×l.5
`EDS
`13.4x1.0
`
`Particle
`
`Analysis
`
`K
`
`Na
`
`grains, and (2) electron probe microanalysis
`and single unpolished
`(WDS) on polished
`with wavelength dispersive
`grains.
`spectroscopy
`which were calculated
`Data are expressed
`by
`in cation
`proportions,
`using 23 oxygen atoms
`stoichiometry
`Mn
`Mg
`
`Ti
`
`Al
`
`Si
`
`Fe
`
`0.01
`bdl
`0.01
`bdl
`0.02
`bdl
`0.02
`bdi
`0.02
`bdi
`bdl
`bd!
`bdi
`bdl
`0.1
`0.1
`bdi
`bdl
`0.1
`
`0.04
`0.1
`0.05
`bdl
`0.06
`0.1
`0.06
`bdl
`0.06
`0.1
`0.1
`0.1
`0.1
`0.1
`0.1
`0.2
`0.1
`bdi
`0.1
`
`4.93
`4.9
`4.94
`5.0
`4.90
`5.0
`4.94
`4.9
`4.93
`5.0
`4.9
`4.8
`5.0
`5.1
`5.2
`5.1
`5.3
`5.0
`5.1
`
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bd1
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bdt
`bdl
`bdi
`bdl
`bd1
`bd1
`bdl
`
`0.03
`bdl
`0.03
`bdl
`0.03
`bdl
`0.03
`bdl
`0.04
`bdi
`bdl
`bdi
`bdl
`0.1
`bdl
`0.1
`bdl
`0.1
`0.2
`
`7.99
`8.1
`7.97
`8.1
`8.00
`8.1
`7.99
`8.1
`8.00
`8.1
`8.1
`8.1
`8.1
`8.0
`7.9
`7.9
`7.8
`8.0
`7.9
`
`Ca
`
`1.88
`1.7
`1.88
`1.7
`1.87
`1.7
`1.88
`1.8
`1.85
`1.8
`1.8
`1.8
`1.7
`1.7
`1.8
`1.7
`1.9
`1.8
`1.8
`
`Mount
`type
`
`Polished
`
`Polished
`
`Polished
`
`Polished
`
`Polished
`
`Loose
`Loose
`Loose
`Loose
`Loose
`Loose
`Loose
`Loose
`Loose
`
`0.01
`bdi
`0.01
`bdl
`0.01
`bdl
`0.01
`bdi
`0.01
`bdl
`bd1
`bd!
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bd!
`bdl
`bdl
`
`.
`
`0.06
`bdl
`0.06
`bdl
`0.06
`bdl
`0.05
`bd1
`0.05
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bdl
`bdi
`bdl
`bdl
`
`bdl, below the detection
`
`limit
`
`of
`
`the analytical
`
`technique
`
`922
`
`Environmental Geology (2004) 45:920-939
`
`

`

`202209030110
`
`FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 09/03/2022 02:20 PMFILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/2024 03:00 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 651NYSCEF DOC. NO. 216
`
`Index #: E2020003840
`
`INDEX NO. E2020003840INDEX NO. 612331/2023
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/03/2022RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2024
`
`Original article
`
`"minor" minerals form 5-25 wt% of the sample,
`Talc Oty district,
`sample,
`California
`and "trace" minerals form <5 wt% of
`The historical
`the sample. These
`of
`the Talc City mining district
`significance
`from World War I
`estimates were based on the experience of the XRDoper-
`through the 1940s is well
`in California
`documented by Page (1951). The district
`and its data output. The
`ator with his instrumentation
`is in the Talc City
`about 47 kmsoutheast
`Page
`of Lone Pine, California.
`examined by this study provide snapshots
`pulverized splits
`Hills
`during its peak of pro-
`and sampled the district
`and variability
`visited
`in the talcose ores.
`the mineralogy
`of
`duction in the mid 1940s;
`the reader is referred
`of the talc or amphibole
`to his
`However, quantitative
`estimates
`from the XRDresults
`geol-
`(Page 1951)
`content should not be interpreted
`of
`the district's
`for descriptions
`report
`and mines. Gay and Wright
`shown in this
`talc deposits,
`(1954)
`report.
`ogy,
`The XRDtechnique can identify
`completed a geologic map of
`the amphibole minerals
`the Talc City area.
`The talc deposits
`within a sample as members of
`the tremolite-actinolite-
`lenses
`are thick
`of
`the Talc City
`district
`To a
`and irregular masses hosted mainly by dolomite.
`is not able to determine the
`but
`ferroactinolite
`series,
`to posi- muchlesser
`talc bodies occur in "silica
`amphibole species.
`is also not possible
`extent
`rock",
`specific
`It
`named by Page (1951)
`massive rock
`for an unstratified,
`between tremolite
`and the sodic-calcic
`distinguish
`tively
`composed mostly of interlocking
`by XRD.
`resembles
`amphiboles winchite and richterite
`quartz;
`it
`Limestone is also nearby. Bedded
`in outcrop.
`quartzite
`dolomite is altered to massive dolomite adjacent
`to the talc
`deposits; both are often closely associated with silica
`rock.
`The silica
`rock is discontinuous
`the mine sites,
`Amphibole-poor
`deposits
`forming
`at
`talc
`lenses surrounded by massive dolomite.
`Sihca
`isolated
`formed by hydrothermal
`processeS rock appears to be partially
`at someof the
`replaced by talc
`rock
`deposits. Petrographic examination of the silica
`Geologic environments that host
`reveals microscopic patches of talc
`areas
`in interstitial
`hydrothermal
`(Page 1951).
`between quartz grains
`talc deposits
`from about 0.8 to 3.2 kmdistance
`The term "hydrothermal"
`is commonly used in a general
`bodies crop out
`Granitic
`from the mines. The granitic
`have been
`and products of hot
`rocks locally
`sense to describe
`the actions
`fluids,
`implying an association with igneous
`suggesting they were affected by
`often, but not always,
`hydrothermally
`altered,
`hydrothermal
`and were not
`hydrothermal
`the
`In this
`processes.
`the talc-forming
`refers
`to
`discussion,
`talc
`event(s)
`heated by a
`source of fluids. Dikes ranging in composition from basalt
`to be the products of
`thought
`deposits
`fluids
`distant magmasource,
`at depth. For example,
`crop out near the Talc City and Prisco
`to diorite
`in
`to felsite
`usually
`no evidence of contact
`the Talc City district,
`or mines (Page 1951). These dikes are also hydrothermally
`California,
`regional metamorphism is apparent
`in the host or country
`(Page
`to predate the talc alteration
`altered and interpreted
`1951). A magmatic source of hydrothermal
`is not
`that drove the talc-forming
`the source of
`the heat
`fluids
`rocks;
`it maybe best viewed
`to buried
`process is not obvious,
`and has been attributed
`obvious within the district.
`If buried,
`the south-
`Heat sources for
`igneous intrusions.
`by geophysical methods.
`or distant
`west Montana talc event(s)
`formation in the
`to be sills
`Page (1951) proposed a model
`that
`are speculated
`for
`talc
`basin, heating and
`involved the following
`intruded an overlying
`events:
`Proterozoic
`Talc City area that
`towards underlying Archean
`basin brines
`circulating
`1. The area was originally
`covered by mostly limestone,
`talc"
`to talc ore
`marbles. Thus, "hydrothermal
`refers
`shale, and sandstone;
`with lesser mterbeds of dolomite,
`rich mMgrose through and
`associated with regional
`bodies that are not directly
`2. Hydrothermal
`fluids
`metamorphism and are not
`against an
`found directly
`them
`limestones and altered
`fractured
`the overlying
`igneous intrusion.
`into massive dolomite, perhaps also converting
`The large,
`of
`hydrothermal
`amphibole-poor,
`talc deposits
`rock ';
`sandstones to the "silica
`and west Texas,
`southwest Montana, Talc City, California,
`3. A second event of
`accompanied another
`of hydrothermal waters enriched mSi and Mg,
`fracturing
`as examples, may represent
`the products of saline,
`sili-
`or localized mag-
`influx
`ceous fluids mobilized by basin-scale
`which replaced massive dolomite with large talc
`is supported by the
`This genetic association
`matic activity.
`lenses. Page
`rock with talc
`and replaced silica
`study by Gammonsand Matt
`deposits
`fluid-inclusion
`recent
`(2002)
`of
`(1951) suggested the talc
`formed by the addition
`excavated at
`the hydrothermal
`the
`of
`talc deposit
`currently
`of silica,
`and water to dolomite,
`and the addition
`silica
`Yellowstone mine, southwest Montana, which indicated
`water, and Mg to silica
`rock. This general
`reaction,
`the presence of highly
`for-
`during the talc
`saline fluids
`shown below,
`is commonly invoked to explam the
`flow, enhanced by
`mation. They proposed that
`"high heat
`replacement of dolomite by talc:
`of thick
`into the (Proterozoic)
`injection
`sedimentary
`sills
`connate brines out of
`the bottom of
`3 dolomite + 4SiO299) + 1H20 = 1 talc + 3 calcite + 3CO2
`the
`forced
`pile,
`Basin and into the underlying
`or adjacent
`(Proterozoic)
`Precambrian basement, where they caused retrograde
`metamorphism and formation of economic talc and
`Abundant fracturing
`deposits"
`dolomitic marble and quar-
`that
`chlorite
`suggest
`district
`(replacing
`(Gammonsand Matt
`flow and talc
`tzo-feldspathic
`gneiss,
`respectively)
`fluid
`are based on field
`2002, p. 44).
`
`and shearing of country rocks
`in the
`and aided
`systems controlled
`fracture
`formation. Page's interpretations
`However, by general
`relationships.
`
`Environmental Geology (2004) 45:920-939
`
`923
`
`

`

`202209030110
`
`FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 09/03/2022 02:20 PMFILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/2024 03:00 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 651NYSCEF DOC. NO. 216
`
`Index #: E2020003840
`
`INDEX NO. E2020003840INDEX NO. 612331/2023
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/03/2022RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2024
`
`Original
`
`article
`
`southwest Montana talc bodies are lenticular
`and elongate,
`the talc deposits and associated
`rocks of the
`appearances,
`and in most places,
`to the lithologic
`do not display
`lenses are parallel
`Talc City district
`of regional
`typical
`features
`talc
`talc bodies cut across
`of the marble. However,
`such as prominent
`metamorphic
`or
`processes,
`foliation
`layering
`the Yellowstone mine (Cerino 2002).
`compression structures.
`at
`layering
`the southwest Montana talc deposits
`The origin
`is not
`or dumps at
`The study sampled talc ore from pits
`of
`sites
`five
`2 and 3). No evidence of
`recent work has reaffirmed
`completely understood, but
`in the Talc City district
`(Tables
`the talc bodies appear to have
`observations that
`amphibole minerals was found in ore samples from this
`earlier
`(Table 2) and SEM-EDSformed during the Precambrian because they are restricted
`based on x-ray diffraction
`district
`to Archean dolomitic marbles and do not replace overlying
`the samples. Platy
`is mixed with small
`analyses of
`talc
`This observation was supported by a
`amounts of calcite,
`Cambrian dolomites.
`dolomite, quartz,
`clinochlore,
`kaolinite,
`published age of 1.36 Ga by the "Ar/39Ar method for
`and K-feldspar
`(lis-
`(uncertain
`vermiculite
`identification)
`in decreasing abundance). A friable white muscovite intergrown with talc
`in the Ruby Range (Brady
`to right
`ted left
`2003). A recent
`study of the
`the Frisco mine
`and others
`with the talc ore body at
`inclusion
`interlayered
`fluid
`layer
`(Gammons and Matt 2002,
`Yellowstone mine deposits
`of mostly quartz with accessory plagioclase,
`consists
`p. 44) determined that
`Thus, none of
`talc, and kaolinite.
`responsible
`the
`"the fluids
`muscovite, dolomite,
`for
`talc
`of our sam-
`than
`(roughly 7x saltier
`formation were saline brines
`of Page (1951), nor
`the results
`descriptions
`the presence of modern seawater),
`and were enriched in CaCl2". They
`pling and mineralogical
`indicate
`analyses,
`of more
`formation
`depths during talc
`of the Talc City
`amphiboles
`burial
`calculated
`in the talc deposits
`district.
`than 3 km at
`temperatures of 190 to 250 °C.
`formation
`Their model for
`the Yellowstone mine
`formation
`at
`talc
`Yellowstone mine, southwest Montana
`that descended along growth
`saline fluids
`involves
`site
`The Yellowstone talc mine is on the northeast
`flank of the
`basin that mayhave
`in an overlying
`Proterozoic
`faults
`Gravelly Range near Ennis, Montana. This enormous talc
`existed above the Archean dolomitic marbles at about
`tons of known reserves)
`than 5.5 million
`sup-
`body (greater
`short
`they suggested the saline fluids were either
`1.36 Ga;
`is the largest known in southwestern Montana, a region that
`in the basin sediments or by
`plied by connate brines
`and known
`contains a total
`of 57 talc mines,
`seawater. Their model, as well as earlier models
`talc prospects,
`overlying
`talc occurrences (Berg 1979; Van Gosen and others
`in southwest Montana (Olson 1976;
`1998).
`formation
`for
`talc
`The Yellowstone mine is the largest
`in the
`invoke
`talc-producer
`1990; Brady and others 2003),
`Anderson and others
`the Regal and Treasure
`U.S., and two other
`large talc mines,
`to form these deposits,
`to rock ratios
`very large water
`to the west in the Ruby through the general
`operate farther
`State mines, currently
`reaction:
`three mines are open-pit operations.
`Range. All
`in the Ruby 3 dolomite + 4SiO2(aq) + 4H20 = 1 talc + 3Ca2++ 6HCO3
`the economically important
`talc deposits
`All of
`and Gravelly Range region of southwest Montana replaced
`In much smaller
`(1990) suggested that water to rock
`Anderson and others
`dolomitic marbles of Archean age.
`of more than 600 are required by this
`reaction
`to
`talc also replaced magnesite, quartz,
`amounts,
`tremolite,
`ratios
`and flush most of
`the
`in solution
`and calcite, which are accessory constituents
`of
`silica
`sufficient
`serpentine,
`carry
`the host marble (Berg 1979). Talc occurrences range from calcite
`out of the system.
`or the
`Regardless of the source of the hydrothermal
`thick up to huge masses,
`and pods centimeters
`fluids
`veinlets
`the Yellowstone
`the end result
`the Yellowstone mine, which
`mechanism,
`such as the thick
`talc body at
`circulation
`at
`least 30 mthick
`the mine site
`is large bodies of mainly massive talc with light
`found). Most of
`(bottom not yet
`is at
`
`Table 2
`abundances in samples
`Mineral
`of hydrothermal
`talc ore col.
`lected from abandoned talc
`mines in the Talc City district
`The
`near Lone Pine, California.
`and longitude
`values
`latitude
`were measured by GPSusing the
`North American Datum of 1927,
`CONUS.In regard to the x-ray
`diffraction
`results
`(see text),
`"major" minerals
`are estimated
`to comprise >25 wt% of
`the
`"minor"
`sample analyzed;
`form 5-25 wt%; and
`minerals
`"trace" minerals
`comprise
`<5 wt%
`
`Site name,
`sample number
`
`Latitude,
`longitude
`
`identified
`Minerals
`by x-ray diffraction
`Major
`
`Minor
`
`Trace
`
`Talc City mine
`11ADV02
`11CDV03
`
`11FDV03
`12ADV02
`Silver Dollar mine
`13ADV02
`Alliance mine
`14ADV02
`14DDV03
`
`Frisco mine
`15ADV02
`Viking mine
`16ADV02
`
`36.3315,
`
`-117.6677
`
`36.3371,
`
`-117.6617
`
`36.3421,
`
`-117.6717
`
`36.3303,
`
`-117.6800
`
`36.3543,
`
`-117.7104
`
`Talc
`Talc
`
`Talc
`Talc, calcite
`
`Calcite,
`
`talc
`
`Talc
`Talc, quartz
`
`Clinochlore
`
`Talc
`
`Clinochlore,
`vermiculite(i)
`
`Quartz,
`Quartz,
`
`clinochlore
`calcite
`
`Kaolinite
`Dolomite,
`
`kaolinite
`
`Clinochlore
`
`Quartz,
`
`dolomite
`
`Quartz
`Vermiculite(?),
`kaolinite
`
`Talc, K-feldspar
`
`Clinochlore,
`
`quartz
`
`924
`
`Environmental Geology (2004) 45:920-939
`
`

`

`202209030110
`
`FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 09/03/2022 02:20 PMFILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/2024 03:00 PM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 651NYSCEF DOC. NO. 216
`
`Index #: E2020003840
`
`INDEX NO. E2020003840INDEX NO. 612331/2023
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/03/2022RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2024
`
`Original artide
`
`in
`
`of
`
`sparse are fluid-inclusion
`which contains trace amounts of limo-
`green coloration,
`talc deposits.
`Especially
`cial)
`talc bodies in the U.S. Relevant
`nite and goethite
`studies of the major
`along with traces of
`replaced pyrite,
`that
`to 1%Fe2+
`The light
`investigations
`published fluid
`green color
`data are primarily
`inclusion
`is attributed
`graphite.
`talc"
`for Mgin octahedral
`of deposits described as "hydrothermal
`replaced
`that
`lat-
`sites within
`the talc
`OH-
`substituting
`of F-
`(Cerino 2002). Minor substitution
`dolostones or magnesite; most of
`these deposits
`lack
`for
`is also
`tice
`amphibole. Examples are described below.
`noted. The bulk chemical compositions
`of talcose ores are
`As noted earlier,
`shown in Table 3.
`to the
`linked
`inclusions
`analyses
`of
`fluid
`of the Ruby and Gravelly Ranges of
`This study analyzed four samples of massive pale-green
`large talc deposits
`published. Gammons
`southwest Montana were recently
`two
`from the floor
`by the lead author
`of
`talc ore collected
`the Yellowstone mine-two samples from an and Matt
`reported analyses and interpretation
`of
`open pits
`of
`(2002)
`pit. XRDand SEM-EDSfluid
`associated with the large talc bodies at
`the
`active pit and two from an inactive
`inclusions
`Yellowstone mine, Gravelly Range, Montana. They deter-
`talc, with no other
`analyses of these samples revealed
`190° to
`large eu- mined that
`fluids were brines
`found. Late-stage
`mineral
`the talc-forming
`(2.2 mNa+),
`at
`impurities
`(post-talc),
`250 °C containing about 10 wt% NaCl
`of quartz and dolomite, accompanied by
`hedral crystals
`11 wt% CaCl2. and relatively
`low dissolved CO2; trapping
`Fe oxide minerals,
`commonly line
`fine-grained
`cavities
`pressures were estimated at 1-4 kbar. Brady and others
`the talc bodies and country
`developed along faults
`that cut
`(2003) examined the isotope geochemistry of muscovites
`rock. These faults, which display normal displacements,
`in dolomite and calcite
`to the
`and fluid
`related
`(Cerino 2002) with inter-
`as growth faults
`inclusions
`are interpreted
`mittent movement through time. Magnesite is plentiful
`of talc bodies in the nearby Ruby Range; they
`formation
`and
`determined the metasomatic fluids were water-rich
`the dolomitic marble that borders the talc
`deposits.
`below ~350 °C.
`CO2-poor, and that
`the talc
`crystallized
`at Rabenwald,
`Large, amphibole-deficient
`west Texas
`talc deposits
`Allamoore district,
`to have formed by
`are thought
`eastern Alps of Austria,
`The ceramic-grade and paint-grade
`(higher
`purity)
`talc
`reacted with
`being mined in the Allamoore district
`saline hydrothermal
`SiO2-rich
`that
`bodies currently
`fluids
`magnesite (Moine and others
`inclusions
`replacement of
`1989). Fluid
`west Texas were formed by the selective
`in
`show a wide
`magnesite. Bourbon (1982, p.77)
`quartz associated with the talc deposition
`suggested:
`"the
`[host]
`with up to 32 wt% NaC1 and 3.7 wt%
`range of salinities,
`magnesite deposits were formed by chemical precipitation
`the inclusions were trapped at
`ephemeral
`lagoons or in associated
`that
`indicate
`CaCl; analyses
`hypersaline
`in isolated
`a minimumof 350 °C and 3 kbar vapor pressure
`(Pohl and
`lakes." Desiccation
`cracks and pseudomorphs of anhydrite
`preserved on bedding surfaces
`Belocky 1999).
`and halite,
`in the talcose
`environ-
`in northern Spain are
`of Puebla de Lillo
`the hypersaline depositional
`Talc deposits
`indicate
`intervals,
`the host magnesite. Bourbon (1981, 1982) con-
`replacement bodies in dolostones adjacent
`to quartzites.
`ment of
`in dolomite and quartz related
`to
`formed via replacement of
`cluded that Allamoore talc
`studies
`inclusion
`Fluid
`conducted by Tornos and Spiro (2000),
`connate or meteoric waters
`magnesite by hydrothermal
`the talc deposits,
`fluids were NaCl-CaCl2-rich
`suggest
`the talc-forming
`in solution.
`that carried
`silica
`at between 280° and 405 °C with variable
`a dilemma to the other-
`The Allamoore district
`salinities
`brines
`presents
`(0-23 wt% NaC1 eq), under
`environ-
`of only

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket