FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04/10/2014 12:41 PM
`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 04 m 2014 12 : 41 P
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO.
`1
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`700043/2014
`INDEX NO. 700043/2014
`
`INDEX NO'
`
`
`
`
`R«C«IV«D vvsczF:
`04/10/2014
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/10/2014
`
`RPTL 730
`
`201209200003
`
`PETI110N
`SMALL CLAIMS ASSESSMENT REVIEW
`IN COUNTIES OUTSIDE NEW YORK CITY
`(one petition per parcel)
`
`ucs 900 (Rev. 2/24/2006)
`
`AR#
`
`SUPREME COURT. COUNTY OFm“—
`Filing #_— Calendar#
`
`
`Assessing Ur,“ Village of West Hampton Dunes
`
`Date of final completion and filing of assessment roll
`
`April 1. 2014
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`Total
`
`Exempt amount
`
`$2,386,440
`
`(c)
`
`Taxable assessed value (3a-3b)
`
`$2,386,440
`
`
`
`Date of filing (or mailing) petition April 1. 2014
`
`Name of owner or owners of pro perty:Yeva and Sheldon Rintel
`
`Post Office Address: c/oLaw Office of Robert G. Litt
`265 Sunrise Hwy, Suite 62, Rockville Centre, NY 11570
`Telephone #1 516 341-7500
`
`
`If applicable, name and address of representative of owner, if representative is filing appl
`(Owner must complete Designation of Representative section.)
`Law Office of Robert G. Litt
`265 Sunrise Hwy, Suite 62, Rockville Centre, NY 11570
`Telephone#: 516 341-7500
`
`Description of property as it appears on the assessment roll.
`
`Lot 30.002
`001
`Block
`2
`Section
`907
`Tax Map #
`School District 01 Remsenherg-Spennk
`
`iwtion:
`
`
`
`Location of property (street, road, highway number, and city, town or village)
`
`820 DUNE RD #A,
`
`
`
`

`

`201209200003
`
`PART II
`
`GROUNDS FOR PETITION
`
`A.
`
`Assessment requested on the complaintform filed with the Board of Assessment Review
`
`Total assessment
`1.
`$596,610
`Exempt amount, if any
`2.
`$0
`
`$596 610
`3.
`Taxable assessment
`
`
`B.
`
`CALCULATION OF EQUALIZED VALUE AND MAXIMUM REDUCTION IN ASSESSMENT
`
`1.
`
`[ 3;]
`
`Property is NOT in a special assessing unit.
`ASSESSED VALUE
`+
`EQUALIZATION RATE
`
`EQUALIZED VALUE
`
`2.
`
`[
`
`]
`
`Property IS in a special assessing unit.
`
`ASSESSED VALUE
`
`+
`
`CLASS ONE RATIO
`
`=
`
`EQUALIZED VALUE
`
`3.
`
`[x]
`
`If the EQUALIZED VALUE exceeds $450,000, enter the ASSESSED VALUE here:
`Multiply the ASSESSED VALUE by:
`Enter the resulthere:
`The result is the maximum total assessment request reduction allowable.
`
`
`$2.386.440
`
`$596,610
`
`x .25
`
`C.
`
`[X]
`
`UNEQUAL ASSESSMENT: The total assessment is unequal because the property is assessed at a higher
`percentage of full (market) value than (check one).
`[
`] (a)
`the average of allother property on the assessment roll, or
`[X ] (b)
`the average of residential property on the assessment roll.
`
`
`Full (market) value of property:
`
`$ To be supplied at hearing
`
`Based on one or more of the following, petitioner believes this property should be assessed at
`of full (market) value: SEE BELOW
`
`%
`
`1. [X] The latest State equalization rate forthe assessing unit in which the property is located (enter
`latest equalization rate:
`”0-57 %).
`
`ti
`2. [X] The latest residentialassessment
`residential assessment ratio:
`110-57
`
`for the assessing unit in which the property is located (enter
`%)
`
`3. [X] A sample of market values of recentsales prices and assessments ofcomparable residential
`properties on which petitioner relies for objection (MWMXXXKKfiWWXXXWMf
`
`4. [X] Statements of the assessor or other local officialthat property has been placed on the roll at
`
`* %.
`
`. This amount may
`Petitioner believes the total assessment should be reduced to $ 1,789,830
`not be less than the total assessment amount indicated in Section A (1), or Section B (3), whichever
`
`is greater.
`
`D.
`
`[X]
`
`EXCESSIVE ASSESSMENT:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`[X] The total assessed value exceeds the full (market) value of the property.
`Total assessed value of property:
`$
`Complainant believes the total assessmentshould be reduced to a full value of $
`Attach list of parcels upon which complainant relies for objection, if applicable.
`This amount may not be less than the amount indicated in Section A (1), or Section B (3).
`] The taxable assessed value is excessive because of the denial of all or a portion of a
`partialexemption. Specify exemption
`(e.g., aged, clergy, veterans, etc).
`Amount of exemption claimed £5
`. Amount granted, if any: $
`amount may not be greater than the amount indicated in A (2).
`If application for exemption was filed, attach a copy ofapplication to this petition.
`
`[
`
`. This
`
`* To be supplied at hearing.
`
`

`

`201209200003
`
`E
`
`1.
`
`[
`
`INFORMATION TO SUPPORT THE FULL (MARKET) VALUE CLAIMED
`ALL INFORMATION TO BE SUPPLIED AT THE HEARING OR PRIOR THERETO IF SO REQUESTED
`
`] Purchase price of property $
`Date of purchase
`
`Relationship. if any, between seller and purchaser
`
`
`
`__
`
`2.
`
`[
`
`]
`
`If property has been recently offered for sale:
`
`When and for how long:
`How offered:
`
`Asking price: $
`lf property has been recently appraised:
`When:
`Purpose of appraisal:
`
`Appraised value:
`
`$
`
`
`
`By Whom:
`
`
`
`If buildings have been recently remodeled, constructed. or additional improvements made.
`state: Year remodeled, constructed, or additions made:
`
`Date commenced:
`
`Cost: $
`
`Date completed:
`
`]
`
`]
`
`3.
`
`[
`
`4.
`
`[
`
`5.
`
`[
`
`] Amount for which your propertyis insured: $
`Name of insurance company and policy number:
`
`
`
`
`6.
`
`[
`
`] Purchase price of comparable property(ies) recently sold: $
`
`
`
`PART III
`LISTING OF TAXING DISTRICTS
`
`
`Names of Taxing Districts
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`COUNTY:
`
`Suffolk
`
`TOWN:
`
`Southampton
`
`VILLAGE:
`
`West Hampton
`
`SCHOOL DISTRICT
`
`01 Remsenberg-Speonk
`
`CITY:
`
`

`

`RPTL 730
`
`201209200003
`
`PART IV
`DESIGNATION OF REPRESENTATIVE OF FILE PETITION
`
`
`
` |
`
`
`
`
`, as petitioner (or officer thereof) hereby designate
`to act as my representative in any and all proceedings before the Small
`Claims Assessment Review of the Supreme Court in Suffolk
`County for purposes of reviewing the
`assessment of my real property as it appears on the 2014/15
`year assessment roll of the Village ofWest Hampton
`
`(assessing unit)
`
`SEE ATTACHED AUTHORIZATION
`
`Signature of Owner
`(Or officer thereof)
`
`Date
`
`PART V
`ELIGIBILITY AND CERTIFICATION
`
`I certify that:
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
`(e)
`
`(f)
`
`The owner has previously filed a complaint required for administrative review
`of assessments.
`
`The property is improved by a one, two or three family. owner-occupied residential structure
`used exclusively for residential purposes, and is not a condominium; except a
`condominium designated as Class 1
`in Nassau County or as “homestead"Class in an
`approved assessing unit.
`The requested assessment is not lower than the assessment requested on the
`complaint filed with the assessor or
`the Board of Assessment Review.
`If the equalized value of the property exceeds $450,000. the requested assessment
`reduction does not exceed 25 percent of the assessed value.
`I have mailed, by certified mail. return receipt requested. or. delivered in person. within
`ten days after the day of filing this petition with the County Clerk, one (1) copy of this petition
`to the clerk of the assessing unit, or if there by no such clerk, thento the officer who
`performs the customary duties of that official.
`l have mailed by regular mail within 10 (ten) days afterthe filing of the Petition with the
`County Clerk one (1) copy of the Petition to:
`(a)
`The clerk of the school district(s)* within which the real property is located, or if
`there be no clerk or the name and address cannot be obtained. then to a trustee,
`and
`
`(b)
`
`The treasurer of the county in which the p -perty is located.
`
`I certify that all statements made on this application are true .
`and belief, and I understand that the making of any willful
`subject me to the provisions of the Penal law relevant to th
`
`
`
`o orrect to the best of my knowledge
`-
`.
`-me‘nt of material fact herein will
`(‘1 filing of false instruments.
`
`
`
`ffalo, Rochester, Syracuse or Yonkers.)
`(*NOT E: Filing with the school district is not required inJr
`
`