`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4
`
`INDEX NO. 9001735
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/06/2023
`
`Index No.: 9001735
`
`ANSWER
`
`
`
`
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF WYOMING
`____________________________________________
`)
`
`)
`CAPITAL ONE, N.A. SUCCESSOR BY MERGER
`)
`TO CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.,
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
` -against-
`)
`
`)
`DAVID WOOLLEY,
`)
`
`)
`
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` Defendant.
`
`The Defendant, DAVID WOOLLEY (“Defendant”), by and through his attorneys, M.
`
`CABRERA & ASSOCIATES, PC, as and for her Answer to the Complaint of CAPITAL ONE,
`
`N.A. SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., (“Plaintiff”) herein
`
`states as follows:
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`1.
`
`Defendant objects to the pleadings set forth in Paragraph 1 of the Complaint as it
`
`is vague, overbroad, and sets forth multiple allegations of fact. As such Defendant is unable to
`
`accurately responsively plead to the same. To the extent a response to the same is required
`
`Defendant admits that he resides in the county in which this action has been filed and lacks
`
`sufficient information or knowledge with which to admit or deny the remaining allegations.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to admit or deny the
`
`allegations set forth in Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Complaint and thereby denies same, leaving
`
`Plaintiff to its proofs.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Defendant denies the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Complaint.
`
`Defendant denies and balance due and is without sufficient information or
`
`knowledge to admit or deny the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraphs 6, 7 and 8 of the
`
`Complaint and thereby denies same, leaving Plaintiff to its proofs.
`
`1 of 3
`
`
`
`FILED: WYOMING COUNTY CLERK 11/06/2023 12:37 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4
`
`INDEX NO. 9001735
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/06/2023
`
`5.
`
`Complaint.
`
`Defendant denies the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 9 and 10 of the
`
`WHEREFORE, Defendant demands judgment against Plaintiff dismissing the First
`
`Cause of Action of Plaintiff’s Complaint with prejudice in addition to any other relief which may
`
`be deemed just and proper.
`
`FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`The Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
`
`SECOND SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are barred under the applicable statute of limitations.
`
`THIRD SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the doctrine of laches.
`
`FOURTH SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are based on a contract of adhesion, and as such, public policy renders
`
`all or portions of it unenforceable.
`
`FIFTH SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the doctrines of waiver and estoppel.
`
`SIXTH SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are based on a contract that is illusory and therefore unenforceable.
`
`SEVENTH SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff’s calculation of interest is usurious or based on a rate that is greater than allowed
`
`by law.
`
`EIGHTH SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff failed to provide Defendant notice that she violated the contract or agreement
`
`prior to bringing suit, so as to allow the Defendant to cure the violation, as required under the
`
`contract or agreement.
`
`
`
`2
`
`2 of 3
`
`
`
`FILED: WYOMING COUNTY CLERK 11/06/2023 12:37 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4
`
`INDEX NO. 9001735
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/06/2023
`
`NINTH SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff failed to credit Defendant for money paid toward the debt which is the subject of
`
`this lawsuit.
`
`TENTH SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff failed to mitigate its damages.
`
`ELEVENTH SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiff failed to comply with the applicable provisions of the Consumer Credit Fairness
`
`Act.
`
`WHEREFORE, Defendant demands judgment that the Court dismiss all counts of
`
`Plaintiff’s complaint and grant the Defendant all other and further relief as may be deemed
`
`equitable, just and proper.
`
`
`Dated: November 6, 2023
`Goshen, New York
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To: Rubin & Rothman, LLC
`1787 Veterans Highway
`Islandia, New York 11749
`Attorneys for the Plaintiff
`
`
`
`M. CABRERA & ASSOCIATES, PC
`Attorneys for Defendant DAVID WOOLLEY
`
`__William Y. Fowlkes________
`William Y. Fowlkes, Esq.
`2002 Route 17M, Suite 12
`Goshen, New York 10924
`Telephone:
`(845) 531-5474
`Facsimile:
`(845) 230-6645
`wfowlkes@mcablaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`3 of 3
`
`