throbber
OPTOLUM, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`CREE, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action No.
`17-cv-00687-WO-JLW
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
`GREENSBORO DIVISION
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`MOTION OF SPENCER K. BEALL TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
`
`Pursuant to Rule 83.1(e) of the Local Rules of
`Practice and Procedure for the Middle District of North
`Carolina, Spencer K. Beall (“Movant”) moves the Court
`for its Order permitting her to withdraw as counsel of
`record for Defendant, Cree, Inc. (“Cree”). In support
`of her motion to withdraw, Movant shows the Court:
`1. Spencer K. Beall, Blaney Harper, and the law
`firm of Jones Day are counsel of record for Cree in the
`above-referenced litigation. Peter Siddoway, Lynne
`Borchers, and the law firm of Sage Patent Group are
`also counsel of record for Cree.
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00687-WO-JLW Document 301 Filed 10/20/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`2. On January 10, 2020, Spencer K. Beall noticed
`her appearance in this action as counsel for Cree.
`3. Spencer K. Beall moves to withdraw as counsel
`for Cree because she is no longer associated with the
`firm of Jones Day.
`4. Cree continues to be represented by Blaney
`Harper and Jones Day, as well as Peter Siddoway, Lynne
`Borchers, and Sage Patent Group, who have appeared on
`its behalf.
`5. Spencer K. Beall has given notice to Cree of
`her withdrawal as counsel in this action. Cree has no
`objection to this motion. The present motion is also
`being served on Cree.
`6. Counsel for Plaintiff, OptoLum, Inc., also has
`been informed of this motion and have no objection to
`the same.
`WHEREFORE, the undersigned counsel moves the Court
`for an Order permitting her to withdraw as counsel of
`record for Cree.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00687-WO-JLW Document 301 Filed 10/20/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`This 19th day of October, 2021.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Spencer K. Beall
`Spencer K. Beall
`Formerly of:
`Jones Day
`51 Louisiana Avenue NW
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`Tel:(202) 879-3965
`sbeall@jonesday.com
`
`Counsel of Record for Defendant
`Cree, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00687-WO-JLW Document 301 Filed 10/20/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that the foregoing MOTION TO
`WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL was electronically filed using the
`Court’s CM/ECF system, which will electronically send
`notification to counsel of record herein.
` further hereby certify that Defendant Cree, Inc.,
`of 4600 Silicon Drive, Durham, North Carolina, 27703
`has also been notified of this motion electronically by
`service to cjacobson@cree.com.
`
`This 19th day of October, 2021.
`
`/s/ Peter D. Siddoway
`Peter D. Siddoway
`SAGE PATENT GROUP
`4120 Main at North Hills Street,
`Suite 230
`Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
`Telephone:(984) 219-3369
`psiddoway@sagepat.com
`
`Attorney for Defendant Cree, Inc.
`
`
` I
`
`
`
`4
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00687-WO-JLW Document 301 Filed 10/20/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket