`
`STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
`
`File No.
`
`Scan No.(s) (official use only)
`
`24CV009749-590
`
`in The General Court Of Justice
`County
`MECKLENBURG
`L]Small Claims
`[District
`[J Superior Court Division
` Name And Address OfPlaintiff
`Central Pointe Apartments LLC, dba Central Pointe
`
`manager@centralpointe-apts.com, assistantmanager@cent
`
`(704}536-3575
`4933 Central Avenue
`Charlotte
`NC
`28205
`
`VERSUS
`
`Name And Address Of Defendant 1
`
`WRIT OF POSSESSION
`
`REAL PROPERTY
`
`Name And Address Of Defendant 2
`
`G.S. 1-313(4), 42-36.2
`
`
`
`
`
`Yisa Obando
`4909 central ave
`Apt 9
`CHARLOTTE
`
`To The Sheriff Of
`
`Nc
`28205
`County:
`MECKLENBURG
`A judgment in favor of the plaintiff was rendered in this case for the possession of the real property described below and you are
`commandedto remove the defendant(s) from, and put the plaintiff in
`possessionof, those premises.
`Description Of Property (include location)
`4909 central ave,Apt 9,CHARLOTTE,NC 28205
`
`
`Date Of Jud
`t
`Date Writ |
`d
`BION
`3/01/2024
`eee
`4/5/2024 1:15:26 pm
`
`Signat
`news
`/s/ Rhonda Adams
`
`
`
`Deputy CSC
`
`Assistant CSC
`
`Clerk Of Superior Court
`
`AOC-CV-401, Rev. 8/17
`© 2017 Administrative Office of the Courts
`
`(Over)
`
`
`
`
`
`U0 1. This Writ Of Possession was served as follows:
`
`RETURN
`
`a. By removing the defendant(s) from the premises and putting the plaintiff in possession after giving notice of removalto the
`defendant(s) as required by law.
`Cb. By removing the defendant(s) from the premises and putting the plaintiff in possessionafter giving notice of removal to the
`defendant(s) as required by law. The defendant’s(s’) property was taken to the warehouselisted below for storage.
`
`c. By giving notice of removal to the defendant(s) as required by law and by leaving the defendant’s(s’) property on the
`premises and locking the premises in accordancewith the written request of the plaintiff which is attached.
`[_]d. By locking the premisesafter the undersigned sheriff received a signed statementfrom thelandlord orthe landlord’s
`authorized agent, stating that the tenant’s property can remain on the premises. (attach signed statement)
`[_] 2. The undersigned sheriff received a signed statement from the landlord or the landlord’s authorized agent, stating that the landlord
`does not want to eject the tenant because the tenant has paid all court costs charged to him/her and hassatisfied his/her
`indebtedness to the landlord. As a result, this Writ Of Possession is being returned unexecuted. (attach signed statement)
`C1 3. Ihave failed to remove the defendant(s) from the premises for the following reason:
`a. Theplaintiff verbally requested that the Writ be returned because the defendant(s) satisfied the obligation to the plaintiff.
`
`b. The plaintiff failed to advance the expenses of removal and one month's storage after being asked to do so.
`
`c. Other: (specify)
`
`
`Name And Address Of Warehouse
`
`
`Fee Paid
`Signature Of Deputy Sheriff Making Return
`
`$ F
`
`
`ee Paid By (type orprint)
`Name Of Deputy Sheriff Making Return (type or print)
`
`
`
`
`Date Received
`Date Executed
`Date Returned
`County Of Deputy Sheriff Making Return
`
`
`
`
`
`AOC-CV-401, Side Two, Rev. 8/17
`© 2017 Administrative Office of the Courts
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
