`WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
`CHARLOTTE DIVISION
`Civil Case No. 3:14-cv-00274-RJC-DSC
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`LIFESCAN, INC. and,
`)
`
`LIFESCAN SCOTLAND, LTD.,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs and
`)
`
`
`Counterclaim-Defendants
`)
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`UNISTRIP TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant and )
`Counterclaimant
`
`)
`____________________________________)
`
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`IN ACCORDANCE WITH the Local Civil Rules of the Western District of North
`
`
`
`Carolina, the Local Patent Rules, and pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure, the undersigned enters the following Claim Construction Scheduling Order in this
`
`matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` DEADLINES AT A GLANCE1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Rule 26 Disclosures: September 17, 2014
`Serve Initial Infringement Contentions:
`
`October 30, 2014
`Serve Initial Invalidity Contentions:
`
`December 30, 2014
`Exchange of Terms for Construction:
`
`January 21, 2015
`Exchange Preliminary Claim Construction:
`February 9, 2015
`File Joint Claim Construction Statement:
`March 11, 2015
`Close of Claim Construction Discovery:
`
`April 10, 2015
`File Opening Claim Construction Brief:
`
`April 24, 2015
`File Responsive Claim Construction Brief:
`May 8, 2015
`File Reply Claim Construction Brief:
`
`May 15, 2015
`File Surreply Claim Construction Brief:
`
`May 22, 2015
`File Claim Construction Chart:
`
`
`May 29, 2015
`Claim Construction Hearing:
`
`
`July 21, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.
`
`
`1 Following Entry of the Claim Construction Order, if the parties request, the Court will issue a scheduling order
`addressing the relevant dates for discovery for that period. If no such order is issued, the parties are directed to
`adhere to the deadlines recognized in this district. All calculations will be based from the entry of Claim
`Construction Order. The parties are requested to request a trial date after the Claim Construction Hearing.
`
`Case 3:14-cv-00274-RJC-DSC Document 20 Filed 09/25/14 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
` I. DISCOVERY
`
`A.
`
`DISCOVERY GUIDELINES: Discovery in this case is limited as follows: Each party
`
`may propound no more than 20 interrogatories, including subparts; no more than 20
`
`requests for admission, and take no more than 6 depositions of non-expert witnesses.
`
`B.
`
`RULE 26 DISCLOSURES: The parties have agreed to exchange the information set
`
`forth in Rule 26 by September 17, 2014.
`
`C.
`
`RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION:
`
`Every response to an interrogatory or request for admission, and every objection thereto,
`
`shall be preceded by the original number and complete text of the corresponding
`
`interrogatory or request for admission.
`
`D.
`
`THE MAINTENANCE OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS: Discovery materials are
`
`NOT to be filed. All counsel are advised to consult the local rule which provides that
`
`while depositions, interrogatories, and requests for admission, and responses thereto,
`
`must still be served on all parties, they are no longer to be filed unless upon order of the
`
`Court. The parties are responsible for the preservation of any and all discovery materials
`
`they may generate.
`
`E.
`
`VIDEO DEPOSITIONS: If video depositions are taken and counsel intend to use them
`
`at trial, counsel are directed to resolve any objections and edit the video accordingly so
`
`that the video may be shown without interruption. Failure to do this prior to trial will
`
`result in objections being deemed to be waived.
`
`F.
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDERS: Any objections made to discovery requests shall be
`
`accompanied by a draft proposed protective order if such order is, or will be, requested.
`
`When counsel submit proposed protective orders, they shall include a provision leaving
`
`Case 3:14-cv-00274-RJC-DSC Document 20 Filed 09/25/14 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`the ultimate disposition of protected materials subject to a final order of the Court on the
`
`completion of litigation.
`
` II. SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY
`WITH THE PRETRIAL ORDER
`
`
`
`Failure to comply with any of the provisions of this Order which causes added delay or
`
`expense to the Court may result in the imposition of sanctions as provided by the Federal Rules
`
`of Civil Procedure.
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Signed: September 25, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-00274-RJC-DSC Document 20 Filed 09/25/14 Page 3 of 3