throbber
Case: 1:20-cv-00817-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/19/20 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
`
`SCIOTO WATER, INC.,
`4707 Gallia Pike
`Franklin Furnace, Ohio 45629
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` vs.
`
`CITY OF PORTSMOUTH,
`728 Second Street
`Portsmouth, Ohio 45662-4036
`
` Defendant.
`
`
` CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`(JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)
`
`
`Plaintiff Scioto Water, Inc. (hereinafter “SWI”) states for its Verified Complaint against
`
`
`
`
`Defendant City of Portsmouth (“Portsmouth”) as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`PARTIES, NATURE OF THE ACTION,
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`1.
`
`SWI is a federally indebted nonprofit rural water association established in 1969
`
`to provide safe and potable water to residents, communities, and businesses in portions of Scioto,
`
`Jackson, Lawrence and Pike Counties.
`
`2.
`
`SWI’s principal place of business is located at 4707 Gallia Pike, Franklin
`
`Furnace, Ohio, where it operates a water treatment plant that produces .64 million gallons of
`
`water per day to serve thousands of customers.
`
`3.
`
`Defendant Portsmouth is an Ohio municipal corporation located in Scioto County,
`
`Ohio.
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-00817-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/19/20 Page: 2 of 9 PAGEID #: 2
`
`4.
`
`This action arises from Portsmouth’s efforts to poach a current customer within
`
`SWI’s service area and less than one mile from SWI’s headquarters in violation of 7 U.S.C. §
`
`1926(b). This statute prohibits municipalities from curtailing or limiting water service provided
`
`or made available by any rural water association indebted to the USDA during the term of such
`
`indebtedness.
`
`5.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and the United States
`
`Constitution. Jurisdiction is also vested pursuant to the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.
`
`6.
`
`Venue is proper pursuant to 27 U.S.C. § 1391(b) since Portsmouth is in this
`
`judicial district and the disputed territory and related infrastructure is located here.
`
`
`
`FACTS COMMON TO ALL CLAIMS
`
`7.
`
`Since 1971, SWI has owned and operated a water distribution system to provide
`
`water services to residents and businesses throughout its service territory.
`
`8.
`
`In furtherance of those services, SWI has been indebted to the FmHA/USDA
`
`since 1971 and is a qualifying association under 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b) (hereinafter § 1926(b)).
`
`9.
`
`Title 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b) prohibits municipalities from exercising their powers to
`
`provide competing water supply services, and from placing conditions or restrictions on the
`
`service provided by § 1926(b) associations, when the exercise of that power would result in the
`
`curtailment or limitation of the service provided or made available by SWI.
`
`10.
`
`Since the early 1970s, SWI has provided water to all Green Local School District
`
`facilities.
`
`11.
`
`The current high school has received water service from SWI since it was
`
`constructed in the late 1970s.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-00817-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/19/20 Page: 3 of 9 PAGEID #: 3
`
`12.
`
`Beginning in 2018, the School District began planning to construct a new
`
`elementary and high school immediately adjacent to the current facility.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`Construction is now scheduled to begin in 2021.
`
`Despite SWI’s longstanding customer relationship with the School District and
`
`the presence of ample waterlines surrounding the property, Portsmouth is now attempting to
`
`provide competing potable water service to the new facility.
`
`15.
`
`Indeed, SWI has ample volume and pressure to serve the School District’s potable
`
`water needs, including its planned sprinkler system.
`
`16.
`
`The School District also plans to construct one or more fire hydrants around the
`
`exterior of the property; however, SWI does not presently provide hydrant service along Gallia
`
`Pike.
`
`17.
`
`In prior instances where SWI does not provide hydrant service, Portsmouth and
`
`SWI have worked cooperatively to ensure that SWI provides potable water while Portsmouth
`
`supports fire hydrants.
`
`18.
`
`Nonetheless, Portsmouth advised the School District that it will not provide
`
`hydrant service unless it also provides potable water to the buildings.
`
`19.
`
`Simply put, SWI has the exclusive right to provide potable water the School
`
`District but does not object to Portsmouth providing solely hydrant service. Indeed, the
`
`infrastructure for each entity to provide the respective service is already in place. Moreover, SWI
`
`is not required to provide hydrant flows to establish protection under § 1926(b).
`
`20.
`
`SWI raised its objection to Portsmouth’s actions; however, Portsmouth continues
`
`to persist and refuses to acknowledge the exclusive nature of SWI’s water service territory.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-00817-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/19/20 Page: 4 of 9 PAGEID #: 4
`
`COUNT ONE
`Declaratory Judgment regarding SWI’s § 1926(b) Rights
`
`SWI incorporates by reference each allegation stated above.
`
`Portsmouth is unlawfully attempting to provide domestic water service to SWI’s
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`existing customer.
`
`23.
`
`Portsmouth’s actions violate 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b), which states:
`
`The service provided or made available through any such
`association shall not be curtailed or limited by inclusion of the area
`served by such association within the boundaries of any municipal
`corporation or other public body, or by the granting of any private
`franchise for similar service within such area during the term of
`such loan; nor shall the happening of such event be the basis of
`requiring such association to secure the franchise, license, or
`permit as a condition to continuing to serve the area by the
`association at the time of the occurrence of such event.
`
`
`24.
`
`SWI is an “association” within the meaning of 7 U.S.C. §1926(b), is indebted to
`
`FmHA/USDA, and, at all times material hereto, has provided, or made available, water service to
`
`the School District.
`
`25.
`
`Accordingly, SWI is entitled to the rights, privileges and protections granted by 7
`
`U.S.C. §1926(b).
`
`26.
`
`Portsmouth’s attempted water service to the School District within SWI’s service
`
`area curtails and limits the water service provided, or made available, by SWI in violation of 7
`
`U.S.C. §1926(b).
`
`27.
`
`As there exists a dispute and actual controversy between the parties that cannot be
`
`resolved absent declaratory relief, SWI is entitled to a judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201
`
`and 2202 declaring the rights and legal relations of the parties as follows:
`
`a.
`
`That SWI is an “association” within the meaning of 7 U.S.C. §
`1926(b), is currently indebted to the FmHA/USDA, and, at all
`times material, has provided or made available water service to the
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-00817-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/19/20 Page: 5 of 9 PAGEID #: 5
`
`subject territory;
`
`
`b.
`
`
`c.
`
`That SWI is entitled to the rights, privileges and protections
`granted under 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b) during the term of the
`indebtedness; and
`
`That the actions of Portsmouth and all those acting in concert with
`Portsmouth, in providing potable water service within SWI’s
`Service Territory will unlawfully curtail or limit SWI’s service in
`violation of 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b).
`
`COUNT TWO
`Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983
`
`SWI incorporates by reference each allegation stated above.
`
`Portsmouth’s encroachment into SWI’s federally protected service territory
`
`
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`constitutes a deprivation of SWI’s rights under color of state law.
`
`30.
`
`To establish a § 1983 violation, SWI must show (1) that Portsmouth has deprived
`
`SWI of a federal constitutional or statutory right (here under 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b)) or threatens to
`
`do so; and (2) that Portsmouth acted under color of state law when it deprived or threatened to
`
`deprive SWI of its federal rights under § 1926(b).
`
`31.
`
`SWI has a federal right under § 1926(b) to be protected from any curtailment or
`
`limitation of the water supply services that SWI has provided or made available.
`
`32.
`
`Portsmouth’s attempt to extend water service to SWI’s current customer
`
`constitutes a deprivation of SWI’s § 1926(b) rights.
`
`33.
`
`Portsmouth’s actions are conducted under color of state law by virtue of
`
`Portsmouth’s status as a municipality and its actions under state law to serve domestic water
`
`within SWI’s service territory.
`
`34.
`
`SWI will suffer damages as a result of Portsmouth’s unlawful encroachment in an
`
`amount yet to be determined.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-00817-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/19/20 Page: 6 of 9 PAGEID #: 6
`
`COUNT THREE
`Preliminary and Permanent Injunction
`
`SWI incorporates by reference each allegation stated above.
`
`SWI has demonstrated a strong likelihood of success on the merits.
`
`Should Portsmouth continue its unlawful actions in violation of 7 U.S.C. §
`
`
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`37.
`
`1926(b), SWI will suffer irreparable harm.
`
`38.
`
`SWI has no adequate remedy at law.
`
`39.
`
`The issuance of a preliminary and permanent injunction will not cause substantial
`
`harm to Portsmouth or the School District.
`
`40.
`
`Absent injunctive relief, Congress’s purpose in enacting 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b) in the
`
`public interest will be thwarted. Title 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b) was enacted: (a) to encourage rural
`
`water development by expanding the number of potential users of such systems, thereby
`
`decreasing per-user costs and (b) to safeguard the viability and financial security of these
`
`associations and loans by protecting such associations from municipal encroachment.
`
`41.
`
`SWI is entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief as follows:
`
`a)
`
`b)
`
`c)
`
`Enjoining Portsmouth from taking any further action to supply potable
`water to the School District; and
`
`Enjoining Portsmouth from taking any further action which will serve to
`curtail or limit the water service made available by SWI to the School
`District in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b); and
`
`Enjoining Portsmouth from taking any further action in violation of the
`declaratory judgment granted herein.
`
`COUNT FOUR
`Constructive Trust – Customers in Dispute
`
`SWI incorporates by reference each allegation stated above.
`
`Any and all water lines, mains, meters, tanks, pump stations, valves, and other
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`42.
`
`43.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-00817-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/19/20 Page: 7 of 9 PAGEID #: 7
`
`facilities owned or later constructed by Portsmouth and used to serve the School District must be
`
`declared to be held in constructive trust for the use and benefit of SWI, and conveyed to SWI as
`
`part of the equitable remedies sought by SWI in this case.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`SWI demands a jury trial as to all issues triable by jury.
`
`WHEREFORE, SWI requests the following relief:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`follows:
`
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`
`
`
`
`Judgment in favor of SWI on all claims for relief asserted herein;
`
`Declaratory judgment in favor of SWI pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 as
`
`a.
`
`
`b.
`
`
`c.
`
`That SWI is an “association” within the meaning of 7 U.S.C. §
`1926(b), is currently indebted to the FmHA/USDA, and, at all
`times material, has provided or made available water service to the
`School District;
`
`That SWI is entitled to the rights, privileges and protection granted
`under 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b) during the term of the indebtedness; and
`
`That the actions of Portsmouth, and all those acting in concert with
`Portsmouth, in attempting to provide water service to the School
`District will unlawfully curtail or limit SWI’s service in violation
`of 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b).
`
`Preliminary and permanent injunctive relief in favor of SWI;
`
`An award of damages in an amount to be determined at trial,
`
`A judgment granting SWI the equitable remedy of forfeiture by Portsmouth
`
`and/or any third-party owner of all water lines and other infrastructure built by Portsmouth
`
`and/or a third-party to provide potable water service to the School District.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`An award to SWI of its costs and attorney fees; and
`
`Such other relief in law or in equity to which SWI may be entitled.
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-00817-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/19/20 Page: 8 of 9 PAGEID #: 8
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`O’TOOLE McLAUGHLIN DOOLEY &
`PECORA, CO., LPA
`
`
`/s/ Matthew A. Dooley
`Matthew A. Dooley (OH 0081482)
`Stephen M. Bosak, Jr. (OH 0092443)
`5455 Detroit Road
`Sheffield Village, Ohio 44054
`Telephone:
`(440) 930-4001
`Facsimile:
`(440) 934-7208
`Email:
`mdooley@omdplaw.com
`
`
`sbosak@omdplaw.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Scioto Water, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-00817-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/19/20 Page: 9 of 9 PAGEID #: 9
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`My name is Jeffrey D. Spradlin, and I am the general manager of Scioto Water, Inc. and
`
`otherwise sui juris. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`
`America that the statements contained in this Verified Complaint are true and correct to the best
`
`of my knowledge.
`
`Executed this “day of October 2020 in Scioto County Ohio.
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket