throbber
Case: 2:19-cv-00411-ALM-CMV Doc #: 170-4 Filed: 09/17/21 Page: 1 of 50 PAGEID #: 11135
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit C
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case: 2:19-cv-00411-ALM-CMV Doc #: 170-4 Filed: 09/17/21 Page: 2 of 50 PAGEID #: 11136
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS
`
` Partners
`p. 3
`
` Eric Gibbs
`
` David Berger p. 5
`
` Dylan Hughes
`p. 7
`
` Linda Lam
`p. 8
`
` Steve Lopez
`p. 9
`
` Karen Barth Menzies p. 10
`
` Geoffrey Munroe
`p. 12
`
` Andre Mura
`p. 13
`
` Rosemary Rivas
`p. 15
`p. 16
`
` Michael Schrag
`
` David Stein
`p. 18
`
` Steven Tindall
`p. 20
`
` Amy Zeman
`p. 22
`
`
` Of Counsel & Counsel
`p. 24
`
`
`Josh Bloomfield
` p. 25
`
` Shawn Judge
`p. 26
`
` Rosanne Mah
`p. 27
`
` George Sampson
`p. 28
`
` Mark Troutman
`
` Associates
`Brian Bailey p. 29
`John Bicknell p. 30
`Aaron Blumenthal p. 31
`Alex Bukac p. 32
` Kyla Gibboney p. 33
` Parker Hutchinson p. 34
` Amanda Karl p. 35
`
`Jeff Kosbie p. 37
` Ashleigh Musser p. 38
` Tayler Walters p. 39
` Simone White p. 40
`
`
`
`
`
`
` SIGNIFICANT
`RECOVERIES
`
` p. 41
` p. 42
`p. 44
`
`
`
`Deceptive Marketing
`Defective Products
`Antitrust & Unfair
` Business Practices
`Securities & Financial
` Fraud
`p. 47
`Data Breach & Privacy
`p. 48
`Mass Tort
`Sexual Assault Litigation p. 49
` p. 49
`Government Reform
`
`p. 47
`
`
`Firm Resume
`
`Gibbs Law Group is a national litigation firm representing plaintiffs in class
`and collective actions in state and federal courts, and in arbitration matters
`worldwide. The firm serves clients in consumer protection, securities and
`financial fraud, antitrust, whistleblower, personal injury, and employment
`cases. We are committed to achieving favorable results for all of our clients
`in the most expeditious and economical manner possible.
`The firm regularly prosecutes multi-state class actions and has one of the best
`track records in the country for successfully certifying classes, developing
`practical damages methodologies, obtaining prompt relief for class members
`victimized by unlawful practices, and working cooperatively with other firms.
`Our attorneys take pride in their ability to simplify complex issues;
`willingness to pursue narrow and innovative legal theories; ability to work
`cooperatively with other plaintiffs’ firms; and desire to outwork and outlast
`well-funded defense teams.
`As a result, our firm and attorneys are frequently recognized by the courts,
`our peers, and the legal media for the quality of their work:
`
` 
`
` Top Plaintiff Lawyers in California, Daily Journal, 2021 (Andre Mura,
`Amy Zeman)
` Top Women Lawyers in California, Daily Journal, 2021 (Amy Zeman)
` Product Liability MVP, Law360, 2021 (Amy Zeman)
` Lawyer of the Year- Mass Torts/ Class Action, Best Lawyers, 2022 (Eric
`Gibbs)
` Winning Litigators Finalist, National Law Journal, 2021 (Amy Zeman)
` Class Action Practice Group of the Year, Law360, 2019
` Top Boutique Law Firms in California, Daily Journal, 2019
` Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar, Law360, 2019 (Eric Gibbs)
` Two 2019 California Lawyer Attorney of the Year (CLAY) Awards
` Top Plaintiff Lawyers in California, Daily Journal, 2020, 2019, 2016 (Eric
`Gibbs)
` Cybersecurity and Privacy MVP, Law360, 2018 (Eric Gibbs)
` Consumer Protection MVP, Law360, 2016 (Eric Gibbs)
` Top Cybersecurity/ Privacy Attorneys Under 40, Law360 Rising Stars,
`2017 (Andre Mura)
` Top Class Action Attorneys Under 40, Law360 Rising Stars, 2017 (David
`Stein)
` Top 40 Lawyers Under 40, Daily Journal, 2017 (David Stein)
` AV-Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell (Eric Gibbs)
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case: 2:19-cv-00411-ALM-CMV Doc #: 170-4 Filed: 09/17/21 Page: 3 of 50 PAGEID #: 11137
`
`
`
`Diversity, Equity & Inclusiveness
`
`Gibbs Law Group is committed to diversity, inclusion, and racial justice in everything we do. Our
`commitment to equity and opportunity starts within our firm and extends to our community and to our
`work. We seek to create a culture where our employees feel comfortable bringing their full selves to work,
`and where we have the knowledge and skills necessary to effectively advocate for our diverse clients.
`
`To support our goal of advancing equity both inside and outside out firm, we created an Equity, Diversity
`and Inclusion Task Force comprised of partners, associates, and staff. The Task Force is working to
`promote diversity among our employees, the clients we represent, and the causes we support. Some of the
`Task Force’s work to date includes:
`
`
`Implementing modifications to the firm’s hiring practices to diversify our applicant pool and to
`prioritize diversity in hiring and retention.
` Participated in the California State Bar’s annual summit on diversity and equity in the legal
`profession.
` Outreach to diversity-focused law school organizations to expand awareness of complex litigation
`opportunities and ensure a diverse pool of applicants.
`
`Identifying and supporting diversity-focused legal organizations and non-profits.
` Maximizing the firm’s capacity for social change in the community.
` Commitment to implementing annual anti-bias and microaggressions trainings.
`
`
`Voting Rights Task Force
`
`Gibbs Law Group is proud to have launched our Voting Rights Task Force, through which we have been
`participating in efforts to protect and expand civic participation across the country. The Task Force seeks
`to identify specific opportunities for both our attorneys and staff to promote voter engagement and
`maximize voter participation. We implemented new programs to promote firmwide involvement in
`protecting and expanding the right to vote, including:
`
`
` Making Election Day a firm holiday.
` Allowing support staff to bill a set number of hours per week to Voting Rights Task Force efforts,
`including with nonprofit organizations.
` Encouraging attorney participation in voter protection volunteer opportunities during elections,
`including staffing voter protection hotlines, poll watching, and helping triage issues that arise.
`
`
` Page 2 of 49
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case: 2:19-cv-00411-ALM-CMV Doc #: 170-4 Filed: 09/17/21 Page: 4 of 50 PAGEID #: 11138
`
` Eric H. Gibbs  Partner
`Eric Gibbs prosecutes antitrust, consumer protection, whistleblower, financial fraud and
`mass tort matters. He has been appointed to leadership positions in dozens of contested,
`high profile class actions and coordinated proceedings. Eric has recovered billions of dollars
`for the clients and classes he represents and has negotiated groundbreaking settlements that
`resulted in meaningful reforms to business practices and have favorably impacted plaintiffs’
`legal rights.
`
`Reputation and Recognition by the Courts
`In over 20 years of practice, Eric has developed a distinguished reputation with his peers and
`the judiciary for his ability to work efficiently and cooperatively with co-counsel, and
`professionally with opposing counsel in class action litigation.
`“[Mr. Gibbs] efficiently managed the requests from well over 20 different law firms and
`effectively represented the interests of Non-Settling Plaintiffs throughout this litigation.”
`- Hon. G. Wu, In re Hyundai & Kia Fuel Economy Litig. (C.D. Cal)
`“The attorneys who handled the case were particularly skilled by virtue of their ability and
`experience.”
`- Hon. D. Debevoise, In re: Mercedes-Benz Teleaid Contract Litig. (D. N.J.)
`“They are experienced and knowledgeable counsel and have significant breadth of
`experience in terms of consumer class actions.”
`- Hon. R. Sabraw, Mitchell v. Am. Fair Credit Assoc’n (Alameda Cty. Superior Ct.)
`“Representation was professional and competent; in the Court’s opinion, counsel obtained
`an excellent result for the class.”
`- Hon. J. Fogel, Sugarman v. Ducati N. Am. (N.D. Cal)
`Achievements and Leadership
`Eric has been recognized as a leading lawyer in class and mass actions. In 2019, Law360
`recognized Eric among its “Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar,” one of only 10 attorneys nationwide
`to receive the prestigious award. He also received the 2019 California Lawyer Attorney of the
`Year (CLAY) Award for his work in the Anthem Data Breach Litigation. Daily Journal named
`him to its coveted list of “Top Plaintiff Lawyers in California” for 2020, 2019 and
`2016. Law360 recognized Eric as a “2016 Consumer Protection MVP,” (the only plaintiff-
`side lawyer in the country selected in that category) and as a “2018 Cybersecurity & Privacy
`MVP.” Consumer Attorneys of California selected Eric and co-counsel as finalists for
`Consumer Attorney of the Year for achieving a $100 million settlement in the Chase “Check
`Loan” Litigation. His cases have been chronicled in major legal and news publications
`including NBC News, CNN, the National Law Journal, The New York Times, Market Watch,
`and Bloomberg News. Eric holds a variety of leadership positions in professional associations
`for consumer advocacy, and he frequently presents on developing trends in the law at
`conferences throughout the country.
`
`Litigation Highlights
`In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach Privacy Litigation – Served as a court-appointed
`member of the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee representing the interests of plaintiffs and
`putative class members following a massive data breach of approximately 80 million personal
`records. The lawsuit settled in August 2018 for $115 million, the largest data breach
`settlement in history at the time.
`
` Page 3 of 49
`
`505 14th Street, Suite 1110
`Oakland, CA 94612
`T 510.350.9700
`ehg@classlawgroup.com
`
`
`Practice Emphasis
`Antitrust & Unfair Competition
`Banking and Financial Fraud
`Class Actions
`Consumer Protection
`Mass Personal Injury
`Whistleblower
`
`Education
`
`Seattle University School of
`Law, J.D., 1995
`
`San Francisco State
`University, B.A., 1991
`
`Awards & Honors
`
`Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar,
`Law 360, 2019
`
`California Lawyer Attorney of
`the Year Award, 2019
`
`“Lawyer of the Year,” Best
`Lawyers in America for Class
`Actions/ Mass Tort Litigation
`(2022)
`
`Top Plaintiff Lawyers in
`California for 2020, 2019,
`2016, Daily Journal
`
`Lawdragon 500 Leading
`Plaintiff Consumer Lawyer,
`2019- 2021
`
`Cybersecurity & Privacy
`MVP, Law 360, 2018
`
`Consumer Protection MVP,
`Law 360, 2016
`
`AV Preeminent® Peer
`Review Rated by Martindale-
`Hubbell
`Top 100 Super Lawyers in
`Northern California
`
`Admissions
`
`California
`
`

`

`Case: 2:19-cv-00411-ALM-CMV Doc #: 170-4 Filed: 09/17/21 Page: 5 of 50 PAGEID #: 11139
`
`In re Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A. “Check Loan” Contract Litigation – multidistrict
`litigation that alleged Chase Bank wronged consumers by offering long-term fixed-rate loans,
`only to later more-than-double the required loan payments. Eric led negotiations in the
`case, which resulted in a $100 million settlement with Chase eight weeks prior to trial.
`In re Adobe Systems Inc. Privacy Litigation – As court-appointed lead counsel, Eric and
`his team reversed a long line of decisions adverse to consumers whose personal information
`was stolen in data breaches. Judge Koh issued a 41 page decision in plaintiffs’ favor and Eric
`negotiated a comprehensive reform of Adobe’s data security practices. The court’s landmark
`decision on Article III standing in this case marked a sea change and has been cited
`favorably in over twenty cases in the year since it was issued.
`In re Hyundai & Kia Fuel Econ. Litigation – As court-appointed liaison counsel, Eric
`reconciled the plaintiffs’ interests and coordinated discovery and settlement negotiations. He
`helped finalize a settlement with an estimated value of up to $210 million.
`Skold v. Intel Corp. – After more than a decade of litigation, Eric as lead counsel achieved
`a nationwide class action settlement on behalf of approximately 5 million consumers of Intel
`Pentium 4 processors. The lawsuit changed Intel’s benchmarking practices and Intel agreed
`to a cash settlement for the class, along with $4 million in charitable donations.
`Parkinson v. Hyundai Motor America – Eric served as class counsel in this lawsuit
`alleging that the flywheel and clutch system in certain Hyundai vehicles was defective. After
`achieving nationwide class certification, Hyundai agreed to a settlement that provided for 50-
`100% reimbursements to class members for their repairs and full reimbursement for rental
`vehicle expenses.
`De La Cruz v. Masco Retail Cabinet Group – Eric served as lead attorney litigating
`the collective claims of dozens of misclassified account representatives for overtime pay
`under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Successfully certified a class of current and
`former Masco account representatives and personally arbitrated the case to judgment
`obtaining full recovery for the class.
`In re Providian Credit Card Cases – Eric played a prominent role in this nationwide
`class action suit brought on behalf of Providian credit card holders alleging that
`Providian engaged in unlawful and fraudulent business practices in connection with the
`marketing and fee assessments for its credit cards. The Honorable Stuart Pollack
`approved a $105 million settlement, plus injunctive relief—one of the largest class action
`recoveries in the United States arising out of consumer credit card litigation.
`Professional Affiliations
`American Association for Justice
`American Bar Foundation- Fellow
`Consumer Attorneys of California
`National Association of Consumer Advocates
`Pound Civil Justice Institute- Fellow
`Public Justice Foundation- Class Action Preservation Project Committee
`
`
`
` Page 4 of 49
`
`

`

`Case: 2:19-cv-00411-ALM-CMV Doc #: 170-4 Filed: 09/17/21 Page: 6 of 50 PAGEID #: 11140
`
`505 14th Street
`Suite 1110
`Oakland, CA 94612
`T 510.350.9700
`dmb@classlawgroup.com
`
`
`Practice Emphasis
`
`Class Actions
`
`Consumer Protection
`
`Privacy
`
`
`
`Education
`
` David M. Berger  Partner
`David Berger represents plaintiffs in class actions with a special emphasis on data breach,
`privacy, and financial services litigation. He currently serves as court-appointed Class
`Counsel in In re US Fertility LLC Data Security Litigation, and has represented data breach
`victims in some of the largest and most influential privacy cases, including litigation against
`Equifax, Anthem, Vizio, Adobe, Banner Health, and Excellus BlueCross BlueShield. David
`has repeatedly obtained record-breaking settlements on behalf of his clients, including in the
`Equifax and Anthem data breach cases, which set successive records for the largest data
`breach settlement in history.
`
`David is widely regarded as a leader in emerging litigation involving data breach and privacy,
`which is underscored by his broad technical expertise—from hacking techniques and
`cybersecurity controls to industry standard IT practices, information security frameworks,
`and auditing processes. He has deposed Chief Information Security Officers and
`information security professionals at Fortune 500 corporations, worked with expert
`witnesses on cutting-edge cybersecurity and damages theories, and supervised large-scale
`document review teams poring over millions of technical documents in a compressed
`timeframe. In addition, David holds the Certified Information Privacy Technologist (CIPT)
`certification through the International Association of Privacy Professionals, a program
`primarily designed for career IT professionals; this allows him to communicate directly with
`company witnesses, without the need for expert translation.
`
`Outside of his litigation experience, David is an active member of the class action legal
`community, frequently speaking at conferences on data breach cases and security issues and
`other class action topics. David serves as the Chair of the American Association for Justice’s
`Consumer Privacy and Data Breach Litigation Group and is an active member of the Sedona
`Conference’s Working Group on Data Security and Privacy Liability.
`
`Prior to joining Gibbs Law Group, he served as a law clerk to the Honorable Laurel Beeler,
`Northern District of California (2011-2014). Before law school, David worked as a magazine
`editor and television presenter in Taiwan and managed an outdoor center on an island off
`the West Coast of Scotland.
`
`Litigation Highlights
`In re Equifax, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation – Key member of
`litigation team securing historic $1.5 billion class action settlement on behalf of 147 million
`consumers whose social security numbers and other private data were exposed in a 2017
`data breach, described by the court as “the largest and most comprehensive recovery in a
`data breach case in U.S. history by several orders of magnitude." David played an integral
`role in negotiating key business practice changes, including overhauling Equifax's handling
`of consumers' personal information and data security and requiring that the company spend
`at least $1 billion for data security and related technology over five years.
`In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach Privacy Litigation – Key member of the litigation team
`representing interests of plaintiffs and putative class members following massive data breach
`of approximately 80 million personal records, including names, dates of birth, Social Security
`numbers, health care ID numbers, email and physical addresses, employment information,
`and income data. The lawsuit settled in August 2018 for $115 million, the largest data
`breach settlement in history.
`Fero v. Excellus Health Plan Inc. – Key member of the litigation team representing the
`interests of 7 million Excellus health plan subscribers and 3.5 million Lifetime subscribers
`whose personal and medical information was compromised.
`
`
`J.D., Northwestern University
`School of Law, 2008
`
`B.A., University of Wisconsin,
`Madison, 1998
`
`Admissions
`
`California
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 5 of 49
`
`

`

`Case: 2:19-cv-00411-ALM-CMV Doc #: 170-4 Filed: 09/17/21 Page: 7 of 50 PAGEID #: 11141
`
`In re Adobe Systems Inc. Privacy Litigation – Key member of the litigation team that
`succeeded in reversing a long line of decisions adverse to consumers whose personal
`information was stolen in data breaches. Judge Koh issued a 41-page decision in plaintiffs’
`favor and the settlement resulted in a comprehensive reform of Adobe’s data security
`practices. The court’s landmark decision on Article III standing marked a sea change and has
`been cited favorably in over twenty cases in the year since it was issued.
`
`Awards & Honors
`Certified Information Privacy Technologist, International Association of Privacy
`Professionals (IAPP)
`Northern California Super Lawyers (2021)
`Rising Star, Northern California Super Lawyers (2016- 2018)
`
`Professional Affiliations
`Chair, American Association for Justice- Consumer Privacy and Data Breach Litigation
`Group
`Consumer Attorneys of California
`Sedona Conference, Working Group on Data Security and Privacy Liability
`
`Presentations and Publications
`Presenter, “Communicating with the Class,” Class Action Mastery Forum, January 2019.
`Presenter, “Hot Topics in Consumer Class Actions Against Insurers: Filed Rate Doctrine,
`Standing, and Reverse Preemption of RICO Claims,” Sacramento California Insurance
`Regulation and Litigation Seminar, Clyde & Co., March 2018.
`Presenter, “Winning strategies in privacy and data security class actions: the plaintiffs'
`perspective," Berkeley Center for Law & Technology, Berkeley Law School, January 2017.
`Presenter, “Don’t be Spokeo’d: What You Need to Know in Litigating Data Breach Cases
`(from breach to remedies),” ABA Business Law Section Annual Meeting, September 8, 2016.
`Presenter, “Developments in ‘E-Commerce’ Class Actions and Privacy Law,” Perrin Class
`Action Litigation Conference, May 16, 2016.
`Presenter, “Data Breach Class Action Litigation,” Mass Torts Made Perfect Conference,
`April 22, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 6 of 49
`
`

`

`Case: 2:19-cv-00411-ALM-CMV Doc #: 170-4 Filed: 09/17/21 Page: 8 of 50 PAGEID #: 11142
`
` Dylan Hughes  Partner
`Dylan Hughes concentrates his practice on investigating and prosecuting fraud matters on
`behalf of whistleblowers, consumers and employees who have been harmed by corporate
`misconduct. He coordinates initial case evaluations and analyses in a variety of practice areas
`and has substantial experience in matters involving health care fraud, particularly in the
`Medicare and pharmaceutical contexts. Dylan represents consumers in cases ranging from
`false advertising to defective products, and employees in misclassification and wage and hour
`cases under state and federal laws.
`
`Mr. Hughes has extensive experience prosecuting complex personal injury cases. He helped
`to obtain millions of dollars for women who suffered blood clots and other serious injuries
`after taking birth control pills. He has also represented clients injured by defective medical
`devices, including defibrillators, blood filters, as well as back pain implants. Mr. Hughes was
`part of the team that recently settled a case alleging medical malpractice for a spinal surgery
`that resulted in partial paralysis.
`
`Mr. Hughes began his career as a law clerk for the Honorable Paul A. Mapes, Administrative
`Law Judge of the Office of Administrative Law Judges, United States Department of Labor.
`He is a member of the American Bar Association, Consumer Attorneys of California,
`American Association for Justice Class Action Litigation Group and the Consumer Rights
`Section of the Barristers Club.
`
`Litigation Highlights
`
`505 14th Street
`Suite 1110
`Oakland, CA 94612
`T 510.350.9700
`F 510.350.9701
`dsh@classlawgroup.com
`
`Practice Emphasis
`
`Class Actions
`
`Consumer Protection
`
`Employment Law
`
`Whistleblower
`
`
`
`Education
`
`University of California,
`Hastings College of Law, J.D.,
`2000
`
`University of California at
`Berkeley, B.A., 1995
`
`Skold v. Intel Corp. – Key member of the legal team in this decade-long litigation that
`achieved a nationwide class action settlement on behalf of approximately 5 million
`consumers of Intel Pentium 4 processors. The lawsuit changed Intel’s benchmarking
`practices and Intel agreed to a cash settlement for the class, along with $4 million in
`charitable donations.
`
`Admissions
`
`California
`
`
`
`In re Adobe Systems Inc. Privacy Litigation – Key member of the litigation team that
`succeeded in reversing a long line of decisions adverse to consumers whose personal
`information was stolen in data breaches. Judge Koh issued a 41-page decision in plaintiffs’
`favor and the settlement resulted in a comprehensive reform of Adobe’s data security
`practices. The court’s landmark decision on Article III standing in this case marked a sea
`change and has been cited favorably in over twenty cases in the year since it was issued.
`
`Velasco v. Chrysler Group LLP – represented consumers who alleged they were sold and
`leased vehicles with defective power control modules that caused vehicle stalling. In addition
`to negotiating a recall of all 2012-13 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles, the
`lawsuit also resulted in Chrysler reimbursing owners for all repair and rental car expenses,
`and extending its warranty.
`
`Parkinson v. Hyundai Motor America – certified a nationwide class alleging Hyundai sold
`vehicles with defective flywheel systems, resulting in a favorable settlement for the class.
`
`Awards & Honors
`Northern California Super Lawyer (2012-2021)
`
`Professional Affiliations
`Consumer Attorneys of California
`American Association for Justice- Class Action Litigation Group
`
`
`
` Page 7 of 49
`
`

`

`Case: 2:19-cv-00411-ALM-CMV Doc #: 170-4 Filed: 09/17/21 Page: 9 of 50 PAGEID #: 11143
`
`505 14th Street
`Suite 1110
`Oakland, CA 94612
`T 510.350.9700
`F 510.350.9701
`lpl@classlawgroup.com
`
`
`
`Practice Emphasis
`
`Class Actions
`
`Consumer Protection
`
`
`
`Education
`
`University of California,
`Hastings College of Law, J.D.,
`magna cum laude, 2014
`
`University of California Los
`Angeles, B.A., 2011
`
`Admissions
`
`California
`
`
`
` Linda Lam  Partner
`Linda Lam focuses her practice on representing individuals who have been harmed by
`corporate misconduct. She has prosecuted fraud, employment, breach of contract, breach of
`fiduciary duty, and medical malpractice claims brought under federal and state laws.
`
`Linda has been an advocate for borrowers who lost their homes to foreclosure during the
`financial crisis, individuals who were fraudulently induced to purchase investment products,
`as well as veterans who received negligent care at VA facilities. Linda’s dedication to her
`clients has led her to being recognized as a “Rising Star” by the Northern California Super
`Lawyers for the past three years.
`
`Linda graduated magna cum laude from the University of California, Hastings College of the
`Law in 2014. Before joining Gibbs Law Group, Linda was an associate attorney at a national
`employment law firm, where she represented employees and retirees in wage and hour and
`employee benefits cases.
`
`
`Litigation Highlights
`Hernandez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. – represents a certified class of more than 500
`home mortgage borrowers who lost their homes to foreclosure after Wells Fargo
`erroneously denied them trial mortgage modifications. On October 12, 2020, the Court
`approved an $18.5 million settlement, resulting in significant compensation payments to
`each class member.
`RCHFU, LLC v. Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corp. – represents plaintiffs alleging
`that Marriott Vacations Worldwide and other defendants breached various fiduciary duties
`by engaging in acts that decimated the value of the plaintiffs’ property interests in the Ritz-
`Carlton Club located in Aspen, Colorado.
`Cooper v. United States of America – represented a veteran of the United States Army
`who alleged that he received negligent medical care at a VA facility, resulting in a delayed
`diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer. The plaintiff alleged that by the time the cancer was
`discovered and diagnosed, it had become incurable. Linda was part of the trial team that won
`a $2.5 million judgment for the plaintiff.
`Ulti-Mate Connectors, Inc. v. American General Life Insurance Agency – represented
`plaintiffs who alleged that American General, among other defendants, fraudulently
`organized, administered, and sold rights to participate in voluntary employee beneficiary
`association plans that were not compliant with IRS regulations. The litigation resulted in a
`favorable settlement for the plaintiffs.
`
`Awards & Honors
`Northern California Super Lawyers, Rising Star (2017 - 2021)
`
`Professional Affiliations
`American Association for Justice
`Consumer Attorneys of California
`
`Publications & Presentations
` The Real ID Act: Proposed Amendments for Credibility Determinations, 11 Hastings
`Race & Poverty L.J. 321, 2014.
`
`
`
`
`
` Page 8 of 49
`
`

`

`Case: 2:19-cv-00411-ALM-CMV Doc #: 170-4 Filed: 09/17/21 Page: 10 of 50 PAGEID #: 11144
`
`
`
`Steve Lopez  Partner
`
`505 14th Street
`Suite 1110
`Oakland, CA 94612
`T 510.350.9700
`sal@classlawgroup.com
`
`Practice Emphasis
`
`Class Actions
`
`Consumer Protection
`
`
`
`Education
`
`
`University of California at
`Berkeley (Berkeley Law),
`J.D., 2014
`
`University of Virginia, B.A.,
`2008
`
`Admissions
`
`California
`
`
`
`Steve Lopez represents consumers, employees and whistleblowers who have been harmed
`by corporate misconduct. He has prosecuted a variety of consumer protection cases ranging
`from false advertising to defective products, as well as complex employment cases involving
`also involved in the investigation and development of new cases.
`
`He serves on the Board of Directors of Consumer Attorneys of California and was selected
`from a statewide pool of applicants for the 2015 Diversity Leadership Academy, a
`prestigious training program aimed to educate the next generation of progressive leaders.
`
`Steve is a 2014 graduate of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, where he
`was a Publishing Editor for the California Law Review and an Editor for the Berkeley
`Journal of Employment and Labor Law. He was also a member of the La Raza Law Students
`Association and the Legal Aid Society–Employment Law Center’s Berkeley Workers’ Rights
`Clinic.
`
`Prior to law school, Mr. Lopez performed research for a consulting firm dedicated to
`improving justice programs. He received his B.A. in economics and international relations
`from the University of Virginia in 2008.
`
`
`Litigation Highlights
`Velasco v. Chrysler Group LLC – Member of the litigation team that represented
`consumers who alleged they were sold and leased vehicles with defective power control
`modules that caused vehicle stalling. The lawsuit resulted in a recall of all 2012-13 Jeep
`Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles, as well as reimbursements for all repair and
`rental car expenses, and extended vehicle warranties.
`In re Hyundai Sonata Engine Litigation- Representing plaintiffs who allege that their
`2011-2014 Hyundai Sonatas suffered premature and catastrophic engine failures due to
`defective rotating assemblies. The Court granted preliminary approval to a comprehensive
`settlement in June 2016.
`Southern California Gas Leak Cases – Member of the litigation team representing
`residents of communities in or near the Los Angeles suburbs of Porter Ranch who were
`affected by the Aliso Canyon well rupture and ensuing gas leak, the largest methane leak in
`U.S. history. The lawsuits seek relief for those who were displaced from their homes,
`suffered illnesses and injuries, sustained property value losses, or lost business due to the
`leak.
`Smith v. Family Video Movie Club, Inc. – Member of the litigation team representing the
`interests of hourly retail employees who alleged they were not properly compensated for all
`wages and overtime earned. The Court recently certified a class.
`
`Awards & Honors
`Northern California Super Lawyers, Rising Star (2017 - 2021)
`
`Professional Affiliations
`American Association for Justice
`Board of Directors, Consumer Attorneys of California
`
`
`
` Page 9 of 49
`
`

`

`Case: 2:19-cv-00411-ALM-CMV Doc #: 170-4 Filed: 09/17/21 Page: 11 of 50 PAGEID #: 11145
`
` Karen Barth Menzies  Partner
`Karen is a nationally recognized mass tort attorney with more than twenty years of
`experience in federal and state litigation. Courts throughout the country have appointed
`Karen to serve in leadership positions including Lead Counsel, Liaison Counsel and Plaintiff
`Steering Committee in some of the largest pharmaceutical and device mass tort cases. Karen
`currently serves in leadership positions in the Taxotere Litigation (federal court), Zoloft
`Birth Defect Litigation (federal and California state courts), Transvaginal Mesh Litigation
`(federal and California state courts), Fosamax Femur Fracture Litigation (California state
`court), Lexapro/Celexa Birth Defect Litigation (Missouri state court).
`Karen is particularly focused on women’s health issues and sexual abuse claims, including a
`current Boy Scouts of America sexual abuse lawsuit investigation involving claims of abuse
`by scoutmasters, troop leaders and other adults affiliated with the Boy Scouts of
`America. She also represents women suffering permanent baldness following breast cancer
`chemotherapy treatments with Taxotere, and children who experienced severe side effects
`after taking the widely prescribed medication Risperdal. Karen believes in advocating for the
`victims who’ve been taken advantage of, and helping to ensure drug safety in the face of
`profit-driven corporations that hide the risks of their products. She has testified twice before
`FDA advisory boards as well as the California State Legislature on the safety concerns
`regarding the SSRI antidepressants and the manufacturers’ misconduct. She has also advised
`victim advocacy groups in their efforts to inform governmental agencies and legislative
`bodies of harms caused by corporations.
`
`kbm@classlawgroup.com
`
`Practice Emphasis
`
`Class Actions
`
`Mass Personal Injury
`
`
`
`Education
`
`University of California, Davis
`King Hall School of Law, J.D.,
`1995.
`
`Colorado State University,
`B.A., 1989.
`
`Admissions
`
`California
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Karen frequently publishes and presents on issues involving drug safety, mass tort litigation,
`FDA reform and federal preemption for both legal organizations (plaintiff and defense) and
`medical groups.
`
`Awards & Honors
`AV Preeminent® Peer Review Rated by Martindale-Hubbell
`Best Lawyers in America, Personal Injury Litigation (2021)
`Individual Recogn

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket