throbber
Plaintiff's Brief In Opposition to Defendant Verizon Wireless’s Motion to Compel Arbitration Indigency 1
`
`IN THE COMMON PLEAS
`
`T OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY OHIO
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`Myron Grace
`
`202^1 JUN 13 P 3= 5b ■
`
`County Common Pleas Court
`
`of Cuyahoga County Ohio
`
`1200 Ontario Street, Cleveland Ohio 44113
`
`Plaintiffs Brief In Opposition to Defendant
`Verizon Wireless’s Motion to Compel
`
`Arbitration Due to Defendant’s Indigent State
`
`' CV24995657
`182790573
`
`182790573
`
`)
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`Rakhshanda Talib
`4
`3495 E. 98th Street, #301
`
`Cleveland, Ohio 44104
`
`+1(440)444-4413
`
`E: Tvpilots@yahoo.com
`
`Defendants
`
`Verizon Wireless Headquarters )
`
`Legal Department
`
`1095 Avenue of the Americas
`
`New York, NY 10036 USA
`
`1-212-395-1000
`
`Attorneys Verizon Wireless
`
`Christine M Haaker (0063225)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`10050 Innovation Drive, Suite 400 )
`
`Miamisburg, Ohio 45342
`
`)
`
`Christine.Haaker@ThompsonHine.com
`
`Brianna D. Vollman (0101144)
`
`312 Walnut Street, Suite 2000
`
`Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`Brianna. V ollman@ThompsonHine. com
`
`

`

`Plaintiff's Brief In Opposition to Defendant Verizon Wireless's Motion to Compel Arbitration Indigency 2
`
`Plaintiffs Brief In Opposition to Defendant Verizon Wireless’s Motion to Compel
`
`Arbitration Due to Defendant’s Indigent State
`
`Arguments In Opposition
`
`1) Plaintiff Myron Grace is Indigent, and therefore any fees to Compel Arbitration is unfair
`
`to him.
`
`2) Plaintiff Myron Grace has no financial means to pay the costs of Arbitration.
`
`3) Plaintiff Myron Grace should not be denied his right to due process, and the trial court
`
`should set a trial date to hear the case.
`
`4) The Plaintiff Myron Grace has filed his Indigency form and attached it to this document
`
`in response.
`
`5) Judge Shannon M Gallagher should vacate her ruling on 05/30/24 allowing Arbitration to
`
`Verizon Wireless, and set a trial date.
`
`Issues
`
`1) Now comes Myron Grace and Rakhshanda Talib on behalf of themselves residing at
`
`3495 E. 98th street, 301, Cleveland Ohio 44104 being known as the plaintiffs. Here comes
`
`also the defendants Verizon Wireless Corporate Headquarters, 95 Avenue of the
`
`Americas, New York, NY 10036, USA and Basking Ridge Operational Headquarters,
`
`One Verizon Way, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920, USA. Myron Grace Verizon
`
`Numbers l-(440)444-4413 and l-(440)902-1668. Rakhshanda Talib Verizon
`
`Numbers 1-(440)465-8945.
`
`2) That Myron Grace is a disabled U.S. Navy Veteran, and that Verizon Wireless did
`
`violate The American Disabilities Act. That on 02-06-24 Myron Grace did call Verizon
`
`Wireless and request a plan for 55 and older that was advertised on Google Search
`
`

`

`Plaintiff's Brief In Opposition to Defendant Verizon Wireless's Motion to Compel Arbitration Indigency 3
`
`Engine by Verizon. That the Verizon Wireless representative stated the advertisement
`
`was for Florida only, but she would make an exception for Myron Grace and apply
`
`the 55 and older plan to his phone bills in February and March 2024. That Myron
`
`Grace did rely on the statement by the Verizon Wireless representative on 02-06-24. That
`
`on February 6,2024 Myron Grace did call back Verizon Wireless and was told he would
`
`be given a discount for the 55 and older plan for sure, and that it would take a few weeks
`
`to kick in, and that Myron Grace did rely on the statement by the Verizon Wireless
`
`representative on 02-06-24. That on March 1,2024 Myron Grace did call back Verizon
`
`Wireless and a Verizon Wireless Supervisor did tell him he was eligible for the 55 and
`
`older did, as long as he switched from the military discount. Myron Grace did rely on the
`
`statement by the Verizon Wireless representative on 03-01-24. That on March 5,2024
`
`Myron Grace did call back Verizon Wireless. That on 03-05-24 Myron Grace was told by
`
`a Verizon Wireless representative and supervisor that he was not eligible for the 55 and
`
`older discount, despite what Myron Grace was promised on several other phone calls.
`
`Myron Grace did rely on the statement by the Verizon Wireless representative on 03-05-
`
`24. Verizon Wireless did make several promises to give Myron Grace the 55 and older
`
`discount, but did not keep the promise made to him.
`
`Other Issues
`
`3) My name is Rakhshanda Talib and I am speaking about the issue that I have with Verizon
`
`Wireless. The issue is that Verizon is trying to make me pay for a stolen phone, an
`
`iPhonel3. Back in November 2022, my son who was 18 years old at the time, stole the
`
`phone. Upon asking the police if I can retrieve the phone since it was my property, the
`
`police advised me that if I went and retrieved the phone I would be charged with assault.
`
`

`

`Plaintiff's Brief In Opposition to Defendant Verizon Wireless's Motion to Compel Arbitration Indigency 4
`
`I had no choice but to contact Verizon and Verizon told me that they could not do
`
`anything about the phone without a police report. I should not have had to have a police
`
`report to report my own property stolen. Even with this non-viable option, I tried to work
`
`with this with Verizon. Verizon told me that I could pay $25/month for the Iphone until it
`
`was paid off, along with paying my own bill. I thought again that this was unfair because
`
`as a consumer I should not have to pay for a stolen device. Afterwards, my bill became
`
`very confusing from Verizon, and I was constantly being billed out in total for the iPhone
`
`along with my own phone line. I had to call Verizon Wireless at least 2-3 times a month
`
`for at least 4 months to try and get my bill straight. As a consumer, I should be able to
`
`know what my bill will be each month, there should not be any surprises. Afterwards,
`
`Verizon began to add extra items onto my bill that I did not ask for. Rakhshanda Talib
`
`would like the phone debt removed from her credit report.
`
`Signatures
`
`Now comes Myron Grace and Rakhshanda Talib in The Cuyahoga County Court of Common
`
`Pleas in Cleveland, Ohio. Myron Grace and Rakhshanda Talib on Behalf of himself residing at
`
`3495 E. 98th street, 301, Cleveland Ohio 44104 being known as the plaintiff(s). Plaintiffs
`
`making claim against the defendant Verizon Wireless Headquarters Legal Department, 1095
`
`Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036 USA 1-212-395-1000 and Verizon Wireless
`
`Basking Ridge Operational Headquarters One Verizon Way, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920,
`
`USA, 1- 908-559-2001. A copy of this document will be delivered by U.S. Mail to the Attorneys
`
`for Verizon Wireless being Christine M Haaker (0063225), 10050 Innovation Drive, Suite 400,
`
`Miamisburg, Ohio 45342, (937) 443-6822 and Brianna D. Vollman, 312 Walnut Street, Suite
`
`2000, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, (513) 352-6751.
`
`

`

`Plaintiff's Brief In Opposition to Defendant Verizon Wireless's Motion to Compel Arbitration Indigency 5
`
`________ ~~
`
`Myron Grace, Pro Se
`
`3495 E. 98th Street, 301
`
`Cleveland, Ohio 44104
`
`T:(440)902-1668
`
`E: Tvpilots@yahoo.com
`
`Rakhshanda Talib, Pro Se, 3495 E. 98th Street, 301, Cleveland, Ohio 44104
`
`T: (440) 465-8945, E: rockiethunder@hotmail.com
`
`Proof of Mailing
`
`The plaintiffs do herby state a copy of the complaint will be delivered to all defendants on
`. At the
`6 the / day of
`
`following addresses. Now comes Myron Grace on Behalf of himself residing at 3495 E. 98th
`
`street, 301, Cleveland Ohio 44104 being known as the plaintiff(s). Plaintiffs making claim
`
`against the defendant Verizon Wireless Headquarters Legal Department, 1095 Avenue of the
`
`Americas, New York, NY 10036 USA 1-212-395-1000 and Verizon Wireless Basking Ridge
`
`Operational Headquarters One Verizon Way, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920, USA, 1- 908-
`
`559-2001. A copy of this document will be delivered by U.S. Mail to the Attorneys for Verizon
`
`Wireless being Christine M Haaker (0063225), 10050 Innovation Drive, Suite 400, Miamisburg,
`
`Ohio 45342, (937) 443-6822 and Brianna D. Vollman, 312 Walnut Street, Suite 2000,
`
`Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, (513) 352-6751.
`
`

`

`Plaintiff's Brief In Opposition to Defendant Verizon Wireless's Motion to Compel Arbitration Indigency 6
`
`*
`
`Myron Grace, Pro Se
`
`3495 E. 98th Street, 301
`
`Cleveland, Ohio 44104
`
`T:(440)902-1668
`
`E: Tvpilots@yahoo.com
`
`Rakhshanda Talib, Pro Se, 3495 E. 98th Street, 301, Cleveland, Ohio 44104
`
`T: (440) 465-8945, E: rockiethunder@hotmail.com
`
`

`

`53944009
`
`case: CV-24-995657
`
`MYRON GRACE
`VS.
`VERIZON WIRELESS
`
`2499847
`
`JUDGE: SHANNON M GALLAGHER
`ROOM: 22D JUSTICE CENTER
`DOCKET DATE: 05/30/2024
`
`MOTION OF DEFENDANT VERIZON WIRELESS TO
`COMPEL ARBITRATION OR TO DISMISS, FILED 05/07/2024,
`IS GRANTED. THIS MATTER IS STAYED PENDING
`COMPLETION OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS AS
`REQUIRED BY THE VERIZON WIRELESS CUSTOMER
`AGREEMENT THAT PLAINTIFF CONSENTED TO. THIS
`MATTER WILL REMAIN STAYED UNTIL THE COMPLETION
`OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS AND WILL ONLY BE
`REINSTATED UPON MOTION. COURT COST ASSESSED TO
`THE PLAINTIFF(S). NOTICE ISSUED
`
`I First-Class Mail
`I U. S. Postage Paid
`I Cleveland, OH
`I Permit No. 1962
`i_____________________
`
`! FROM:
`
`I CUYAHOGA COUNTY - COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
`I NAILAHK. BYRD-CLERK OF COURTS
`I JUSTICE CENTER - COURT TOWER
`I 1200 ONTARIO ST
`I CLEVELAND, OH44II3
`I___________________________________________________ I
`
`TO:
`RAKHSHANDA TALIB
`3495 E. 98TH STREET, #301
`CLEVELAND, OH 44104
`
`'feFPi 4.4.10^
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket