throbber
NAILAH K. BYRD
`CUYAHOGA COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
`1200 Ontario Street
`Cleveland, Ohio 44113
`
`Court of Common Pleas
`
`New Case Electronically Filed: COMPLAINT
`April 10, 2024 15:43
`
`By: DONALD W. DAVIS 0030559
`Confirmation Nbr. 3137204
`
`SOUTHWEST UROLOGY, LLC, ET AL
`vs.
`
`TIMA. SIDOR, M.D.
`
`CV 24 995752
`
`Judge: MICHAEL P. SHAUGHNESSY
`
`Pages Filed: 171
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirmation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
`CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
`
`) CASE NO.:
`
` COMPLAINT
`
`))))
`
`Plaintiffs, Southwest Urology, LLC (“Southwest Urology”) and ION Cleveland Holdings,
`
`LLC (“ION”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by and through the undersigned counsel, and for their
`
`Complaint against Defendant, Tim A. Sidor, M.D. (“Defendant Sidor,” and together with
`
`Plaintiffs, the “Parties”) states as follows:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff Southwest Urology is an Ohio limited liability company.
`
`Plaintiff Southwest Urology is a professional medical practice specializing in
`
`urological care.
`
`Plaintiff ION is a Delaware limited liability company.
`
`Defendant Sidor is an individual residing at 6689 Kingscote Park, Independence,
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Ohio 44131.
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirmation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`))
`
` JUDGE:
`
`))))))))))))))
`
`SOUTHWEST UROLOGY, LLC
`6900 PEARL ROAD
`MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS, OH 44130
`
`& I
`
`ON CLEVELAND HOLDINGS, LLC
`1209 ORANGE STREET
`WILMINGTON, DE 19801
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`TIM A. SIDOR, M.D.
`6689 KINGSCOTE PARK
`INDEPENDENCE, OHIO 44131
`
`Defendant.
`
`

`

`5.
`
`Defendant Sidor is a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State of Ohio,
`
`providing professional medical services in the specialty of urology.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to R.C. § 2305.01.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Civ. R. 3 (C)(1), (3) and (6).
`
`Jurisdiction and venue are also proper because the Parties agreed, by and through
`
`their February 1, 2024, Severance and Release of Claims Agreement (“Severance Agreement”)
`
`that “[t]he sole and exclusive jurisdiction shall be the court, state or federal, having jurisdiction
`
`over Cuyahoga County, Ohio for any disputes arising from or related to this Agreement.”
`
`Severance Agreement, ¶ 12, attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”
`
`FACTUAL OVERVIEW
`
`Employment Agreement
`
`9.
`
`On or about December 31, 2020, Plaintiff Southwest Urology and Defendant Sidor
`
`entered into the Shareholder Physician Employment Agreement (“Employment Agreement”).
`
`10.
`
`A true and accurate copy of the Employment Agreement is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit “B.”
`
`11.
`
`Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Defendant Sidor agreed to provide
`
`professional medical and related clinical health care services to Plaintiff Southwest Urology on a
`
`full-time basis, with the initial term of the Employment Agreement beginning December 31, 2020,
`
`and ending December 31, 2025 (the “Term”). See Employment Agreement, § III.a.
`
`12.
`
`Defendant Sidor was to perform such duties and responsibilities under the
`
`Agreement “in good faith, in a diligent, trustworthy, businesslike, proficient, and efficient manner
`
`with reasonable care….” See Employment Agreement, § I.c.
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirm ation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`Equity Interest
`
`13.
`
`In addition to practicing medicine, and pursuant to a December 31, 2020, Securities
`
`Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) entered into by and between Plaintiff ION,
`
`Specialty Network Partners, LLC (“SNP”), Emerald Necklace Urology Group, Inc. (“Emerald
`
`Necklace”) and the physician owners of Emerald Necklace (“Owners”), Defendant Sidor held a
`
`fifteen and a half percent (15.5%) ownership interest (“Equity Interest”) of Emerald Necklace in
`
`SNP as defined by the terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement.
`
`That SNP was a Delaware limited liability company that has been dissolved.
`
`A true and accurate copy of the Purchase Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`“C.”
`
`Restrictive Covenants
`
`16.
`
`As set forth in more detail below, in consideration for his employment with
`
`Southwest Urology and grant of Equity Interest in Emerald Necklace, Defendant Sidor agreed to
`
`be bound by certain restrictive covenants.
`
`17.
`
`Such restrictive covenants are set forth in Article IV of the Employment Agreement
`
`and include, without limitation, Confidentiality (IV.a.), Non-Competition (IV.c.), Non-Solicitation
`
`(IV.d.), and Non-Disparagement (IV.e.).
`
`18.
`
`Plaintiff Southwest Urology and Defendant Sidor agreed that the restrictive
`
`covenants were necessary to induce Plaintiff Southwest Urology to enter into the Employment
`
`Agreement, and further agreed that the restrictive covenants are reasonable and narrowly tailed to
`
`protect the confidential information and other legitimate business interests of Plaintiff Southwest
`
`Urology. See Employment Agreement, Art. IV.g.
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirm ation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`19.
`
`In his capacity as a physician pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Defendant
`
`Sidor had access to certain confidential, propriety, or other non-public information regarding
`
`Plaintiff Southwest Urology and SNP as well as their affiliates and related entities (defined in the
`
`Employment Agreement as the “Company Group”), including tangible and intangible materials
`
`arising from, or otherwise related to, the services performed and as well as the identities and
`
`contact information of patients. See Employment Agreement, Art. IV (“In the course of
`
`Physician’s employment by the Company, the Physician has had and will continue to have access
`
`to the most sensitive and most valuable trade secrets, proprietary information and other
`
`Confidential Information of the Company Group….”).
`
`20.
`
`In his capacity as a shareholder pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Defendant
`
`Sidor similarly acknowledged his access to, among other things, “confidential, proprietary and
`
`trade secret information (including all tangible and intangible embodiments thereof) that concerns
`
`the Company Group entities or their respective businesses….”). See Purchase Agreement, § 5.8.
`
`21.
`
`Given, among other things, his access to Plaintiffs’ confidential information,
`
`Defendant Sidor agreed to be bound to the Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation agreements
`
`during the Restricted Period, defined as “the Term plus . . . the period from the Separation Date
`
`until the second anniversary of the Separation Date.” Employment Agreement, p. 15.
`
`22.
`
`Article IV.c. sets forth the Non-Competition agreement and states, in part:
`
`Non-Competition. During the Restricted Period, the Physician will not, directly or
`indirectly (other than through and for the benefit of the Company Group), anywhere
`within or with respect to the Restricted Territory, own, manage, operate, join,
`control, finance or participate in, or participate in the ownership, management,
`operation, control or financing of, or be connected as an owner, investor, partner,
`joint venturer, director, limited liability company manager, employee, independent
`contractor, consultant or other agent of, any Person or enterprise (other than the
`Company Group) that is engaged in any Competing Business . . .
`
`See Employment Agreement, IV.c.
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirm ation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`23.
`
`Defendant Sidor agreed not to compete against Plaintiffs within the Restricted
`
`Territory, defined as “30 miles of any location at which the Company Group conducted the
`
`Business and the Physician provided professional . . . services . . .” See Employment Agreement,
`
`p. 16.
`
`24.
`
`Article IV.d. of the Employment Agreement sets forth the Non-Solicitation
`
`agreement and states, in part:
`
`Non-Solicitation. During the Restricted Period, the Physician will not, directly or
`indirectly (other than through and for the benefit of the Company Group):
`
`(a) solicit or induce or attempt to solicit or induce (including by recruiting,
`interviewing or identifying or targeting as a candidate for recruitment) any
`Restricted Person to terminate, restrict or hinder such Restricted Person’s
`association with any Company Group entity or interfere in any way with the
`relationship between such Restricted Person and any Company Group entity…
`
`(b) hire or retain, or attempt to hire or otherwise retain the services of any
`Restricted Person as a partner, member of the board of directors or an equivalent
`governing body, officer, employee, independent contractor, licensee,
`consultant, advisor, agent or in any other capacity, or attempt or assist anyone
`else to do so, or
`
`(c) interfere with the relationship between any Company Group entity and any
`Person (i) who is a partner, stockholder, lender, joint venturer, investor,
`consultant, agent, customer, patient, physician referral source, third party payor,
`supplier, vendor, lessor, lessee, dealer, distributor, licensor, licensee or other
`Person having a business relationship with any Company Group entity and (ii)
`with whom the Physician had contact during the Term or about whom the
`Physician had access to Confidential Information during the Term.
`
`See Employment Agreement, IV.d.
`
`25.
`
`In addition, Defendant Sidor agreed to “keep confidential and not disclose… the
`
`terms of this Agreement and all Confidential Information.” See Employment Agreement, IV.a.
`
`26.
`
`Defendant Sidor further agreed to not “directly or indirectly, make any disparaging,
`
`derogatory, negative or knowingly false statement about any Company Group entity…” See
`
`Employment Agreement, IV.e.
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirm ation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`27.
`
`Plaintiff Southwest Urology and Defendant Sidor agreed that “any breach of the
`
`restrictive covenants in this Article IV will cause immediate and irreparable harm . . . which could
`
`not be adequately remedied through the payment of monetary damages,” entitling Plaintiff
`
`Southwest Urology to injunctive relief in addition to other legal and equitable remedies. See
`
`Employment Agreement, IV.g.
`
`28.
`
`Defendant Sidor agreed to an equitable tolling provision concerning the restrictive
`
`covenants of Article IV: “If the Physician breaches any covenant in this Article IV, then the
`
`duration of such covenant will be tolled for a period of time equal to the time of such breach and,
`
`if the Company Group seeks injunctive relief or other remedies for any such breach, then the
`
`duration of such covenant will be tolled for a period of time equal to the pendency of such
`
`proceedings (including all appeals).” See Employment Agreement, IV.h.
`
`Amendment to Employment Agreement
`
`29.
`
`Thereafter, on or about December 31, 2023, Plaintiff ION and SNP and Defendant
`
`Sidor agreed to amend the Employment Agreement effective January 1, 2024, pursuant to an
`
`agreement styled as a “Term Sheet” (the “Amendment”).
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`A true and accurate copy of the Amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit “D.”
`
`The Amendment provided for various changes to Defendant Sidor’s employment
`
`structure for a six-month period, beginning on January 1, 2024, and ending on June 30, 2024.
`
`32.
`
`The Amendment provided that the Parties would enter into a later agreement to be
`
`reduced to a mutually acceptable writing, to include a complete settlement and release of all claims
`
`between the Parties. Amendment, ¶¶ 6, 9.
`
`33.
`
`Pursuant to the Amendment, Defendant Sidor took paid vacation time from January
`
`1, 2024, to January 14, 2024. Amendment, ¶ 2.
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirm ation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`34.
`
`Upon Defendant Sidor’s return to work following his paid vacation, Defendant
`
`Sidor began to engage in activities in violation of the restrictive covenants set forth in his
`
`Employment Agreement including, but not limited to, diverting patients from Plaintiff Southwest
`
`Urology, unbeknownst to Plaintiffs at that time.
`
`35.
`
`Specifically, following numerous patient appointments in January and February
`
`2024 at Plaintiff Southwest Urology’s facility, Defendant Sidor distributed handwritten notes to
`
`Southwest Urology patients in which Defendant Sidor: (A) advised patients that he had accepted
`
`employment with University Hospital (UH) Parma Medical Center, and (B) instructed patients to
`
`begin scheduling their appointments with Defendant Sidor at UH Parma Medical Center effective
`
`June 1, 2024.
`
`Severance Agreement
`
`36.
`
`Thereafter, in January 2024, the Parties executed the Severance Agreement, with
`
`Defendant Sidor signing on January 24, 2024, and Plaintiffs’ representatives signing on January
`
`29, 2024. See Severance Agreement, p. 9. The Employment Agreement and Severance Agreement
`
`shall be collectively referred to herein as the “Agreements.”
`
`37.
`
`The effective date of the Severance Agreement was February 1, 2024. See
`
`Severance Agreement, § 4(d).
`
`38.
`
`Pursuant to the terms of the Severance Agreement, Dr. Sidor agreed to continue
`
`providing professional services as an at-will employee from January 1, 2024, through June 30,
`
`2024. See Severance Agreement, § 1.
`
`39.
`
`Again, and notwithstanding Section 1 of the Severance Agreement (i.e., providing
`
`for Defendant Sidor’s continuity of care through June 30, 2024), Defendant Sidor had already
`
`accepted competitive employment at UH Parma Medical Center effective June 1, 2024.
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirm ation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`40.
`
`In exchange for Defendant Sidor’s continuity of patient care, Plaintiffs agreed to
`
`pay Defendant Sidor a pro-rated salary of $250,000.00 and authorized paid vacation time, among
`
`other consideration. See Severance Agreement, § 1.
`
`41.
`
`Plaintiffs further agreed to waive the Non-Competition restrictive covenant set
`
`forth in Section IV.c. of the Employment Agreement, effective July 1, 2024. See Severance
`
`Agreement, § 2(a) (emphasis added).
`
`42.
`
`Regarding the Equity Interest, the Parties agreed that, in exchange for Plaintiffs’
`
`lump sum payment of $205,000.00 on or about March 31, 2024, Defendant Sidor would forfeit his
`
`Equity Interest in Emerald Necklace and any related entity, as well as any and all rights and
`
`obligations under the Purchase Agreement. See Severance Agreement, § 3(b).
`
`43.
`
`In exchange for all of the foregoing, Defendant Sidor agreed to certain ongoing
`
`obligations and restrictive covenants following the effective date of the Severance Agreement.
`
`44.
`
`Specifically, Defendant Sidor agreed not to “contact, directly indirectly, or through
`
`an agent, any former, current, or known future patients, contractors, employees, affiliates, and
`
`partners regarding [Plaintiffs] . . . in an attempt to persuade one of these foregoing individuals or
`
`entities to break, nullify, void, breach, or otherwise alter their relationship with [Plaintiffs] . . .”
`
`See Severance Agreement, § 8.
`
`45.
`
`The Parties further agreed that the restrictive covenants in the Employment
`
`Agreement concerning Non-Solicitation and Non-Disparagement, among others, would remain in
`
`full force and effect as set forth therein. See Severance Agreement, § 9.
`
`46.
`
`Defendant Sidor, again, agreed to maintain Plaintiffs’ confidential information
`
`including, without limitation, that which concerns Plaintiffs’ employees and patients, and that his
`
`failure to do so would entitle Plaintiffs to all legal remedies and result in termination and/or
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirm ation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`repayment of compensation provided pursuant to the Severance Agreement. See Severance
`
`Agreement, § 7.
`
`47.
`
`The Parties agreed that “[the Severance Agreement] and any other documents
`
`referenced herein including the Employment Agreement and Amendment constitute the complete
`
`understanding between [Plaintiffs] and [Defendant] . . .” See Severance Agreement, § 17.
`
`48.
`
`The Parties agreed that “[s]hould [Defendant Sidor] breach any terms of this
`
`Agreement and [Plaintiffs] are successful in an action against [Defendant] for such breach,
`
`[Defendant] shall be liable to [Plaintiffs] for the costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney
`
`fees, for bringing such action against [Defendant].” See Severance Agreement, § 13.
`
`49.
`
`After the execution of the Severance Agreement, Plaintiffs discovered that
`
`Defendant Sidor violated, and is continuing to violate, the Non-Competition covenant set forth
`
`Section IV.c. of the Employment Agreement and incorporated into the Severance Agreement by,
`
`as previously indicated herein, accepting employment at a direct competitor of Plaintiff Southwest
`
`Urology — UH Parma Medical Center — effective June 1, 2024.
`
`50.
`
`Defendant Sidor’s competitive employment with the UH Parma Medical Center
`
`violates his obligation to continue rendering services full-time to Plaintiff Southwest Urology’s
`
`patients through June 30, 2024.
`
`51.
`
`In addition, Defendant Sidor violated, and is continuing to violate, the Non­
`
`Solicitation provision set forth in Section IV.d. of the Employment Agreement as incorporated into
`
`the Severance Agreement by, among other actions, soliciting patients, physicians, and employees
`
`of Plaintiffs.
`
`52.
`
`Specifically, Plaintiffs are aware of at least two (2) employees who Defendant Sidor
`
`has either directly or indirectly solicited to join him at UH Parma Medical Center.
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirm ation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`53.
`
`Defendant Sidor failed, and continues to fail, to maintain Confidential Information
`
`in violation of Section IV.a. of the Employment Agreement and Section 7 of the Severance
`
`Agreement.
`
`54.
`
`Defendant Sidor violated, and continues to violate, the Non-Disparagement
`
`provision set forth in Section IV.e. of the Employment Agreement as incorporated into the
`
`Severance Agreement by, among other actions, making disparaging, derogatory, negative, and
`
`knowingly false statements concerning Plaintiffs.
`
`55.
`
`Specifically, Plaintiffs have been advised by numerous individuals that Defendant
`
`Sidor is attempting to incite worry in Plaintiffs’ patients and employees regarding the stability and
`
`longevity of Plaintiffs’ institutions.
`
`56.
`
`In March 2024, Defendant Sidor was terminated for cause due to his violations of
`
`the restrictive covenants set forth in Article IV, among other reasons.
`
`COUNT ONE
`
`57.
`
`58.
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all of the foregoing allegations.
`
`The Agreements are valid, legally enforceable contracts between Plaintiffs and
`
`Defendant Sidor.
`
`59.
`
`60.
`
`Plaintiffs have fully performed as required under the Agreements.
`
`As set forth herein, Defendant Sidor has failed, and continues to fail, to adhere to
`
`the contractual obligations set forth in the Agreements including those governing non-competition,
`
`non-solicitation, confidentiality, and non-disparagement.
`
`61.
`
`Defendant Sidor’s violations of the restrictive covenants, as set forth above,
`
`constitute breaches of the Agreements.
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirmation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`62.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Sidor’s breach of the Agreements,
`
`Plaintiffs have suffered harm, and are exposed to the risk of further irreparable harm through,
`
`without limitation, loss of patients, loss of goodwill, and disclosure of confidential and propriety
`
`business information.
`
`63.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Sidor’s breach of the Agreements,
`
`Plaintiffs have been damaged in an amount in excess of $25,000.
`
`64.
`
`Plaintiffs are entitled to injunctive relief for the restricted period of two years as set
`
`forth in the Employment Agreement, subject to equitable tolling.
`
`COUNT TWO
`
`65.
`
`66.
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all of the foregoing allegations.
`
`Prior to executing the Severance Agreement on January 24, 2024, Defendant Sidor
`
`had already engaged in violations of the restrictive covenants in the Employment Agreement,
`
`including, without limitation, diverting patients from Plaintiffs as well as accepting competitive
`
`employment with UH Parma Medical Center, unbeknownst to Plaintiffs.
`
`67.
`
`Prior to the execution of the Severance Agreement, Defendant Sidor knowingly
`
`made false statements to Plaintiff Southwest Urology including, without limitation, that he would
`
`continue rendering services full-time to Plaintiff Southwest Urology’s patients through June 30,
`
`2024.
`
`68.
`
`At the time Defendant Sidor executed the Severance Agreement, Defendant Sidor
`
`had no present intent to perform his obligations as set forth therein.
`
`69.
`
`At the time Defendant Sidor executed the Severance Agreement, Defendant Sidor
`
`knew that he had already violated the restrictive covenants set forth in the Employment Agreement.
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirmation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`70.
`
`Defendant Sidor’s representations were material to Plaintiffs’ decision to enter into
`
`the Severance Agreement.
`
`71.
`
`Defendant Sidor knew the above representations were false at the time he made
`
`them, or in the alternative, made the representations with such recklessness as to the truth or falsity
`
`of same that knowledge may be implied.
`
`72.
`
`73.
`
`Defendant Sidor intended that Plaintiffs would rely on his representations.
`
`Plaintiffs justifiably relied on Defendant Sidor’s representations to their detriment
`
`by entering into the Severance Agreement, paying compensation, authorizing paid vacation time,
`
`among other benefits provided to Defendant Sidor.
`
`74.
`
`As a proximate cause of Defendant Sidor’s fraudulent misrepresentations, Plaintiffs
`
`have been damaged in an amount to be determined.
`
`75.
`
`Defendant Sidor’s behavior reflects and was a conscious disregard for the rights of
`
`Plaintiffs that have a great probability of causing substantial harm, entitling Plaintiffs to punitive
`
`damages.
`
`76.
`
`77.
`
`COUNT THREE
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all of the foregoing allegations.
`
`Prior to the execution of the Severance Agreement, Defendant Sidor knowingly
`
`made false statements to Plaintiff Southwest Urology including, without limitation, that he would
`
`continue rendering services full-time to Plaintiff Southwest Urology’s patients through June 30,
`
`2024.
`
`78.
`
`Defendant Sidor concealed from Plaintiffs that he had accepted competitive
`
`employment with the UH Parma Medical Center.
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirmation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`79.
`
`Defendant Sidor’s misrepresentations and omissions were material to Plaintiffs’
`
`decision to enter into the Severance Agreement.
`
`80.
`
`Defendant Sidor knew the above representations were false at the time he made
`
`them, or in the alternative, made the representations with such recklessness as to the truth or falsity
`
`of same that knowledge may be implied.
`
`81.
`
`Defendant Sidor intended that Plaintiffs would rely on his misrepresentations and
`
`omissions to induce Plaintiffs to enter into the Severance Agreement.
`
`82.
`
`Plaintiffs justifiably relied on Defendant Sidor’s misrepresentations and omissions
`
`to their detriment by entering into the Severance Agreement.
`
`83.
`
`As a proximate cause of Defendant Sidor’s fraudulent misrepresentations and
`
`omissions, Plaintiffs have also been damaged by increased administrative costs and expenses and
`
`loss of goodwill.
`
`84.
`
`Defendant Sidor’s behavior reflects a conscious disregard for the rights of Plaintiffs
`
`that has a great probability of causing substantial harm, entitling Plaintiffs to punitive damages.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court enter judgment in their favor
`
`and against Defendant Sidor, and award the following relief:
`
`A.
`
`A preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Defendant Sidor from:
`
`i.
`
`engaging in competitive conduct with Plaintiffs in violation of the Non­
`
`Competition provision for the restricted period of two years as set forth in
`
`the Employment Agreement, subject to equitable tolling;
`
`ii.
`
`engaging in conduct in violation of the Non-Solicitation provision for the
`
`restricted period of two years as set forth in the Employment Agreement,
`
`subject to equitable tolling;
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirmation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`iii.
`
`using and/or disclosing the confidential, propriety, or other non-public
`
`information in violation of the Agreements; and
`
`iv.
`
`engaging in statements and conduct in violation of the Non-Disparagement
`
`provision of the Agreements.
`
`Compensatory damages in excess of $25,000.
`
`Punitive damages.
`
`Reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incurred in the pursuance of this
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`E.
`
`All such other and further relief, legal and equitable, that the Court deems just and
`
`action.
`
`proper.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BRENNAN, MANNA & DIAMOND, LLC
`
`/s/ Donald W. Davis
`Donald W. Davis (#0030559)
`John N. Childs (#0023489)
`Elizabeth Shively Boatwright (#0081264)
`75 East Market Street
`Akron, Ohio 44308
`Telephone No.: (330) 253-5060
`Facsimile No.: (330) 253-5197
`dwdavis@bmdllc.com
`Email(s):
`jnchilds@bmdllc.com
`esboatwright@bmdllc.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirmation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`DocuSIgn Envelope ID: 6A480915-668A-45AA-AE7A-199DAFCA5E09
`
`SEVERA
`
`AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS AGREEMENT
`
`THIS SEVERANCE AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS AGREEMENT (the
`“Agreement”) is entered into by and between Specialty Network Partners, LLC (“SNP”), ION
`Cleveland Holdings, LLC (“ION”), Southwest Urology, LLC (“Southwest Urology”) (SNP,
`ION, and Southwest Urology are collectively, the “Employer”) and Dr. 71m A. Sidor, MD. (the
`“Employee”) (each a “Party” to this Agreement and collectively the “Parties”).
`
`WHEREAS, Employee has been employed to provide medical and related clinical
`services on behalf of Employer pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Parties’ Shareholder
`Physician Employment Agreement dated December 31, 2020 (the “Employment Agreement”);
`and
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties amended the terms and conditions of the Employment
`Agreement, in writing, effective January 1,2024 (the “Amendment”) to provide for Employee’s
`transition from his employment with Employer between January 1,2024, through June 30,2024;
`and
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties, by and through tills Agreement, desire to finalize Employee’s
`transition from his employment with Employer.
`
`- NOW THEREFORE, as provided in this Agreement and in consideration of the
`promises and obligations set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Separation Date. The Parties agree that, to provide for Employee’s transition from Ins
`employment with Employer, Employee udll continue to render professional services as an
`at-will employee of Employer beginning January 1, 2024, and continuing through June
`30,2024 (the “Transition Period”), at the agreed upon, prorated salary of Two Hundred
`and Fifty Thousand and 00/100 ($250,000.00), less appropriate deductions, taxes, and
`withholdings. During the Transition Period, Employee shall be entitled to take two (2)
`weeks of paid vacation beginning on January 1,2024, and continuing through January 14,
`2024. Following January 14, 2024, through the termination of the Transition Period,
`Employee shall be entitled to take an additional two (2) weeks of paid vacation, with
`appropriate advance notice to Employer. The Parties agree that Employee’s last day of
`active employment shall be June 30, 2024 (“Separation Date”). As of the Separation
`Date, Employee will be relieved of all duties and responsibilities in connection with his
`employment and will no longer have any authority to act on behalf of or bind the
`Employer.
`
`2.
`
`Consideration, In consideration for the obligations of Employee, including Employee’s
`waiver and release of claims as outlined in Section 4 herein, and effective as of July 1,
`2024, Employer agrees to provide the following benefits to which Employee is not
`otherwise entitled:
`
`a.
`
`Waiver of the Non-Competition restrictive covenant set forth in Section IV.c of
`the Parties’ Employment Agreement
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43 / / CV 24 995752 / Confirmation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`Exhibit A
`
`

`

`DocuSign Envelope ID: 6A480915-668A-45AA-AE7A-199DAFCA5E09
`
`b. Waiver of the penalty provisions set forth in the Parties’ Employment Agreement
`arising as a result of the early termination of the Employment Agreement.
`
`c.
`
`With the exclusive exception of the benefits) outlined in Section 2(aXb) of this
`Agreement, Employee will not be entitled to any other benefits including, but not
`limited to, salary, paid time off, commissions, bonuses, reimbursements,
`retirement/401K contributions, distributions, ownership buyout, or medical,
`vision, or dental insurance, unless otherwise required by law.
`
`3.
`
`Ownership Interest
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`As of January 1, 2024, Employee acknowledges and agrees that Employee does
`not 0) hold any officer, manager, or other legal position at Southwest Urology;
`and @9 own, control, or otherwise have the right to any economic benefit of any
`equity or other security of Southwest Urology.
`
`The Parties acknowledge that, pursuant to the December 31, 2020, Securities
`Purchase Agreement ("Purchase Agreement”) entered into by and between ION,
`SNP, Emerald Necklace Urology Croup, Inc. (“Emerald Necklace”), and the
`physician owners of Emerald Necklace ("Owners”), Employee received fifteen
`and a half percent (15.5%) interest (fire "Equity Interest”) of Emerald Necklace in
`SNP as defined by the terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement The
`Parties agree that, in exchange for, and in consideration ofc Employer’s lump sum
`payment of Two Hundred and Five Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($205,000.00)
`on or about March 31,2024, Employee wifi forfeit his Equity Interest in Emerald
`Necklace and any related entity, and any rights and obligations regarding the
`same under the Purchase Agreement, to Employer. Immediately upon Employer’s
`payment to Employee consistent with the foregoing, Employee will no longer
`maintain any Equity Interest or other interest in Emerald Necklace or any related
`entity, and shall be terminated as a party to the Purchase Agreement
`
`Employee is an indirect owner in the Peari Road Surgery Center (the “ASC”), by
`and through his ownership in 6900 LLC (the "Holdco”). Employee understands
`that on or around March 31,2024, Employee, the ASC and Holdco will take such
`action pursuant to the ASC’s Second Amended and Restated Operating
`Agreement, dated December 31,2020 (the “ASC Operating Agreement”) and the
`governing documents of Holdco to redeem Employee’s indirect ownership in the
`ASC at Ure determined fair market value as valued by a third party independent
`valuation firm.
`
`4.
`
`Employee Release. In consideration for benefits provided in Section 2 of this
`Agreement, which the Parties agree the Employer is not otherwise obligated to provide,
`Employee agrees as follows:
`
`Electronically Filed 04/10/2024 15:43/ / CV 24 995752/ Confirmation Nbr. 3137204 / CLSH1
`
`

`

`DocuSign Envelope ID: 6A480915-668A-45AA-AE7A-199DAFCA5E09
`
`Employee waives and releases any and all claims and/or causes of action, whether
`known or unknown, which Employee may have or claim to have against the
`Employer arising from or as a result of his employment with the Employer or as a
`result of his separation from the Employer, including any claims and/or causes of
`action against the Employer’s members, managers, owners, executives, agents,
`attorneys, accountants, affiliates, related entities, subsidiaries, patients, and
`employees. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, it is understood and
`agreed that this Agreement is intended to cover, and does cover, but is not limited
`to, any and all actions, causes of action, claims and demands of whatever kind or
`nature on account of any and all known and unknown injuries, losses, or damage
`sustained by Employee during or arising out of Employee's application for,
`employment with and subsequent separation from Employer, to every extent
`allowed by law, those rights and claims arising under federal, state or local
`constitutions, statutes, laws, rules, regulations, executive orders, or common law
`regulating employer conduct or prohibiting employment discrimination,
`harassment, retaliation and/or interference based upon race, color, sex, religion,
`handicap or disability, national

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket