throbber

`Filed on behalf of Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam
`By: Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam, Pro Se
`
`
`222 Stanford Avenue
`
`
`
`
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`
`
`
`
`Tel: (650) 690-0995
`
`
`
`
`Fax: (650) 854-3393
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________
`
`Updated Mandatory Notice (37 CFR 42.8(a)(2))
`
`In
`
`Covered Business Method Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,037,158
`
`_____________________
`
`SAP America, Inc.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________
`
`CASE CBM2014-00018
`
`Patent 8,037,158
`
`_____________________
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1. Mandatory Notice (37 CFR 42.8(a)(2))
`
`
`
` REAL PARTY IN INTEREST: The real party-in-interest of Patent Owner is
`
`Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam. (“Lakshmi”)
`
` RELATED MATTERS: Patent Owner notes that U.S. Patent No. 8,037,158 is
`
`involved in the following current proceedings that may affect or may be affected
`
`by a decision in this proceeding: SAP America v. Pi-Net International, Inc. No.
`
`3:13-cv-01248 EDL (N.D. Cal); Pi-Net International, Inc. v. Citizen’s Financial
`
`Group Inc., No. 1:12-cv-00355 (D. Del); and Pi-Net International, Inc. v. JP
`
`Morgan Chase & Co, No. 1:12-cv-00282 (D. Del).
`
`SERVICE INFORMATION: Please address all correspondence to the lead
`
`counsel as shown below. Patent Owner consents to electronic service by email at
`
`the email address provided below:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`LEAD AND BACKUP COUNSEL:
`
`
`
`Lead Counsel
`
`Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam (Pro Se)
`
`Backup Counsel
`
`Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam (Pro Se)
`
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`
`Tel.: 650.690.0995
`
`Tel.: 650.690.0995
`
`Fax: 650.854.3393
`
`Fax: 650.854.3393
`
`laks22002@yahoo.com
`
`laks22002@yahoo.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 10, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`222 Stanford Avenue
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`650.690.0995
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`DR. LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
`
`_/Lakshmi Arunachalam/_________
` Lakshmi Arunachalam
`
`
`Pro Se Patent Owner
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE (37 CFR 42.6(e), 42.105(a))
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the above-captioned “Dr. Lakshmi
`
`Arunachalam’s Updated Mandatory Notice in Covered Business Method Review
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 8,037,158 Under 37 CFR 42.8(a)(2))” in Case CBM2013-00018
`
`was served in its entirety on September 10, 2014, upon the following parties via e-
`
`mail:
`
`
`
`
`Lori A. Gordon and Michael Q. Lee
`
`
`
`SAP, America, Inc
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN
`
`
`
`Attn: Samir N. Pandya
`& FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sr. IP Counsel
`
`1100 New York Avenue, NW
`
`
`SAP Global Litigation Group
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`
`3999 West Chester Pike
`lgordon-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`Newtown Square, PA 19073
`mlee-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`
`610.661.9767
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`Samir.pandya@sap.com
`Petitioner’s correspondence address Of record at the USPTO PTAB
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 10, 2014
`222 Stanford Avenue
`
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`
`650.690.0995
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam
`
`_/Lakshmi Arunachalam/_________
`Lakshmi Arunachalam
`Pro Se Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket