`
`In the United States Court of Federal Claims
`No. 11-130 C
`(Filed February 11, 2014)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RETURN MAIL, INC.,
`)
`
`
`
` Plaintiff, )
`
`
`)
`
`v.
`)
`
`)
`THE UNITED STATES,
` Defendant.
`
`))
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`The parties filed a joint status report on January 13, 2014, informing the
`
`court that settlement discussions are moving forward, but that the parties intended
`to discuss a schedule to govern in the event that the case cannot be resolved. See
`Doc. 56. On January 31, 2014, the parties filed a second joint status report,
`including two proposed schedules. See Doc. 57.
`
`Because the parties were unable to agree on a schedule, the court sets the
`
`following schedule:
`
`September 26, 2014
`
`November 7, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`December 5, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`January 16, 2015
`
`January 30, 2015
`
`Close of fact discovery
`
`Disclosure of expert reports in compliance with RCFC
`26(a)(2)(B) & (C) for any expert who may be used at
`trial to present evidence on any issue for which a party
`has the burden of proof at trial
`
`Disclosure of any expert reports in compliance with
`RCFC 26(a)(2)(B) & (C) for any expert who may be used
`at trial to present evidence to rebut any expert testimony
`offered by a party that has the burden of proof at trial
`
`Depositions of expert witnesses to be completed
`
`Post discovery conference
`
`RMI EXHIBIT 2007
`CBM2014-00116
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`Case 1:11-cv-00130-JFM Document 58 Filed 02/11/14 Page 2 of 2
`
`Meeting of counsel in accordance with RCFC Appendix
`A, ¶ 13
`
`Pretrial submissions in accordance with RCFC Appendix
`A, ¶¶ 14(a), 14(d), 15, and 16 directed to issues for which
`a party has the burden of proof
`
`February 13, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`March 13, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`April 17, 2015
`
`
`
`
`May 1, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`May 22, 2015
`
`June 8, 2015
`
`If either party has a good-faith objection to this schedule, it must inform the
`
`court no later than 14 days from the date of this order. The court recognizes, of
`course, that needs may arise to adjust deadlines as the litigation progresses. Either
`party may, for good cause, move the court to revise the schedule should changes
`become necessary.
`
`Also within 14 days of this order, the parties shall inform the court whether a
`
`status conference is required at this time.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Responsive pretrial submissions in accordance with
`RCFC Appendix A, ¶¶ 14(a), 14(d), 15, and 16
`
`Further responsive submissions in accordance with
`RCFC Appendix A, ¶ 14(c), and stipulations, if
`any,
`in accordance with RCFC Appendix A, ¶ 17
`
`Pretrial conference
`
`Trial begins
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ James F. Merow
`James F. Merow
`Senior Judge
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
