throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 11
`
` Entered: January 7, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`SALESFORCE.COM, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VIRTUALAGILITY, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case CBM2014-00181
`Patent 8,095,413
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, and
`CHRISTOPER KAISER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BRADEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Termination of the Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2014-00181
`Patent 8,095,413
`
`
`On November 7, 2014, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327(a), the parties filed a
`
`Joint Motion to terminate this proceeding. Paper 8 (“Joint Motion”).
`
`Accompanying the Joint Motion, the parties filed a true copy of a Settlement
`
`Agreement resolving their dispute along with a Joint Request to treat the
`
`Settlement Agreement as business confidential, to be kept separate from the patent
`
`file under 35 U.S.C. § 327(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74. Ex. 1011; Paper 9 (“Joint
`
`Request”). We authorized the filing of these papers.
`
`This proceeding is still in its preliminary stages. Other than the pending
`
`Joint Motion and Joint Request, no significant activity has occurred since the filing
`
`of the Petition on August 27, 2014. Paper 3. A preliminary response to the
`
`Petition, due on December 4, 2014, was not filed by Patent Owner, and trial has
`
`not been instituted yet. Based on the facts of this case, it is appropriate to
`
`terminate this proceeding without rendering a final written decision. 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.72. Therefore, the Joint Motion is granted.
`
`Both parties request that the Settlement Agreement be kept separate and
`
`treated as business confidential information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b). Joint
`
`Request, 2. The Joint Request was filed along with the Settlement Agreement, and
`
`both were filed before termination of the proceeding. Id. Accordingly, the Joint
`
`Request is granted. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), the Settlement Agreement
`
`“shall only be available (1) [t]o a Government agency on written request to the
`
`Board; or (2) [t]o any other person upon written request to the Board to make the
`
`settlement agreement available, along with the fee specified in [37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.15(d)] and on a showing of good cause.”
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2014-00181
`Patent 8,095,413
`
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the settlement agreement (Ex.
`
`1011) be treated as business confidential information, to be kept separate from the
`
`file of U.S. Patent No. 8,095,413 is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement (Ex. 1011) shall be
`
`made available only pursuant to the provisions of 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate the proceeding is
`
`granted; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeding is terminated.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2014-00181
`Patent 8,095,413
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Michael Rosato
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`
`Jose Villarreal
`jvillarreal@wsgr.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jay Kesan
`jay@keyiplaw.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket