throbber
Trials@uspto.gov Paper No. 16
`
`571-272-7822
`Date Entered: October 14, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ACXIOM CORPORATION, et al.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PHOENIX LICENSING, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
` Case CBM2015-00134 Patent 8,234,184 B21
`Case CBM2015-00135 Patent 6,999,938 B1
`Case CBM2015-00136 Patent 7,856,375 B2
`Case CBM2015-00137 Patent 7,890,366 B2
`Case CBM2015-00138 Patent 8,738,435 B2
`Case CBM2015-00139 Patent 7,860,744 B2
`Case CBM2015-00140 Patent 5,987,434
`____________
`
`
`Before STACEY G. WHITE, PETER P. CHEN, ROBERT J. WEINSCHENK, and
`ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WHITE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER TO CLARIFY MOTIONS TO TERMINATE
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 This order addresses a similar issue in the seven cases. Therefore, we exercise
`discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The parties, however, are not
`authorized to use this style of heading in subsequent papers.
`
`

`
`CBM2015-00134 Patent 8,234,184 B2 CBM2015-00135 Patent 6,999,938 B1
`CBM2015-00136 Patent 7,856,375 B2 CBM2015-00137 Patent 7,890,366 B2
`CBM2015-00138 Patent 8,738,435 B2 CBM2015-00139 Patent 7,860,744 B2
`CBM2015-00140 Patent 5,987,434
`
`
`Pursuant to authorization by the Board, Patent Owner and Petitioner Gerber
`
`Life Insurance (“Gerber”) filed a joint motion requesting termination of
`
`CBM2015-00134 (Paper 11), CBM2015-00135 (Paper 11), CBM2015-00136
`
`(Paper 12), CBM2015-00137 (Paper 10), CBM2015-00138 (Paper 10), CBM2015-
`
`00139 (Paper 10), and CBM2015-00140 (Paper 11) with respect to Gerber.2
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 327(a), applicable to post-grant review proceedings for
`
`review of the patentability of covered business method patents, a proceeding shall
`
`be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner
`
`and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding
`
`before the request for termination is filed. These matters are in the preliminary
`
`stage. Patent Owner Preliminary Responses were filed September 11, 2015, and
`
`September 15, 2015. Decisions whether to institute trial have not been issued in
`
`any of the cases. Thus, these proceedings with respect to Gerber are at a stage
`
`eligible for termination.
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 327(b), any agreement or understanding between the
`
`Patent Owner and a Petitioner, including any collateral agreements referred to in
`
`such agreement or understanding, made in connection with, or in contemplation of,
`
`the termination of the proceeding shall be in writing, and a true copy of such
`
`agreement or understanding shall be filed in the Office.
`
`The parties filed a brief termination agreement that does not describe any
`
`terms of the parties’ agreement. Ex. 2002. Gerber and Patent Owner do not
`
`represent that they have filed a true copy of all agreements between the parties as
`
`required by 35 U.S.C. § 327.
`
`
`2 The Motions and supporting documents are identical in each case. Thus, for ease
`of reference we will refer to the filings in CBM2015-00134.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`CBM2015-00134 Patent 8,234,184 B2 CBM2015-00135 Patent 6,999,938 B1
`CBM2015-00136 Patent 7,856,375 B2 CBM2015-00137 Patent 7,890,366 B2
`CBM2015-00138 Patent 8,738,435 B2 CBM2015-00139 Patent 7,860,744 B2
`CBM2015-00140 Patent 5,987,434
`
`
`Within FIVE BUSINESS DAYS of this Order, Gerber and Patent Owner are
`
`required to file a Joint Statement addressing whether any agreements exist, other
`
`than Ex. 2002, resolving the patentability disputes in CBM2015-00134,
`
`CBM2015-00135, CBM2015-00136, CBM2015-00137, CBM2015-00138,
`
`CBM2015-00139, and CBM2015-00140, and if any such agreements exist, to
`
`submit a true copy of all such agreements with the Joint Statement. Any such
`
`agreements may be filed with a request that they be treated as business confidential
`
`information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`If Gerber and Patent Owner assert that no such agreements exist, Gerber and
`
`Patent Owner must jointly certify in writing that there are no other written or oral
`
`agreements or understandings between them made in connection with, or in
`
`contemplation of, the termination of patentability disputes in CBM2015-00134,
`
`CBM2015-00135, CBM2015-00136, CBM2015-00137, CBM2015-00138,
`
`CBM2015-00139, and CBM2015-00140 or the challenge to the patentability of
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 8,234,184 B2; 6,999,938 B1; 7,856,375 B2; 7,890,366 B2;
`
`8,738,435 B2; 7,860,744 B2; or 5,987,434.
`
`The Joint Certification should be in the following form.
`
`JOINT CERTIFICATION
`
`The parties hereby jointly certify that there are no other written or oral
`
`agreements or understandings, including any collateral agreements, between them,
`
`including but not limited to licenses, covenants not to sue, confidentiality
`
`agreements, payment agreements, or other agreements of any kind that have been
`
`made in connection with or in contemplation of the termination of Gerber Life
`
`Insurance Company from Cases CBM2015-00134, CBM2015-00135, CBM2015-
`
`00136, CBM2015-00137, CBM2015-00138, CBM2015-00139, and CBM2015-
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`CBM2015-00134 Patent 8,234,184 B2 CBM2015-00135 Patent 6,999,938 B1
`CBM2015-00136 Patent 7,856,375 B2 CBM2015-00137 Patent 7,890,366 B2
`CBM2015-00138 Patent 8,738,435 B2 CBM2015-00139 Patent 7,860,744 B2
`CBM2015-00140 Patent 5,987,434
`
`00140 pending before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board or in regards to any
`
`challenge to the patentability of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,234,184 B2; 6,999,938 B1;
`
`7,856,375 B2; 7,890,366 B2; 8,738,435 B2; 7,860,744 B2; or 5,987,434. The
`
`entire agreement between the Gerber and Patent Owner related to termination of
`
`Gerber from CBM2015-00134, CBM2015-00135, CBM2015-00136, CBM2015-
`
`00137, CBM2015-00138, CBM2015-00139, and CBM2015-00140 is
`
`memorialized in Exhibit 2002 filed in CBM2015-00134, CBM2015-00135,
`
`CBM2015-00136, CBM2015-00137, CBM2015-00138, CBM2015-00139, and
`
`CBM2015-00140.
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDERED that Gerber and Patent Owner shall file with the Board within
`
`FIVE BUSINESS DAYS of this Order a Joint Statement addressing whether any
`
`agreements exist, other than Ex. 2002, resolving the patentability dispute in
`
`CBM2015-00134, CBM2015-00135, CBM2015-00136, CBM2015-00137,
`
`CBM2015-00138, CBM2015-00139, and CBM2015-00140, and if any such
`
`agreements exist, to submit a true copy of all such agreements with the Joint
`
`Statement;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 327 and
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74, Gerber and Patent Owner are authorized to file a Joint Request
`
`that any agreements submitted with the Joint Statement be treated as business
`
`confidential; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED, that if no such agreements exist, Gerber and Patent
`
`Owner shall file with the Board within FIVE BUSINESS DAYS of this Order a
`
`Joint Certification so stating in the form provided in this Order.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`CBM2015-00134 Patent 8,234,184 B2 CBM2015-00135 Patent 6,999,938 B1
`CBM2015-00136 Patent 7,856,375 B2 CBM2015-00137 Patent 7,890,366 B2
`CBM2015-00138 Patent 8,738,435 B2 CBM2015-00139 Patent 7,860,744 B2
`CBM2015-00140 Patent 5,987,434
`
`
`The Parties are reminded of the Duty of Candor that applies in proceedings
`
`before the Office. 37 C.F.R. § 42.11.
`
`5
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Walter Renner
`axf@fr.com
`
`Roberto Devoto
`CBM38784-0006CP1@fr.com
`
`Matthew Jakubowski
`CBM38784-0006CP1@fr.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Shawn Diedtrich
`shawn@prudenslaw.com
`
`Louis Hoffman
`louis@valuablepatents.com
`
`John Love
`jlove@tumeyllp.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket