throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 91
`Entered: May 17, 2017
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC, TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.,
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC., TRADESTATION TECHNOLOGIES,
`INC., and IBFX, INC.
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case CBM2015-001721
`Patent No. 7,783,556 B1
`
`____________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, MEREDITH C. PETRAVICK, and
`JEREMY M. PLENZLER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PETRAVICK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Denying Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.71
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Case CBM2016-00040 has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`

`

`CBM2015-00172
`Patent No. 7,783,556 B1
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) filed a Request
`for Rehearing (Paper 88, “Req. Reh’g”) of our Final Decision (Paper 86, “Dec.”)
`determining that claims 1–22 of U.S. Patent No. 7,783,556 B1 (Ex. 1001, “the ’556
`patent”) are unpatentable. For the reasons that follow, the Request for Rehearing is
`denied.
`
`
`ANALYSIS
`A party requesting rehearing bears the burden of showing that the decision
`should be modified. 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(d). The party must identify specifically all
`matters we misapprehended or overlooked, and the place where each matter was
`previously addressed in a motion, an opposition, or a reply. Id.
`Patent Owner requests rehearing of our determination that claims 1–22 are
`not patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Req. Reh’g 1–2. Patent Owner argues
`that we “misapprehended that the Federal Circuit’s analysis in Trading
`Technologies Int’l, Inc., v. CQG, Inc., No. 2016-1616, 2017 WL 192716 (Fed. Cir.
`Jan. 18, 2017) (“CQG”) squarely applied here.” Id. at 1. Patent Owner’s
`arguments are not persuasive.
`We did not misapprehend the Federal Circuit’s analysis in CQG. See Dec.
`
`33–34. As discussed in our Final Decision, we considered CQG but determined
`that the claims of the ’556 patent were unlike the claims at issue in CQG. Id. at 34.
`“For example, the claims of the ’556 patent do not recite the static display of prices
`feature claimed by the [patent at issue in CQG].” Id. Considering the actual
`elements of the claims of the ’556 patent, we considered and discussed both
`Supreme Court and Federal Circuit guidance emanating from several decisions
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`CBM2015-00172
`Patent No. 7,783,556 B1
`
`
`relevant to the facts of this case. See Dec. 26–38. We determined that the claims
`of the ’556 patent are like those found ineligible by the Federal Circuit in, for
`example, Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A., 830 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir.
`2016), because the claims of the ’556 patent do “not go beyond requiring the
`collection, analysis, and display of available information in a particular field,
`stating those functions in general terms, without limiting them to technical means
`for performing the functions that are arguably an advance over conventional
`computer and network technology.” Id. at 30–33 (quoting Electric Power Group,
`LLC v. Alstom S.A., 830 F.3d 1350, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2016)). Patent Owner’s
`argument is not sufficient reason for us to modify the Final Decision, as mere
`disagreement with a decision is not a sufficient basis for requesting rehearing.
`
`
`ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing is denied.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`

`

`CBM2015-00172
`Patent No. 7,783,556 B1
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Robert Sokohl
`STERNE KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`rsokohl-ptab@skgf.com
`
`John C. Phillips
`Kevin Su
`FISH & RICHARDON, P.C.
`Phillips@fr.com
`CBM41919-0002CP1@fr.com
`
`Michael Rosato
`Matthew Argenti
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`margenti@wsgr.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Leif R. Sigmond, Jr.
`Cole B. Richter
`Michael D. Gannon
`Jennifer M. Kurcz
`McDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP
`sigmond@mbhb.com
`richter@mbhb.com
`gannon@mbhb.com
`kurcz@mbhb.com
`
`Steven F. Borsand
`Jay Q. Knobloch
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`steve.borsand@tradingtechnologies.com
`jay.knobloch@tradingtechnologies.com
`
`
`4
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket