throbber
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 17
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
` Entered: February 3, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`ACXIOM CORPORATION, and
`ADVANCE AMERICA, CASH ADVANCE CENTERS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PHOENIX LICENSING, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case CBM2015-00180
`Patent 8,352,317 B2
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before BARRY L. GROSSMAN, STACEY G. WHITE, and
`PETER P. CHEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`TERMINATION OF PETITIONER
`ADVANCE AMERICA, CASH ADVANCE CENTERS, INC.
`
`Conduct of the Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`CBM2015-00180
`Patent 8,352,317 B2
`
`
`Pursuant to authorization by the Board in an e-mail sent December 29, 2015,
`Patent Owner and Petitioner Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.
`(“Advance America”) filed a joint motion requesting termination of this
`proceeding with respect to Advance America. Paper 14 (“Joint Motion”).1 Also
`before us is a joint request by Patent Owner and Advance America to treat as
`confidential the submitted settlement agreement (Ex. 2011) on which the requested
`termination is based. Paper 15 (“Joint Request”)).2
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 327(a), applicable to post-grant review proceedings for
`review of the patentability of covered business method patents, a proceeding shall
`be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner
`and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding
`before the request for termination is filed. This matter is in its preliminary stage.
`A Patent Owner Preliminary Response was filed on December 30, 2015 (Paper
`16), the same day as the Joint Motion and the Joint Request. A decision whether to
`institute a trial has not been issued. Thus, this proceeding with respect to Advance
`America is at a stage eligible for termination.
`
`
`1 The Petition refers to Petitioner “Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.
`(‘Advance America’).” Pet.1. Advance America is identified in the Petition as a
`real party-in-interest. Id. at 4. The Motion refers to “Advance America and Cash
`Advance Centers, Inc. (‘AA Entities’).” Joint Motion 1 (emphasis added). The
`Joint Motion suggests that Cash Advance Centers, Inc. is a Petitioner separate and
`distinct from Advance America, which is inconsistent with the Petition. It is also
`inconsistent with the Settlement Agreement, which is with “Advance America,
`Cash Advance Centers, Inc. (‘Advance America’).” Ex. 2011, 1. We consider the
`Motion to be on behalf of the party identified in the Petition and the Settlement
`Agreement, which is Advance America.
`2 The Joint Request refers to “Advance America and Cash Advance Centers, Inc.
`(‘AA’).” Joint Request 1 (emphasis added). Based on the analysis above, we
`consider the Joint Request to be on behalf of the party identified in the Petition and
`the Settlement Agreement, which is Advance America.
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`CBM2015-00180
`Patent 8,352,317 B2
`
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 327(b), any agreement or understanding between the
`Patent Owner and a Petitioner, including any collateral agreements referred to in
`such agreement or understanding, made in connection with, or in contemplation of,
`the termination of the proceeding shall be in writing, and a true copy of such
`agreement or understanding shall be filed in the Office. In the Joint Motion, Patent
`Owner and Advance America certify that they reached an agreement resolving the
`dispute in identified in the Petition (Joint Motion 1), and that the entire agreement
`between Advance America and Patent Owner related to termination of Advance
`America from CBM2015-00180 is memorialized in Ex. 2011 filed in this
`proceeding (id. at 1–2).
`Based on the facts in the case before us, we grant the Joint Motion and
`terminate this proceeding with respect to Advance America. 37 C.F.R. § 42.74.
`We also grant the Joint Request to maintain Exhibit 2011 as business confidential
`in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate the proceeding with respect
`to Advance America is granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Request that the agreement (Ex. 2011)
`submitted in support of the Joint Motion be treated as business confidential
`information, to be kept separate from the file of U.S. Patent No. 8,352,317, and
`made available only under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 327(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74(c), is granted.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`CBM2015-00180
`Patent 8,352,317 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`W. Karl Renner
`axf@fr.com
`Roberto J. Devoto
`G. Hopkins Guy, III
`Jeremy J. Taylor
`Jamie R. Lynn
`CBM38784-0007CP2@fr.com
`Rob Kohse
`rob.kohse@sutherland.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Louis J. Hoffman
`LOUIS J. HOFFMAN, P.C.
`donald@valuablepatents.com
`
`Shawn Diedtrich
`PRUDENS LAW LLC
`shawn@prudenslaw.com
`
`John J. Love
`TUMEY L.L.P.
`jlove@tumeyllp.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket