`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 22
`Entered: December 7, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`iHEARTMEDIA, INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`DTS, INC.
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case CBM2016-00010
`
`Patent 7,908,172
`
`
`
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, and MINN
`CHUNG, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`37 C.F.R. 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00010
`Patent 7,908,172
`
`
`
`A conference call was held on November 18, 2016 including Patent
`
`Owner Impulse Radio LLC (“Impulse”) and Petitioner iHeart Media, Inc.
`
`During the call, Impulse Radio LLC represented that DTS Inc. is now the
`
`owner of the challenged patent and requested authorization to substitute
`
`DTS Inc. (“DTS”) in place of Impulse Radio. Mandatory Notices, Paper 19.
`
`Petitioner did not oppose Impulse’s request. Based on the facts presented,
`
`the Board authorized DTS and Impulse’s request.
`
`
`
`DTS has submitted updated mandatory notices informing the Board
`
`that DTS is now the patent owner in the current proceeding and has moved
`
`to substitute its counsel for that of Impulse. Papers 19 and 20. The caption
`
`of the proceeding has been changed to reflect the change in ownership of the
`
`challenged patent and the substitution of DTS’s counsel for that of Impulse’s
`
`is granted.
`
`
`
`Additionally, during the conference call, DTS and Petitioner
`
`represented that the parties were engaged in settlement negotiations.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Marc Pensabene
`mpensabene@omm.com
`Brian Cook
`bcook@omm.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Daniel Albers
`dalbers@btlaw.com
`Steven Shipe
`steven.shipe@btlaw.com
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
