`571.272.7822
`
`Paper No. 36
` Entered: May 17, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CQG, INC., CQG, LLC (f/k/a CQGT, LLC),
`INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC, TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC., and
`TRADESTATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Petitioner,1
`
`v.
`
`CHART TRADING DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case CBM2016-00046 (Patent No. 7,890,416 B2)
`Case CBM2016-00047 (Patent No. 8,041,626 B2)
`Case CBM2016-00048 (Patent No. 8,060,435 B2)2
`____________
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, KEVIN F. TURNER, and
`KEVIN W. CHERRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`CHERRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing Notice
`35 U.S.C. § 326(a)(10); 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`1 CQG, Inc. and CQG, LLC are parties in all three cases. Interactive
`Brokers LLC is a party in CBM2016-00046 and 47. Tradestation Group,
`Inc., Tradestation Securities, Inc., and Tradestation Technologies, Inc. are
`only parties in CBM2016-00046.
`2 The Board is entering this Order in each proceeding. The parties are not
`authorized to use a caption identifying multiple proceedings.
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00046 (Patent 7,890,416 B2)
`CBM2016-00047 (Patent 8,041,626 B2)
`CBM2016-00048 (Patent 8,060,435 B2)
`
`
`Both Petitioner and Patent Owner requested a hearing pursuant to
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a). CBM2016-00046, Papers 34, 35; CBM2016-00047,
`
`Papers 33, 34; CBM2016-00048, Papers 33, 34. In each of its requests,
`
`Petitioner requested “no more than one hour per side of oral argument.” See
`
`CBM2016-00046, Paper 34, 1.3 In its requests, Petitioner did not specify
`
`whether or not it was requesting that amount of time for each of the cases or
`
`for all of the cases together in a consolidated hearing for all three
`
`proceedings. Patent Owner asked for a consolidated hearing, and requested
`
`“a total of forty-five (45) minutes of argument to address issues in all three
`
`proceedings.” See CBM2016-00046, Paper 35, 1. In order to clarify
`
`whether Petitioner was amenable to a consolidated hearing, we issued an
`
`order asking the parties to inform us whether they would agree to a
`
`consolidated hearing. See CBM2016-00046, Paper 36. Judges Cherry and
`
`Lee also held a call with counsel for the parties on May 16, 2017, to obtain
`
`their views on a consolidated hearing. On the call, counsel for both parties
`
`agreed to a consolidated hearing. In view of the foregoing, the parties’
`
`requests for oral hearing are granted.
`
`These proceedings will be heard in the afternoon of June 8, 2017,
`
`beginning at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Given the overlap in these three
`
`proceedings, each side will have 60 minutes of total argument time.
`
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s original
`
`patent claims at issue are unpatentable. Also, Petitioner has filed a Motion
`
`to Exclude Evidence in each proceeding, and Patent Owner has filed a
`
`Motion to Amend Claims in each proceeding. Therefore, at oral hearing,
`
`
`3 We cite to the papers in CBM2016-00046 as representative.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00046 (Patent 7,890,416 B2)
`CBM2016-00047 (Patent 8,041,626 B2)
`CBM2016-00048 (Patent 8,060,435 B2)
`
`Petitioner will proceed first to present its case with respect to the challenged
`
`claims and grounds with respect to which the Board instituted trial and any
`
`arguments in support of its Motions to Exclude. Thereafter, Patent Owner
`
`will respond to Petitioner’s presentation and present any arguments in
`
`support of its Motions to Amend. Each party may reserve rebuttal time.
`
`Petitioner may make use of the time it has reserved to rebut Patent Owner’s
`
`presentation. Patent Owner may then use its rebuttal time, if any, to present
`
`rebuttal with regard to its Motion to Amend.
`
`New arguments not previously presented in the parties’ substantive
`
`papers in this proceeding should not be raised at oral hearing.
`
`The hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance on the
`
`ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`
`Virginia. In-person attendance will be accommodated on a first-come, first-
`
`served basis. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the
`
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served
`
`(7) business days prior to the hearing. They shall be filed at the Board prior
`
`to the hearing, and the parties must initiate a conference call with the Board
`
`by two (2) business days prior to the hearing to resolve any dispute over the
`
`propriety of each party’s demonstrative exhibits. Any dispute over the
`
`propriety of demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented two business
`
`days prior to the hearing will be considered waived. The parties are directed
`
`to CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC, Case IPR2013-
`
`00033 (PTAB October 23, 2013) (Paper 118), regarding the appropriate
`
`content of demonstrative exhibits.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00046 (Patent 7,890,416 B2)
`CBM2016-00047 (Patent 8,041,626 B2)
`CBM2016-00048 (Patent 8,060,435 B2)
`
`
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be
`
`directed to the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for audio-visual
`
`equipment are to be made at least five (5) business days in advance of the
`
`hearing date. The request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is
`
`not received timely in the manner specified herein, the equipment may not
`
`be available on the day of the hearing.
`
`The parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and
`
`specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number)
`
`referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the
`
`reporter’s transcript. The parties also should note that at least one member
`
`of the panel will be attending the oral hearing electronically from a remote
`
`location. Paper copies of the demonstrative exhibits may be submitted to the
`
`panel at hearing time but are not required. Because of limitations of the
`
`audio transmission systems in the hearing room, the presenter may speak
`
`only when standing at the hearing room lectern. If the parties have questions
`
`as to whether demonstrative exhibits would be sufficiently visible to all of
`
`the judges, the parties are invited to contact the Board at (571) 272-9797.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at
`
`hearing, although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in
`
`whole or in part. If any lead counsel will not be in attendance at hearing, the
`
`Board should be notified via a joint telephone conference call no later than
`
`two business days prior to the hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`CBM2016-00046 (Patent 7,890,416 B2)
`CBM2016-00047 (Patent 8,041,626 B2)
`CBM2016-00048 (Patent 8,060,435 B2)
`
`
`ORDER
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`
`ORDERED that the parties shall take note of the above information
`
`about the oral hearing to be held on June 8, 2017.
`
`.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Benjamin Lieb
`John C. Heuton
`SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.
`blieb@sheridanross.com
`jheuton@sheridanross.com
`
`Michael Rosato
`Matthew Argenti
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`margenti@wsgr.com
`
`John Phillips
`FISH & RICHARDSON
`phillips@fr.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`James Barney
`Timothy McAnulty
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`James.barney@finnegan.com
`Timothy.mcanulty@finnegan.com
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`