throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 10
`Entered: August 23, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`EBAY INC. and PAYPAL, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`XPRT VENTURES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`
`Cases CBM2017-00024 (Patent 7,610,244 B2)
`CBM2017-00025 (Patent 7,627,538 B2)
`CBM2017-00026 (Patent 7,512,563 B2)
`CBM2017-00027 (Patent 7,483,856 B2)
`CBM2017-00028 (Patent 7,599,881 B2)
`CBM2017-00029 (Patent 7,567,937 B2)1
`
`____________
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, KEVIN F. TURNER, and MICHAEL R. ZECHER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ZECHER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER RESETTING DUE DATE 7
`Conduct of the Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a)
`
`
`1 This Order addresses an issue that is identical in all six cases. We, therefore,
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each of the six cases. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in any subsequent
`papers.
`
`

`

`CBM2017-00024 (Patent 7,610,244 B2) CBM2017-00027 (Patent 7,483,856 B2)
`CBM2017-00025 (Patent 7,627,538 B2) CBM2017-00028 (Patent 7,599,881 B2)
`CBM2017-00026 (Patent 7,512,563 B2) CBM2017-00029 (Patent 7,567,937 B2)
`
`
`I. DISCUSSION
`On August 21, 2017, we received an email correspondence from
`Petitioner, eBay, Inc. and PayPal, Inc., requesting an initial conference call
`to discuss rescheduling the oral argument for each of the proceedings
`identified above from the current date of April 19, 2018, to May 3, 2018.
`Petitioner further represented that Patent Owner, XPRT Ventures LLC, does
`not oppose its request to reschedule the oral argument.
`Upon receiving the email correspondence from Petitioner, we checked
`with the Board’s Administrative Staff to determine if there were any hearing
`rooms available on the date of May 3, 2018. After confirming that hearing
`rooms were available on that date, we notified the parties via email that,
`based on the particular circumstances presented here, Petitioner’s request to
`reschedule the oral argument in these cases is granted, and the date of the
`oral argument would be reset to May 3, 2018.
`
`
`II. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s request to reschedule the oral argument
`in these cases is granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that DUE DATE 7, the date of the oral
`argument for these proceedings, is reset to May 3, 2018.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`CBM2017-00024 (Patent 7,610,244 B2) CBM2017-00027 (Patent 7,483,856 B2)
`CBM2017-00025 (Patent 7,627,538 B2) CBM2017-00028 (Patent 7,599,881 B2)
`CBM2017-00026 (Patent 7,512,563 B2) CBM2017-00029 (Patent 7,567,937 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Adrian Percer
`Jared Bobrow
`Brian Chang
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`adrian.percer@weil.com
`jared.bobrow@weil.com
`brian.chang@weil.com
`
`
`Naveen Modi
`Paul Hastings LLP
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`George Likourezos
`g.likourezos@verizon.net
`
`Michael A. Scaturro
`adcourt@optionline.net
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket